scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Maria Nicola

Bio: Maria Nicola is an academic researcher from Imperial College Healthcare. The author has contributed to research in topics: Pandemic & Exit strategy. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 7 publications receiving 2715 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The socio-economic effects of COVID-19 on individual aspects of the world economy are summarised to show the need for medical supplies has significantly increased and the food sector has seen a great demand due to panic-buying and stockpiling of food products.

4,060 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: There is an urgent need for up-to-date management guidelines for the management of COVID-19, and an evidence-based review of current practice.

294 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The current evidence is reviewed and recommendations for changes to surgical practice to minimise the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic are offered.

187 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: With guidelines specific to each specialty being implemented and followed, surgeons should be able to continue to provide safe and effective care to their patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

165 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper attempts to compartmentalise leadership aspects, allowing a closer examination of reports and the analysis of outcomes, to formulate a number of evidence-based recommendations on the de-escalation of restrictions.

105 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The socio-economic effects of COVID-19 on individual aspects of the world economy are summarised to show the need for medical supplies has significantly increased and the food sector has seen a great demand due to panic-buying and stockpiling of food products.

4,060 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The COVID-19 pandemic is associated with highly significant levels of psychological distress that, in many cases, would meet the threshold for clinical relevance.

3,011 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
16 Feb 2021-Vaccine
TL;DR: A systematic search of the peer-reviewed English survey literature indexed in PubMed was done on 25 December 2020 as discussed by the authors to provide an up-to-date assessment of COVID-19 vaccination acceptance rates worldwide.

1,096 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This national survey explores factors associated with vaccine hesitancy and suggests that multipronged efforts will be needed to increase acceptance of a coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine.
Abstract: Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly instigated a global pandemic. Vaccine development is proceeding at an unprecedented pace. Once available, it will be important to maximize vaccine uptake and coverage. Objective To assess intent to be vaccinated against COVID-19 among a representative sample of adults in the United States and identify predictors of and reasons for vaccine hesitancy. Design Cross-sectional survey, fielded from 16 through 20 April 2020. Setting Representative sample of adults residing in the United States. Participants Approximately 1000 adults drawn from the AmeriSpeak probability-based research panel, covering approximately 97% of the U.S. household population. Measurements Intent to be vaccinated against COVID-19 was measured with the question, "When a vaccine for the coronavirus becomes available, will you get vaccinated?" Response options were "yes," "no," and "not sure." Participants who responded "no" or "not sure" were asked to provide a reason. Results A total of 991 AmeriSpeak panel members responded. Overall, 57.6% of participants (n = 571) intended to be vaccinated, 31.6% (n = 313) were not sure, and 10.8% (n = 107) did not intend to be vaccinated. Factors independently associated with vaccine hesitancy (a response of "no" or "not sure") included younger age, Black race, lower educational attainment, and not having received the influenza vaccine in the prior year. Reasons for vaccine hesitancy included vaccine-specific concerns, a need for more information, antivaccine attitudes or beliefs, and a lack of trust. Limitations Participants' intent to be vaccinated was explored before a vaccine was available and when the pandemic was affecting a narrower swath of the United States. Questions about specific information or factors that might increase vaccination acceptance were not included. The survey response rate was 16.1%. Conclusion This national survey, conducted during the coronavirus pandemic, revealed that approximately 3 in 10 adults were not sure they would accept vaccination and 1 in 10 did not intend to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Targeted and multipronged efforts will be needed to increase acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine when one becomes available. Primary funding source Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

895 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present the most comprehensive and large-scale study to date on how students perceive the impacts of the first wave of COVID-19 crisis on various aspects of their lives on a global level.
Abstract: The paper presents the most comprehensive and large-scale study to date on how students perceive the impacts of the first wave of COVID-19 crisis in early 2020 on various aspects of their lives on a global level. With a sample of 30,383 students from 62 countries, the study reveals that amid the worldwide lockdown and transition to online learning students were most satisfied with the support provided by teaching staff and their universities’ public relations. Still, deficient computer skills and the perception of a higher workload prevented them from perceiving their own improved performance in the new teaching environment. Students were mainly concerned about issues to do with their future professional career and studies, and experienced boredom, anxiety, and frustration. The pandemic has led to the adoption of particular hygienic behaviours (e.g., wearing masks, washing hands) and discouraged certain daily practices (e.g., leaving home, shaking hands). Students were also more satisfied with the role played by hospitals and universities during the epidemic compared to the governments and banks. The findings also show that students with certain socio-demographic characteristics (male, part-time, first-level, applied sciences, a lower living standard, from Africa or Asia) were significantly less satisfied with their academic work/life during the crisis, whereas female, full-time, first-level students and students faced with financial problems were generally affected more by the pandemic in terms of their emotional life and personal circumstances. Key factors influencing students’ satisfaction with the role of their university are also identified. Policymakers and higher education institutions around the world may benefit from these findings while formulating policy recommendations and strategies to support students during this and any future pandemics.

849 citations