Author
Maria Teresa Petrucci
Other affiliations: Policlinico Umberto I, University of Turin, University of Bologna ...read more
Bio: Maria Teresa Petrucci is an academic researcher from Sapienza University of Rome. The author has contributed to research in topics: Multiple myeloma & Lenalidomide. The author has an hindex of 58, co-authored 317 publications receiving 16865 citations. Previous affiliations of Maria Teresa Petrucci include Policlinico Umberto I & University of Turin.
Topics: Multiple myeloma, Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, Transplantation, Melphalan
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
Spanish National Research Council1, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens2, Rabin Medical Center3, University of Münster4, Charles University in Prague5, Sapienza University of Rome6, University of Turin7, Medical University of Lublin8, Peking University9, Harvard University10, Millennium Pharmaceuticals11, Johnson & Johnson12
TL;DR: Bortezomib plus melphalan-prednisone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma who were ineligible for high-dose therapy was superior to melphAlan-predisonsone alone.
Abstract: The time to progression among patients receiving bortezomib plus melphalan– prednisone (bortezomib group) was 24.0 months, as compared with 16.6 months among those receiving melphalan–prednisone alone (control group) (hazard ratio for the bortezomib group, 0.48; P<0.001). The proportions of patients with a partial response or better were 71% in the bortezomib group and 35% in the control group; complete-response rates were 30% and 4%, respectively (P<0.001). The median duration of the response was 19.9 months in the bortezomib group and 13.1 months in the control group. The hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.61 for the bortezomib group (P = 0.008). Adverse events were consistent with established profiles of toxic events associated with bortezomib and melphalan–prednisone. Grade 3 events occurred in a higher proportion of patients in the bortezomib group than in the control group (53% vs. 44%, P = 0.02), but there were no significant differences in grade 4 events (28% and 27%, respectively) or treatment-related deaths (1% and 2%). Conclusions Bortezomib plus melphalan–prednisone was superior to melphalan–prednisone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma who were ineligible for high-dose therapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00111319.)
1,728 citations
VU University Amsterdam1, Heidelberg University2, University of Barcelona3, Harvard University4, Complutense University of Madrid5, Lille University of Science and Technology6, Marche Polytechnic University7, Mayo Clinic8, Emory University9, Sapienza University of Rome10, University of Bologna11, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences12, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens13, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center14, Erasmus University Rotterdam15, University of Navarra16, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes17
TL;DR: The R-ISS is a simple and powerful prognostic staging system, and it is recommended for use in future clinical studies to stratify patients with NDMM effectively with respect to the relative risk to their survival.
Abstract: Purpose The clinical outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) is heterogeneous. A simple and reliable tool is needed to stratify patients with MM. We combined the International Staging System (ISS) with chromosomal abnormalities (CA) detected by interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization after CD138 plasma cell purification and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) to evaluate their prognostic value in newly diagnosed MM (NDMM). Patients and Methods Clinical and laboratory data from 4,445 patients with NDMM enrolled onto 11 international trials were pooled together. The K-adaptive partitioning algorithm was used to define the most appropriate subgroups with homogeneous survival. Results ISS, CA, and LDH data were simultaneously available in 3,060 of 4,445 patients. We defined the following three groups: revised ISS (R-ISS) I (n = 871), including ISS stage I (serum β2-microglobulin level < 3.5 mg/L and serum albumin level ≥ 3.5 g/dL), no high-risk CA [del(17p) and/or t(4;14) and/or t(14;16)], and normal LDH level (l...
1,350 citations
TL;DR: Oral MPT is an effective first-line treatment for elderly patients with multiple myeloma and anticoagulant prophylaxis reduces frequency of thrombosis.
792 citations
TL;DR: VTD induction therapy before double autologous stem-cell transplantation significantly improves rate of complete or near complete response, and represents a new standard of care for patients with multiple myeloma who are eligible for transplant.
783 citations
University of Turin1, Masaryk University2, University of Münster3, Sapienza University of Rome4, Monash University5, Medical University of Vienna6, Medical University of Warsaw7, University of Tübingen8, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza9, University of Bologna10, Medical University of Białystok11, Ankara University12, Charles University in Prague13, Dresden University of Technology14, University of Ulm15, Celgene16, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens17
TL;DR: MPR-R significantly prolonged progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible for transplantation, with the greatest benefit observed in patients 65 to 75 years of age.
Abstract: The median follow-up period was 30 months. The median progression-free survival was significantly longer with MPR-R (31 months) than with MPR (14 months; hazard ratio, 0.49; P<0.001) or MP (13 months; hazard ratio, 0.40; P <0.001). Response rates were superior with MPR-R and MPR (77% and 68%, respectively, vs. 50% with MP; P<0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively, for the comparison with MP). The progression-free survival benefit associated with MPR-R was noted in patients 65 to 75 years of age but not in those older than 75 years of age (P = 0.001 for treatment-by-age interaction). After induction therapy, a landmark analysis showed a 66% reduction in the rate of progression with MPR-R (hazard ratio for the comparison with MPR, 0.34; P<0.001) that was age-independent. During induction therapy, the most frequent adverse events were hematologic; grade 4 neutropenia was reported in 35%, 32%, and 8% of the patients in the MPR-R, MPR, and MP groups, respectively. The 3-year rate of second primary tumors was 7% with MPR-R, 7% with MPR, and 3% with MP. Conclusions MPR-R significantly prolonged progression-free survival in patients with newly di agnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible for transplantation, with the great est benefit observed in patients 65 to 75 years of age. (Funded by Celgene; MM-015 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00405756.)
688 citations
Cited by
More filters
Journal Article•
28,685 citations
Mayo Clinic1, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens2, University of Turin3, Heidelberg University4, Harvard University5, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center6, University of Navarra7, University of Pennsylvania8, VU University Medical Center9, Emory University10, University of Bologna11, Mount Sinai Hospital12, Memorial Hospital of South Bend13, Karolinska University Hospital14, Carolinas Healthcare System15, Aalborg University16, Ankara University17, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center18
TL;DR: The disease definition of multiple myeloma is updated to include validated biomarkers in addition to existing requirements of attributable CRAB features (hypercalcaemia, renal failure, anaemia, and bone lesions), and specific metrics that new biomarkers should meet for inclusion in the disease definition are provided.
Abstract: This International Myeloma Working Group consensus updates the disease defi nition of multiple myeloma to include validated biomarkers in addition to existing requirements of attributable CRAB features (hypercalcaemia, renal failure, anaemia, and bone lesions). These changes are based on the identifi cation of biomarkers associated with near inevitable development of CRAB features in patients who would otherwise be regarded as having smouldering multiple myeloma. A delay in application of the label of multiple myeloma and postponement of therapy could be detrimental to these patients. In addition to this change, we clarify and update the underlying laboratory and radiographic variables that fulfi l the criteria for the presence of myeloma-defi ning CRAB features, and the histological and monoclonal protein requirements for the disease diagnosis. Finally, we provide specifi c metrics that new biomarkers should meet for inclusion in the disease defi nition. The International Myeloma Working Group recommends the implementation of these criteria in routine practice and in future clinical trials, and recommends that future studies analyse any diff erences in outcome that might occur as a result of the new disease defi nition.
3,049 citations
TL;DR: The response rate among the patients who received high-dose therapy was 81 percent, whereas it was 57 percent in the group treated with conventional chemotherapy (P<0.001).
Abstract: Background The median survival of patients with myeloma after conventional chemotherapy is three years or less. Promising results have been reported with high-dose therapy supported by autologous bone marrow transplantation. We conducted a randomized study comparing conventional chemotherapy and high-dose therapy. Methods Two hundred previously untreated patients under the age of 65 years who had myeloma were randomly assigned at the time of diagnosis to receive either conventional chemotherapy or high-dose therapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation. Results The response rate among the patients who received high-dose therapy was 81 percent (including complete responses in 22 percent and very good partial responses in 16 percent), whereas it was 57 percent (complete responses in 5 percent and very good partial responses in 9 percent) in the group treated with conventional chemotherapy (P<0.001). The probability of event-free survival for five years was 28 percent in the high-dose group and 10 perce...
2,650 citations
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center1, University of Salamanca2, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences3, Mayo Clinic4, Alexandra Hospital5, Lund University6, Karolinska Institutet7, Ankara University8, Washington University in St. Louis9, Cross Cancer Institute10, University of Turin11, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital12, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center13, University of Pavia14, Harvard University15, University of Bologna16, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust17
TL;DR: The European Group for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplant/International Bone Marrows Transplant Registry criteria have been expanded, clarified and updated to provide a new comprehensive evaluation system to adequately assess clinical outcomes in myeloma.
Abstract: New uniform response criteria are required to adequately assess clinical outcomes in myeloma. The European Group for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplant/International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry criteria have been expanded, clarified and updated to provide a new comprehensive evaluation system. Categories for stringent complete response and very good partial response are added. The serum free light-chain assay is included to allow evaluation of patients with oligo-secretory disease. Inconsistencies in prior criteria are clarified making confirmation of response and disease progression easier to perform. Emphasis is placed upon time to event and duration of response as critical end points. The requirements necessary to use overall survival duration as the ultimate end point are discussed. It is anticipated that the International Response Criteria for multiple myeloma will be widely used in future clinical trials of myeloma.
2,411 citations
Spanish National Research Council1, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens2, Rabin Medical Center3, University of Münster4, Charles University in Prague5, Sapienza University of Rome6, University of Turin7, Medical University of Lublin8, Peking University9, Harvard University10, Millennium Pharmaceuticals11, Johnson & Johnson12
TL;DR: Bortezomib plus melphalan-prednisone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma who were ineligible for high-dose therapy was superior to melphAlan-predisonsone alone.
Abstract: The time to progression among patients receiving bortezomib plus melphalan– prednisone (bortezomib group) was 24.0 months, as compared with 16.6 months among those receiving melphalan–prednisone alone (control group) (hazard ratio for the bortezomib group, 0.48; P<0.001). The proportions of patients with a partial response or better were 71% in the bortezomib group and 35% in the control group; complete-response rates were 30% and 4%, respectively (P<0.001). The median duration of the response was 19.9 months in the bortezomib group and 13.1 months in the control group. The hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.61 for the bortezomib group (P = 0.008). Adverse events were consistent with established profiles of toxic events associated with bortezomib and melphalan–prednisone. Grade 3 events occurred in a higher proportion of patients in the bortezomib group than in the control group (53% vs. 44%, P = 0.02), but there were no significant differences in grade 4 events (28% and 27%, respectively) or treatment-related deaths (1% and 2%). Conclusions Bortezomib plus melphalan–prednisone was superior to melphalan–prednisone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma who were ineligible for high-dose therapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00111319.)
1,728 citations