Feature selection (FS) methods can be used in data pre-processing to achieve efficient data reduction. This is useful for finding accurate data models. Since exhaustive search for optimal feature subset is infeasible in most cases, many search strategies have been proposed in literature. The usual applications of FS are in classification, clustering, and regression tasks. This review considers most of the commonly used FS techniques. Particular emphasis is on the application aspects. In addition to standard filter, wrapper, and embedded methods, we also provide insight into FS for recent hybrid approaches and other advanced topics.

/pdf/a-review-of-feature-selection-methods-with-applications-5g944kurae.pdf

A review of feature selection methods with applications

It is important to detect breast cancer as early as possible. In this manuscript, a new methodology for classifying breast cancer using deep learning and some segmentation techniques are introduced. A new computer aided detection (CAD) system is proposed for classifying benign and malignant mass tumors in breast mammography images. In this CAD system, two segmentation approaches are used. The first approach involves determining the region of interest (ROI) manually, while the second approach uses the technique of threshold and region based. The deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) is used for feature extraction. A well-known DCNN architecture named AlexNet is used and is fine-tuned to classify two classes instead of 1,000 classes. The last fully connected (fc) layer is connected to the support vector machine (SVM) classifier to obtain better accuracy. The results are obtained using the following publicly available datasets (1) the digital database for screening mammography (DDSM); and (2) the Curated Breast Imaging Subset of DDSM (CBIS-DDSM). Training on a large number of data gives high accuracy rate. Nevertheless, the biomedical datasets contain a relatively small number of samples due to limited patient volume. Accordingly, data augmentation is a method for increasing the size of the input data by generating new data from the original input data. There are many forms for the data augmentation; the one used here is the rotation. The accuracy of the new-trained DCNN architecture is 71.01% when cropping the ROI manually from the mammogram. The highest area under the curve (AUC) achieved was 0.88 (88%) for the samples obtained from both segmentation techniques. Moreover, when using the samples obtained from the CBIS-DDSM, the accuracy of the DCNN is increased to 73.6%. Consequently, the SVM accuracy becomes 87.2% with an AUC equaling to 0.94 (94%). This is the highest AUC value compared to previous work using the same conditions.

Breast cancer detection using deep convolutional neural networks and support vector machines

Classification of benign and malignant masses based on Zernike moments

Volleyball Premier League Algorithm

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) studies have become increasingly popular both with clinicians and researchers as they are capable of providing unique insights into brain function. However, multiple technical considerations (ranging from specifics of paradigm design to imaging artifacts, complex protocol definition, and multitude of processing and methods of analysis, as well as intrinsic methodological limitations) must be considered and addressed in order to optimize fMRI analysis and to arrive at the most accurate and grounded interpretation of the data. In practice, the researcher/clinician must choose, from many available options, the most suitable software tool for each stage of the fMRI analysis pipeline. Herein we provide a straightforward guide designed to address, for each of the major stages, the techniques and tools involved in the process. We have developed this guide both to help those new to the technique to overcome the most critical difficulties in its use, as well as to serve as a resource for the neuroimaging community.

/pdf/a-hitchhiker-s-guide-to-functional-magnetic-resonance-3stip51emk.pdf

A Hitchhiker's Guide to Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Digital technology has in the last few decades entered almost every aspect of medicine. There has been a huge development in noninvasive medical imaging equipment. Because there are many medical equipment manufacturers, a standard for storage and exchange of medical images needed to be developed. DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine) makes medical image exchange more easy and independent of the imaging equipment manufacturer. Besides the image data, DICOM file format supports other information useful to describe the image. This makes DICOM easy to use and the data exchange fast and safe while avoiding possible confusion caused by multiple files for the same study.

Overview of the DICOM standard

Mammography is at present the best available technique for early detection of breast cancer. The most common breast abnormalities that may indicate breast cancer are masses and calcifications. In some cases, subtle signs that can also lead to a breast cancer diagnosis, such as architectural distortion and bilateral asymmetry, are present. Breast abnormalities are defined with wide range of features and may be easily missed or misinterpreted by radiologists while reading large amount of mammographic images provided in screening programs. To help radiologists provide an accurate diagnosis, a computer-aided detection (CADe) and computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) algorithms are being developed. CADe and CADx algorithms help reducing the number of false positives and they assist radiologists in deciding between follow up and biopsy. This chapter gives a survey of image processing algorithms that have been developed for detection of masses and calcifications. An overview of algorithms in each step (segmentation step, feature extraction step, feature selection step, classification step) of the mass detection algorithms is given. Wavelet detection methods and other recently proposed methods for calcification detection are presented. An overview of contrast enhancement and noise equalization methods is given as well as an overview of calcification classification algorithms.

/pdf/a-survey-of-image-processing-algorithms-in-digital-2n4azf48fo.pdf

A Survey of Image Processing Algorithms in Digital Mammography

https://vcl.fer.hr/papers_pdf/robust automatic breast and pectoral muscle segmentation from scanned mammograms.pdf

Robust automatic breast and pectoral muscle segmentation from scanned mammograms

This paper presents a review of recent advances in the development of methods for segmentation of the breast boundary and the pectoral muscle in mammograms. Regardless of improvement of imaging technology, accurate segmentation of the breast boundary and detection of the pectoral muscle are still challenging tasks for image processing algorithms. In this paper, we discuss problems related to mammographic image preprocessing and accurate segmentation. We review specific methods that were commonly used in most of the techniques proposed for segmentation of mammograms and discuss their advantages and disadvantages. Comparative analysis of the methods reported on is made difficult by variations in the datasets and procedures of evaluation used by the authors. We attempt to overcome some of these limitations by trying to compare methods which used the same dataset and have some similarities in approaches to the breast boundary segmentation and detection of the pectoral muscle. In this paper, we will address the most often used methods for segmentation such as thresholding, morphology, region growing, active contours, and wavelet filtering. These methods, or their combinations, are the ones most used in the last decade by the majority of work published in this image processing domain.

/pdf/review-of-recent-advances-in-segmentation-of-the-breast-2i7zxdwmr9.pdf

Review of recent advances in segmentation of the breast boundary and the pectoral muscle in mammograms

Mammography as an x-ray method usually gives good results for lower density breasts while higher breast tissue densities significantly reduce the overall detection sensitivity and can lead to false negative results. In automatic detection algorithms knowledge about breast density can be useful for setting an appropriate decision threshold in order to produce more accurate detection. Because the overall intensity of mammograms is not directly correlated with the breast density we have decided to observe breast density as a texture classification problem. In this paper we propose breast density classification using feature selection process for different classifiers based on grayscale features of first and second order. In feature selection process different selection methods were used and obtained results show the improvement on overall classification by choosing the appropriate method and classifier. The classification accuracy has been tested on the mini-MIAS database and KBD-FER digital mammography database with different number of categories for each database. Obtained accuracy stretches between 97.2 % and 76.4 % for different number of categories.

/pdf/breast-density-classification-using-multiple-feature-4i0we8l757.pdf

Mario Mustra

Papers

Overview of the DICOM standard

A Survey of Image Processing Algorithms in Digital Mammography

Robust automatic breast and pectoral muscle segmentation from scanned mammograms

Review of recent advances in segmentation of the breast boundary and the pectoral muscle in mammograms

Breast Density Classification Using Multiple Feature Selection