scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Marjorie W. Evans

Bio: Marjorie W. Evans is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Dissociation (chemistry) & Mass. The author has an hindex of 3, co-authored 3 publications receiving 2497 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The first and second papers in this series, which make it possible to interpret entropy data in terms of a physical picture, are applied to binary solutions, and equations are derived relating energy and volume changes when a solution is formed to the entropy change for the process as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: The ideas of the first and second papers in this series, which make it possible to interpret entropy data in terms of a physical picture, are applied to binary solutions, and equations are derived relating energy and volume changes when a solution is formed to the entropy change for the process. These equations are tested against data obtained by various authors on mixtures of normal liquids, and on solutions of non‐polar gases in normal solvents. Good general agreement is found, and it is concluded that in such solutions the physical picture of molecules moving in a ``normal'' manner in each others' force fields is adequate. As would be expected, permanent gases, when dissolved in normal liquids, loosen the forces on neighboring solvent molecules producing a solvent reaction which increases the partial molal entropy of the solute.Entropies of vaporization from aqueous solutions diverge strikingly from the normal behavior established for non‐aqueous solutions. The nature of the deviations found for non‐polar solutes in water, together with the large effect of temperature upon them, leads to the idea that the water forms frozen patches or microscopic icebergs around such solute molecules, the extent of the iceberg increasing with the size of the solute molecule. Such icebergs are apparently formed also about the non‐polar parts of the molecules of polar substances such as alcohols and amines dissolved in water, in agreement with Butler's observation that the increasing insolubility of large non‐polar molecules is an entropy effect. The entropies of hydration of ions are discussed from the same point of view, and the conclusion is reached that ions, to an extent which depends on their sizes and charges, may cause a breaking down of water structure as well as a freezing or saturation of the water nearest them. Various phenomena recorded in the literature are interpreted in these terms. The influence of temperature on certain salting‐out coefficients is interpreted in terms of entropy changes. It appears that the salting‐out phenomenon is at least partly a structural effect. It is suggested that structural influences modify the distribution of ions in an electrolytesolution, and reasons are given for postulating the existence of a super‐lattice structure in solutions of LaCl3 and of EuCl3. An example is given of a possible additional influence of structural factors upon reacting tendencies in aqueous solutions.

2,572 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a pure sample of CH3D has been prepared and studied in the mass spectrometer, and it has been shown that the mass spectrum of CH 3D cannot be predicted from that of CH4 by assuming complete similarity between H and D (except mass).
Abstract: A pure sample of CH3D has been prepared and studied in the mass spectrometer. The mass spectrum of CH3D cannot be predicted from that of CH4 by assuming complete similarity between H and D (except mass). More information has been obtained on the difference in behavior of H and D on electron impact previously noticed by Delfosse and Hipple for C2H2D2. There is a difference in dissociation probability of C–H and C–D bonds which is approximately constant for several ionization processes and over a considerable range in electron energy. In addition to this there is a difference in behavior of H atoms in CH4 and H atoms in CH3D. In order to account for the mass spectrum of CH3D in terms of the mass spectrum of CH4 both these effects must be taken into consideration. Re‐examination of the data of Delfosse and Hipple points not only to the difference between H and D atoms in C2H2D2, but also to a difference in behavior of H atoms in C2H4 and H atoms in C2H2D2.

24 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a model for steady detonation waves in homogeneous condensed materials is proposed, in which the pressure profile in the direction of the wave motion is square between shock front and Chapman-Jouguet surface.
Abstract: A model is proposed for steady detonation waves in homogeneous condensed materials. The model is one in which the pressure profile in the direction of the wave motion is square between shock front and Chapman‐Jouguet surface. The reaction rate in the steady zone is allowed to vary with the steady detonation wave velocity according to the temperature in the reaction zone. The model refines and makes quantitative an early suggestion by Eyring, Powell, Duffey, and Parlin. The results give a failure diameter, with dual‐valued solutions at greater diameters. Predictions of failure diameter, wave velocity at failure diameter, induction time during initiation, and shock sensitivity for given charge dimension are possible. The predicted results for two materials of widely different detonation properties, liquid TNT and ammonium nitrate at theoretical crystalline density, are compared with observations.

18 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: On the basis of the thermochemical behavior of small molecule interactions, it is concluded that the strengthening of hydrogen bonds in the past decade, a complete thermodynamic description of the self-association of many proteins and their interactions is concluded.
Abstract: Reviewing the thermodynamic parameters characterizing self-association and ligand binding of proteins at 25 OC, we find AGO, AHo, AS\", and ACpo are often all of negative sign. It is thus not possible to account for the stability of association complexes of proteins on the basis of hydrophobic interactions alone. We present a conceptual model of protein association consisting of two steps: the mutual penetration of hydration layers causing disordering of the solvent followed by further short-range interactions. The net AGO for the complete association process is primarily determined by the positive entropy change accompanying the first step and the negative enthalpy change of the second step. On the basis of the thermochemical behavior of small molecule interactions, we conclude that the strengthening of hydrogen bonds in the I n the past decade, a complete thermodynamic description of the self-association of many proteins and their interactions From the Laboratory of Molecular Biology (P.D.R.) and Laboratory of Nutrition and Endocrinology (S.S.), National Institute of Arthritis, Metabolism and Digestive Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20205. Received September 23, 1980. low dielectric macromolecular interior and van der Waals' interactions introduced as a consequence of the hydrophobic effect are the most important factors contributing to the observed negative values of AHo and ASo and hence to the stability of protein association complexes. The X-ray crystallographic structures of these complexes are consonant with this analysis. The tendency for protein association reactions to become entropy dominated and/or entropy-enthalpy assisted at low temperatures and enthalpy dominated at high temperatures (a consequence of the typically negative values of AC,\") arises from the diminution of the hydrophobic effect with increasing temperature which is a general property of the solvent, water. with small molecular substrates has become available. Concomitantly, X-ray crystallography has provided a detailed picture of some of these associations, and this has stimulated a number of theoretical studies (Levitt & Warshel, 1975; Gelin & Karplus, 1975; Chothia & Janin, 1975), based upon energetic considerations, to account for these structures. The This article not subject to U S . Copyright. Published 1981 by the American Chemical Society T H E R M O D Y N A M I C S O F P R O T E I N A S S O C I A T I O N V O L . 2 0 , N O . 1 1 , 1 9 8 1 3097 Table I: Thermodynamics of Protein Association' association process A G \" ~ AiY A s o , A c p o (kcal mol-') (kcal mol-l) (cal K-I mol-') (cal K-I mol-I) refb trypsin (bovine) + inhibitor (soybean) -14.6 8.6 78 -440 c, d deoxyhemoglobin S gelation -3.4 2.0 18 -200 e, f lysozyme self-association (indefinite) -3.9 -6 .4 -8.3 g glucagon trimerization -12.1 -3 1 -64 -430 h, i hemoglobin t haptoglobin -11.5 -3 3 -7 3 -940 i a-chymotrypsin dimerization -7.1 -35 -9 5 k, I S-peptide + S-protein (ribonuclease) -13 -40 -90 -1100 m, n All thermodynamic parameters expressed per mole of complex formed except the indefinite association cases of hemoglobin S and lysozyme for which the mole refers to the monomeric protein reacted. Unitary entropy and free energy are given for processes of defined stoichiometry. Standard states are hypothetical 1 M protein, pH at which the reaction was measured. All pHs were close to 7 except for trypsin, pH 5, haptoglobin, pH 5.5, and glucagon, pH 10.5. All data for 25 \"C except glucagon, T = 30 \"C. ence is to calorimetric work and the second is to X-ray crystallographic structure determination. al. (1974). e Rosset al. (1977). Wishner e t al. (1975). g Banerjee et al. (1975). Johnson et al. (1979). * Sasaki et al. (1975). For each entry, the first referSweet et Baugh & Trowbridge (1972). Lavialle et al. (1974). Shiao & Sturtevant (1969). lVandlen &Tulinsky (1973). Hearn et al. (1971). Wyckoff e t al. (1970). methodology and problems involved in such calculations have been critically reviewed by NBmethy & Scheraga (1977). In this paper we review the thermodynamics of protein association processes for the examples best characterized in terms of their chemistry and structure. From this survey we find that the thermodynamic parameters AGO, Ai?, AS\", and ACpo are predominantly of negative sign. This result poses severe difficulties for interpretations of protein association based upon the entropically driven hydrophobic effect. The aim of this paper is to attempt to account for the signs and magnitudes of these thermodynamic parameters for protein association reactions in terms of known molecular forces and the thermochemistry of small molecule interactions.

4,576 citations

Book ChapterDOI
TL;DR: The chapter reviews that the denaturation is a process in which the spatial arrangement of the polypeptide chains within the molecule is changed from that typical of the native protein to a more disordered arrangement.
Abstract: Publisher Summary This chapter explores that the changes that take place in the protein molecules during denaturation constitute one of the most interesting and complex classes of reactions that can be found either in nature or in the laboratory These reactions are important because of the information they can provide about the more intimate details of protein structure and function They are also significant because they challenge the chemist with a difficult area for the application of chemical principles The chapter reviews that the denaturation is a process in which the spatial arrangement of the polypeptide chains within the molecule is changed from that typical of the native protein to a more disordered arrangement The chapter also discusses the classification of protein structures: primary, secondary, and tertiary structures The primary structure is that expressed by the structural chemical formula and depends entirely on the chemical valence bonds that the classical organic chemist would write down for the protein molecule The secondary structure is the configuration of the polypeptide chain that results from the satisfaction of the hydrogen bonding potential between the peptide N-H and C=O groups The tertiary structure is the pattern according to which the secondary structures are packed together within the native protein molecule The term “denaturation” as used in this chapter is indented to include changes in both the secondary and tertiary structures

4,528 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The present review aims to provide a reassessment of the factors important for folding in light of current knowledge, including contributions to the free energy of folding arising from electrostatics, hydrogen-bonding and van der Waals interactions, intrinsic propensities, and hydrophobic interactions.
Abstract: T e purpose of this review is to assess the nature and magnitudes of the dominant forces in protein folding. Since proteins are only marginally stable at room temperature,’ no type of molecular interaction is unimportant, and even small interactions can contribute significantly (positively or negatively) to stability (Alber, 1989a,b; Matthews, 1987a,b). However, the present review aims to identify only the largest forces that lead to the structural features of globular proteins: their extraordinary compactness, their core of nonpolar residues, and their considerable amounts of internal architecture. This review explores contributions to the free energy of folding arising from electrostatics (classical charge repulsions and ion pairing), hydrogen-bonding and van der Waals interactions, intrinsic propensities, and hydrophobic interactions. An earlier review by Kauzmann (1959) introduced the importance of hydrophobic interactions. His insights were particularly remarkable considering that he did not have the benefit of known protein structures, model studies, high-resolution calorimetry, mutational methods, or force-field or statistical mechanical results. The present review aims to provide a reassessment of the factors important for folding in light of current knowledge. Also considered here are the opposing forces, conformational entropy and electrostatics. The process of protein folding has been known for about 60 years. In 1902, Emil Fischer and Franz Hofmeister independently concluded that proteins were chains of covalently linked amino acids (Haschemeyer & Haschemeyer, 1973) but deeper understanding of protein structure and conformational change was hindered because of the difficulty in finding conditions for solubilization. Chick and Martin (191 1) were the first to discover the process of denaturation and to distinguish it from the process of aggregation. By 1925, the denaturation process was considered to be either hydrolysis of the peptide bond (Wu & Wu, 1925; Anson & Mirsky, 1925) or dehydration of the protein (Robertson, 1918). The view that protein denaturation was an unfolding process was

3,570 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This review focuses on work that deals with the mechanisms of detergent action in membrane solubilization including properties of detergents model lipid systems and detergent-protein interactions; in addition a possible sequence of events when deterGents interact with biological membranes receives attention.

2,850 citations

Book ChapterDOI
TL;DR: This chapter considers the parameters that are required for an adequate description of a polypeptide chain and the mathematical method of utilizing these parameters for calculating the coordinates of all the atoms in a suitable frame of reference so that all the interatomic distances, and bond angles, can be calculated and their consequences worked out.
Abstract: Publisher Summary This chapter deals with the recent developments regarding the description and nature of the conformation of proteins and polypeptides with special reference to the stereochemical aspects of the problem. This chapter considers the parameters that are required for an adequate description of a polypeptide chain. This chapter focuses the attention on what may be called “internal parameters”—that is, those which can be defined in terms of the relationships among atoms or units that form the building blocks of the polypeptide chains. This chapter also provides an account of the mathematical method of utilizing these parameters for calculating the coordinates of all the atoms in a suitable frame of reference, so that all the interatomic distances, and bond angles, can be calculated and their consequences worked out. This chapter observes conformations in amino acids, peptides, polypeptides, and proteins.

2,802 citations