scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Mark D. Hunter

Bio: Mark D. Hunter is an academic researcher from University of Michigan. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Herbivore. The author has an hindex of 56, co-authored 173 publications receiving 10921 citations. Previous affiliations of Mark D. Hunter include Northern Arizona University & Laval University.


Papers
More filters
Book
09 Jun 1999
TL;DR: This chapter discusses insect ecology in the context of climate change, natural Enemies and Insect Population Dynamics, and Insect Pest Management.
Abstract: Preface. 1. An Overview of Insect Ecology. 2. Insects and Climate. 3. Insect Herbivores. 4. Resource Limitation. 5. Natural Enemies and Insect Population Dynamics. 6. Evolutionary Ecology. 7. Physiological Ecology. 8. Insects in Ecosystems. 9. Biodiversity. 10. Insect Conservation. 11. Insects and Diseases. 12. Insect Pest Management. References. Index

384 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This book discusses Herbivore populations in Tropical Communities, how fruit-and-Nectar Feeding Birds and Mammals Track Their Food Resources, and Competition in Flower Utilization.
Abstract: M.D. Hunter and P.W. Price, Introduction: Plants as a Variable Resource Base for Animals. M.C. Rossiter, The Impact of Resource Variation on Population Quality in Herbivorous Insects: A Critical Aspect of Population Dynamics. R.S. Ostfeld, Small Mammal Herbivores in a Patchy Environment: Individual Strategies and Population Responses. A.E. Weis and D.R. Campbell, Plant Genotype: A Variable Factor in Insect-Plant Interaction. B.J. Rathcke, Nectar Distributions, Pollinator Behavior, and Plant Reproductive Success. P.W. Price, Plant Resources as the Mechanistic Basis for Insect Herbivore Population Dynamics. J.C. Schultz, Factoring Natural Enemies into Plant Tissue Availability to Herbivores. T. Ohgushi, Resource Limitation on Insect Herbivore Populations. J.R. Karr, M. Dionne, and I. Schlosser, Bottom-Up versus Top-Down Regulation of Vertebrate Populations: Lessons from Birds and Fish. M.D. Hunter, Interactions Within Herbivore Communities Mediated by the Host Plant: The Keystone Herbivore Concept. D.W. Roubik, Loose Niches in Tropical Communities: Why Are There So Few Bees and So Many Trees? T.H. Fleming, How Do Fruit-and-Nectar Feeding Birds and Mammals Track Their Food Resources? T. Inoue and M. Kato, Inter-and Intraspecific Morphological Variation in Bumblebee Species, and Competition in Flower Utilization. J.M. Scriber and R.C. Lederhouse, The Thermal Environment as a Resource Dictating Patterns of Feeding Specialization of Insect Herbivores. Each chapter includes references. Index.

294 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In the new method, hydrolyzable tannins are reacted at 85 degrees C for 20 h in methanol/sulfuric acid to quantitatively release methyl gallate, and with plant samples, relative standard deviations of less than 3% were obtained.
Abstract: A widely used method for analyzing hydrolyzable tannins afer reaction with KIO3 has been modified to include a methanolysis step followed by oxidation with KIO3. In the new method, hydrolyzable tannins (gallotannins and ellagitannins) are reacted at 85 °C for 20 h in methanol/sulfuric acid to quantitatively release methyl gallate. Dried plant samples can be methanolyzed under the same conditions to convert hydrolyzable tannins to methyl gallate. Oxidation of the methyl gallate by KIO3 at pH 5.5, 30 °C, forms a chromophore with λmax 525 nm, which is determined spectrophotometrically. The detection limit of the method is 1.5 μg of methyl gallate, and with plant samples, relative standard deviations of less than 3% were obtained. Keywords: Tannin; polyphenolic compound; hydrolyzable tannin; methyl gallate; galloyl glucose; gallotannin; potassium iodate

271 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: "# # $ % &'" ! &
Abstract: \"# # $ % &'\" ! & \"# ( & (\" # ) ! )% ! % ! ' %$ ) % ! \"'# & ## % & ! # $ % % $ % % ' &* (# ) ! & % % % ' # % ( % & # '# ) ! (\" ' ## % # ' % & & # (% % % % # #*( # ) (\" & '# * % ) & % * % * ' & % & %# # %) ! \"% &'\" \" % )& % \"% #! & * \"% #! )% # % # ) % \"( ' % \" + % \" )% # , \" % ( \" & \"%* %* # ) \"# % % * & # % \"% &'# % )& # ' ! ' % & (\" % # ) ! % (# ) \" % '% #\" (\" ! % % % )& # ' ' & ) % ! $ % \"% # ' #\" ' ' '\"# & % % \"% # & ) % # % ( # ) ! &\" # ' % ) & # ' ! \" # % % ' % % $ * & '% . % \"% & # ) # % ! # * ' %\" \"% ( % )& #\" # ) \" ' # % % # ) # % /0 % ! 12234! % )& ' %' ) % % % ' # # ) % # \" \" # # ( % ' '\"# / 5 ! 67718 ( ! 67718 $ % )#\" ! 67764! # ) & ## & && # %' \" / \" 9 \"-! 67714! # ' ## % ( \" % /,% 9 #(% ! 67718 ! 67714 & ) & # ' % ( % / %# 9 \"%' ! 12:;8 & ! 12268 & ! 122<8 \"# ! 67714 & ) '\"(# # $ % )% ) \"%) % \" % * ) % # ( % )& # ) # '% '% % =\" % \" ! ' # & ) & . % ) # '% '% (\" ' % )& # ' / # ! 67774! % % ' % % ' %\" \"% / %! 122:4! ( \"% # & # % ' # ' %\" \"% % $ \"% # ' #\" ' '\"# &&\" # ) ' ! #\" ) ! % ## $ % ( ) % % / ! 122<8 # ! 67774! # ( % )& / ## ) ! 67774! ' % /0%\" 9 % $ ! 67774! ' =\" # />\" % ! 122?8 0\"\" % ! 67778 > $ 9 ) %! 67714! ' %* / & ! 12238 @ % # 9 \" ! 67714 & % # & /,% & ! 67774 ## % (\" %* & ) (\" % # ' % % # ! # ) %' % &' % # ) # ' %\" \"% / #(% $! 122<8 ! 67714! ) ) ' '\"# / ) % 9 & ! 122?8 9 0 %$' % $! 67714! %* # % ' '% % '% /0%\" 9 % $ ! 12238 . ! 67764 % \" % * ) ' # # ) )% ) % \"% # ' % (\" % ' '\"# &&\" ! % % & # % ) ' \"% \" % ) # $ ( # ' ) & , # ! % ( & % %$ -'# % # $ \")) & ''% % \" \"% %$

248 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Preface to the Princeton Landmarks in Biology Edition vii Preface xi Symbols used xiii 1.
Abstract: Preface to the Princeton Landmarks in Biology Edition vii Preface xi Symbols Used xiii 1. The Importance of Islands 3 2. Area and Number of Speicies 8 3. Further Explanations of the Area-Diversity Pattern 19 4. The Strategy of Colonization 68 5. Invasibility and the Variable Niche 94 6. Stepping Stones and Biotic Exchange 123 7. Evolutionary Changes Following Colonization 145 8. Prospect 181 Glossary 185 References 193 Index 201

14,171 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The current status of botanical screening efforts, as well as in vivo studies of their effectiveness and toxicity, are summarized and the structure and antimicrobial properties of phytochemicals are addressed.
Abstract: The use of and search for drugs and dietary supplements derived from plants have accelerated in recent years. Ethnopharmacologists, botanists, microbiologists, and natural-products chemists are combing the Earth for phytochemicals and “leads” which could be developed for treatment of infectious diseases. While 25 to 50% of current pharmaceuticals are derived from plants, none are used as antimicrobials. Traditional healers have long used plants to prevent or cure infectious conditions; Western medicine is trying to duplicate their successes. Plants are rich in a wide variety of secondary metabolites, such as tannins, terpenoids, alkaloids, and flavonoids, which have been found in vitro to have antimicrobial properties. This review attempts to summarize the current status of botanical screening efforts, as well as in vivo studies of their effectiveness and toxicity. The structure and antimicrobial properties of phytochemicals are also addressed. Since many of these compounds are currently available as unregulated botanical preparations and their use by the public is increasing rapidly, clinicians need to consider the consequences of patients self-medicating with these preparations.

7,486 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Understanding this complexity, while taking strong steps to minimize current losses of species, is necessary for responsible management of Earth's ecosystems and the diverse biota they contain.
Abstract: Humans are altering the composition of biological communities through a variety of activities that increase rates of species invasions and species extinctions, at all scales, from local to global. These changes in components of the Earth's biodiversity cause concern for ethical and aesthetic reasons, but they also have a strong potential to alter ecosystem properties and the goods and services they provide to humanity. Ecological experiments, observations, and theoretical developments show that ecosystem properties depend greatly on biodiversity in terms of the functional characteristics of organisms present in the ecosystem and the distribution and abundance of those organisms over space and time. Species effects act in concert with the effects of climate, resource availability, and disturbance regimes in influencing ecosystem properties. Human activities can modify all of the above factors; here we focus on modification of these biotic controls. The scientific community has come to a broad consensus on many aspects of the re- lationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, including many points relevant to management of ecosystems. Further progress will require integration of knowledge about biotic and abiotic controls on ecosystem properties, how ecological communities are struc- tured, and the forces driving species extinctions and invasions. To strengthen links to policy and management, we also need to integrate our ecological knowledge with understanding of the social and economic constraints of potential management practices. Understanding this complexity, while taking strong steps to minimize current losses of species, is necessary for responsible management of Earth's ecosystems and the diverse biota they contain.

6,891 citations

Book ChapterDOI
01 Apr 1994-Oikos
TL;DR: The role that many organisms play in the creation, modification and maintenance of habitats does not involve direct trophic interactions between species, but they are nevertheless important and common.
Abstract: Interactions between organisms are a major determinant of the distribution and abundance of species. Ecology textbooks (e.g., Ricklefs 1984, Krebs 1985, Begon et al. 1990) summarise these important interactions as intra- and interspecific competition for abiotic and biotic resources, predation, parasitism and mutualism. Conspicuously lacking from the list of key processes in most text books is the role that many organisms play in the creation, modification and maintenance of habitats. These activities do not involve direct trophic interactions between species, but they are nevertheless important and common. The ecological literature is rich in examples of habitat modification by organisms, some of which have been extensively studied (e.g. Thayer 1979, Naiman et al. 1988).

5,407 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the negative and positive effects of agricultural land use for the conservation of biodiversity, and its relation to ecosystem services, need a landscape perspective, which is difficult to be found in the literature.
Abstract: Understanding the negative and positive effects of agricultural land use for the conservation of biodiversity, and its relation to ecosystem services, needs a landscape perspective. Agriculture can contribute to the conservation of high-diversity systems, which may provide important ecosystem services such as pollination and biological control via complementarity and sampling effects. Land-use management is often focused on few species and local processes, but in dynamic, agricultural landscapes, only a diversity of insurance species may guarantee resilience (the capacity to reorganize after disturbance). Interacting species experience their surrounding landscape at different spatial scales, which influences trophic interactions. Structurally complex landscapes enhance local diversity in agroecosystems, which may compensate for local high-intensity management. Organisms with high-dispersal abilities appear to drive these biodiversity patterns and ecosystem services, because of their recolonization ability and larger resources experienced. Agri-environment schemes (incentives for farmers to benefit the environment) need to broaden their perspective and to take the different responses to schemes in simple (high impact) and complex (low impact) agricultural landscapes into account. In simple landscapes, local allocation of habitat is more important than in complex landscapes, which are in total at risk. However, little knowledge of the relative importance of local and landscape management for biodiversity and its relation to ecosystem services make reliable recommendations difficult.

3,460 citations