scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Mark F. McEntee

Bio: Mark F. McEntee is an academic researcher from University College Cork. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Mammography. The author has an hindex of 23, co-authored 171 publications receiving 1950 citations. Previous affiliations of Mark F. McEntee include University College Dublin & RMIT University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Baseline figures for Irish CT DRLs are provided on the most frequently performed CT examinations, and wide variations in mean doses across sites suggest a large potential for optimisation of examinations.
Abstract: Objective: To propose Irish CT diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) by collecting radiation doses for the most commonly performed CT examinations. Methods: A pilot study investigated the most frequent CT examinations. 40 CT sites were then asked to complete a survey booklet to allow the recording of CT parameters for each of 9 CT examinations during a 12-week period. Dose data [CT volume index (CTDIvol) and dose–length product (DLP)] on a minimum of 10 average-sized patients in each category were recorded to calculate a mean site CTDIvol and DLP value. The rounded 75th percentile was used to calculate a DRL for each site and the country by compiling all results. Results are compared with international DRL data. Results: Data were collected for 3305 patients. 30 sites responded with data for 34 scanners, representing 54% of the national total. All equipment had multislice capability (2–128 slices). DRLs are proposed using CTDIvol (mGy) and DLP (mGy cm) for CT head (66/58 and 940, respectively), sinuses (16 and 210, respectively), cervical spine (19 and 420, respectively), thorax (9/11 and 390, respectively), high resolution CT (7 and 280, respectively), CT pulmonary angiography (13 and 430, respectively), multiphase abdomen (13 and 1120, respectively), routine abdomen/pelvis (12 and 600, respectively) and trunk examinations (10/12 and 850, respectively). These values are lower than current DRLs and comparable to other international studies. Wide variations in mean doses are noted across sites. Conclusions: Baseline figures for Irish CT DRLs are provided on the most frequently performed CT examinations. The variations in dose between CT departments as well as between identical scanners suggest a large potential for optimisation of examinations.

144 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Differences in the gland compartment volumes of prostate tissue having distinct diffusivities, rather than changes in the conventionally cited "cellularity" metrics, are likely to be the major contributor to clinically observed variations of ADC in prostate tissue.
Abstract: Differences in the relative volumes of prostate gland components having distinct diffusivities, rather than changes in the conventionally cited “cellularity” metrics, are likely to be the major contributor to clinically observed variations of apparent diffusion coefficient in prostate tissue.

129 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Typical office lighting and current recommendations on ambient lighting can reduce diagnostic efficacy compared with lower levels of ambient lighting, particularly for clinicians not expert in interpreting posteroanterior wrist images.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE. The aim of the work was to establish optimum ambient light conditions for viewing radiologic images of the wrist on liquid crystal display monitors.MATERIALS AND METHODS. Five ambient light levels were investigated: 480, 100, 40, 25, and 7 lux. Seventy-nine experienced radiologists were asked to examine 30 posteroanterior wrist images and decide whether a fracture was present. All images were displayed on liquid crystal display monitors. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed, and the numbers of false-positive and false-negative findings were recorded.RESULTS. For all the radiologists, greater area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and lower numbers of false-positive and false-negative findings were recorded at 40 and 25 lux compared with 480 and 100 lux. At 7 lux, the results were generally similar to those at 480 and 100 lux. The experience and knowledge of radiologists specializing in imaging of musculoskeletal trauma appeared to compensate in part for inapp...

128 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Findings of this study showed no evidence that the accuracy of expert radiologists is altered due to changing prevalence expectation rates, however, the time spent interpreting each image and the number of fixations increased at higher prevalence rates.
Abstract: An increase in prior prevalence expectation does affect visual search; however, there is no evidence that there is a large effect on diagnostic efficacy.

83 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Handheld devices show promise in the field of emergency teleconsultation for detection of basic orthopedic injuries and intracranial hemorrhage and some comparisons approached significance.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE. Orthopedic injury and intracranial hemorrhage are commonly encountered in emergency radiology, and accurate and timely diagnosis is important. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the diagnostic accuracy of handheld computing devices is comparable to that of monitors that might be used in emergency teleconsultation.SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Two handheld devices, a Dell Axim personal digital assistant (PDA) and an Apple iPod Touch device, were studied. The diagnostic efficacy of each device was tested against that of secondary-class monitors (primary class being clinical workstation display) for each of two image types—posteroanterior wrist radiographs and slices from CT of the brain—yielding four separate observer performance studies. Participants read a bank of 30 wrist or brain images searching for a specific abnormality (distal radial fracture, fresh intracranial bleed) and rated their confidence in their decisions. A total of 168 readings by examining radiologists of the American ...

72 citations


Cited by
More filters
Book
01 Jan 1997
TL;DR: This new edition of Ann Bowling's well-known and highly respected text is a comprehensive, easy to read, guide to the range of methods used to study and evaluate health and health services.
Abstract: This new edition of Ann Bowling's well-known and highly respected text has been thoroughly revised and updated to reflect key methodological developments in health research. It is a comprehensive, easy to read, guide to the range of methods used to study and evaluate health and health services. It describes the concepts and methods used by the main disciplines involved in health research, including: demography, epidemiology, health economics, psychology and sociology.The research methods described cover the assessment of health needs, morbidity and mortality trends and rates, costing health services, sampling for survey research, cross-sectional and longitudinal survey design, experimental methods and techniques of group assignment, questionnaire design, interviewing techniques, coding and analysis of quantitative data, methods and analysis of qualitative observational studies, and types of unstructured interviewing. With new material on topics such as cluster randomization, utility analyses, patients' preferences, and perception of risk, the text is aimed at students and researchers of health and health services. It has also been designed for health professionals and policy makers who have responsibility for applying research findings in practice, and who need to know how to judge the value of that research.

2,602 citations

01 Jan 2011
TL;DR: The study concludes that understanding lags first requires agreeing models, definitions and measures, which can be applied in practice, and a second task would be to develop a process by which to gather these data.
Abstract: This study aimed to review the literature describing and quantifying time lags in the health research translation process. Papers were included in the review if they quantified time lags in the development of health interventions. The study identified 23 papers. Few were comparable as different studies use different measures, of different things, at different time points. We concluded that the current state of knowledge of time lags is of limited use to those responsible for R&D and knowledge transfer who face difficulties in knowing what they should or can do to reduce time lags. This effectively ‘blindfolds’ investment decisions and risks wasting effort. The study concludes that understanding lags first requires agreeing models, definitions and measures, which can be applied in practice. A second task would be to develop a process by which to gather these data.

1,429 citations

01 Jan 1980

764 citations