Mark Hallett

Bio: Mark Hallett is an academic researcher from National Institutes of Health. The author has contributed to research in topics: Transcranial magnetic stimulation & Motor cortex. The author has an hindex of 186, co-authored 1170 publications receiving 123741 citations. Previous affiliations of Mark Hallett include Government of the United States of America & Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.

Patients with Parkinson disease are prone to functional neurological disorders

Abstract: Until recently the management of Parkinson disease focused almost entirely on the triad of bradykinesia, rigidity and tremor. It then became apparent that there are many non-motor features as well, and management of these is often as important as the motor symptoms. The work of Onofrj et al first reported that functional symptoms are also frequent in Parkinson disease.1 In a large study of 488 patients with Parkinson disease, 7.5% had some ‘somatoform disorders’, both motor and non-motor in type. They also noted that these symptoms could precede the motor and non-motor symptoms. The JNNP paper by Wissel et al 2 describes …

The Phenomenon of Exquisite Motor Control in Tic Disorders and its Pathophysiological Implications.

Abstract: The unifying characteristic of movement disorders is the phenotypic presentation of abnormal motor outputs, either as isolated phenomena or in association with further clinical, often neuropsychiatric, features. However, the possibility of a movement disorder also characterized by supranormal or enhanced volitional motor control has not received attention. Based on clinical observations and cases collected over a number of years, we here describe the intriguing clinical phenomenon that people with tic disorders are often able to control specific muscle contractions as part of their tic behaviors to a degree that most humans typically cannot. Examples are given in accompanying video documentation. We explore medical literature on this topic and draw analogies with early research of fine motor control physiology in healthy humans. By systematically analyzing the probable sources of this unusual capacity, and focusing on neuroscientific accounts of voluntary motor control, sensory feedback, and the role of motor learning in tic disorders, we provide a novel pathophysiological account explaining both the presence of exquisite control over motor output and that of overall tic behaviors. We finally comment on key questions for future research on the topic and provide concluding remarks on the complex movement disorder of tic behaviors. © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Functional or psychogenic: what's the better name?

Abstract: tional’ is that it might imply normal function rather than dysfunction and contradicts the notion that the treating physician wants and should convey to the patient about the ‘cause’ of the psychogenic disorder.” These are some of the reasons why I still prefer the term psychogenic instead of functional. Patients who present with these disorders generally perceive themselves as “dysfunctional” rather than “functional.” Furthermore, I believe that the latter term is too vague. When the term psychogenic is introduced to the patients in a sensitive and tactful way and the patients are reassured that there is no evidence of “neurological damage,” they are more willing to accept the role of psychodynamic factors, such as stress, in their condition and are more amenable to psychological and psychiatric intervention. Most patients understand that stress can cause elevation in blood pressure, palpitation, and tremors, so they can also accept that dystonia, parkinsonism, tics, and other movement disorders can be manifestations of stress or other psychological factors, even though these precipitants may not always be obvious or readily identifiable, especially during the first encounter.

The Brain's Default Network Anatomy, Function, and Relevance to Disease

Abstract: Thirty years of brain imaging research has converged to define the brain’s default network—a novel and only recently appreciated brain system that participates in internal modes of cognition Here we synthesize past observations to provide strong evidence that the default network is a specific, anatomically defined brain system preferentially active when individuals are not focused on the external environment Analysis of connectional anatomy in the monkey supports the presence of an interconnected brain system Providing insight into function, the default network is active when individuals are engaged in internally focused tasks including autobiographical memory retrieval, envisioning the future, and conceiving the perspectives of others Probing the functional anatomy of the network in detail reveals that it is best understood as multiple interacting subsystems The medial temporal lobe subsystem provides information from prior experiences in the form of memories and associations that are the building blocks of mental simulation The medial prefrontal subsystem facilitates the flexible use of this information during the construction of self-relevant mental simulations These two subsystems converge on important nodes of integration including the posterior cingulate cortex The implications of these functional and anatomical observations are discussed in relation to possible adaptive roles of the default network for using past experiences to plan for the future, navigate social interactions, and maximize the utility of moments when we are not otherwise engaged by the external world We conclude by discussing the relevance of the default network for understanding mental disorders including autism, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer’s disease

Parallel Organization of Functionally Segregated Circuits Linking Basal Ganglia and Cortex

Abstract: Information about the basal ganglia has accumulated at a prodigious pace over the past decade, necessitating major revisions in our concepts of the structural and functional organization of these nuclei. From earlier data it had appeared that the basal ganglia served primarily to integrate diverse inputs from the entire cerebral cortex and to "funnel" these influences, via the ventrolateral thalamus, to the motor cortex (Allen & Tsukahara 1974, Evarts & Thach 1969, Kemp & Powell 1971). In particular, the basal

FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data

Abstract: This paper describes FieldTrip, an open source software package that we developed for the analysis of MEG, EEG, and other electrophysiological data. The software is implemented as a MATLAB toolbox and includes a complete set of consistent and user-friendly high-level functions that allow experimental neuroscientists to analyze experimental data. It includes algorithms for simple and advanced analysis, such as time-frequency analysis using multitapers, source reconstruction using dipoles, distributed sources and beamformers, connectivity analysis, and nonparametric statistical permutation tests at the channel and source level. The implementation as toolbox allows the user to perform elaborate and structured analyses of large data sets using the MATLAB command line and batch scripting. Furthermore, users and developers can easily extend the functionality and implement new algorithms. The modular design facilitates the reuse in other software packages.

Principles of Neural Science

Abstract: I have developed "tennis elbow" from lugging this book around the past four weeks, but it is worth the pain, the effort, and the aspirin. It is also worth the (relatively speaking) bargain price. Including appendixes, this book contains 894 pages of text. The entire panorama of the neural sciences is surveyed and examined, and it is comprehensive in its scope, from genomes to social behaviors. The editors explicitly state that the book is designed as "an introductory text for students of biology, behavior, and medicine," but it is hard to imagine any audience, interested in any fragment of neuroscience at any level of sophistication, that would not enjoy this book. The editors have done a masterful job of weaving together the biologic, the behavioral, and the clinical sciences into a single tapestry in which everyone from the molecular biologist to the practicing psychiatrist can find and appreciate his or