scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Mark Hallett

Bio: Mark Hallett is an academic researcher from National Institutes of Health. The author has contributed to research in topics: Transcranial magnetic stimulation & Motor cortex. The author has an hindex of 186, co-authored 1170 publications receiving 123741 citations. Previous affiliations of Mark Hallett include Government of the United States of America & Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that volitional inhibition enhances SICI but reduces LICI nonselectively, suggesting that these two inhibitory mechanisms act differently during execution and suppression of voluntary movements.
Abstract: To investigate the effect of volitional inhibition on cortical inhibitory mechanisms, we performed transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies with a Go/NoGo reaction task in seven healthy subjects. Subjects were asked to extend their right index finger only after Go, but to remain relaxed after NoGo. Single- and paired-pulse TMS were triggered at the average reaction time for the Go response in each subject after Go or NoGo cues. Motor evoked potentials were recorded in the extensor indicis proprius (EIP) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles of right hand. Paired-pulse TMS with subthreshold conditioning stimuli at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 2 ms [short intracortical inhibition (SICI)] and 15 ms [intracortical facilitation (ICF)] and that with suprathreshold conditioning stimuli at ISI of 80 ms [long intracortical inhibition (LICI)] were performed in both Go/NoGo and control conditions. Inhibition of SICI was enhanced in both EIP and ADM after NoGo and was reduced only in EIP after Go. Inhibition of LICI was reduced in both muscles during both conditions, while ICF was not altered. The present results demonstrate that volitional inhibition enhances SICI but reduces LICI nonselectively. These results suggest that these two inhibitory mechanisms act differently during execution and suppression of voluntary movements.

138 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Results demonstrate that not only PPc but also the PMv acts in the processing of sensorimotor information during gestures, which might be the substrate underlying selective deficits in ideomotor apraxia patients.

138 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that voluntary hand movement exerts an inhibitory influence on a diffuse area of the ipsilateral motor cortex, which is both time and movement dependent.
Abstract: We investigated the influence of self-paced, phasic voluntary hand movement on the excitability of the ipsilateral motor cortex. Single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the right motor cortex triggered by EMG onset of self-paced movements of individual right hand fingers at intervals ranging from 13 to 2,000 ms. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were evaluated in several left arm muscles. Significant suppression of MEP amplitudes was observed when TMS was applied between 35 and 70 ms after EMG onset. This inhibition was diffuse, affecting "adjacent" muscles (those near the homologous muscle in the same extremity) as well as homologous muscles, but more inhibition was observed in adjacent and distal muscles than homologous and proximal muscles. Significant inhibition of ipsilateral motor cortex was produced by index finger movements (both the extensor indicis proprius and the first dorsal interosseus), but not by little finger movement (the abductor digiti minimi). Paired-pulse TMS (at 2- and 10-ms interstimulus intervals) showed a significant increase in intracortical facilitation (ICF) selectively in the homologous muscle when triggered by self-paced movement of the opposite hand, but no change was observed in intracortical inhibition. When stimulation was triggered by self-paced movements, the silent period of the homologous muscle was significantly shortened, but the F-wave and compound muscle action potential were unchanged. Our findings demonstrate that voluntary hand movement exerts an inhibitory influence on a diffuse area of the ipsilateral motor cortex. This inhibitory influence is both time and movement dependent. The inhibitory influence is nonselective, while the facilitatory influence (enhancing ICF) appears to act selectively on the homologous muscles. These effects are most likely mediated by a transcallosal pathway.

138 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: Movement-related cortical potentials represent averaged electroencephalographic activity before and after a voluntary movement and appear to represent feedback from the movement and may originate, in part, from the supplementary motor area.
Abstract: Movement-related cortical potentials represent averaged electroencephalographic activity before and after a voluntary movement. They begin with a slowly rising negativity, called the Bereitschaftspotential (BP), and progress to a steeper, later negativity starting about 400 msec before the onset of movement, called the negativity slope (NS'). They are followed by the motor potential, which is seen partly before and partly after the movement. The initial slope of motor potential (isMP) occurs just before the onset of electromyographic (EMG) activity, is focal topographically over the primary motor cortex, and probably represents activation of the primary motor cortex. This contralateral focal negativity persists for 30 to 50 msec after the onset of EMG activity, when it then drops off in the central and parietal regions, an event called the parietal peak of motor potential (ppMP). Subsequently, the peak negativity shifts toward the anterior contralateral area, where it reaches the highest negativity of the recording, called the frontal peak of motor potential (fpMP). The fpMP appears to represent feedback from the movement and may originate, in part, from the supplementary motor area. In patients with congenital mirror movements, the isMP occurs bilaterally. In patients with Parkinson's disease and cerebellar disease, the isMP is more diffuse and the fpMP is more posterior than normal. Movement-related cortical potentials are useful research tools, but are not yet appropriate for clinical applications.

138 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The findings suggest that somatotopy of input-output relationships is implemented at both a spinal and a cortical level in the human central nervous system and may also depend on the motor task involved.
Abstract: Integration of tactile afferent signals with motor commands is crucial for the performance of purposeful movements such as during manipulation of an object in the hand. To study the somatotopic organization of sensorimotor integration we applied electrical peripheral conditioning stimuli to a digit located near (homotopic stimulation) or distant from (heterotopic stimulation) relaxed or isometrically contracted intrinsic hand muscles at variable time intervals prior to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Cutaneous stimulation has previously been shown to modulate the amplitude of the motor evoked potential (MEP) and to shorten the duration of the silent period (SP) evoked by TMS. In relaxed target muscles the time-dependent modulation of TMS-evoked motor responses by homotopic conditioning stimulation differed from modulation by heterotopic stimulation. Similar differences in the modulation pattern evoked by homotopic and heterotopic conditioning stimulation were observed for two distinct target muscles of the hand (abductor digiti minimi, abductor pollicis brevis muscle). Differences in modulation were maximal when the conditioning stimulation was applied 25-30 ms and 150-200 ms prior to TMS. Comparison of the modulation of the amplitudes of MEPs evoked by transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) and the modulation of those evoked by TMS suggests that differences between homotopic and heterotopic stimulation originate subcortically at 25- to 30-ms and, at least partially, cortically at 150- to 200-ms interstimulus intervals. In isometrically contracted intrinsic hand muscles the degree to which the SP was shortened reflected the location and the timing of the conditioning stimulus. Shortening was maximal when the conditioning stimulus was applied nearest to the contracted target muscle and 20 ms prior to the test stimulus. In contrast to the SP duration, the MEP size in voluntarily contracted target muscles was unaffected by the location of the conditioning stimulus. The somatotopic gradient of SP shortening was abolished when the two target muscles were simultaneously activated isometrically. Together, our findings suggest that somatotopy of input-output relationships is implemented at both a spinal and a cortical level in the human central nervous system and may also depend on the motor task involved.

137 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Past observations are synthesized to provide strong evidence that the default network is a specific, anatomically defined brain system preferentially active when individuals are not focused on the external environment, and for understanding mental disorders including autism, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer's disease.
Abstract: Thirty years of brain imaging research has converged to define the brain’s default network—a novel and only recently appreciated brain system that participates in internal modes of cognition Here we synthesize past observations to provide strong evidence that the default network is a specific, anatomically defined brain system preferentially active when individuals are not focused on the external environment Analysis of connectional anatomy in the monkey supports the presence of an interconnected brain system Providing insight into function, the default network is active when individuals are engaged in internally focused tasks including autobiographical memory retrieval, envisioning the future, and conceiving the perspectives of others Probing the functional anatomy of the network in detail reveals that it is best understood as multiple interacting subsystems The medial temporal lobe subsystem provides information from prior experiences in the form of memories and associations that are the building blocks of mental simulation The medial prefrontal subsystem facilitates the flexible use of this information during the construction of self-relevant mental simulations These two subsystems converge on important nodes of integration including the posterior cingulate cortex The implications of these functional and anatomical observations are discussed in relation to possible adaptive roles of the default network for using past experiences to plan for the future, navigate social interactions, and maximize the utility of moments when we are not otherwise engaged by the external world We conclude by discussing the relevance of the default network for understanding mental disorders including autism, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer’s disease

8,448 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The basal ganglia serve primarily to integrate diverse inputs from the entire cerebral cortex and to "funnel" these influences, via the ventrolateral thalamus, to the motor cortex.
Abstract: Information about the basal ganglia has accumulated at a prodigious pace over the past decade, necessitating major revisions in our concepts of the structural and functional organization of these nuclei. From earlier data it had appeared that the basal ganglia served primarily to integrate diverse inputs from the entire cerebral cortex and to "funnel" these influences, via the ventrolateral thalamus, to the motor cortex (Allen & Tsukahara 1974, Evarts & Thach 1969, Kemp & Powell 1971). In particular, the basal

8,111 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: FieldTrip is an open source software package that is implemented as a MATLAB toolbox and includes a complete set of consistent and user-friendly high-level functions that allow experimental neuroscientists to analyze experimental data.
Abstract: This paper describes FieldTrip, an open source software package that we developed for the analysis of MEG, EEG, and other electrophysiological data. The software is implemented as a MATLAB toolbox and includes a complete set of consistent and user-friendly high-level functions that allow experimental neuroscientists to analyze experimental data. It includes algorithms for simple and advanced analysis, such as time-frequency analysis using multitapers, source reconstruction using dipoles, distributed sources and beamformers, connectivity analysis, and nonparametric statistical permutation tests at the channel and source level. The implementation as toolbox allows the user to perform elaborate and structured analyses of large data sets using the MATLAB command line and batch scripting. Furthermore, users and developers can easily extend the functionality and implement new algorithms. The modular design facilitates the reuse in other software packages.

7,963 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
06 Jun 1986-JAMA
TL;DR: The editors have done a masterful job of weaving together the biologic, the behavioral, and the clinical sciences into a single tapestry in which everyone from the molecular biologist to the practicing psychiatrist can find and appreciate his or her own research.
Abstract: I have developed "tennis elbow" from lugging this book around the past four weeks, but it is worth the pain, the effort, and the aspirin. It is also worth the (relatively speaking) bargain price. Including appendixes, this book contains 894 pages of text. The entire panorama of the neural sciences is surveyed and examined, and it is comprehensive in its scope, from genomes to social behaviors. The editors explicitly state that the book is designed as "an introductory text for students of biology, behavior, and medicine," but it is hard to imagine any audience, interested in any fragment of neuroscience at any level of sophistication, that would not enjoy this book. The editors have done a masterful job of weaving together the biologic, the behavioral, and the clinical sciences into a single tapestry in which everyone from the molecular biologist to the practicing psychiatrist can find and appreciate his or

7,563 citations