scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Mark I. McCarthy

Bio: Mark I. McCarthy is an academic researcher from University of Oxford. The author has contributed to research in topics: Genome-wide association study & Type 2 diabetes. The author has an hindex of 200, co-authored 1028 publications receiving 187898 citations. Previous affiliations of Mark I. McCarthy include St Mary's Hospital & Imperial College London.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Paul Burton1, David Clayton2, Lon R. Cardon, Nicholas John Craddock3  +192 moreInstitutions (4)
07 Jun 2007-Nature
TL;DR: This study has demonstrated that careful use of a shared control group represents a safe and effective approach to GWA analyses of multiple disease phenotypes; generated a genome-wide genotype database for future studies of common diseases in the British population; and shown that, provided individuals with non-European ancestry are excluded, the extent of population stratification in theBritish population is generally modest.
Abstract: There is increasing evidence that genome-wide association ( GWA) studies represent a powerful approach to the identification of genes involved in common human diseases. We describe a joint GWA study ( using the Affymetrix GeneChip 500K Mapping Array Set) undertaken in the British population, which has examined similar to 2,000 individuals for each of 7 major diseases and a shared set of similar to 3,000 controls. Case-control comparisons identified 24 independent association signals at P < 5 X 10(-7): 1 in bipolar disorder, 1 in coronary artery disease, 9 in Crohn's disease, 3 in rheumatoid arthritis, 7 in type 1 diabetes and 3 in type 2 diabetes. On the basis of prior findings and replication studies thus-far completed, almost all of these signals reflect genuine susceptibility effects. We observed association at many previously identified loci, and found compelling evidence that some loci confer risk for more than one of the diseases studied. Across all diseases, we identified a large number of further signals ( including 58 loci with single-point P values between 10(-5) and 5 X 10(-7)) likely to yield additional susceptibility loci. The importance of appropriately large samples was confirmed by the modest effect sizes observed at most loci identified. This study thus represents a thorough validation of the GWA approach. It has also demonstrated that careful use of a shared control group represents a safe and effective approach to GWA analyses of multiple disease phenotypes; has generated a genome-wide genotype database for future studies of common diseases in the British population; and shown that, provided individuals with non-European ancestry are excluded, the extent of population stratification in the British population is generally modest. Our findings offer new avenues for exploring the pathophysiology of these important disorders. We anticipate that our data, results and software, which will be widely available to other investigators, will provide a powerful resource for human genetics research.

9,244 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Monkol Lek, Konrad J. Karczewski1, Konrad J. Karczewski2, Eric Vallabh Minikel2, Eric Vallabh Minikel1, Kaitlin E. Samocha, Eric Banks2, Timothy Fennell2, Anne H. O’Donnell-Luria1, Anne H. O’Donnell-Luria3, Anne H. O’Donnell-Luria2, James S. Ware, Andrew J. Hill2, Andrew J. Hill1, Andrew J. Hill4, Beryl B. Cummings1, Beryl B. Cummings2, Taru Tukiainen2, Taru Tukiainen1, Daniel P. Birnbaum2, Jack A. Kosmicki, Laramie E. Duncan1, Laramie E. Duncan2, Karol Estrada1, Karol Estrada2, Fengmei Zhao1, Fengmei Zhao2, James Zou2, Emma Pierce-Hoffman2, Emma Pierce-Hoffman1, Joanne Berghout5, David Neil Cooper6, Nicole A. Deflaux7, Mark A. DePristo2, Ron Do, Jason Flannick2, Jason Flannick1, Menachem Fromer, Laura D. Gauthier2, Jackie Goldstein2, Jackie Goldstein1, Namrata Gupta2, Daniel P. Howrigan2, Daniel P. Howrigan1, Adam Kiezun2, Mitja I. Kurki2, Mitja I. Kurki1, Ami Levy Moonshine2, Pradeep Natarajan, Lorena Orozco, Gina M. Peloso2, Gina M. Peloso1, Ryan Poplin2, Manuel A. Rivas2, Valentin Ruano-Rubio2, Samuel A. Rose2, Douglas M. Ruderfer8, Khalid Shakir2, Peter D. Stenson6, Christine Stevens2, Brett Thomas2, Brett Thomas1, Grace Tiao2, María Teresa Tusié-Luna, Ben Weisburd2, Hong-Hee Won9, Dongmei Yu, David Altshuler2, David Altshuler10, Diego Ardissino, Michael Boehnke11, John Danesh12, Stacey Donnelly2, Roberto Elosua, Jose C. Florez1, Jose C. Florez2, Stacey Gabriel2, Gad Getz1, Gad Getz2, Stephen J. Glatt13, Christina M. Hultman14, Sekar Kathiresan, Markku Laakso15, Steven A. McCarroll1, Steven A. McCarroll2, Mark I. McCarthy16, Mark I. McCarthy17, Dermot P.B. McGovern18, Ruth McPherson19, Benjamin M. Neale1, Benjamin M. Neale2, Aarno Palotie, Shaun Purcell8, Danish Saleheen20, Jeremiah M. Scharf, Pamela Sklar, Patrick F. Sullivan21, Patrick F. Sullivan14, Jaakko Tuomilehto22, Ming T. Tsuang23, Hugh Watkins17, Hugh Watkins16, James G. Wilson24, Mark J. Daly1, Mark J. Daly2, Daniel G. MacArthur2, Daniel G. MacArthur1 
18 Aug 2016-Nature
TL;DR: The aggregation and analysis of high-quality exome (protein-coding region) DNA sequence data for 60,706 individuals of diverse ancestries generated as part of the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) provides direct evidence for the presence of widespread mutational recurrence.
Abstract: Large-scale reference data sets of human genetic variation are critical for the medical and functional interpretation of DNA sequence changes. Here we describe the aggregation and analysis of high-quality exome (protein-coding region) DNA sequence data for 60,706 individuals of diverse ancestries generated as part of the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC). This catalogue of human genetic diversity contains an average of one variant every eight bases of the exome, and provides direct evidence for the presence of widespread mutational recurrence. We have used this catalogue to calculate objective metrics of pathogenicity for sequence variants, and to identify genes subject to strong selection against various classes of mutation; identifying 3,230 genes with near-complete depletion of predicted protein-truncating variants, with 72% of these genes having no currently established human disease phenotype. Finally, we demonstrate that these data can be used for the efficient filtering of candidate disease-causing variants, and for the discovery of human 'knockout' variants in protein-coding genes.

8,758 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
08 Oct 2009-Nature
TL;DR: This paper examined potential sources of missing heritability and proposed research strategies, including and extending beyond current genome-wide association approaches, to illuminate the genetics of complex diseases and enhance its potential to enable effective disease prevention or treatment.
Abstract: Genome-wide association studies have identified hundreds of genetic variants associated with complex human diseases and traits, and have provided valuable insights into their genetic architecture. Most variants identified so far confer relatively small increments in risk, and explain only a small proportion of familial clustering, leading many to question how the remaining, 'missing' heritability can be explained. Here we examine potential sources of missing heritability and propose research strategies, including and extending beyond current genome-wide association approaches, to illuminate the genetics of complex diseases and enhance its potential to enable effective disease prevention or treatment.

7,797 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
John T. Lonsdale, Jeffrey Thomas, Mike Salvatore, Rebecca Phillips, Edmund Lo, Saboor Shad, Richard Hasz, Gary Walters, Fernando U. Garcia1, Nancy Young2, Barbara A. Foster3, Mike Moser3, Ellen Karasik3, Bryan Gillard3, Kimberley Ramsey3, Susan L. Sullivan, Jason Bridge, Harold Magazine, John Syron, Johnelle Fleming, Laura A. Siminoff4, Heather M. Traino4, Maghboeba Mosavel4, Laura Barker4, Scott D. Jewell5, Daniel C. Rohrer5, Dan Maxim5, Dana Filkins5, Philip Harbach5, Eddie Cortadillo5, Bree Berghuis5, Lisa Turner5, Eric Hudson5, Kristin Feenstra5, Leslie H. Sobin6, James A. Robb6, Phillip Branton, Greg E. Korzeniewski6, Charles Shive6, David Tabor6, Liqun Qi6, Kevin Groch6, Sreenath Nampally6, Steve Buia6, Angela Zimmerman6, Anna M. Smith6, Robin Burges6, Karna Robinson6, Kim Valentino6, Deborah Bradbury6, Mark Cosentino6, Norma Diaz-Mayoral6, Mary Kennedy6, Theresa Engel6, Penelope Williams6, Kenyon Erickson, Kristin G. Ardlie7, Wendy Winckler7, Gad Getz7, Gad Getz8, David S. DeLuca7, MacArthur Daniel MacArthur8, MacArthur Daniel MacArthur7, Manolis Kellis7, Alexander Thomson7, Taylor Young7, Ellen Gelfand7, Molly Donovan7, Yan Meng7, George B. Grant7, Deborah C. Mash9, Yvonne Marcus9, Margaret J. Basile9, Jun Liu8, Jun Zhu10, Zhidong Tu10, Nancy J. Cox11, Dan L. Nicolae11, Eric R. Gamazon11, Hae Kyung Im11, Anuar Konkashbaev11, Jonathan K. Pritchard11, Jonathan K. Pritchard12, Matthew Stevens11, Timothée Flutre11, Xiaoquan Wen11, Emmanouil T. Dermitzakis13, Tuuli Lappalainen13, Roderic Guigó, Jean Monlong, Michael Sammeth, Daphne Koller14, Alexis Battle14, Sara Mostafavi14, Mark I. McCarthy15, Manual Rivas15, Julian Maller15, Ivan Rusyn16, Andrew B. Nobel16, Fred A. Wright16, Andrey A. Shabalin16, Mike Feolo17, Nataliya Sharopova17, Anne Sturcke17, Justin Paschal17, James M. Anderson17, Elizabeth L. Wilder17, Leslie Derr17, Eric D. Green17, Jeffery P. Struewing17, Gary F. Temple17, Simona Volpi17, Joy T. Boyer17, Elizabeth J. Thomson17, Mark S. Guyer17, Cathy Ng17, Assya Abdallah17, Deborah Colantuoni17, Thomas R. Insel17, Susan E. Koester17, Roger Little17, Patrick Bender17, Thomas Lehner17, Yin Yao17, Carolyn C. Compton17, Jimmie B. Vaught17, Sherilyn Sawyer17, Nicole C. Lockhart17, Joanne P. Demchok17, Helen F. Moore17 
TL;DR: The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project is described, which will establish a resource database and associated tissue bank for the scientific community to study the relationship between genetic variation and gene expression in human tissues.
Abstract: Genome-wide association studies have identified thousands of loci for common diseases, but, for the majority of these, the mechanisms underlying disease susceptibility remain unknown. Most associated variants are not correlated with protein-coding changes, suggesting that polymorphisms in regulatory regions probably contribute to many disease phenotypes. Here we describe the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project, which will establish a resource database and associated tissue bank for the scientific community to study the relationship between genetic variation and gene expression in human tissues.

6,545 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Kristin G. Ardlie, David S. DeLuca, Ayellet V. Segrè, Timothy J. Sullivan, Taylor Young, Ellen Gelfand, Casandra A. Trowbridge, Julian Maller, Taru Tukiainen, Monkol Lek, Lucas D. Ward, Pouya Kheradpour, Benjamin Iriarte, Yan Meng, Cameron D. Palmer, Tõnu Esko, Wendy Winckler, Joel N. Hirschhorn, Manolis Kellis, Daniel G. MacArthur, Gad Getz, Andrey A. Shabalin, Gen Li, Yi-Hui Zhou, Andrew B. Nobel, Ivan Rusyn, Fred A. Wright, Tuuli Lappalainen, Pedro G. Ferreira, Halit Ongen, Manuel A. Rivas, Alexis Battle, Sara Mostafavi, Jean Monlong, Michael Sammeth, Marta Melé, Ferran Reverter, Jakob M. Goldmann, Daphne Koller, Roderic Guigó, Mark I. McCarthy, Emmanouil T. Dermitzakis, Eric R. Gamazon, Hae Kyung Im, Anuar Konkashbaev, Dan L. Nicolae, Nancy J. Cox, Timothée Flutre, Xiaoquan Wen, Matthew Stephens, Jonathan K. Pritchard, Zhidong Tu, Bin Zhang, Tao Huang, Quan Long, Luan Lin, Jialiang Yang, Jun Zhu, Jun Liu, Amanda Brown, Bernadette Mestichelli, Denee Tidwell, Edmund Lo, Mike Salvatore, Saboor Shad, Jeffrey A. Thomas, John T. Lonsdale, Michael T. Moser, Bryan Gillard, Ellen Karasik, Kimberly Ramsey, Christopher Choi, Barbara A. Foster, John Syron, Johnell Fleming, Harold Magazine, Rick Hasz, Gary Walters, Jason Bridge, Mark Miklos, Susan L. Sullivan, Laura Barker, Heather M. Traino, Maghboeba Mosavel, Laura A. Siminoff, Dana R. Valley, Daniel C. Rohrer, Scott D. Jewell, Philip A. Branton, Leslie H. Sobin, Mary Barcus, Liqun Qi, Jeffrey McLean, Pushpa Hariharan, Ki Sung Um, Shenpei Wu, David Tabor, Charles Shive, Anna M. Smith, Stephen A. Buia, Anita H. Undale, Karna Robinson, Nancy Roche, Kimberly M. Valentino, Angela Britton, Robin Burges, Debra Bradbury, Kenneth W. Hambright, John Seleski, Greg E. Korzeniewski, Kenyon Erickson, Yvonne Marcus, Jorge Tejada, Mehran Taherian, Chunrong Lu, Margaret J. Basile, Deborah C. Mash, Simona Volpi, Jeffery P. Struewing, Gary F. Temple, Joy T. Boyer, Deborah Colantuoni, Roger Little, Susan E. Koester, Latarsha J. Carithers, Helen M. Moore, Ping Guan, Carolyn C. Compton, Sherilyn Sawyer, Joanne P. Demchok, Jimmie B. Vaught, Chana A. Rabiner, Nicole C. Lockhart 
08 May 2015-Science
TL;DR: The landscape of gene expression across tissues is described, thousands of tissue-specific and shared regulatory expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) variants are cataloged, complex network relationships are described, and signals from genome-wide association studies explained by eQTLs are identified.
Abstract: Understanding the functional consequences of genetic variation, and how it affects complex human disease and quantitative traits, remains a critical challenge for biomedicine. We present an analysi...

4,418 citations


Cited by
More filters
28 Jul 2005
TL;DR: PfPMP1)与感染红细胞、树突状组胞以及胎盘的单个或多个受体作用,在黏附及免疫逃避中起关键的作�ly.
Abstract: 抗原变异可使得多种致病微生物易于逃避宿主免疫应答。表达在感染红细胞表面的恶性疟原虫红细胞表面蛋白1(PfPMP1)与感染红细胞、内皮细胞、树突状细胞以及胎盘的单个或多个受体作用,在黏附及免疫逃避中起关键的作用。每个单倍体基因组var基因家族编码约60种成员,通过启动转录不同的var基因变异体为抗原变异提供了分子基础。

18,940 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Adam Auton1, Gonçalo R. Abecasis2, David Altshuler3, Richard Durbin4  +514 moreInstitutions (90)
01 Oct 2015-Nature
TL;DR: The 1000 Genomes Project set out to provide a comprehensive description of common human genetic variation by applying whole-genome sequencing to a diverse set of individuals from multiple populations, and has reconstructed the genomes of 2,504 individuals from 26 populations using a combination of low-coverage whole-generation sequencing, deep exome sequencing, and dense microarray genotyping.
Abstract: The 1000 Genomes Project set out to provide a comprehensive description of common human genetic variation by applying whole-genome sequencing to a diverse set of individuals from multiple populations. Here we report completion of the project, having reconstructed the genomes of 2,504 individuals from 26 populations using a combination of low-coverage whole-genome sequencing, deep exome sequencing, and dense microarray genotyping. We characterized a broad spectrum of genetic variation, in total over 88 million variants (84.7 million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), 3.6 million short insertions/deletions (indels), and 60,000 structural variants), all phased onto high-quality haplotypes. This resource includes >99% of SNP variants with a frequency of >1% for a variety of ancestries. We describe the distribution of genetic variation across the global sample, and discuss the implications for common disease studies.

12,661 citations

Journal Article
Fumio Tajima1
30 Oct 1989-Genomics
TL;DR: It is suggested that the natural selection against large insertion/deletion is so weak that a large amount of variation is maintained in a population.

11,521 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: For the next few weeks the course is going to be exploring a field that’s actually older than classical population genetics, although the approach it’ll be taking to it involves the use of population genetic machinery.
Abstract: So far in this course we have dealt entirely with the evolution of characters that are controlled by simple Mendelian inheritance at a single locus. There are notes on the course website about gametic disequilibrium and how allele frequencies change at two loci simultaneously, but we didn’t discuss them. In every example we’ve considered we’ve imagined that we could understand something about evolution by examining the evolution of a single gene. That’s the domain of classical population genetics. For the next few weeks we’re going to be exploring a field that’s actually older than classical population genetics, although the approach we’ll be taking to it involves the use of population genetic machinery. If you know a little about the history of evolutionary biology, you may know that after the rediscovery of Mendel’s work in 1900 there was a heated debate between the “biometricians” (e.g., Galton and Pearson) and the “Mendelians” (e.g., de Vries, Correns, Bateson, and Morgan). Biometricians asserted that the really important variation in evolution didn’t follow Mendelian rules. Height, weight, skin color, and similar traits seemed to

9,847 citations

01 Jan 2014
TL;DR: These standards of care are intended to provide clinicians, patients, researchers, payors, and other interested individuals with the components of diabetes care, treatment goals, and tools to evaluate the quality of care.
Abstract: XI. STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING DIABETES CARE D iabetes is a chronic illness that requires continuing medical care and patient self-management education to prevent acute complications and to reduce the risk of long-term complications. Diabetes care is complex and requires that many issues, beyond glycemic control, be addressed. A large body of evidence exists that supports a range of interventions to improve diabetes outcomes. These standards of care are intended to provide clinicians, patients, researchers, payors, and other interested individuals with the components of diabetes care, treatment goals, and tools to evaluate the quality of care. While individual preferences, comorbidities, and other patient factors may require modification of goals, targets that are desirable for most patients with diabetes are provided. These standards are not intended to preclude more extensive evaluation and management of the patient by other specialists as needed. For more detailed information, refer to Bode (Ed.): Medical Management of Type 1 Diabetes (1), Burant (Ed): Medical Management of Type 2 Diabetes (2), and Klingensmith (Ed): Intensive Diabetes Management (3). The recommendations included are diagnostic and therapeutic actions that are known or believed to favorably affect health outcomes of patients with diabetes. A grading system (Table 1), developed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and modeled after existing methods, was utilized to clarify and codify the evidence that forms the basis for the recommendations. The level of evidence that supports each recommendation is listed after each recommendation using the letters A, B, C, or E.

9,618 citations