M
Mark P. Jensen
Researcher at University of Washington
Publications - 711
Citations - 53212
Mark P. Jensen is an academic researcher from University of Washington. The author has contributed to research in topics: Chronic pain & Pain catastrophizing. The author has an hindex of 103, co-authored 672 publications receiving 47194 citations. Previous affiliations of Mark P. Jensen include United States Department of Veterans Affairs & Washington University in St. Louis.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods.
TL;DR: The results indicate that, for the present sample, the scales yield similar results in terms of the number of subjects who respond correctly to them and their predictive validity, however, when considering the remaining 3 criteria, the 101‐point numerical rating scale appears to be the most practical index.
Journal ArticleDOI
Interpreting the Clinical Importance of Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials: IMMPACT Recommendations
Robert H. Dworkin,Dennis C. Turk,Kathleen W. Wyrwich,Dorcas E. Beaton,Charles S. Cleeland,John T. Farrar,Jennifer A. Haythornthwaite,Mark P. Jensen,Robert D. Kerns,Deborah N. Ader,Nancy A. Brandenburg,Laurie B. Burke,David Cella,Julie Chandler,Penny Cowan,Rozalina Dimitrova,Raymond A. Dionne,Sharon Hertz,Alejandro R. Jadad,Nathaniel P. Katz,Henrik Kehlet,Lynn D. Kramer,Donald C. Manning,Cynthia McCormick,Michael P. McDermott,Henry J McQuay,Sanjay Patel,Linda Porter,Steve Quessy,Bob A. Rappaport,Christine Rauschkolb,Dennis A. Revicki,Margaret Rothman,Kenneth E. Schmader,Brett R. Stacey,Joseph W. Stauffer,Thorsten von Stein,Richard E. White,James Witter,Stojan Zavisic +39 more
TL;DR: A consensus meeting was convened by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) to provide recommendations for interpreting clinical importance of treatment outcomes in clinical trials of the efficacy and effectiveness of chronic pain treatments as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI
Topical Review and RecommendationsCore outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
Robert H. Dworkin,Dennis C. Turk,John T. Farrar,Jennifer A. Haythornthwaite,Mark P. Jensen,Nathaniel P. Katz,Robert D. Kerns,Gerold Stucki,Robert R. Allen,Nicholas Bellamy,Daniel B. Carr,Julie Chandler,Penney Cowan,Raymond A. Dionne,Bradley S. Galer,Sharon Hertz,Alejandro R. Jadad,Lynn D. Kramer,James Witter +18 more
Journal ArticleDOI
Validity of four pain intensity rating scales
TL;DR: The validity of 4 common pain intensity measures is supported, although the 0–10 Numerical Rating Scale and Visual Analogue Scale evidenced the most responsivity, while the NRS emerged as being both most responsive and able to detect sex differences in pain intensity.