scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Markus Fischer

Bio: Markus Fischer is an academic researcher from University of Bern. The author has contributed to research in topics: Biodiversity & Species richness. The author has an hindex of 85, co-authored 490 publications receiving 28454 citations. Previous affiliations of Markus Fischer include University of Zurich & Radboud University Nijmegen.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Sandra Díaz1, Sebsebe Demissew2, Julia Carabias3, Carlos Alfredo Joly4, Mark Lonsdale, Neville Ash5, Anne Larigauderie, Jay Ram Adhikari, Salvatore Arico6, András Báldi, Ann M. Bartuska7, Ivar Andreas Baste, Adem Bilgin, Eduardo S. Brondizio8, Kai M. A. Chan9, Viviana E. Figueroa, Anantha Kumar Duraiappah, Markus Fischer, Rosemary Hill10, Thomas Koetz, Paul Leadley11, Philip O'b. Lyver12, Georgina M. Mace13, Berta Martín-López14, Michiko Okumura5, Diego Pacheco, Unai Pascual15, Edgar Selvin Pérez, Belinda Reyers16, Eva Roth17, Osamu Saito18, Robert J. Scholes19, Nalini Sharma5, Heather Tallis20, Randolph R. Thaman21, Robert T. Watson22, Tetsukazu Yahara23, Zakri Abdul Hamid, Callistus Akosim, Yousef S. Al-Hafedh24, Rashad Allahverdiyev, Edward Amankwah, T. Stanley Asah25, Zemede Asfaw2, Gabor Bartus26, Anathea L. Brooks6, Jorge Caillaux27, Gemedo Dalle, Dedy Darnaedi, Amanda Driver (Sanbi), Gunay Erpul28, Pablo Escobar-Eyzaguirre, Pierre Failler29, Ali Moustafa Mokhtar Fouda, Bojie Fu30, Haripriya Gundimeda31, Shizuka Hashimoto32, Floyd Homer, Sandra Lavorel33, Gabriela Lichtenstein34, William Armand Mala35, Wadzanayi Mandivenyi, Piotr Matczak36, Carmel Mbizvo, Mehrasa Mehrdadi, Jean Paul Metzger37, Jean Bruno Mikissa38, Henrik Moller39, Harold A. Mooney40, Peter J. Mumby41, Harini Nagendra42, Carsten Nesshöver43, Alfred Oteng-Yeboah44, György Pataki45, Marie Roué, Jennifer Rubis6, Maria Schultz46, Peggy Smith47, Rashid Sumaila9, Kazuhiko Takeuchi18, Spencer Thomas, Madhu Verma48, Youn Yeo-Chang49, Diana Zlatanova50 
National University of Cordoba1, Addis Ababa University2, National Autonomous University of Mexico3, State University of Campinas4, United Nations Environment Programme5, UNESCO6, United States Department of Agriculture7, Indiana University8, University of British Columbia9, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation10, University of Paris-Sud11, Landcare Research12, University College London13, Autonomous University of Madrid14, University of Cambridge15, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research16, University of Southern Denmark17, United Nations University18, Virginia Tech College of Natural Resources and Environment19, The Nature Conservancy20, University of the South Pacific21, University of East Anglia22, Kyushu University23, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology24, University of Washington25, Budapest University of Technology and Economics26, Environmental Law Institute27, Ankara University28, University of Portsmouth29, Chinese Academy of Sciences30, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay31, Kyoto University32, Joseph Fourier University33, National Scientific and Technical Research Council34, University of Yaoundé35, Polish Academy of Sciences36, University of São Paulo37, École Normale Supérieure38, University of Otago39, Stanford University40, University of Queensland41, Azim Premji University42, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ43, University of Ghana44, Corvinus University of Budapest45, Stockholm University46, Lakehead University47, Indian Institute of Forest Management48, Seoul National University49, Sofia University50
TL;DR: The first public product of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) is its Conceptual Framework as discussed by the authors, which will underpin all IPBES functions and provide structure and comparability to the syntheses that will produce at different spatial scales, on different themes, and in different regions.

1,585 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is concluded that invasive alien species had higher values for those traits related to performance than non-invasive species, suggesting that it might become possible to predict future plant invasions from species traits.
Abstract: A major aim in ecology is identifying determinants of invasiveness. We performed a meta-analysis of 117 field or experimental-garden studies that measured pair-wise trait differences of a total of 125 invasive and 196 non-invasive plant species in the invasive range of the invasive species. We tested whether invasiveness is associated with performance-related traits (physiology, leaf-area allocation, shoot allocation, growth rate, size and fitness), and whether such associations depend on type of study and on biogeographical or biological factors. Overall, invasive species had significantly higher values than non-invasive species for all six trait categories. More trait differences were significant for invasive vs. native comparisons than for invasive vs. non-invasive alien comparisons. Moreover, for comparisons between invasive species and native species that themselves are invasive elsewhere, no trait differences were significant. Differences in physiology and growth rate were larger in tropical regions than in temperate regions. Trait differences did not depend on whether the invasive alien species originates from Europe, nor did they depend on the test environment. We conclude that invasive alien species had higher values for those traits related to performance than non-invasive species. This suggests that it might become possible to predict future plant invasions from species traits.

1,497 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
23 Dec 2008-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: It is suggested that local adaptation is less common in plant populations than generally assumed, and the clear role of population size for the ability to evolve local adaptation raises considerable doubt on the ability of small plant populations to cope with changing environments.
Abstract: Local adaptation is of fundamental importance in evolutionary, population, conservation, and global-change biology The generality of local adaptation in plants and whether and how it is influenced by specific species, population and habitat characteristics have, however, not been quantitatively reviewed Therefore, we examined published data on the outcomes of reciprocal transplant experiments using two approaches We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the performance of local and foreign plants at all transplant sites In addition, we analysed frequencies of pairs of plant origin to examine whether local plants perform better than foreign plants at both compared transplant sites In both approaches, we also examined the effects of population size, and of the habitat and species characteristics that are predicted to affect local adaptation We show that, overall, local plants performed significantly better than foreign plants at their site of origin: this was found to be the case in 710% of the studied sites However, local plants performed better than foreign plants at both sites of a pair-wise comparison (strict definition of local adaption) only in 453% of the 1032 compared population pairs Furthermore, we found local adaptation much more common for large plant populations (>1000 flowering individuals) than for small populations (<1000 flowering individuals) for which local adaptation was very rare The degree of local adaptation was independent of plant life history, spatial or temporal habitat heterogeneity, and geographic scale Our results suggest that local adaptation is less common in plant populations than generally assumed Moreover, our findings reinforce the fundamental importance of population size for evolutionary theory The clear role of population size for the ability to evolve local adaptation raises considerable doubt on the ability of small plant populations to cope with changing environments

909 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Jingjing Liang1, Thomas W. Crowther2, Nicolas Picard3, Susan K. Wiser4, Mo Zhou1, Giorgio Alberti5, Ernst Detlef Schulze6, A. David McGuire7, Fabio Bozzato, Hans Pretzsch8, Sergio de-Miguel, Alain Paquette9, Bruno Hérault10, Michael Scherer-Lorenzen11, Christopher B. Barrett12, Henry B. Glick2, Geerten M. Hengeveld13, Gert-Jan Nabuurs13, Sebastian Pfautsch14, Helder Viana15, Helder Viana16, Alexander Christian Vibrans, Christian Ammer17, Peter Schall17, David David Verbyla7, N. M. Tchebakova18, Markus Fischer19, James V. Watson1, Han Y. H. Chen20, Xiangdong Lei, Mart-Jan Schelhaas13, Huicui Lu13, Damiano Gianelle, Elena I. Parfenova18, Christian Salas21, Eungul Lee1, Boknam Lee22, Hyun-Seok Kim, Helge Bruelheide23, David A. Coomes24, Daniel Piotto, Terry Sunderland25, Terry Sunderland26, Bernhard Schmid27, Sylvie Gourlet-Fleury, Bonaventure Sonké28, Rebecca Tavani3, Jun Zhu29, Susanne Brandl8, Jordi Vayreda, Fumiaki Kitahara, Eric B. Searle20, Victor J. Neldner30, Michael R. Ngugi30, Christopher Baraloto31, Christopher Baraloto32, Lorenzo Frizzera, Radomir Bałazy33, Jacek Oleksyn34, Jacek Oleksyn35, Tomasz Zawiła-Niedźwiecki36, Olivier Bouriaud37, Filippo Bussotti38, Leena Finér, Bogdan Jaroszewicz39, Tommaso Jucker24, Fernando Valladares40, Fernando Valladares41, Andrzej M. Jagodziński35, Pablo Luis Peri42, Pablo Luis Peri43, Pablo Luis Peri44, Christelle Gonmadje28, William Marthy45, Timothy G. O'Brien45, Emanuel H. Martin46, Andrew R. Marshall47, Francesco Rovero, Robert Bitariho, Pascal A. Niklaus27, Patricia Alvarez-Loayza48, Nurdin Chamuya49, Renato Valencia50, Frédéric Mortier, Verginia Wortel, Nestor L. Engone-Obiang51, Leandro Valle Ferreira52, David E. Odeke, R. Vásquez, Simon L. Lewis53, Simon L. Lewis54, Peter B. Reich14, Peter B. Reich34 
West Virginia University1, Yale University2, Food and Agriculture Organization3, Landcare Research4, University of Udine5, Max Planck Society6, University of Alaska Fairbanks7, Technische Universität München8, Université du Québec à Montréal9, University of the French West Indies and Guiana10, University of Freiburg Faculty of Biology11, Cornell University12, Wageningen University and Research Centre13, University of Sydney14, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu15, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro16, University of Göttingen17, Russian Academy of Sciences18, Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research19, Lakehead University20, University of La Frontera21, Seoul National University22, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg23, University of Cambridge24, James Cook University25, Center for International Forestry Research26, University of Zurich27, University of Yaoundé I28, University of Wisconsin-Madison29, Queensland Government30, Institut national de la recherche agronomique31, Florida International University32, Forest Research Institute33, University of Minnesota34, Polish Academy of Sciences35, Warsaw University of Life Sciences36, Ştefan cel Mare University of Suceava37, University of Florence38, University of Warsaw39, King Juan Carlos University40, Spanish National Research Council41, International Trademark Association42, National Scientific and Technical Research Council43, National University of Austral Patagonia44, Wildlife Conservation Society45, College of African Wildlife Management46, University of York47, Durham University48, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources49, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador50, Centre national de la recherche scientifique51, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi52, University of Leeds53, University College London54
14 Oct 2016-Science
TL;DR: A consistent positive concave-down effect of biodiversity on forest productivity across the world is revealed, showing that a continued biodiversity loss would result in an accelerating decline in forest productivity worldwide.
Abstract: The biodiversity-productivity relationship (BPR) is foundational to our understanding of the global extinction crisis and its impacts on ecosystem functioning. Understanding BPR is critical for the accurate valuation and effective conservation of biodiversity. Using ground-sourced data from 777,126 permanent plots, spanning 44 countries and most terrestrial biomes, we reveal a globally consistent positive concave-down BPR, showing that continued biodiversity loss would result in an accelerating decline in forest productivity worldwide. The value of biodiversity in maintaining commercial forest productivity alone-US$166 billion to 490 billion per year according to our estimation-is more than twice what it would cost to implement effective global conservation. This highlights the need for a worldwide reassessment of biodiversity values, forest management strategies, and conservation priorities.

889 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The observed generality of the positive relationships between population size, plant fitness and genetic diversity implies that the negative effects of habitat fragmentation on plant Fitness and genetic variation are common.
Abstract: Summary 1Relationships between plant population size, fitness and within-population genetic diversity are fundamental for plant ecology, evolution and conservation. We conducted meta-analyses of studies published between 1987 and 2005 to test whether these relationships are generally positive, whether they are sensitive to methodological differences among studies, whether they differ between species of different life span, mating system or rarity and whether they depend on the size ranges of the studied populations. 2Mean correlations between population size, fitness and genetic variation were all significantly positive. The positive correlation between population size and female fitness tended to be stronger in field studies than in common garden studies, and the positive correlation between genetic variation and fitness was significantly stronger in DNA than in isoenzyme studies. 3The strength and direction of correlations between population size, fitness and genetic variation were independent of plant life span and the size range of the studied populations. The mean correlations tended to be stronger for the rare species than for common species. 4Expected heterozygosity, the number of alleles and the number or proportion of polymorphic loci significantly increased with population size, but the level of inbreeding FIS was independent of population size. The positive relationship between population size and the number of alleles and the number or proportion of polymorphic loci was stronger in self-incompatible than in self-compatible species. Furthermore, fitness and genetic variation were positively correlated in self-incompatible species, but independent of each other in self-compatible species. 5The close relationships between population size, genetic variation and fitness suggest that population size should always be taken into account in multipopulation studies of plant fitness or genetic variation. 6The observed generality of the positive relationships between population size, plant fitness and genetic diversity implies that the negative effects of habitat fragmentation on plant fitness and genetic variation are common. Moreover, the stronger positive associations observed in self-incompatible species and to some degree in rare species, suggest that these species are most prone to the negative effects of habitat fragmentation.

814 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Preface to the Princeton Landmarks in Biology Edition vii Preface xi Symbols used xiii 1.
Abstract: Preface to the Princeton Landmarks in Biology Edition vii Preface xi Symbols Used xiii 1. The Importance of Islands 3 2. Area and Number of Speicies 8 3. Further Explanations of the Area-Diversity Pattern 19 4. The Strategy of Colonization 68 5. Invasibility and the Variable Niche 94 6. Stepping Stones and Biotic Exchange 123 7. Evolutionary Changes Following Colonization 145 8. Prospect 181 Glossary 185 References 193 Index 201

14,171 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Apr 1988-Nature
TL;DR: In this paper, a sedimentological core and petrographic characterisation of samples from eleven boreholes from the Lower Carboniferous of Bowland Basin (Northwest England) is presented.
Abstract: Deposits of clastic carbonate-dominated (calciclastic) sedimentary slope systems in the rock record have been identified mostly as linearly-consistent carbonate apron deposits, even though most ancient clastic carbonate slope deposits fit the submarine fan systems better. Calciclastic submarine fans are consequently rarely described and are poorly understood. Subsequently, very little is known especially in mud-dominated calciclastic submarine fan systems. Presented in this study are a sedimentological core and petrographic characterisation of samples from eleven boreholes from the Lower Carboniferous of Bowland Basin (Northwest England) that reveals a >250 m thick calciturbidite complex deposited in a calciclastic submarine fan setting. Seven facies are recognised from core and thin section characterisation and are grouped into three carbonate turbidite sequences. They include: 1) Calciturbidites, comprising mostly of highto low-density, wavy-laminated bioclast-rich facies; 2) low-density densite mudstones which are characterised by planar laminated and unlaminated muddominated facies; and 3) Calcidebrites which are muddy or hyper-concentrated debrisflow deposits occurring as poorly-sorted, chaotic, mud-supported floatstones. These

9,929 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: For the next few weeks the course is going to be exploring a field that’s actually older than classical population genetics, although the approach it’ll be taking to it involves the use of population genetic machinery.
Abstract: So far in this course we have dealt entirely with the evolution of characters that are controlled by simple Mendelian inheritance at a single locus. There are notes on the course website about gametic disequilibrium and how allele frequencies change at two loci simultaneously, but we didn’t discuss them. In every example we’ve considered we’ve imagined that we could understand something about evolution by examining the evolution of a single gene. That’s the domain of classical population genetics. For the next few weeks we’re going to be exploring a field that’s actually older than classical population genetics, although the approach we’ll be taking to it involves the use of population genetic machinery. If you know a little about the history of evolutionary biology, you may know that after the rediscovery of Mendel’s work in 1900 there was a heated debate between the “biometricians” (e.g., Galton and Pearson) and the “Mendelians” (e.g., de Vries, Correns, Bateson, and Morgan). Biometricians asserted that the really important variation in evolution didn’t follow Mendelian rules. Height, weight, skin color, and similar traits seemed to

9,847 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
10 Mar 1970

8,159 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Understanding this complexity, while taking strong steps to minimize current losses of species, is necessary for responsible management of Earth's ecosystems and the diverse biota they contain.
Abstract: Humans are altering the composition of biological communities through a variety of activities that increase rates of species invasions and species extinctions, at all scales, from local to global. These changes in components of the Earth's biodiversity cause concern for ethical and aesthetic reasons, but they also have a strong potential to alter ecosystem properties and the goods and services they provide to humanity. Ecological experiments, observations, and theoretical developments show that ecosystem properties depend greatly on biodiversity in terms of the functional characteristics of organisms present in the ecosystem and the distribution and abundance of those organisms over space and time. Species effects act in concert with the effects of climate, resource availability, and disturbance regimes in influencing ecosystem properties. Human activities can modify all of the above factors; here we focus on modification of these biotic controls. The scientific community has come to a broad consensus on many aspects of the re- lationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, including many points relevant to management of ecosystems. Further progress will require integration of knowledge about biotic and abiotic controls on ecosystem properties, how ecological communities are struc- tured, and the forces driving species extinctions and invasions. To strengthen links to policy and management, we also need to integrate our ecological knowledge with understanding of the social and economic constraints of potential management practices. Understanding this complexity, while taking strong steps to minimize current losses of species, is necessary for responsible management of Earth's ecosystems and the diverse biota they contain.

6,891 citations