Martin F. Quaas

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present the rationale for the inclusive valuation of nature's contributions to people (NCP) in decision making, as well as broad methodological steps for doing so, and argue that transformative practices aiming at sustainable futures would benefit from embracing such diversity, which require recognizing and addressing power relationships across stakeholder groups that hold different values on human nature-relations and NCP.

TL;DR: The analysis reveals the substantial potential of SES models to address issues that are of utmost importance for managing complex human-environment relationships, such as: the implications of ecological and social structure for resource management, and uncertainty in natural and social systems and ways to address it.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors systematically define and delineate sustainability economics in terms of its normative foundation, aims, subject matter, ontology, and genuine research agenda, and propose an ontology for sustainability economics.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the relationship between resilience and sustainability of ecological-economic systems and conclude that more criteria than just resilience have to be taken into account when designing policies for the sustainable development of ecological economic systems, and vice versa, the property of resilience should not be confused with the positive normative connotations of sustainability.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors systematically define and delineate sustainability economics in terms of its normative foundation, aims, subject matter, ontology, and genuine research agenda, and propose an ontology for sustainability economics.