scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Martin H. Redish

Bio: Martin H. Redish is an academic researcher from Northwestern University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Supreme court & Commercial speech. The author has an hindex of 13, co-authored 118 publications receiving 683 citations. Previous affiliations of Martin H. Redish include Villanova University & Washington University in St. Louis.


Papers
More filters
Journal Article
TL;DR: The question of what value does free speech serve may well determine the extent of constitutional protection to be given to such forms of expression as literature, art, science, commercial speech, and speech related to the political process as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: Commentators and jurists have long searched for an explanation of the true value served by the first amendment's protection of free speech. This issue certainly has considerable intellectual appeal, and the practical stakes are also high. For the answer we give to the question what value does free speech serve may well determine the extent of constitutional protection to be given to such forms of expression as literature, art, science, commercial speech, and speech related to the political process. There seems to be general agreement that the Supreme Court has failed in its attempts to devise a coherent theory of free expression.1 These efforts have been characterized by \"a pattern of aborted doctrines, shifting rationales, and frequent changes of position by individual Justices.\" 2 Commentators, by contrast, have been eager to elaborate upon their unified theories of the value of free speech. Professor Emerson, probably the leading modern theorist of free speech, has recognized four separate values served by the first amendment's protection of expression: (1) \"assuring individual self-fulfillment;\" 3 (2) \"advancing knowledge and discovering truth;\" 4 (3) \"provid[ing] for participation in decisionmaking by all members of society;\" 1 and (4) \"achieving a more adaptable and hence a more stable community,... maintaining the precarious balance between healthy cleavage and necessary consensus.\" ' Al-

75 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: Redish is the author of The Adversary First Amendment (Stanford University Press, 2013) and Money Talks: Speech, Economic Power and the Values of Democracy (N.Y.U. Press, 2001) as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: Martin H. Redish is the Louis and Harriet Ancel Professor of Law and Public Policy at Northwestern Pritzker School of Law. Redish is the author of The Adversary First Amendment (Stanford University Press, 2013) and Money Talks: Speech, Economic Power, and the Values of Democracy (N.Y.U. Press, 2001), among other scholarly works on free expression. He is currently working on Commercial Speech and the First Amendment in the TwentyFirst Century, to be published by Cambridge University Press. The author thanks Andrew Stebbins of the class of 2017 at Indiana University Maurer School of Law for his invaluable research assistance. Commercial Speech and the Values of Free Expression by Martin H. Redish

24 citations


Cited by
More filters
01 Jan 2014
TL;DR: In this paper, Cardozo et al. proposed a model for conflict resolution in the context of bankruptcy resolution, which is based on the work of the Cardozo Institute of Conflict Resolution.
Abstract: American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review 17 Am. Bankr. Inst. L. Rev., No. 1, Spring, 2009. Boston College Law Review 50 B.C. L. Rev., No. 3, May, 2009. Boston University Public Interest Law Journal 18 B.U. Pub. Int. L.J., No. 2, Spring, 2009. Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 10 Cardozo J. Conflict Resol., No. 2, Spring, 2009. Cardozo Public Law, Policy, & Ethics Journal 7 Cardozo Pub. L. Pol’y & Ethics J., No. 3, Summer, 2009. Chicago Journal of International Law 10 Chi. J. Int’l L., No. 1, Summer, 2009. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 20 Colo. J. Int’l Envtl. L. & Pol’y, No. 2, Winter, 2009. Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts 32 Colum. J.L. & Arts, No. 3, Spring, 2009. Connecticut Public Interest Law Journal 8 Conn. Pub. Int. L.J., No. 2, Spring-Summer, 2009. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 18 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol’y, No. 1, Fall, 2008. Cornell Law Review 94 Cornell L. Rev., No. 5, July, 2009. Creighton Law Review 42 Creighton L. Rev., No. 3, April, 2009. Criminal Law Forum 20 Crim. L. Forum, Nos. 2-3, Pp. 173-394, 2009. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 34 Del. J. Corp. L., No. 2, Pp. 433-754, 2009. Environmental Law Reporter News & Analysis 39 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis, No. 7, July, 2009. European Journal of International Law 20 Eur. J. Int’l L., No. 2, April, 2009. Family Law Quarterly 43 Fam. L.Q., No. 1, Spring, 2009. Georgetown Journal of International Law 40 Geo. J. Int’l L., No. 3, Spring, 2009. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 22 Geo. J. Legal Ethics, No. 2, Spring, 2009. Golden Gate University Law Review 39 Golden Gate U. L. Rev., No. 2, Winter, 2009. Harvard Environmental Law Review 33 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev., No. 2, Pp. 297-608, 2009. International Review of Law and Economics 29 Int’l Rev. L. & Econ., No. 1, March, 2009. Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation 24 J. Envtl. L. & Litig., No. 1, Pp. 1-201, 2009. Journal of Legislation 34 J. Legis., No. 1, Pp. 1-98, 2008. Journal of Technology Law & Policy 14 J. Tech. L. & Pol’y, No. 1, June, 2009. Labor Lawyer 24 Lab. Law., No. 3, Winter/Spring, 2009. Michigan Journal of International Law 30 Mich. J. Int’l L., No. 3, Spring, 2009. New Criminal Law Review 12 New Crim. L. Rev., No. 2, Spring, 2009. Northern Kentucky Law Review 36 N. Ky. L. Rev., No. 4, Pp. 445-654, 2009. Ohio Northern University Law Review 35 Ohio N.U. L. Rev., No. 2, Pp. 445-886, 2009. Pace Law Review 29 Pace L. Rev., No. 3, Spring, 2009. Quinnipiac Health Law Journal 12 Quinnipiac Health L.J., No. 2, Pp. 209-332, 2008-2009. Real Property, Trust and Estate Law Journal 44 Real Prop. Tr. & Est. L.J., No. 1, Spring, 2009. Rutgers Race and the Law Review 10 Rutgers Race & L. Rev., No. 2, Pp. 441-629, 2009. San Diego Law Review 46 San Diego L. Rev., No. 2, Spring, 2009. Seton Hall Law Review 39 Seton Hall L. Rev., No. 3, Pp. 725-1102, 2009. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 18 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J., No. 3, Spring, 2009. Stanford Environmental Law Journal 28 Stan. Envtl. L.J., No. 3, July, 2009. Tulsa Law Review 44 Tulsa L. Rev., No. 2, Winter, 2008. UMKC Law Review 77 UMKC L. Rev., No. 4, Summer, 2009. Washburn Law Journal 48 Washburn L.J., No. 3, Spring, 2009. Washington University Global Studies Law Review 8 Wash. U. Global Stud. L. Rev., No. 3, Pp.451-617, 2009. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 29 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol’y, Pp. 1-401, 2009. Washington University Law Review 86 Wash. U. L. Rev., No. 6, Pp. 1273-1521, 2009. William Mitchell Law Review 35 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev., No. 4, Pp. 1235-1609, 2009. Yale Journal of International Law 34 Yale J. Int’l L., No. 2, Summer, 2009. Yale Journal on Regulation 26 Yale J. on Reg., No. 2, Summer, 2009.

1,336 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present an analysis of the diversity principle in communications policy, focusing on diversity as a measurable concept, with potentially interacting dimensions and numerous means of assessment, in the spirit of the Federal Communication Commission's empirical commitment to diversity.
Abstract: This article presents an examination of the diversity principle in communications policy. Given the Federal Communication Commission's recent emphasis on diversity as a policy objective, diversity assessments must return to the forefront of communications policy analysis. To provide an analytical framework for such research, the diversity principle is broken into three distinct components (source, content, and exposure diversity), and multiple subcomponents. In the spirit of the FCC's empirical commitment to the diversity principle, this analysis focuses on diversity as a measurable concept, with potentially interacting dimensions and numerous means of assessment.

287 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The concept of a chronic street nuisance was introduced in this article, where the authors proposed a formal definition of such a nuisance, based on the Tragedy of Agora and the Agora tragedy.
Abstract: II. CHRONIC NUISANCES IN PUBLIC SPACES .................. 1173 A. The Tragedy of the Agora ......................... 1174 B. The Concept of a Chronic Street Nuisance ............. 1175 1. Harms of Chronic Street Misconduct in General ...... 1177 2. Chronic Panhandling ......................... 1179 a. Benefits of Panhandling ..................... 1179 b. Harms of Panhandling ..................... 1181 3. Chronic Bench Squatting ....................... 1183 C. A Recommended Doctrinal Definition of a Chronic Street Nuisance ................................ 1184 1. A Proposed Prima Facie Case ................... 1184 a. The Proposal ............................ 1185 b. The Inadequacy of an "Effect on the Street Headcount" Test .......................... 1186 c. Only Acts, Not a Status, Can Create a Nuisance ... 1186

190 citations

Book
27 Mar 2005

188 citations

DissertationDOI
01 Jan 2019
TL;DR: Theological significance of the relation of freedom and time in the SCIENCES and human beings is discussed in this paper. But the focus of this paper is on the relationship between freedom, freedom, and time.
Abstract: THE THEOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE RELATIONS OF FREEDOM AND TIME IN THE SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES: AN EVALUATION OF THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF DAVID BOHM AND PAULI PYLKKÖ by Michael F. Younker Adviser: Martin Hanna ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCHOF GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH

172 citations