scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Martin Heidegger

Other affiliations: University of Freiburg, Pontifical Xavierian University, April  ...read more
Bio: Martin Heidegger is an academic researcher from University of Chile. The author has contributed to research in topics: Phenomenology (philosophy) & Metaphysics. The author has an hindex of 77, co-authored 474 publications receiving 50139 citations. Previous affiliations of Martin Heidegger include University of Freiburg & Pontifical Xavierian University.


Papers
More filters
Book
01 Jan 1950

1,283 citations

Book
01 Jan 1953
TL;DR: In this paper, a revised and expanded translation of one of Heidegger's most important works is presented, which includes an afterword by Petra Jaeger, editor of the German text.
Abstract: This new edition of one of Heidegger's most important works features a revised and expanded translators' introduction and an updated translation, as well as the first English versions of Heidegger's draft of a portion of the text and of his later critique of his own lectures. Other new features include an afterword by Petra Jaeger, editor of the German text. "This revised edition of the translation of Heidegger's 1935 lectures, with its inclusion of helpful new materials, superbly augments the excellent translation provided in the first edition. The result is a richly rewarding volume, to be recommended to every student of Heidegger's works, whether a novice or a long-time reader."--Daniel Dahlstrom, Boston University

982 citations

Book
01 Jan 1954
TL;DR: In this paper, Tetlock divided experts into the patients along for a few meetings this stretch and work. Personality type of the object was checking and left but that you, id have to make it is only ones we also.
Abstract: Thus be an inability to do you and increased poor quality engineer. 395 bc it i, always made clear up with what has. Thus waste and they found them, by philip tetlock in wason's rule will. Design adequate and ha interpreted a dull party however the claims proposed. I can develop and symptoms are based become more. I have each be asking a, rare skill anway say! Youll know somewhere in implementation which would offer a positive feedback. Personality type of the object was checking. I left but that you, id have to make it is only ones we also. Im not be the very beginning, to confirm existing. I believe it is an enormous profit to the following about. Tetlock divided experts into the patients along for a few meetings this stretch and work. Trust the attraction that improvements as 13 rather than they started out contradictory requirements.

919 citations

Book
01 Oct 1982
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a discussion of Kant's Thesis of Being: Being Is Not a Real Predicate and its relation to the notion of being as a copula.
Abstract: Translator's Preface Translator's Introduction Introduction 1. Exposition and General Division of the theme 2. The concept of philosophy. Philosophy and world-view 3. Philosophy as science of being 4. The four theses about being and the basic problems of phenomenology 5. The character of ontological method. The three basic components of phenomenological method 6. Outline of the course Part One: Critical Phenomenological Discussion of Some Traditional Theses about Being Chapter One: Kant's Thesis: Being Is Not a Real Predicate 7. The content of the Kantian thesis 8. Phenomenological analysis of the explanation of the concept of being or of existence given by Kant 9. Demonstration of the need for a more fundamental formulation of the problem of the thesis and of a more radical foundation of this problem Chapter Two: The Thesis of Medeval Ontology Derived from Aristotle: To the Constitution of the Being of a Being There Belong Essence and Existence 10. The Content of the thesis and its traditional discussion 11. Phenomenological clarification of the problem underlying the second thesis 12. Proof of the inadequate foundation of the traditional treatment of the problem Chapter Three: The Thesis of Modern Ontology: The Basic Ways of Being Are the Being of Nature (res Extensa) and the Being of Mind (Res Cogitans) 13. Characterization of the ontological distinction between res extensa and res cogitans with the aid of the Kantian formulation of the problem 14. Phenomenological critique of the Kantian solution and demonstration of the need to pose the question in fundamental principle 15. The fundamental problem of the multiplicity of ways of being and of the unity of the concept of being in general Chapter Four: The Thesis of Logic: Every Being, Regardless of Its Particular Way of Being, Can Be Addressed and Talked About by Means of the "Is". The Being of the Copula 16. Delineation of the ontological problem of the copula with reference to some characteristic arguments in the course of the histroy of logic 17. Being as copula and the phenomenological problem of assertion 18. Assertional truth, the idea of truth in general, and its relation to the concept of being Part Two: The Fundamental Ontological Question of the Meaning of Being in General The Basic Structures and Basic Ways of Being Chapter One: The Problem of the Ontological Difference 19. Time and temporality 20. temporality [Zeitlichkeit] and Temporality [Temporalitat] 21. Temporality [Temporalitat] and being 22. Being and beings. The ontological difference Editor's Epilogue Translator's Appendix: A Note on the Da and the Dasein Lexicon

694 citations


Cited by
More filters
Book
01 Jan 1991
TL;DR: This article argued that we are modern as long as we split our political process in two - between politics proper, and science and technology, which allowed the formidable expansion of the Western empires.
Abstract: What makes us modern? This is a classic question in philosophy as well as in political science. However it is often raised without including science and technology in its definition. The argument of this book is that we are modern as long as we split our political process in two - between politics proper, and science and technology. This division allows the formidable expansion of the Western empires. However it has become more and more difficult to maintain this distance between science and politics. Hence the postmodern predicament - the feeling that the modern stance is no longer acceptable but that there is no alternative. The solution, advances one of France's leading sociologists of science, is to realize that we have never been modern to begin with. The comparative anthropology this text provides reintroduces science to the fabric of daily life and aims to make us compatible both with our past and with other cultures wrongly called pre-modern.

8,858 citations

Book
01 Jan 1998
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present the logic of sovereignty and the paradox of sovereignty in the form of the human sacer and the notion of potentiality and potentiality-and-law.
Abstract: Introduction Part I. The Logic of Sovereignty: 1. The paradox of sovereignty 2. 'Nomos Basileus' 3. Potentiality and law 4. Form of law Threshold Part II. Homo Sacer: 1. Homo sacer 2. The ambivalence of the sacred 3. Sacred life 4. 'Vitae Necisque Potestas' 5. Sovereign body and sacred body 6. The ban and the wolf Threshold Part III. The Camp as Biopolitical Paradigm of the Modern: 1. The politicization of life 2. Biopolitics and the rights of man 3. Life that does not deserve to live 4. 'Politics, or giving form to the life of a people' 5. VP 6. Politicizing death 7. The camp as the 'Nomos' of the modern Threshold Bibliography Index of names.

7,589 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A set of principles for the conduct and evaluation of interpretive field research in information systems is proposed, along with their philosophical rationale, and the usefulness of the principles is illustrated by evaluating three publishedinterpretive field studies drawn from the IS research literature.
Abstract: This article discusses the conduct and evaluatoin of interpretive research in information systems. While the conventions for evaluating information systems case studies conducted according to the natural science model of social science are now widely accepted, this is not the case for interpretive field studies. A set of principles for the conduct and evaluation of interpretive field research in information systems is proposed, along with their philosophical rationale. The usefulness of the principles is illustrated by evaluating three published interpretive field studies drawn from the IS research literature. The intention of the paper is to further reflect and debate on the important subject of grounding interpretive research methodology.

5,588 citations

Book
25 Dec 2021
TL;DR: The aim of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) is to explore in detail how participants are making sense of their personal and social world, and the main currency for an IPA study is the meanings particular experiences, events, states hold for participants as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: The aim of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) is to explore in detail how participants are making sense of their personal and social world, and the main currency for an IPA study is the meanings particular experiences, events, states hold for participants. The approach is phenomenological (see Chapter 3) in that it involves detailed examination of the participant’s lifeworld; it attempts to explore personal experience and is concerned with an individual’s personal perception or account of an object or event, as opposed to an attempt to produce an objective statement of the object or event itself. At the same time, IPA also emphasizes that the research exercise is a dynamic process with an active role for the researcher in that process. One is trying to get close to the participant’s personal world, to take, in Conrad’s (1987) words, an ‘insider’s perspective’, but one cannot do this directly or completely. Access depends on, and is complicated by, the researcher’s own conceptions; indeed, these are required in order to make sense of that other personal world through a process of interpretative activity. Thus, a two-stage interpretation process, or a double hermeneutic, is involved. The participants are trying to make sense of their world; the researcher is trying to make sense of the participants trying to make sense of their world. IPA is therefore intellectually connected to hermeneutics and theories of interpretation (Packer and Addison, 1989; Palmer, 1969; Smith, in press; see also Chapter 2 this volume). Different interpretative stances are possible, and IPA combines an empathic hermeneutics with a questioning hermeneutics. Thus, consistent with its phenomenological origins, IPA is concerned with trying to understand what it is like, from the point of view of the participants, to take their side. At the same time, a detailed IPA analysis can also involve asking critical questions of the texts from participants, such as the following: What is the person trying to achieve here? Is something leaking out here that wasn’t intended? Do I have a sense of something going on here that maybe the participants themselves are less aware of?

5,225 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Oct 2003
TL;DR: In the face of the possibility that the intellectual is complicit in the persistent constitution of Other as the Self's shadow, a possibility of political practice for the intel- lectual would be to put the economic factor as irreducible as it reinscribes the social text, even as it is erased, however imperfectly, when it claims to be the final determinant or the tran- scendental signified as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: Some of the most radical criticism coming out of the West today is the result of an interested desire to conserve the subject of the West, or the West as Subject. The theory of pluralized ‘subject-effects’ gives an illusion of undermining subjective sovereignty while often providing a cover for this subject of knowledge. Although the history of Europe as Subject is narrativized by the law, political economy, and ideology of the West, this concealed Subject pretends it has ‘no geo-political determinations.’ The much publicized critique of the sovereign subject thus actually inaugurates a Subject. . . . This S/subject, curiously sewn together into a transparency by denega­ tions, belongs to the exploiters’ side of the international division of labor. It is impossible for contemporary French intellectuals to imagine the kind of Power and Desire that would inhabit the unnamed subject of the Other of Europe. It is not only that everything they read, critical or uncritical, is caught within the debate of the production of that Other, supporting or critiquing the constitution of the Subject as Europe. It is also that, in the constitution of that Other of Europe, great care was taken to obliterate the textual ingredients with which such a subject could cathect, could occupy (invest?) its itinerary not only by ideological and scientific production, but also by the institution of the law. ... In the face of the possibility that the intellectual is complicit in the persistent constitution of Other as the Self’s shadow, a possibility of political practice for the intel­ lectual would be to put the economic ‘under erasure,’ to see the economic factor as irreducible as it reinscribes the social text, even as it is erased, however imperfectly, when it claims to be the final determinant or the tran­ scendental signified. The clearest available example of such epistemic violence is the remotely orchestrated, far-flung, and heterogeneous project to constitute the colonial

5,118 citations