Martin Heidegger

Bio: Martin Heidegger is an academic researcher from University of Chile. The author has contributed to research in topics: Phenomenology (philosophy) & Metaphysics. The author has an hindex of 77, co-authored 474 publications receiving 50139 citations. Previous affiliations of Martin Heidegger include University of Freiburg & Pontifical Xavierian University.

On the Essence of Truth

Abstract: Our topic is the essence of truth The question regarding the essence of truth is not concerned with whether truth is a truth of practical experience or of economic calculation, the truth of a technical consideration or of political sagacity, or, in particular, a truth of scientific research or of artistic composition, or even the truth of thoughtful reflection or of cultic belief The question of essence disregards all this and attends to the one thing that in general distinguishes every “truth” as truth

The principle of reason

Abstract: TranslatorOs Introduction Foreword Lecture Course Lecture One Lecture Two Lecture Three Lecture Four Lecture Five Lecture Six Lecture Seven Lecture Eight Lecture Nine Lecture Ten Lecture Eleven Lecture Twelve Lecture Thirteen Address The Principle of Reason Bibliographical Notes Notes on the Translation Glossaries

The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic

Abstract: Key to References Cited in the Text Introduction I. On the traditional conception of logic II. Introduction to the idea of philosophy III. The Definition of philosophy according to Aristotle IV. The Basic question of philosophy and the question of man V. Basic problems of a philosophical logic VI. The traditional classifications of logic and the task of returning to the foundations of this logic Preliminary Note Firt Major Part Dismantling LeibnizOs Doctrine of Judgement Down to Basic Metaphysical Problems 1. Characterization of the general structure of judgment 2. Judgement and the idea of truth. The basic forms of truth In memoriam Max Scheler 3. The idea of truth and the principles of knowledge Summary 4. The idea of knowledge as such 5. The essential determination of the being of genuine beings a) The monad as drive b) Intermediate reflections to find the guiding clue for the interpretation of being c) The structure 6. The basic notion of being as such (not carried out) 7. The theory of judgment and the notion of being. Logic and ontology Second Major Part The Metaphysics of the Principle of Reason as the Foundational Problem of Logic First Section: Exposition of teh Dimensions of the Problem 8. The principle of ground as a rule of thought 9. The essence of truth and its essential relation to OgroundO a) The essence of propositional truth b) Intentionality and transcendence 10. The problem of transcendence and the problem of Being and Time Appendix: Describing the Idea and Function of a Fundamental Ontology Second Section: The problem of Ground 11. The transcendence of Dasein a) On the concept of transcendence b) The phenomenon of world c) Freedom and world 12. Transcendence and temporality (nihil originarium) 13. Transcendence temporalizing itself in temporality and the essence of ground 14. The essence of ground and the idea of logic supplement: distance and nearness editorOs epilogue translatorOs afterword index

We Have Never Been Modern

Abstract: What makes us modern? This is a classic question in philosophy as well as in political science. However it is often raised without including science and technology in its definition. The argument of this book is that we are modern as long as we split our political process in two - between politics proper, and science and technology. This division allows the formidable expansion of the Western empires. However it has become more and more difficult to maintain this distance between science and politics. Hence the postmodern predicament - the feeling that the modern stance is no longer acceptable but that there is no alternative. The solution, advances one of France's leading sociologists of science, is to realize that we have never been modern to begin with. The comparative anthropology this text provides reintroduces science to the fabric of daily life and aims to make us compatible both with our past and with other cultures wrongly called pre-modern.

Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life

Abstract: Introduction Part I. The Logic of Sovereignty: 1. The paradox of sovereignty 2. 'Nomos Basileus' 3. Potentiality and law 4. Form of law Threshold Part II. Homo Sacer: 1. Homo sacer 2. The ambivalence of the sacred 3. Sacred life 4. 'Vitae Necisque Potestas' 5. Sovereign body and sacred body 6. The ban and the wolf Threshold Part III. The Camp as Biopolitical Paradigm of the Modern: 1. The politicization of life 2. Biopolitics and the rights of man 3. Life that does not deserve to live 4. 'Politics, or giving form to the life of a people' 5. VP 6. Politicizing death 7. The camp as the 'Nomos' of the modern Threshold Bibliography Index of names.

A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems

Abstract: This article discusses the conduct and evaluatoin of interpretive research in information systems. While the conventions for evaluating information systems case studies conducted according to the natural science model of social science are now widely accepted, this is not the case for interpretive field studies. A set of principles for the conduct and evaluation of interpretive field research in information systems is proposed, along with their philosophical rationale. The usefulness of the principles is illustrated by evaluating three published interpretive field studies drawn from the IS research literature. The intention of the paper is to further reflect and debate on the important subject of grounding interpretive research methodology.

Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis

Abstract: The aim of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) is to explore in detail how participants are making sense of their personal and social world, and the main currency for an IPA study is the meanings particular experiences, events, states hold for participants. The approach is phenomenological (see Chapter 3) in that it involves detailed examination of the participant’s lifeworld; it attempts to explore personal experience and is concerned with an individual’s personal perception or account of an object or event, as opposed to an attempt to produce an objective statement of the object or event itself. At the same time, IPA also emphasizes that the research exercise is a dynamic process with an active role for the researcher in that process. One is trying to get close to the participant’s personal world, to take, in Conrad’s (1987) words, an ‘insider’s perspective’, but one cannot do this directly or completely. Access depends on, and is complicated by, the researcher’s own conceptions; indeed, these are required in order to make sense of that other personal world through a process of interpretative activity. Thus, a two-stage interpretation process, or a double hermeneutic, is involved. The participants are trying to make sense of their world; the researcher is trying to make sense of the participants trying to make sense of their world. IPA is therefore intellectually connected to hermeneutics and theories of interpretation (Packer and Addison, 1989; Palmer, 1969; Smith, in press; see also Chapter 2 this volume). Different interpretative stances are possible, and IPA combines an empathic hermeneutics with a questioning hermeneutics. Thus, consistent with its phenomenological origins, IPA is concerned with trying to understand what it is like, from the point of view of the participants, to take their side. At the same time, a detailed IPA analysis can also involve asking critical questions of the texts from participants, such as the following: What is the person trying to achieve here? Is something leaking out here that wasn’t intended? Do I have a sense of something going on here that maybe the participants themselves are less aware of?

Can the Subaltern Speak

Abstract: Some of the most radical criticism coming out of the West today is the result of an interested desire to conserve the subject of the West, or the West as Subject. The theory of pluralized ‘subject-effects’ gives an illusion of undermining subjective sovereignty while often providing a cover for this subject of knowledge. Although the history of Europe as Subject is narrativized by the law, political economy, and ideology of the West, this concealed Subject pretends it has ‘no geo-political determinations.’ The much publicized critique of the sovereign subject thus actually inaugurates a Subject. . . . This S/subject, curiously sewn together into a transparency by denega­ tions, belongs to the exploiters’ side of the international division of labor. It is impossible for contemporary French intellectuals to imagine the kind of Power and Desire that would inhabit the unnamed subject of the Other of Europe. It is not only that everything they read, critical or uncritical, is caught within the debate of the production of that Other, supporting or critiquing the constitution of the Subject as Europe. It is also that, in the constitution of that Other of Europe, great care was taken to obliterate the textual ingredients with which such a subject could cathect, could occupy (invest?) its itinerary not only by ideological and scientific production, but also by the institution of the law. ... In the face of the possibility that the intellectual is complicit in the persistent constitution of Other as the Self’s shadow, a possibility of political practice for the intel­ lectual would be to put the economic ‘under erasure,’ to see the economic factor as irreducible as it reinscribes the social text, even as it is erased, however imperfectly, when it claims to be the final determinant or the tran­ scendental signified. The clearest available example of such epistemic violence is the remotely orchestrated, far-flung, and heterogeneous project to constitute the colonial