scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Masato Kagitani

Bio: Masato Kagitani is an academic researcher from Tohoku University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Jupiter & Linear polarization. The author has an hindex of 19, co-authored 83 publications receiving 1274 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Mauri Valtonen1, Stanisław Zoła2, Stanisław Zoła3, Stefano Ciprini4, Stefano Ciprini5, Achamveedu Gopakumar6, Katsura Matsumoto7, Kozo Sadakane7, M. R. Kidger8, Kosmas Gazeas9, Kari Nilsson1, Andrei Berdyugin1, Vilppu Piirola1, Helen Jermak10, Kiran S. Baliyan11, F. Alicavus12, David Boyd, M. Campas Torrent, F. Campos, J. Carrillo Gómez, Daniel B. Caton13, V. H. Chavushyan14, J. Dalessio15, B. Debski2, Dinko Dimitrov, Marek Drozdz3, H. Er16, Ahmet Erdem12, A. Escartin Pérez, V. Fallah Ramazani1, Alexei V. Filippenko17, Shashikiran Ganesh11, F. Garcia, F. Gómez Pinilla, Maheswar Gopinathan18, J. B. Haislip19, René Hudec20, René Hudec21, G. Hurst, K. M. Ivarsen19, Martin Jelínek21, Arti Joshi18, Masato Kagitani22, Navpreet Kaur11, William C. Keel23, Aaron P. LaCluyze19, Byeong-Cheol Lee24, Byeong-Cheol Lee25, Elina Lindfors1, J. Lozano de Haro, J. P. Moore19, Markus Mugrauer, R. Naves Nogues, A. W. Neely, R. H. Nelson, Waldemar Ogloza3, S. Okano22, Jeewan C. Pandey18, M. Perri5, M. Perri26, Pauli Pihajoki27, Gary Poyner, Judith L. Provencal15, T. Pursimo, A. Raj24, A. Raj25, Daniel E. Reichart19, R. Reinthal1, S. Sadegi1, Takeshi Sakanoi22, J.-L. Salto González, Sameer11, T. Schweyer28, T. Schweyer29, Michal Siwak3, F. C. Soldán Alfaro, Eda Sonbas, Iain A. Steele10, John T. Stocke30, Jan Strobl21, L. O. Takalo1, Toma Tomov31, L. Tremosa Espasa, J. R. Valdes14, J. Valero Pérez, F. Verrecchia5, F. Verrecchia26, James R. Webb32, Mizuki Yoneda, M. Zejmo33, WeiKang Zheng17, J. H. Telting, J. Saario, T. M. Reynolds, Andreas Kvammen, E. Gafton, R. Karjalainen, Jussi Harmanen1, Pere Blay34 
TL;DR: In this paper, a quasi-periodic quasar with roughly 12-year optical cycles displays prominent outbursts that are predictable in a binary black hole model, and the model predicted a major optical outburst in 2015 December.
Abstract: OJ 287 is a quasi-periodic quasar with roughly 12 year optical cycles. It displays prominent outbursts that are predictable in a binary black hole model. The model predicted a major optical outburst in 2015 December. We found that the outburst did occur within the expected time range, peaking on 2015 December 5 at magnitude 12.9 in the optical R-band. Based on Swift/XRT satellite measurements and optical polarization data, we find that it included a major thermal component. Its timing provides an accurate estimate for the spin of the primary black hole, $\chi =0.313\pm 0.01$. The present outburst also confirms the established general relativistic properties of the system such as the loss of orbital energy to gravitational radiation at the 2% accuracy level, and it opens up the possibility of testing the black hole no-hair theorem with 10% accuracy during the present decade.

118 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors found that the outburst did occur within the expected time range, peaking on 2015 December 5 at magnitude 12.9 in the optical R-band, based on Swift/XRT satellite measurements and optical polarization data.
Abstract: OJ287 is a quasi-periodic quasar with roughly 12 year optical cycles. It displays prominent outbursts which are predictable in a binary black hole model. The model predicted a major optical outburst in December 2015. We found that the outburst did occur within the expected time range, peaking on 2015 December 5 at magnitude 12.9 in the optical R-band. Based on Swift/XRT satellite measurements and optical polarization data, we find that it included a major thermal component. Its timing provides an accurate estimate for the spin of the primary black hole, chi = 0.313 +- 0.01. The present outburst also confirms the established general relativistic properties of the system such as the loss of orbital energy to gravitational radiation at the 2 % accuracy level and it opens up the possibility of testing the black hole no-hair theorem with a 10 % accuracy during the present decade.

103 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Sprint-A satellite with the EUV spectrometer (Extreme Ultraviolet Spectroscope for Exospheric Dynamics: EXCEED) was launched in September 2013 by the Epsilon rocket.
Abstract: The Sprint-A satellite with the EUV spectrometer (Extreme Ultraviolet Spectroscope for Exospheric Dynamics: EXCEED) was launched in September 2013 by the Epsilon rocket. Now it is orbiting around the Earth (954.05 km×1156.87 km orbit; the period is 104 minutes) and one has started a broad and varied observation program. With an effective area of more than 1 cm2 and well-calibrated sensitivity in space, the EUV spectrometer will produce spectral images (520–1480 A) of the atmospheres/magnetospheres of several planets (Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn) from the Earth’s orbit. At the first day of the observation, EUV emissions from the Io plasma torus (mainly sulfur ions) and aurora (H2 Lyman and Werner bands) of Jupiter have been identified. Continuous 3-month measurement for Io’s plasma torus and aurora is planned to witness the sporadic and sudden brightening events occurring on one or both regions. For Venus, the Fourth Positive (A1 Π-X1 Σ +) system of CO and some yet known emissions of the atmosphere were identified even though the exposure was short (8-min). Long-term exposure from April to June (for approximately 2 months) will visualize the Venusian ionosphere and tail in the EUV spectral range. Saturn and Mars are the next targets.

75 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Lankeswar Dey1, Mauri Valtonen2, Achamveedu Gopakumar1, Stanisław Zoła3, Stanisław Zoła4, René Hudec5, René Hudec6, Pauli Pihajoki7, Stefano Ciprini8, Stefano Ciprini9, Katsura Matsumoto10, Kozo Sadakane10, M. R. Kidger11, Kari Nilsson2, Seppo Mikkola2, A. Sillanpää2, L. O. Takalo2, Harry Lehto2, Andrei Berdyugin2, Vilppu Piirola2, Helen Jermak12, Kiran S. Baliyan13, T. Pursimo, Daniel B. Caton14, F. Alicavus15, A. Baransky, Pere Blay16, P. Boumis, David Boyd, M. Campas Torrent, F. Campos, J. Carrillo Gómez, Sudeep Chandra17, V. H. Chavushyan18, J. Dalessio19, B. Debski4, Marek Drozdz3, H. Er20, Ahmet Erdem15, A. Escartin Pérez, V. Fallah Ramazani2, Alexei V. Filippenko21, E. Gafton22, Shashikiran Ganesh13, F. Garcia, Kosmas Gazeas23, V. Godunova, F. Gómez Pinilla, Maheswar Gopinathan24, J. B. Haislip25, Jussi Harmanen2, G. Hurst, Jan Janík26, Martin Jelínek5, Martin Jelínek27, Arti Joshi24, Masato Kagitani28, R. Karjalainen, Navpreet Kaur13, William C. Keel29, Vladimir Kouprianov25, Vladimir Kouprianov30, T. Kundera4, Sebastian Kurowski4, Andreas Kvammen31, Aaron P. LaCluyze25, Byeong-Cheol Lee32, Byeong-Cheol Lee33, Alexios Liakos, Elina Lindfors2, J. Lozano de Haro, Markus Mugrauer, R. Naves Nogues, A. W. Neely, R. H. Nelson, Waldemar Ogloza3, S. Okano28, Urszula Pajdosz-Śmierciak4, Jeewan C. Pandey24, M. Perri34, M. Perri9, Gary Poyner, Judith L. Provencal19, A. Raj35, Daniel E. Reichart25, R. Reinthal2, T. M. Reynolds, J. Saario36, S. Sadegi37, Takeshi Sakanoi28, J.-L. Salto González, Sameer38, T. Schweyer39, T. Schweyer40, A. Simon, Michal Siwak3, F. C. Soldán Alfaro, Eda Sonbas, Iain A. Steele12, John T. Stocke41, Jan Strobl27, Jan Strobl5, Toma Tomov42, L. Tremosa Espasa, J. R. Valdes18, J. Valero Pérez, F. Verrecchia34, F. Verrecchia9, V. Vasylenko, James R. Webb43, Mizuki Yoneda, M. Zejmo44, WeiKang Zheng21, P. Zielinski45 
TL;DR: In this article, it was shown that even the effects of certain hereditary contributions to GW emission are required to predict impact flare timings of OJ 287, and they developed an approach that incorporated this effect into the BBH model for OJ287.
Abstract: Results from regular monitoring of relativistic compact binaries like PSR 1913+16 are consistent with the dominant (quadrupole) order emission of gravitational waves (GWs). We show that observations associated with the binary black hole (BBH) central engine of blazar OJ 287 demand the inclusion of gravitational radiation reaction effects beyond the quadrupolar order. It turns out that even the effects of certain hereditary contributions to GW emission are required to predict impact flare timings of OJ 287. We develop an approach that incorporates this effect into the BBH model for OJ 287. This allows us to demonstrate an excellent agreement between the observed impact flare timings and those predicted from ten orbital cycles of the BBH central engine model. The deduced rate of orbital period decay is nine orders of magnitude higher than the observed rate in PSR 1913+16, demonstrating again the relativistic nature of OJ 287's central engine. Finally, we argue that precise timing of the predicted 2019 impact flare should allow a test of the celebrated black hole "no-hair theorem" at the 10% level.

71 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Arti Goyal1, Łukasz Stawarz1, Stanisław Zoła2, Stanisław Zoła1, Volodymyr Marchenko1, Marian Soida1, Kari Nilsson3, Stefano Ciprini4, Stefano Ciprini5, Andrzej S. Baran2, Michal Ostrowski1, Paul J. Wiita6, Gopal-Krishna7, Aneta Siemiginowska8, Malgosia Sobolewska8, Svetlana G. Jorstad9, Svetlana G. Jorstad10, Alan P. Marscher10, M. F. Aller11, Hugh D. Aller11, Talvikki Hovatta3, Daniel B. Caton12, Daniel E. Reichart13, Katsura Matsumoto14, Kozo Sadakane14, Kosmas Gazeas15, M. Kidger16, Vilppu Piirola3, Helen Jermak17, F. Alicavus18, Kiran S. Baliyan19, A. Baransky, A. Berdyugin6, Pere Blay20, P. Boumis, David Boyd, Y. Bufan21, M. Campas Torrent, F. Campos, J. Carrillo Gómez, J. Dalessio22, B. Debski1, Dinko Dimitrov23, Marek Drozdz2, H. Er24, Ahmet Erdem18, A. Escartin Pérez, V. Fallah Ramazani3, Alexei V. Filippenko25, E. Gafton, F. Garcia, V. Godunova, F. Gómez Pinilla, Maheswar Gopinathan26, J. B. Haislip13, S. Haque27, Jussi Harmanen3, René Hudec28, René Hudec29, G. Hurst, K. M. Ivarsen13, Arti Joshi26, Masato Kagitani30, N. Karaman, R. Karjalainen, Navpreet Kaur19, Navpreet Kaur31, Dorota Kozieł-Wierzbowska1, E. Kuligowska1, T. Kundera1, Sebastian Kurowski1, Andreas Kvammen, Aaron P. LaCluyze13, Byeong-Cheol Lee32, Alexios Liakos, J. Lozano de Haro, J. P. Moore13, Markus Mugrauer33, R. Naves Nogues, A. W. Neely, Waldemar Ogloza2, S. Okano30, U. Pajdosz1, J. C. Pandey26, M. Perri5, M. Perri34, Gary Poyner, Judith L. Provencal22, T. Pursimo, A. Raj35, B. Rajkumar27, R. Reinthal3, T. M. Reynolds, J. Saario, S. Sadegi36, Takeshi Sakanoi30, J.-L. Salto González, Sameer37, Sameer19, A. Simon, Michal Siwak2, Tassilo Schweyer38, Tassilo Schweyer39, F. C. Soldán Alfaro, Eda Sonbas, J. Strobl29, L. O. Takalo3, L. Tremosa Espasa, J. R. Valdes40, V. Vasylenko, F. Verrecchia5, F. Verrecchia34, James R. Webb41, Makoto Yoneda, M. Zejmo42, WeiKang Zheng25, P. Zieliński43, J. Janik42, V. H. Chavushyan40, I. Mohammed27, C. C. Cheung44, Marcello Giroletti34 
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors acknowledge support from the Polish National Science Centre (NCN) through the grant 2012/04/A/ST9/04404 and 2017/27/B/ST 9/01855.
Abstract: A.G. and M.O. acknowledge support from the Polish National Science Centre (NCN) through the grant 2012/04/A/ST9/00083. D.K.W. and A.G. acknowledge the support from 2013/09/B/ST9/00026. L.S. and V.M. are supported by Polish NSC grant UMO-2016/22/E/ST9/00061. M.S. acknowledges the support of 2012/07/B/ST9/04404. S.Z. acknowledges the support of 2013/09/B/ST9/00599 and 2017/27/B/ST9/01855. R.H. acknowledges GA CR grant 13-33324S. A.S. and M.So. were supported by National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) contract NAS8-03060 (Chandra X-ray Center). M.So. also acknowledges Polish NCN grant OPUS 2014/13/B/ST9/00570. A. V.F. is grateful for support from National Science Foundation (NSF) grant AST-1211916, NASA grant NNX12AF12G, the TABASGO Foundation, the Christopher R. Redlich Fund, and the Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science (U.C. Berkeley). Research at Lick Observatory is partially supported by a generous gift from Google.This research has made use of data from the University of Michigan Radio Astronomy Observatory, which has been supported by the University of Michigan and by a series of grants from the NSF, most recently AST-0607523, and NASA Fermi grants NNX09AU16G, NNX10AP16G, and NNX11A013G. The OVRO 40 m Telescope Fermi Blazar Monitoring Program is supported by NASA under awards NNX08AW31G and NNX11A043G, and by the NSF under awards AST-0808050 and AST-1109911. Based on observations obtained with telescopes of the University Observatory Jena, which is operated by the Astrophysical Institute of the Friedrich-Schiller University.The Fermi-LAT Collaboration acknowledges generous ongoing support from a number of agencies and institutes that have supported both the development and the operation of the LAT as well as scientific data analysis. These include NASA and the Department of Energy (DOE) in the United States, the Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Institut National de Physique Nucleaire et de Physique des Particules in France, the Agenzia Spaziale Italiana and the Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare in Italy, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), and Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) in Japan, and the KA Wallenberg Foundation, the Swedish Research Council, and the Swedish National Space Board in Sweden. Additional support for science analysis during the operations phase is gratefully acknowledged from the Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica in Italy and the Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales in France. This work was performed in part under DOE Contract DE-AC02-765F00515. (2012/04/A/ST9/00083 - Polish National Science Centre (NCN); UMO-2016/22/E/ST9/00061 - Polish NSC grant; 13-33324S - GA CR; NAS8-03060 - National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA); OPUS 2014/13/B/ST9/00570 - Polish NCN grant; AST-1211916 - National Science Foundation (NSF) grant; NNX12AF12G - NASA grant; TABASGO Foundation; Christopher R. Redlich Fund; Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science (U.C. Berkeley); Google; University of Michigan; AST-0607523 - NSF; AST-0808050 - NSF; AST-1109911 - NSF; NNX09AU16G - NASA Fermi grants; NNX10AP16G - NASA Fermi grants; NNX11A013G - NASA Fermi grants; NNX08AW31G - NASA; NNX11A043G - NASA; NASA; Department of Energy (DOE) in the United States; Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Institut National de Physique Nucleaire et de Physique des Particules in France; Agenzia Spaziale Italiana; Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare in Italy; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT); High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK); Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) in Japan; KA Wallenberg Foundation; Swedish Research Council; Swedish National Space Board in Sweden; Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica in Italy; Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales in France; DE-AC02-765F00515 - DOE Contract; 2013/09/B/ST9/00026; 2012/07/B/ST9/04404; 2013/09/B/ST9/00599; 2017/27/B/ST9/01855)

69 citations


Cited by
More filters
15 Mar 1979
TL;DR: In this article, the experimental estimation of parameters for models can be solved through use of the likelihood ratio test, with particular attention to photon counting experiments, and procedures presented solve a greater range of problems than those currently in use, yet are no more difficult to apply.
Abstract: Many problems in the experimental estimation of parameters for models can be solved through use of the likelihood ratio test. Applications of the likelihood ratio, with particular attention to photon counting experiments, are discussed. The procedures presented solve a greater range of problems than those currently in use, yet are no more difficult to apply. The procedures are proved analytically, and examples from current problems in astronomy are discussed.

1,748 citations

01 Jan 2016
TL;DR: The radiative processes in astrophysics is universally compatible with any devices to read, and is available in the digital library an online access to it is set as public so you can get it instantly.
Abstract: Thank you very much for reading radiative processes in astrophysics. Maybe you have knowledge that, people have look hundreds times for their favorite readings like this radiative processes in astrophysics, but end up in malicious downloads. Rather than reading a good book with a cup of tea in the afternoon, instead they juggled with some harmful virus inside their desktop computer. radiative processes in astrophysics is available in our digital library an online access to it is set as public so you can get it instantly. Our book servers saves in multiple locations, allowing you to get the most less latency time to download any of our books like this one. Merely said, the radiative processes in astrophysics is universally compatible with any devices to read.

645 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a review of recent progress in high-contrast imaging with particular emphasis on observational results, discoveries near and below the deuterium-burning limit, and a practical overview of large-scale surveys and dedicated instruments is presented.
Abstract: High-contrast adaptive optics imaging is a powerful technique to probe the architectures of planetary systems from the outside-in and survey the atmospheres of self-luminous giant planets. Direct imaging has rapidly matured over the past decade and especially the last few years with the advent of high-order adaptive optics systems, dedicated planet-finding instruments with specialized coronagraphs, and innovative observing and post-processing strategies to suppress speckle noise. This review summarizes recent progress in high-contrast imaging with particular emphasis on observational results, discoveries near and below the deuterium-burning limit, and a practical overview of large-scale surveys and dedicated instruments. I conclude with a statistical meta-analysis of deep imaging surveys in the literature. Based on observations of 384 unique and single young ($\approx$5--300~Myr) stars spanning stellar masses between 0.1--3.0~\Msun, the overall occurrence rate of 5--13~\Mjup \ companions at orbital distances of 30--300~AU is 0.6$^{+0.7}_{-0.5}$\% assuming hot-start evolutionary models. The most massive giant planets regularly accessible to direct imaging are about as rare as hot Jupiters are around Sun-like stars. Dividing this sample into individual stellar mass bins does not reveal any statistically-significant trend in planet frequency with host mass: giant planets are found around 2.8$^{+3.7}_{-2.3}$\% of BA stars, $<$4.1\% of FGK stars, and $<$3.9\% of M dwarfs. Looking forward, extreme adaptive optics systems and the next generation of ground- and space-based telescopes with smaller inner working angles and deeper detection limits will increase the pace of discovery to ultimately map the demographics, composition, evolution, and origin of planets spanning a broad range of masses and ages.

397 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Vassilis Angelopoulos1, P. Cruce1, Alexander Drozdov1, Eric Grimes1, N. Hatzigeorgiu2, D. A. King2, Davin Larson2, James W. Lewis2, J. M. McTiernan2, D. A. Roberts3, C. L. Russell1, Tomoaki Hori4, Yoshiya Kasahara5, Atsushi Kumamoto6, Ayako Matsuoka, Yukinaga Miyashita7, Yoshizumi Miyoshi4, I. Shinohara, Mariko Teramoto4, Jeremy Faden, Alexa Halford8, Matthew D. McCarthy9, Robyn Millan10, John Sample11, David M. Smith12, L. A. Woodger10, Arnaud Masson, A. A. Narock3, Kazushi Asamura, T. F. Chang4, C. Y. Chiang13, Yoichi Kazama14, Kunihiro Keika15, S. Matsuda4, Tomonori Segawa4, Kanako Seki15, Masafumi Shoji4, Sunny W. Y. Tam13, Norio Umemura4, B. J. Wang14, B. J. Wang16, Shiang-Yu Wang14, Robert J. Redmon17, Juan V. Rodriguez18, Juan V. Rodriguez17, Howard J. Singer17, Jon Vandegriff19, S. Abe20, Masahito Nose4, Masahito Nose21, Atsuki Shinbori4, Yoshimasa Tanaka22, S. UeNo21, L. Andersson23, P. Dunn2, Christopher M. Fowler23, Jasper Halekas24, Takuya Hara2, Yuki Harada21, Christina O. Lee2, Robert Lillis2, David L. Mitchell2, Matthew R. Argall25, Kenneth R. Bromund3, James L. Burch26, Ian J. Cohen19, Michael Galloy27, Barbara L. Giles3, Allison Jaynes24, O. Le Contel28, Mitsuo Oka2, T. D. Phan2, Brian Walsh29, Joseph Westlake19, Frederick Wilder23, Stuart D. Bale2, Roberto Livi2, Marc Pulupa2, Phyllis Whittlesey2, A. DeWolfe23, Bryan Harter23, E. Lucas23, U. Auster30, John W. Bonnell2, Christopher Cully31, Eric Donovan31, Robert E. Ergun23, Harald U. Frey2, Brian Jackel31, A. Keiling2, Haje Korth19, J. P. McFadden2, Yukitoshi Nishimura29, Ferdinand Plaschke32, P. Robert28, Drew Turner8, James M. Weygand1, Robert M. Candey3, R. C. Johnson3, T. Kovalick3, M. H. Liu3, R. E. McGuire3, Aaron Breneman33, Kris Kersten33, P. Schroeder2 
TL;DR: The SPEDAS development history, goals, and current implementation are reviewed, and its “modes of use” are explained with examples geared for users and its technical implementation and requirements with software developers in mind are outlined.
Abstract: With the advent of the Heliophysics/Geospace System Observatory (H/GSO), a complement of multi-spacecraft missions and ground-based observatories to study the space environment, data retrieval, analysis, and visualization of space physics data can be daunting. The Space Physics Environment Data Analysis System (SPEDAS), a grass-roots software development platform ( www.spedas.org ), is now officially supported by NASA Heliophysics as part of its data environment infrastructure. It serves more than a dozen space missions and ground observatories and can integrate the full complement of past and upcoming space physics missions with minimal resources, following clear, simple, and well-proven guidelines. Free, modular and configurable to the needs of individual missions, it works in both command-line (ideal for experienced users) and Graphical User Interface (GUI) mode (reducing the learning curve for first-time users). Both options have “crib-sheets,” user-command sequences in ASCII format that can facilitate record-and-repeat actions, especially for complex operations and plotting. Crib-sheets enhance scientific interactions, as users can move rapidly and accurately from exchanges of technical information on data processing to efficient discussions regarding data interpretation and science. SPEDAS can readily query and ingest all International Solar Terrestrial Physics (ISTP)-compatible products from the Space Physics Data Facility (SPDF), enabling access to a vast collection of historic and current mission data. The planned incorporation of Heliophysics Application Programmer’s Interface (HAPI) standards will facilitate data ingestion from distributed datasets that adhere to these standards. Although SPEDAS is currently Interactive Data Language (IDL)-based (and interfaces to Java-based tools such as Autoplot), efforts are under-way to expand it further to work with python (first as an interface tool and potentially even receiving an under-the-hood replacement). We review the SPEDAS development history, goals, and current implementation. We explain its “modes of use” with examples geared for users and outline its technical implementation and requirements with software developers in mind. We also describe SPEDAS personnel and software management, interfaces with other organizations, resources and support structure available to the community, and future development plans.

371 citations