scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Matthew DeJongh

Bio: Matthew DeJongh is an academic researcher from Hope College. The author has contributed to research in topics: Genome project & DNA microarray. The author has an hindex of 11, co-authored 24 publications receiving 9910 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A fully automated service for annotating bacterial and archaeal genomes that identifies protein-encoding, rRNA and tRNA genes, assigns functions to the genes, predicts which subsystems are represented in the genome, uses this information to reconstruct the metabolic network and makes the output easily downloadable for the user.
Abstract: The number of prokaryotic genome sequences becoming available is growing steadily and is growing faster than our ability to accurately annotate them. We describe a fully automated service for annotating bacterial and archaeal genomes. The service identifies protein-encoding, rRNA and tRNA genes, assigns functions to the genes, predicts which subsystems are represented in the genome, uses this information to reconstruct the metabolic network and makes the output easily downloadable for the user. In addition, the annotated genome can be browsed in an environment that supports comparative analysis with the annotated genomes maintained in the SEED environment. The service normally makes the annotated genome available within 12–24 hours of submission, but ultimately the quality of such a service will be judged in terms of accuracy, consistency, and completeness of the produced annotations. We summarize our attempts to address these issues and discuss plans for incrementally enhancing the service. By providing accurate, rapid annotation freely to the community we have created an important community resource. The service has now been utilized by over 120 external users annotating over 350 distinct genomes.

9,397 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Model SEED is introduced, a web-based resource for high-throughput generation, optimization and analysis of genome-scale metabolic models and introduces techniques to automate nearly every step of this process, taking ∼48 h to reconstruct a metabolic model from an assembled genome sequence.
Abstract: Genome-scale metabolic models have proven to be valuable for predicting organism phenotypes from genotypes. Yet efforts to develop new models are failing to keep pace with genome sequencing. To address this problem, we introduce the Model SEED, a web-based resource for high-throughput generation, optimization and analysis of genome-scale metabolic models. The Model SEED integrates existing methods and introduces techniques to automate nearly every step of this process, taking approximately 48 h to reconstruct a metabolic model from an assembled genome sequence. We apply this resource to generate 130 genome-scale metabolic models representing a taxonomically diverse set of bacteria. Twenty-two of the models were validated against available gene essentiality and Biolog data, with the average model accuracy determined to be 66% before optimization and 87% after optimization.

952 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Adam P. Arkin1, Adam P. Arkin2, Robert W. Cottingham3, Christopher S. Henry4, Nomi L. Harris1, Rick Stevens5, Sergei Maslov6, Paramvir S. Dehal1, Doreen Ware7, Fernando Perez, Shane Canon1, Michael W. Sneddon1, Matthew L. Henderson1, William J. Riehl1, Dan Murphy-Olson4, Stephen Y. Chan1, Roy T. Kamimura1, Sunita Kumari7, Meghan M Drake3, Thomas Brettin4, Elizabeth M. Glass4, Dylan Chivian1, Dan Gunter1, David J. Weston3, Benjamin H. Allen3, Jason K. Baumohl1, Aaron A. Best8, Benjamin P. Bowen1, Steven E. Brenner2, Christopher Bun4, John-Marc Chandonia1, Jer Ming Chia7, R. L. Colasanti4, Neal Conrad4, James J. Davis4, Brian H. Davison3, Matthew DeJongh8, Scott Devoid4, Emily M. Dietrich4, Inna Dubchak1, Janaka N. Edirisinghe5, Janaka N. Edirisinghe4, Gang Fang9, José P. Faria4, Paul M. Frybarger4, Wolfgang Gerlach4, Mark Gerstein9, Annette Greiner1, James Gurtowski7, Holly L. Haun3, Fei He6, Rashmi Jain10, Rashmi Jain1, Marcin P. Joachimiak1, Kevin P. Keegan4, Shinnosuke Kondo8, Vivek Kumar7, Miriam Land3, Folker Meyer4, Mark Mills3, Pavel S. Novichkov1, Taeyun Oh10, Taeyun Oh1, Gary J. Olsen11, Robert Olson4, Bruce Parrello4, Shiran Pasternak7, Erik Pearson1, Sarah S. Poon1, Gavin Price1, Srividya Ramakrishnan7, Priya Ranjan12, Priya Ranjan3, Pamela C. Ronald10, Pamela C. Ronald1, Michael C. Schatz7, Samuel M. D. Seaver4, Maulik Shukla4, Roman A. Sutormin1, Mustafa H Syed3, James Thomason7, Nathan L. Tintle8, Daifeng Wang9, Fangfang Xia4, Hyunseung Yoo4, Shinjae Yoo6, Dantong Yu6 
TL;DR: Author(s): Arkin, Adam P; Cottingham, Robert W; Henry, Christopher S; Harris, Nomi L; Stevens, Rick L; Maslov, Sergei; Dehal, Paramvir; Ware, Doreen; Perez, Fernando; Canon, Shane; Sneddon, Michael W; Henderson, Matthew L; Riehl, William J; Murphy-Olson, Dan; Chan, Stephen Y; Kamimura, Roy T.
Abstract: Author(s): Arkin, Adam P; Cottingham, Robert W; Henry, Christopher S; Harris, Nomi L; Stevens, Rick L; Maslov, Sergei; Dehal, Paramvir; Ware, Doreen; Perez, Fernando; Canon, Shane; Sneddon, Michael W; Henderson, Matthew L; Riehl, William J; Murphy-Olson, Dan; Chan, Stephen Y; Kamimura, Roy T; Kumari, Sunita; Drake, Meghan M; Brettin, Thomas S; Glass, Elizabeth M; Chivian, Dylan; Gunter, Dan; Weston, David J; Allen, Benjamin H; Baumohl, Jason; Best, Aaron A; Bowen, Ben; Brenner, Steven E; Bun, Christopher C; Chandonia, John-Marc; Chia, Jer-Ming; Colasanti, Ric; Conrad, Neal; Davis, James J; Davison, Brian H; DeJongh, Matthew; Devoid, Scott; Dietrich, Emily; Dubchak, Inna; Edirisinghe, Janaka N; Fang, Gang; Faria, Jose P; Frybarger, Paul M; Gerlach, Wolfgang; Gerstein, Mark; Greiner, Annette; Gurtowski, James; Haun, Holly L; He, Fei; Jain, Rashmi; Joachimiak, Marcin P; Keegan, Kevin P; Kondo, Shinnosuke; Kumar, Vivek; Land, Miriam L; Meyer, Folker; Mills, Marissa; Novichkov, Pavel S; Oh, Taeyun; Olsen, Gary J; Olson, Robert; Parrello, Bruce; Pasternak, Shiran; Pearson, Erik; Poon, Sarah S; Price, Gavin A; Ramakrishnan, Srividya; Ranjan, Priya; Ronald, Pamela C; Schatz, Michael C; Seaver, Samuel MD; Shukla, Maulik; Sutormin, Roman A; Syed, Mustafa H; Thomason, James; Tintle, Nathan L; Wang, Daifeng; Xia, Fangfang; Yoo, Hyunseung; Yoo, Shinjae; Yu, Dantong

743 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The method sets the stage for the automated generation of substantially complete metabolic networks for over 400 complete genome sequences currently in the SEED, an open-source software environment for comparative genome annotation and analysis.
Abstract: Current methods for the automated generation of genome-scale metabolic networks focus on genome annotation and preliminary biochemical reaction network assembly, but do not adequately address the process of identifying and filling gaps in the reaction network, and verifying that the network is suitable for systems level analysis. Thus, current methods are only sufficient for generating draft-quality networks, and refinement of the reaction network is still largely a manual, labor-intensive process. We have developed a method for generating genome-scale metabolic networks that produces substantially complete reaction networks, suitable for systems level analysis. Our method partitions the reaction space of central and intermediary metabolism into discrete, interconnected components that can be assembled and verified in isolation from each other, and then integrated and verified at the level of their interconnectivity. We have developed a database of components that are common across organisms, and have created tools for automatically assembling appropriate components for a particular organism based on the metabolic pathways encoded in the organism's genome. This focuses manual efforts on that portion of an organism's metabolism that is not yet represented in the database. We have demonstrated the efficacy of our method by reverse-engineering and automatically regenerating the reaction network from a published genome-scale metabolic model for Staphylococcus aureus. Additionally, we have verified that our method capitalizes on the database of common reaction network components created for S. aureus, by using these components to generate substantially complete reconstructions of the reaction networks from three other published metabolic models (Escherichia coli, Helicobacter pylori, and Lactococcus lactis). We have implemented our tools and database within the SEED, an open-source software environment for comparative genome annotation and analysis. Our method sets the stage for the automated generation of substantially complete metabolic networks for over 400 complete genome sequences currently in the SEED. With each genome that is processed using our tools, the database of common components grows to cover more of the diversity of metabolic pathways. This increases the likelihood that components of reaction networks for subsequently processed genomes can be retrieved from the database, rather than assembled and verified manually.

143 citations

Book ChapterDOI
TL;DR: This chapter describes the automated model reconstruction process in detail, starting from a new genome sequence and finishing on a functioning genome-scale metabolic model.
Abstract: Over the past decade, genome-scale metabolic models have proven to be a crucial resource for predicting organism phenotypes from genotypes. These models provide a means of rapidly translating detailed knowledge of thousands of enzymatic processes into quantitative predictions of whole-cell behavior. Until recently, the pace of new metabolic model development was eclipsed by the pace at which new genomes were being sequenced. To address this problem, the RAST and the Model SEED framework were developed as a means of automatically producing annotations and draft genome-scale metabolic models. In this chapter, we describe the automated model reconstruction process in detail, starting from a new genome sequence and finishing on a functioning genome-scale metabolic model. We break down the model reconstruction process into eight steps: submitting a genome sequence to RAST, annotating the genome, curating the annotation, submitting the annotation to Model SEED, reconstructing the core model, generating the draft biomass reaction, auto-completing the model, and curating the model. Each of these eight steps is documented in detail.

131 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Prokka is introduced, a command line software tool to fully annotate a draft bacterial genome in about 10 min on a typical desktop computer, and produces standards-compliant output files for further analysis or viewing in genome browsers.
Abstract: UNLABELLED: The multiplex capability and high yield of current day DNA-sequencing instruments has made bacterial whole genome sequencing a routine affair. The subsequent de novo assembly of reads into contigs has been well addressed. The final step of annotating all relevant genomic features on those contigs can be achieved slowly using existing web- and email-based systems, but these are not applicable for sensitive data or integrating into computational pipelines. Here we introduce Prokka, a command line software tool to fully annotate a draft bacterial genome in about 10 min on a typical desktop computer. It produces standards-compliant output files for further analysis or viewing in genome browsers. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Prokka is implemented in Perl and is freely available under an open source GPLv2 license from http://vicbioinformatics.com/.

10,432 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A fully automated service for annotating bacterial and archaeal genomes that identifies protein-encoding, rRNA and tRNA genes, assigns functions to the genes, predicts which subsystems are represented in the genome, uses this information to reconstruct the metabolic network and makes the output easily downloadable for the user.
Abstract: The number of prokaryotic genome sequences becoming available is growing steadily and is growing faster than our ability to accurately annotate them. We describe a fully automated service for annotating bacterial and archaeal genomes. The service identifies protein-encoding, rRNA and tRNA genes, assigns functions to the genes, predicts which subsystems are represented in the genome, uses this information to reconstruct the metabolic network and makes the output easily downloadable for the user. In addition, the annotated genome can be browsed in an environment that supports comparative analysis with the annotated genomes maintained in the SEED environment. The service normally makes the annotated genome available within 12–24 hours of submission, but ultimately the quality of such a service will be judged in terms of accuracy, consistency, and completeness of the produced annotations. We summarize our attempts to address these issues and discuss plans for incrementally enhancing the service. By providing accurate, rapid annotation freely to the community we have created an important community resource. The service has now been utilized by over 120 external users annotating over 350 distinct genomes.

9,397 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The interconnectedness of the SEED database and RAST, the RAST annotation pipeline and updates to both resources are described.
Abstract: In 2004, the SEED (http://pubseed.theseed.org/) was created to provide consistent and accurate genome annotations across thousands of genomes and as a platform for discovering and developing de novo annotations. The SEED is a constantly updated integration of genomic data with a genome database, web front end, API and server scripts. It is used by many scientists for predicting gene functions and discovering new pathways. In addition to being a powerful database for bioinformatics research, the SEED also houses subsystems (collections of functionally related protein families) and their derived FIGfams (protein families), which represent the core of the RAST annotation engine (http://rast.nmpdr.org/). When a new genome is submitted to RAST, genes are called and their annotations are made by comparison to the FIGfam collection. If the genome is made public, it is then housed within the SEED and its proteins populate the FIGfam collection. This annotation cycle has proven to be a robust and scalable solution to the problem of annotating the exponentially increasing number of genomes. To date, >12 000 users worldwide have annotated >60 000 distinct genomes using RAST. Here we describe the interconnectedness of the SEED database and RAST, the RAST annotation pipeline and updates to both resources.

3,415 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The open-source metagenomics RAST service provides a new paradigm for the annotation and analysis of metagenomes that is stable, extensible, and freely available to all researchers.
Abstract: Random community genomes (metagenomes) are now commonly used to study microbes in different environments. Over the past few years, the major challenge associated with metagenomics shifted from generating to analyzing sequences. High-throughput, low-cost next-generation sequencing has provided access to metagenomics to a wide range of researchers. A high-throughput pipeline has been constructed to provide high-performance computing to all researchers interested in using metagenomics. The pipeline produces automated functional assignments of sequences in the metagenome by comparing both protein and nucleotide databases. Phylogenetic and functional summaries of the metagenomes are generated, and tools for comparative metagenomics are incorporated into the standard views. User access is controlled to ensure data privacy, but the collaborative environment underpinning the service provides a framework for sharing datasets between multiple users. In the metagenomics RAST, all users retain full control of their data, and everything is available for download in a variety of formats. The open-source metagenomics RAST service provides a new paradigm for the annotation and analysis of metagenomes. With built-in support for multiple data sources and a back end that houses abstract data types, the metagenomics RAST is stable, extensible, and freely available to all researchers. This service has removed one of the primary bottlenecks in metagenome sequence analysis – the availability of high-performance computing for annotating the data. http://metagenomics.nmpdr.org

3,322 citations