scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Maurizio Galderisi published in 1991"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Sex-specific linear regression analyses were used to examine the contribution of diabetes mellitus and glucose intolerance to age-adjusted echocardiographic parameters in 1,986 men and 2,529 women from the original Framingham Study cohort and the Framingham Offspring Study.
Abstract: Although several reports have described early changes of cardiac structure and function in diabetic patients, controversy persists regarding the existence of a clinically distinct diabetic cardiomyopathy. To this end, sex-specific linear regression analyses were used to examine the contribution of diabetes mellitus and glucose intolerance to age-adjusted echocardiographic parameters in 1,986 men (mean age 48 years) and 2,529 women (mean age 50 years) from the original Framingham Study cohort and the Framingham Offspring Study. Subjects with evidence of cardiovascular disease at the time of echocardiogram were excluded. Diabetics had higher heart rates than nondiabetics (67.9 vs 64.0 beats/min (p = 0.002) in men, and 73.1 vs 68.3 beats/min (p = 0.004) in women). Diabetic women had increased left ventricular (LV) wall thickness (18.7 vs 17.1 mm, p less than 0.001), relative wall thickness (0.403 vs 0.377, p = 0.008), LV end-diastolic dimension (46.9 vs 45.7 mm, p = 0.03) and LV mass corrected for height (100.4 vs 82.2 g/m, p less than 0.001). Women with glucose intolerance showed similar, less significant trends (p = 0.007 for wall thickness, p less than 0.01 for LV mass). In diabetic men, fractional shortening was slightly reduced (0.355 vs 0.360, p less than 0.05). In a multivariate model that included potentially confounding factors, diabetes remained an independent contributor to LV mass (p = 0.004) and wall thickness (p = 0.008) in women. In a separate linear regression model, which assessed the association of age with LV mass, the age-coefficient for diabetic women was much higher than that for nondiabetics (13.6 vs 6.6 g/m per 10-year increment in age).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

532 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Diastolic parameters may be useful tools for assessing myocardial compliance and may be effective markers of diastolic dysfunction.
Abstract: A total of 20 untreated hypertensive patients were divided into two equal groups matched for sex, age and blood pressure but with [mean diastolic wall thickness (MDWT) greater than 1.2 cm] or without (MDWT greater than 1.2 cm) left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). All patients underwent pulsed doppler echocardiography and 99Tc radionuclide ventriculography at rest to assess diastolic and systolic abnormalities. In hypertensives with LVH the interventricular wall thickness, posterior wall thickness and relative diastolic wall thickness were significantly (P less than 0.01) higher and peak filling rate was significantly (P less than 0.01) lower than in hypertensives without LVH. The indices of systolic function, however, were not significantly different in the two patient groups. In hypertensives without LVH peak filling rate directly correlated with heart rate, whereas in those with LVH peak filling rate directly correlated with heart rate and the ratio of peak velocity of early left ventricular filling : peak velocity of late left ventricular filling due to atrial contraction. It is concluded that diastolic parameters may be useful tools for assessing myocardial compliance and may be effective markers of diastolic dysfunction.

4 citations


Journal Article
TL;DR: SR isradipine can be considered a safe and effective first-choice drug for the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension and was well tolerated, with a low incidence of side effects.
Abstract: In this study we used casual and 24-h blood pressure (BP) monitoring and Doppler echocardiographic data to investigate the antihypertensive and hemodynamic effects of isradipine 5 mg in the new slow-release oral (SRO) formulation administered once daily for 12 weeks to 10 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. The antihypertensive action of SR isradipine was revealed by the normalized values of casual BP in 60 patients and by the significant reduction of 24-h BP variability as assessed by mean standard variation, coefficient of variation and the percent incidence of abnormal levels of both systolic and diastolic BP during 24 h (p less than .001). The echocardiographic data showed some beneficial hemodynamic effects (improvement of systolic and diastolic indices) without significant variation of left ventricular structure. The drug was well tolerated, with a low incidence of side effects. In conclusion, SR isradipine can be considered a safe and effective first-choice drug for the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.

3 citations