scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Menno P. Creyghton

Bio: Menno P. Creyghton is an academic researcher from Utrecht University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Enhancer & Epigenetics. The author has an hindex of 17, co-authored 27 publications receiving 6358 citations. Previous affiliations of Menno P. Creyghton include Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience & Erasmus University Medical Center.

Papers
More filters
Journal Article•DOI•
TL;DR: The epigenetic landscape of enhancer elements in embryonic stem cells and several adult tissues in the mouse is interrogated and it is found that histone H3K27ac distinguishes active enhancers from inactive/poised enhancers and poised enhancer networks provide clues to unrealized developmental programs.
Abstract: Developmental programs are controlled by transcription factors and chromatin regulators, which maintain specific gene expression programs through epigenetic modification of the genome. These regulatory events at enhancers contribute to the specific gene expression programs that determine cell state and the potential for differentiation into new cell types. Although enhancer elements are known to be associated with certain histone modifications and transcription factors, the relationship of these modifications to gene expression and developmental state has not been clearly defined. Here we interrogate the epigenetic landscape of enhancer elements in embryonic stem cells and several adult tissues in the mouse. We find that histone H3K27ac distinguishes active enhancers from inactive/poised enhancer elements containing H3K4me1 alone. This indicates that the amount of actively used enhancers is lower than previously anticipated. Furthermore, poised enhancer networks provide clues to unrealized developmental programs. Finally, we show that enhancers are reset during nuclear reprogramming.

3,541 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
03 Dec 2009-Nature
TL;DR: Quantitative analyses define distinct cell-division-rate-dependent and -independent modes for accelerating the stochastic course of reprogramming, and suggest that the number of cell divisions is a key parameter driving epigenetic reprograming to pluripotency.
Abstract: Direct reprogramming of somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells can be achieved by overexpression of Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc transcription factors, but only a minority of donor somatic cells can be reprogrammed to pluripotency. Here we demonstrate that reprogramming by these transcription factors is a continuous stochastic process where almost all mouse donor cells eventually give rise to iPS cells on continued growth and transcription factor expression. Additional inhibition of the p53/p21 pathway or overexpression of Lin28 increased the cell division rate and resulted in an accelerated kinetics of iPS cell formation that was directly proportional to the increase in cell proliferation. In contrast, Nanog overexpression accelerated reprogramming in a predominantly cell-division-rate-independent manner. Quantitative analyses define distinct cell-division-rate-dependent and -independent modes for accelerating the stochastic course of reprogramming, and suggest that the number of cell divisions is a key parameter driving epigenetic reprogramming to pluripotency.

1,026 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
18 Apr 2008-Cell
TL;DR: This study provides definite proof for the direct nuclear reprogramming of terminally differentiated adult cells to pluripotency through transgenic and inducible expression of transcription factors.

874 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
14 Nov 2008-Cell
TL;DR: Genome-wide analysis reveals that H2AZ occupies the promoters of developmentally important genes in a manner that is remarkably similar to that of the Polycomb group (PcG) protein Suz12, and finds that H 2AZ and PcG protein occupancy is interdependent at promoters, and shows that H1AZ is necessary for ES cell differentiation.

341 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
TL;DR: The data indicate that stoichiometry of reprogramming factors can influence epigenetic and biological properties of iPS cells and should be considered when comparing different iPS and ES cell lines.

320 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal Article•DOI•
Anshul Kundaje1, Wouter Meuleman2, Wouter Meuleman1, Jason Ernst3, Misha Bilenky4, Angela Yen2, Angela Yen1, Alireza Heravi-Moussavi4, Pouya Kheradpour1, Pouya Kheradpour2, Zhizhuo Zhang2, Zhizhuo Zhang1, Jianrong Wang2, Jianrong Wang1, Michael J. Ziller2, Viren Amin5, John W. Whitaker, Matthew D. Schultz6, Lucas D. Ward2, Lucas D. Ward1, Abhishek Sarkar1, Abhishek Sarkar2, Gerald Quon1, Gerald Quon2, Richard Sandstrom7, Matthew L. Eaton1, Matthew L. Eaton2, Yi-Chieh Wu1, Yi-Chieh Wu2, Andreas R. Pfenning2, Andreas R. Pfenning1, Xinchen Wang2, Xinchen Wang1, Melina Claussnitzer1, Melina Claussnitzer2, Yaping Liu1, Yaping Liu2, Cristian Coarfa5, R. Alan Harris5, Noam Shoresh2, Charles B. Epstein2, Elizabeta Gjoneska1, Elizabeta Gjoneska2, Danny Leung8, Wei Xie8, R. David Hawkins8, Ryan Lister6, Chibo Hong9, Philippe Gascard9, Andrew J. Mungall4, Richard A. Moore4, Eric Chuah4, Angela Tam4, Theresa K. Canfield7, R. Scott Hansen7, Rajinder Kaul7, Peter J. Sabo7, Mukul S. Bansal1, Mukul S. Bansal10, Mukul S. Bansal2, Annaick Carles4, Jesse R. Dixon8, Kai How Farh2, Soheil Feizi1, Soheil Feizi2, Rosa Karlic11, Ah Ram Kim1, Ah Ram Kim2, Ashwinikumar Kulkarni12, Daofeng Li13, Rebecca F. Lowdon13, Ginell Elliott13, Tim R. Mercer14, Shane Neph7, Vitor Onuchic5, Paz Polak15, Paz Polak2, Nisha Rajagopal8, Pradipta R. Ray12, Richard C Sallari2, Richard C Sallari1, Kyle Siebenthall7, Nicholas A Sinnott-Armstrong2, Nicholas A Sinnott-Armstrong1, Michael Stevens13, Robert E. Thurman7, Jie Wu16, Bo Zhang13, Xin Zhou13, Arthur E. Beaudet5, Laurie A. Boyer1, Philip L. De Jager2, Philip L. De Jager15, Peggy J. Farnham17, Susan J. Fisher9, David Haussler18, Steven J.M. Jones19, Steven J.M. Jones4, Wei Li5, Marco A. Marra4, Michael T. McManus9, Shamil R. Sunyaev15, Shamil R. Sunyaev2, James A. Thomson20, Thea D. Tlsty9, Li-Huei Tsai2, Li-Huei Tsai1, Wei Wang, Robert A. Waterland5, Michael Q. Zhang21, Lisa Helbling Chadwick22, Bradley E. Bernstein15, Bradley E. Bernstein6, Bradley E. Bernstein2, Joseph F. Costello9, Joseph R. Ecker11, Martin Hirst4, Alexander Meissner2, Aleksandar Milosavljevic5, Bing Ren8, John A. Stamatoyannopoulos7, Ting Wang13, Manolis Kellis2, Manolis Kellis1 •
19 Feb 2015-Nature
TL;DR: It is shown that disease- and trait-associated genetic variants are enriched in tissue-specific epigenomic marks, revealing biologically relevant cell types for diverse human traits, and providing a resource for interpreting the molecular basis of human disease.
Abstract: The reference human genome sequence set the stage for studies of genetic variation and its association with human disease, but epigenomic studies lack a similar reference. To address this need, the NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium generated the largest collection so far of human epigenomes for primary cells and tissues. Here we describe the integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes generated as part of the programme, profiled for histone modification patterns, DNA accessibility, DNA methylation and RNA expression. We establish global maps of regulatory elements, define regulatory modules of coordinated activity, and their likely activators and repressors. We show that disease- and trait-associated genetic variants are enriched in tissue-specific epigenomic marks, revealing biologically relevant cell types for diverse human traits, and providing a resource for interpreting the molecular basis of human disease. Our results demonstrate the central role of epigenomic information for understanding gene regulation, cellular differentiation and human disease.

5,037 citations

01 Feb 2015
TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe the integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes generated as part of the NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium, profiled for histone modification patterns, DNA accessibility, DNA methylation and RNA expression.
Abstract: The reference human genome sequence set the stage for studies of genetic variation and its association with human disease, but epigenomic studies lack a similar reference. To address this need, the NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium generated the largest collection so far of human epigenomes for primary cells and tissues. Here we describe the integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes generated as part of the programme, profiled for histone modification patterns, DNA accessibility, DNA methylation and RNA expression. We establish global maps of regulatory elements, define regulatory modules of coordinated activity, and their likely activators and repressors. We show that disease- and trait-associated genetic variants are enriched in tissue-specific epigenomic marks, revealing biologically relevant cell types for diverse human traits, and providing a resource for interpreting the molecular basis of human disease. Our results demonstrate the central role of epigenomic information for understanding gene regulation, cellular differentiation and human disease.

4,409 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
TL;DR: The current understanding of alterations in the epigenetic landscape that occur in cancer compared with normal cells, the roles of these changes in cancer initiation and progression, including the cancer stem cell model, and the potential use of this knowledge in designing more effective treatment strategies are discussed.
Abstract: Epigenetic mechanisms are essential for normal development and maintenance of tissue-specific gene expression patterns in mammals. Disruption of epigenetic processes can lead to altered gene function and malignant cellular transformation. Global changes in the epigenetic landscape are a hallmark of cancer. The initiation and progression of cancer, traditionally seen as a genetic disease, is now realized to involve epigenetic abnormalities along with genetic alterations. Recent advancements in the rapidly evolving field of cancer epigenetics have shown extensive reprogramming of every component of the epigenetic machinery in cancer including DNA methylation, histone modifications, nucleosome positioning and non-coding RNAs, specifically microRNA expression. The reversible nature of epigenetic aberrations has led to the emergence of the promising field of epigenetic therapy, which is already making progress with the recent FDA approval of three epigenetic drugs for cancer treatment. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of alterations in the epigenetic landscape that occur in cancer compared with normal cells, the roles of these changes in cancer initiation and progression, including the cancer stem cell model, and the potential use of this knowledge in designing more effective treatment strategies.

4,033 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
TL;DR: The epigenetic landscape of enhancer elements in embryonic stem cells and several adult tissues in the mouse is interrogated and it is found that histone H3K27ac distinguishes active enhancers from inactive/poised enhancers and poised enhancer networks provide clues to unrealized developmental programs.
Abstract: Developmental programs are controlled by transcription factors and chromatin regulators, which maintain specific gene expression programs through epigenetic modification of the genome. These regulatory events at enhancers contribute to the specific gene expression programs that determine cell state and the potential for differentiation into new cell types. Although enhancer elements are known to be associated with certain histone modifications and transcription factors, the relationship of these modifications to gene expression and developmental state has not been clearly defined. Here we interrogate the epigenetic landscape of enhancer elements in embryonic stem cells and several adult tissues in the mouse. We find that histone H3K27ac distinguishes active enhancers from inactive/poised enhancer elements containing H3K4me1 alone. This indicates that the amount of actively used enhancers is lower than previously anticipated. Furthermore, poised enhancer networks provide clues to unrealized developmental programs. Finally, we show that enhancers are reset during nuclear reprogramming.

3,541 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
11 Apr 2013-Cell
TL;DR: In this article, the ESC master transcription factors form unusual enhancer domains at most genes that control the pluripotent state, called super-enhancers, which consist of clusters of enhancers that are densely occupied by the master regulators and Mediator.

2,978 citations