Author
Meral Beksac
Other affiliations: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Bio: Meral Beksac is an academic researcher from Ankara University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Multiple myeloma & Transplantation. The author has an hindex of 48, co-authored 294 publications receiving 16012 citations. Previous affiliations of Meral Beksac include University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Topics: Multiple myeloma, Transplantation, Medicine, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
Mayo Clinic1, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens2, University of Turin3, Heidelberg University4, Harvard University5, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center6, University of Navarra7, University of Pennsylvania8, VU University Medical Center9, Emory University10, University of Bologna11, Mount Sinai Hospital12, Memorial Hospital of South Bend13, Karolinska University Hospital14, Carolinas Healthcare System15, Aalborg University16, Ankara University17, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center18
TL;DR: The disease definition of multiple myeloma is updated to include validated biomarkers in addition to existing requirements of attributable CRAB features (hypercalcaemia, renal failure, anaemia, and bone lesions), and specific metrics that new biomarkers should meet for inclusion in the disease definition are provided.
Abstract: This International Myeloma Working Group consensus updates the disease defi nition of multiple myeloma to include validated biomarkers in addition to existing requirements of attributable CRAB features (hypercalcaemia, renal failure, anaemia, and bone lesions). These changes are based on the identifi cation of biomarkers associated with near inevitable development of CRAB features in patients who would otherwise be regarded as having smouldering multiple myeloma. A delay in application of the label of multiple myeloma and postponement of therapy could be detrimental to these patients. In addition to this change, we clarify and update the underlying laboratory and radiographic variables that fulfi l the criteria for the presence of myeloma-defi ning CRAB features, and the histological and monoclonal protein requirements for the disease diagnosis. Finally, we provide specifi c metrics that new biomarkers should meet for inclusion in the disease defi nition. The International Myeloma Working Group recommends the implementation of these criteria in routine practice and in future clinical trials, and recommends that future studies analyse any diff erences in outcome that might occur as a result of the new disease defi nition.
3,049 citations
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center1, University of Salamanca2, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences3, Mayo Clinic4, Alexandra Hospital5, Lund University6, Karolinska Institutet7, Ankara University8, Washington University in St. Louis9, Cross Cancer Institute10, University of Turin11, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital12, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center13, University of Pavia14, Harvard University15, University of Bologna16, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust17
TL;DR: The European Group for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplant/International Bone Marrows Transplant Registry criteria have been expanded, clarified and updated to provide a new comprehensive evaluation system to adequately assess clinical outcomes in myeloma.
Abstract: New uniform response criteria are required to adequately assess clinical outcomes in myeloma. The European Group for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplant/International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry criteria have been expanded, clarified and updated to provide a new comprehensive evaluation system. Categories for stringent complete response and very good partial response are added. The serum free light-chain assay is included to allow evaluation of patients with oligo-secretory disease. Inconsistencies in prior criteria are clarified making confirmation of response and disease progression easier to perform. Emphasis is placed upon time to event and duration of response as critical end points. The requirements necessary to use overall survival duration as the ultimate end point are discussed. It is anticipated that the International Response Criteria for multiple myeloma will be widely used in future clinical trials of myeloma.
2,411 citations
University of Turin1, Mayo Clinic2, University of Tübingen3, Emory University4, Semmelweis University5, Ankara University6, Charles University in Prague7, University of Mainz8, Cornell University9, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development10, Janssen Pharmaceutica11, Monash University12, Erasmus University Rotterdam13
TL;DR: Among patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, daratumumab in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than borteonib and DexamethAsone alone and was associated with infusion-related reactions and higher rates of thrombocytopenia and neutropenia.
Abstract: BackgroundDaratumumab, a human IgGκ monoclonal antibody that targets CD38, induces direct and indirect antimyeloma activity and has shown substantial efficacy as monotherapy in heavily pretreated patients with multiple myeloma, as well as in combination with bortezomib in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. MethodsIn this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 498 patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma to receive bortezomib (1.3 mg per square meter of body-surface area) and dexamethasone (20 mg) alone (control group) or in combination with daratumumab (16 mg per kilogram of body weight) (daratumumab group). The primary end point was progression-free survival. ResultsA prespecified interim analysis showed that the rate of progression-free survival was significantly higher in the daratumumab group than in the control group; the 12-month rate of progression-free survival was 60.7% in the daratumumab group versus 26.9% in the control group. After a median follow-up period ...
1,135 citations
Emory University1, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens2, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre3, Medical University of Lublin4, Charles University in Prague5, University of Navarra6, Rabin Medical Center7, Ankara University8, Monash University9, Queen Mary University of London10, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center11, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine12, Dresden University of Technology13, Bristol-Myers Squibb14, Harvard University15
TL;DR: Patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who received a combination of elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone had a significant relative reduction of 30% in the risk of disease progression or death.
Abstract: BackgroundElotuzumab, an immunostimulatory monoclonal antibody targeting signaling lymphocytic activation molecule F7 (SLAMF7), showed activity in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in a phase 1b–2 study in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. MethodsIn this phase 3 study, we randomly assigned patients to receive either elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (elotuzumab group) or lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone (control group). Coprimary end points were progression-free survival and the overall response rate. Final results for the coprimary end points are reported on the basis of a planned interim analysis of progression-free survival. ResultsOverall, 321 patients were assigned to the elotuzumab group and 325 to the control group. After a median follow-up of 24.5 months, the rate of progression-free survival at 1 year in the elotuzumab group was 68%, as compared with 57% in the control group; at 2 years, the rates were 41% and 27%, respectively. Median progressi...
1,083 citations
University of Turin1, Masaryk University2, University of Münster3, Sapienza University of Rome4, Monash University5, Medical University of Vienna6, Medical University of Warsaw7, University of Tübingen8, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza9, University of Bologna10, Medical University of Białystok11, Ankara University12, Charles University in Prague13, Dresden University of Technology14, University of Ulm15, Celgene16, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens17
TL;DR: MPR-R significantly prolonged progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible for transplantation, with the greatest benefit observed in patients 65 to 75 years of age.
Abstract: The median follow-up period was 30 months. The median progression-free survival was significantly longer with MPR-R (31 months) than with MPR (14 months; hazard ratio, 0.49; P<0.001) or MP (13 months; hazard ratio, 0.40; P <0.001). Response rates were superior with MPR-R and MPR (77% and 68%, respectively, vs. 50% with MP; P<0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively, for the comparison with MP). The progression-free survival benefit associated with MPR-R was noted in patients 65 to 75 years of age but not in those older than 75 years of age (P = 0.001 for treatment-by-age interaction). After induction therapy, a landmark analysis showed a 66% reduction in the rate of progression with MPR-R (hazard ratio for the comparison with MPR, 0.34; P<0.001) that was age-independent. During induction therapy, the most frequent adverse events were hematologic; grade 4 neutropenia was reported in 35%, 32%, and 8% of the patients in the MPR-R, MPR, and MP groups, respectively. The 3-year rate of second primary tumors was 7% with MPR-R, 7% with MPR, and 3% with MP. Conclusions MPR-R significantly prolonged progression-free survival in patients with newly di agnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible for transplantation, with the great est benefit observed in patients 65 to 75 years of age. (Funded by Celgene; MM-015 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00405756.)
688 citations
Cited by
More filters
01 Aug 2000
TL;DR: Assessment of medical technology in the context of commercialization with Bioentrepreneur course, which addresses many issues unique to biomedical products.
Abstract: BIOE 402. Medical Technology Assessment. 2 or 3 hours. Bioentrepreneur course. Assessment of medical technology in the context of commercialization. Objectives, competition, market share, funding, pricing, manufacturing, growth, and intellectual property; many issues unique to biomedical products. Course Information: 2 undergraduate hours. 3 graduate hours. Prerequisite(s): Junior standing or above and consent of the instructor.
4,833 citations
University of Ulm1, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center2, King's College London3, University of Rome Tor Vergata4, University of Münster5, Brigham and Women's Hospital6, University of Chicago7, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center8, Leipzig University9, VU University Amsterdam10, University of Valencia11, National Taiwan University12, Alfred Hospital13, Monash University14, Erasmus University Medical Center15, Ohio State University16
TL;DR: An international panel to provide updated evidence- and expert opinion-based recommendations for diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults includes a revised version of the ELN genetic categories, a proposal for a response category based on MRD status, and criteria for progressive disease.
4,066 citations
Mayo Clinic1, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens2, University of Turin3, Heidelberg University4, Harvard University5, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center6, University of Navarra7, University of Pennsylvania8, VU University Medical Center9, Emory University10, University of Bologna11, Mount Sinai Hospital12, Memorial Hospital of South Bend13, Karolinska University Hospital14, Carolinas Healthcare System15, Aalborg University16, Ankara University17, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center18
TL;DR: The disease definition of multiple myeloma is updated to include validated biomarkers in addition to existing requirements of attributable CRAB features (hypercalcaemia, renal failure, anaemia, and bone lesions), and specific metrics that new biomarkers should meet for inclusion in the disease definition are provided.
Abstract: This International Myeloma Working Group consensus updates the disease defi nition of multiple myeloma to include validated biomarkers in addition to existing requirements of attributable CRAB features (hypercalcaemia, renal failure, anaemia, and bone lesions). These changes are based on the identifi cation of biomarkers associated with near inevitable development of CRAB features in patients who would otherwise be regarded as having smouldering multiple myeloma. A delay in application of the label of multiple myeloma and postponement of therapy could be detrimental to these patients. In addition to this change, we clarify and update the underlying laboratory and radiographic variables that fulfi l the criteria for the presence of myeloma-defi ning CRAB features, and the histological and monoclonal protein requirements for the disease diagnosis. Finally, we provide specifi c metrics that new biomarkers should meet for inclusion in the disease defi nition. The International Myeloma Working Group recommends the implementation of these criteria in routine practice and in future clinical trials, and recommends that future studies analyse any diff erences in outcome that might occur as a result of the new disease defi nition.
3,049 citations
TL;DR: The criteria and significance of early or precursor lesions and the identification of certain lymphoid neoplasms largely associated with particular age groups, such as children and the elderly are addressed, and the issue of borderline categories having overlapping features with large B-cell lymphomas is reviewed.
1,735 citations