Michael Brand

Bio: Michael Brand is an academic researcher from Dresden University of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Zebrafish & FGF8. The author has an hindex of 75, co-authored 173 publications receiving 21146 citations. Previous affiliations of Michael Brand include University of Cologne & Monash University.

The identification of genes with unique and essential functions in the development of the zebrafish, Danio rerio

Abstract: In a large-scale screen, we isolated mutants displaying a specific visible phenotype in embryos or early larvae of the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Males were mutagenized with ethylnitrosourea (ENU) and F2 families of single pair matings between sibling F1 fish, heterozygous for a mutagenized genome, were raised. Egg lays were obtained from several crosses between F2 siblings, resulting in scoring of 3857 mutagenized genomes. F3 progeny were scored at the second, third and sixth day of development, using a stereomicroscope. In a subsequent screen, fixed embryos were analyzed for correct retinotectal projection. A total of 4264 mutants were identified. Two thirds of the mutants displaying rather general abnormalities were eventually discarded. We kept and characterized 1163 mutants. In complementation crosses performed between mutants with similar phenotypes, 894 mutants have been assigned to 372 genes. The average allele frequency is 2.4. We identified genes involved in early development, notochord, brain, spinal cord, somites, muscles, heart, circulation, blood, skin, fin, eye, otic vesicle, jaw and branchial arches, pigment pattern, pigment formation, gut, liver, motility and touch response. Our collection contains alleles of almost all previously described zebrafish mutants. From the allele frequencies and other considerations we estimate that the 372 genes defined by the mutants probably represent more than half of all genes that could have been discovered using the criteria of our screen. Here we give an overview of the spectrum of mutant phenotypes obtained, and discuss the limits and the potentials of a genetic saturation screen in the zebrafish.

Fgf8 is mutated in zebrafish acerebellar (ace) mutants and is required for maintenance of midbrain-hindbrain boundary development and somitogenesis

Abstract: We describe the isolation of zebrafish Fgf8 and its expression during gastrulation, somitogenesis, fin bud and early brain development. By demonstrating genetic linkage and by analysing the structure of the Fgf8 gene, we show that acerebellar is a zebrafish Fgf8 mutation that may inactivate Fgf8 function. Homozygous acerebellar embryos lack a cerebellum and the midbrain-hindbrain boundary organizer. Fgf8 function is required to maintain, but not initiate, expression of Pax2.1 and other marker genes in this area. We show that Fgf8 and Pax2.1 are activated in adjacent domains that only later become overlapping, and activation of Fgf8 occurs normally in no isthmus embryos that are mutant for Pax2.1. These findings suggest that multiple signaling pathways are independently activated in the midbrain-hindbrain boundary primordium during gastrulation, and that Fgf8 functions later during somitogenesis to polarize the midbrain. Fgf8 is also expressed in a dorsoventral gradient during gastrulation and ectopically expressed Fgf8 can dorsalize embryos. Nevertheless, acerebellar mutants show only mild dorsoventral patterning defects. Also, in spite of the prominent role suggested for Fgf8 in limb development, the pectoral fins are largely unaffected in the mutants. Fgf8 is therefore required in development of several important signaling centers in the zebrafish embryo, but may be redundant or dispensable for others.

Genes controlling and mediating locomotion behavior of the zebrafish embryo and larva

Abstract: Zebrafish embryos and larvae have stage-specific patterns of motility or locomotion. Two embryonic structures accomplish this behavior: the central nervous system (CNS) and skeletal muscles. To identify genes that are functionally involved in mediating and controlling different patterns of embryonic and larval motility, we included a simple touch response test in our zebrafish large-scale genetic screen. In total we identified 166 mutants with specific defects in embryonic motility. These mutants fall into 14 phenotypically distinct groups comprising at least 48 genes. Here we describe the various phenotypic groups including mutants with no or reduced motility, mechanosensory defective mutants, ‘spastic’ mutants, circling mutants and motor circuit defective mutants. In 63 mutants, defining 18 genes, striation of somitic muscles is reduced. Phenotypic analysis provides evidence that these 18 genes have distinct and consecutive functions during somitic muscle development. The genes sloth (slo) and frozen (fro) already act during myoblast differentiation, while 13 genes appear to function later, in the formation of myofibers and the organization of sarcomeres. Mutations in four other genes result in muscle-specific degeneration. 103 mutations, defining at least 30 genes, cause no obvious defects in muscle formation and may instead affect neuronal development. Analysis of the behavioral defects suggests that these genes participate in the diverse locomotion patterns observed, such as touch response, rhythmic tail movements, equilibrium control, or that they simply confer general motility to the animal. In some of these mutants specific defects in the developing nervous system are detected. Mutations in two genes, nevermind (nev) and macho (mao), affect axonal projection in the optic tectum, whereas axon formation and elongation of motorneurons are disrupted by mutations in the diwanka (diw) and the unplugged (unp) genes.

Mutations affecting somite formation and patterning in the zebrafish, Danio rerio

Abstract: Somitogenesis is the basis of segmentation of the mesoderm in the trunk and tail of vertebrate embryos. Two groups of mutants with defects in this patterning process have been isolated in our screen for zygotic mutations affecting the embryonic development of the zebrafish (Danio rerio). In mutants of the first group, boundaries between individual somites are invisible early on, although the paraxial mesoderm is present. Later, irregular boundaries between somites are present. Mutations in fused somites (fss) and beamter (bea) affect all somites, whereas mutations in deadly seven (des), after eight (aei) and white tail (wit) only affect the more posterior somites. Mutants of all genes but wit are homozygous viable and fertile. Skeletal stainings and the expression pattern of myoD and snail1 suggest that anteroposterior patterning within individual somites is abnormal. In the second group of mutants, formation of the horizontal myoseptum, which separates the dorsal and ventral part of the myotome, is reduced. Six genes have been defined in this group (you-type genes). you-too mutants show the most severe phenotype; in these the adaxial cells, muscle pioneers and the primary motoneurons are affected, in addition to the horizontal myoseptum. The horizontal myoseptum is also missing in mutants that lack a notochord. The similarity of the somite phenotype in mutants lacking the notochord and in the you-type mutants suggests that the genes mutated in these two groups are involved in a signaling pathway from the notochord, important for patterning of the somites.

Principles of Neural Science

Abstract: I have developed "tennis elbow" from lugging this book around the past four weeks, but it is worth the pain, the effort, and the aspirin. It is also worth the (relatively speaking) bargain price. Including appendixes, this book contains 894 pages of text. The entire panorama of the neural sciences is surveyed and examined, and it is comprehensive in its scope, from genomes to social behaviors. The editors explicitly state that the book is designed as "an introductory text for students of biology, behavior, and medicine," but it is hard to imagine any audience, interested in any fragment of neuroscience at any level of sophistication, that would not enjoy this book. The editors have done a masterful job of weaving together the biologic, the behavioral, and the clinical sciences into a single tapestry in which everyone from the molecular biologist to the practicing psychiatrist can find and appreciate his or

The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome.

Abstract: Zebrafish have become a popular organism for the study of vertebrate gene function. The virtually transparent embryos of this species, and the ability to accelerate genetic studies by gene knockdown or overexpression, have led to the widespread use of zebrafish in the detailed investigation of vertebrate gene function and increasingly, the study of human genetic disease. However, for effective modelling of human genetic disease it is important to understand the extent to which zebrafish genes and gene structures are related to orthologous human genes. To examine this, we generated a high-quality sequence assembly of the zebrafish genome, made up of an overlapping set of completely sequenced large-insert clones that were ordered and oriented using a high-resolution high-density meiotic map. Detailed automatic and manual annotation provides evidence of more than 26,000 protein-coding genes, the largest gene set of any vertebrate so far sequenced. Comparison to the human reference genome shows that approximately 70% of human genes have at least one obvious zebrafish orthologue. In addition, the high quality of this genome assembly provides a clearer understanding of key genomic features such as a unique repeat content, a scarcity of pseudogenes, an enrichment of zebrafish-specific genes on chromosome 4 and chromosomal regions that influence sex determination.

Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data

Abstract: Spatial localization is a key determinant of cellular fate and behavior, but methods for spatially resolved, transcriptome-wide gene expression profiling across complex tissues are lacking. RNA staining methods assay only a small number of transcripts, whereas single-cell RNA-seq, which measures global gene expression, separates cells from their native spatial context. Here we present Seurat, a computational strategy to infer cellular localization by integrating single-cell RNA-seq data with in situ RNA patterns. We applied Seurat to spatially map 851 single cells from dissociated zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos and generated a transcriptome-wide map of spatial patterning. We confirmed Seurat's accuracy using several experimental approaches, then used the strategy to identify a set of archetypal expression patterns and spatial markers. Seurat correctly localizes rare subpopulations, accurately mapping both spatially restricted and scattered groups. Seurat will be applicable to mapping cellular localization within complex patterned tissues in diverse systems.

Hedgehog signaling in animal development: paradigms and principles.

Abstract: Since their isolation in the early 1990s, members of the Hedgehog family of intercellular signaling proteins have come to be recognized as key mediators of many fundamental processes in embryonic development. Their activities are central to the growth, patterning, and morphogenesis of many different regions within the body plans of vertebrates and insects, and most likely other invertebrates. In some contexts, Hedgehog signals act as morphogens in the dose-dependent induction of distinct cell fates within a target field, in others as mitogens regulating cell proliferation or as inducing factors controlling the form of a developing organ. These diverse functions of Hedgehog proteins raise many intriguing questions about their mode of operation. How do these proteins move between or across fields of cells? How are their activities modulated and transduced? What are their intracellular targets? In this article we review some well-established paradigms of Hedgehog function inDrosophila and vertebrate development and survey the current understanding of the synthesis, modification, and transduction of Hedgehog proteins. Embryological studies over much of the last century that relied primarily on the physical manipulation of cells within the developing embryo or fragments of the embryo in culture, provided many compelling examples for the primacy of cell–cell interactions in regulating invertebrate and vertebrate development. The subsequent identification of many of the signaling factors that mediate cellular communication has led to two general conclusions. First, although there are many important signals, most of these fall into a few large families of secreted peptide factors: theWnt (Wodarz and Nusse 1998), fibroblast growth factor (Szebenyi and Fallon 1999), TGFsuperfamily (Massague and Chen 2000), plateletderived growth factor (Betsholtz et al. 2001), ephrin (Bruckner and Klein 1998), and Hedgehog families. Second, parallel studies in invertebrate and vertebrate systems have shown that although the final outcome might look quite different (e.g., a fly vs. a mouse), there is a striking conservation in the deployment of members of the same signaling families to regulate development of these seemingly quite different organisms. This review focuses on one of the most intriguing examples of this phenomenon, that of the Hedgehog family. As with many of the advances in our understanding of the genetic regulation of animal development, hedgehog (hh) genes owe their discovery to the pioneering work of Nusslein-Volhard and Wieschaus (1980). In their screen for mutations that disrupt the Drosophila larval body plan, these authors identified several that cause the duplication of denticles (spiky cuticular processes that decorate the anterior half of each body segment) and an accompanying loss of naked cuticle, characteristic of the posterior half of each segment (see Fig. 1). The ensuing appearance of a continuous lawn of denticles projecting from the larval cuticle evidently suggested the spines of a hedgehog to the discoverers, hence the origin of the name of one of these genes. Other loci identified by mutants with this phenotype included armadillo, gooseberry, and wingless (wg). In contrast, animals mutant for the aptly named naked gene showed the converse phenotype, with denticle belts replaced by naked cuticle in every segment. On the basis of these mutant phenotypes, Nusslein-Volhard and Wieschaus (1980) proposed that these so-called segment-polarity genes regulate pattern within each of the segments of the larval body, individual genes acting within distinct subregions of the emerging segmental pattern. The first important breakthrough in unraveling how segment-polarity genes act came in the mid-1980s with the cloning of two members of the class, wingless and engrailed (en). Wg was shown to be the ortholog of the vertebrate proto-oncogene int1 (subsequently renamed Wnt1 and the founder member of the Wnt family of secreted peptide factors; Rijsewijk et al. 1987), whereas the sequence of en revealed that it encodes a homeodomaincontaining transcription factor (Fjose et al. 1985; Poole et al. 1985). Intriguingly, the two genes were found to be expressed in adjacent narrow stripes of cells in each segment (Martinez Arias et al. 1988). A close spatial relationship between Wnt1 and En expression domains was also reported in the primordial midbrain and hindbrain of the vertebrate embryo (McMahon et al. 1992). AnalyWe dedicate this review to the memory of our dear friend and colleague Rosa Beddington, whose encouragement led to our initial collaboration. 3Corresponding authors. E-MAIL p.w.ingham@sheffield.ac.uk; FAX 0114-222-288. E-MAIL amcmahon@biosun.harvard.edu; FAX (617) 496-3763. Article and publication are at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/ gad.938601.

Rab GTPases as coordinators of vesicle traffic.

Abstract: Rab GTPases control intracellular vesicle traffic by acting as regulatable switches that recruit effector molecules when in their GTP-bound form. The functional coupling between multiple Rab GTPases ensures the spatiotemporally coordinated regulation of vesicle traffic. Membrane trafficking between organelles by vesiculotubular carriers is fundamental to the existence of eukaryotic cells. Central in ensuring that cargoes are delivered to their correct destinations are the Rab GTPases, a large family of small GTPases that control membrane identity and vesicle budding, uncoating, motility and fusion through the recruitment of effector proteins, such as sorting adaptors, tethering factors, kinases, phosphatases and motors. Crosstalk between multiple Rab GTPases through shared effectors, or through effectors that recruit selective Rab activators, ensures the spatiotemporal regulation of vesicle traffic. Functional impairments of Rab pathways are associated with diseases, such as immunodeficiencies, cancer and neurological disorders.