M
Michael Clark
Researcher at University of Oxford
Publications - 54
Citations - 12405
Michael Clark is an academic researcher from University of Oxford. The author has contributed to research in topics: Food systems & Agriculture. The author has an hindex of 18, co-authored 47 publications receiving 6937 citations. Previous affiliations of Michael Clark include University of Minnesota.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems
Walter C. Willett,Johan Rockström,Johan Rockström,Brent Loken,Marco Springmann,Tim Lang,Sonja J. Vermeulen,Sonja J. Vermeulen,Tara Garnett,David Tilman,David Tilman,Fabrice DeClerck,Fabrice DeClerck,Amanda Wood,Malin Jonell,Michael Clark,Line Gordon,Jessica Fanzo,Corinna Hawkes,Rami Zurayk,Juan A Rivera,Wim de Vries,Lindiwe Majele Sibanda,Ashkan Afshin,Abhishek Chaudhary,Abhishek Chaudhary,Mario Herrero,Rina Agustina,Francesco Branca,Anna Lartey,Shenggen Fan,Beatrice Crona,Elizabeth L. Fox,Victoria Bignet,Max Troell,Max Troell,Therese Lindahl,Therese Lindahl,Sudhvir Singh,Sarah Cornell,K. Srinath Reddy,Sunita Narain,Sania Nishtar,Christopher J L Murray +43 more
TL;DR: Food in the Anthropocene : the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems focuses on meat, fish, vegetables and fruit as sources of protein.
Journal ArticleDOI
Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health
David Tilman,Michael Clark +1 more
TL;DR: Alternative diets that offer substantial health benefits could, if widely adopted, reduce global agricultural greenhouse gas emissions, reduce land clearing and resultant species extinctions, and help prevent such diet-related chronic non-communicable diseases.
Journal ArticleDOI
Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits
Marco Springmann,Michael Clark,Daniel Mason-D'Croz,Daniel Mason-D'Croz,Keith Wiebe,Benjamin Leon Bodirsky,Luis Lassaletta,Wim de Vries,Sonja J. Vermeulen,Mario Herrero,Kimberly M. Carlson,Malin Jonell,Max Troell,Max Troell,Fabrice DeClerck,Line Gordon,Rami Zurayk,Peter Scarborough,Mike Rayner,Brent Loken,Jess Fanzo,H. Charles J. Godfray,David Tilman,David Tilman,Johan Rockström,Johan Rockström,Walter C. Willett +26 more
TL;DR: A global model finds that the environmental impacts of the food system could increase by 60–90% by 2050, and that dietary changes, improvements in technologies and management, and reductions in food loss and waste will all be needed to mitigate these impacts.
Journal ArticleDOI
Future threats to biodiversity and pathways to their prevention
TL;DR: Proactive international efforts to increase crop yields, minimize land clearing and habitat fragmentation, and protect natural lands could increase food security in developing nations and preserve much of Earth's remaining biodiversity.
Journal ArticleDOI
Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice
Abstract: Global agricultural feeds over 7 billion people, but is also a leading cause of environmental degradation. Understanding how alternative agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice drive environmental degradation is necessary for reducing agriculture's environmental impacts. A meta-analysis of life cycle assessments that includes 742 agricultural systems and over 90 unique foods produced primarily in high-input systems shows that, per unit of food, organic systems require more land, cause more eutrophication, use less energy, but emit similar greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) as conventional systems; that grass-fed beef requires more land and emits similar GHG emissions as grain-feed beef; and that low-input aquaculture and non-trawling fisheries have much lower GHG emissions than trawling fisheries. In addition, our analyses show that increasing agricultural input efficiency (the amount of food produced per input of fertilizer or feed) would have environmental benefits for both crop and livestock systems. Further, for all environmental indicators and nutritional units examined, plant-based foods have the lowest environmental impacts; eggs, dairy, pork, poultry, non-trawling fisheries, and non-recirculating aquaculture have intermediate impacts; and ruminant meat has impacts ~100 times those of plant-based foods. Our analyses show that dietary shifts towards low-impact foods and increases in agricultural input use efficiency would offer larger environmental benefits than would switches from conventional agricultural systems to alternatives such as organic agriculture or grass-fed beef.