[1] Atmospheric gravity waves have been a subject of intense research activity in recent years because of their myriad effects and their major contributions to atmospheric circulation, structure, and variability. Apart from occasionally strong lower-atmospheric effects, the major wave influences occur in the middle atmosphere, between ∼ 10 and 110 km altitudes because of decreasing density and increasing wave amplitudes with altitude. Theoretical, numerical, and observational studies have advanced our understanding of gravity waves on many fronts since the review by Fritts [1984a]; the present review will focus on these more recent contributions. Progress includes a better appreciation of gravity wave sources and characteristics, the evolution of the gravity wave spectrum with altitude and with variations of wind and stability, the character and implications of observed climatologies, and the wave interaction and instability processes that constrain wave amplitudes and spectral shape. Recent studies have also expanded dramatically our understanding of gravity wave influences on the large-scale circulation and the thermal and constituent structures of the middle atmosphere. These advances have led to a number of parameterizations of gravity wave effects which are enabling ever more realistic descriptions of gravity wave forcing in large-scale models. There remain, nevertheless, a number of areas in which further progress is needed in refining our understanding of and our ability to describe and predict gravity wave influences in the middle atmosphere. Our view of these unknowns and needs is also offered.

/pdf/gravity-wave-dynamics-and-effects-in-the-middle-atmosphere-4huexaq7y8.pdf

Gravity wave dynamics and effects in the middle atmosphere

https://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~yelle/eprints/Yelle04b.pdf

Aeronomy of extra-solar giant planets at small orbital distances

Atmosphere: State of the Art and Challenges Barbara Nozier̀e,*,† Markus Kalberer,*,‡ Magda Claeys,* James Allan, Barbara D’Anna,† Stefano Decesari, Emanuela Finessi, Marianne Glasius, Irena Grgic,́ Jacqueline F. Hamilton, Thorsten Hoffmann, Yoshiteru Iinuma, Mohammed Jaoui, Ariane Kahnt, Christopher J. Kampf, Ivan Kourtchev,‡ Willy Maenhaut, Nicholas Marsden, Sanna Saarikoski, Jürgen Schnelle-Kreis, Jason D. Surratt, Sönke Szidat, Rafal Szmigielski, and Armin Wisthaler †Ircelyon/CNRS and Universite ́ Lyon 1, 69626 Villeurbanne Cedex, France ‡University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, United Kingdom University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium The University of Manchester & National Centre for Atmospheric Science, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom Istituto ISAC C.N.R., I-40129 Bologna, Italy University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom University of Aarhus, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark National Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaẗ, 55122 Mainz, Germany Leibniz-Institut für Troposphar̈enforschung, 04318 Leipzig, Germany Alion Science & Technology, McLean, Virginia 22102, United States Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, 55128 Mainz, Germany Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium Finnish Meteorological Institute, FI-00101 Helsinki, Finland Helmholtz Zentrum München, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland Institute of Physical Chemistry PAS, Warsaw 01-224, Poland University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway

/pdf/the-molecular-identification-of-organic-compounds-in-the-1rs6wk4d8f.pdf

The molecular identification of organic compounds in the atmosphere : state of the art and challenges

Global warming is expected to drive increasing extreme sea levels (ESLs) and flood risk along the world's coastlines. In this work we present probabilistic projections of ESLs for the present century taking into consideration changes in mean sea level, tides, wind-waves, and storm surges. Between the year 2000 and 2100 we project a very likely increase of the global average 100-year ESL of 34-76 cm under a moderate-emission-mitigation-policy scenario and of 58-172 cm under a business as usual scenario. Rising ESLs are mostly driven by thermal expansion, followed by contributions from ice mass-loss from glaciers, and ice-sheets in Greenland and Antarctica. Under these scenarios ESL rise would render a large part of the tropics exposed annually to the present-day 100-year event from 2050. By the end of this century this applies to most coastlines around the world, implying unprecedented flood risk levels unless timely adaptation measures are taken.

/pdf/global-probabilistic-projections-of-extreme-sea-levels-show-1suozfqs6n.pdf

Global probabilistic projections of extreme sea levels show intensification of coastal flood hazard.

Forcing of the ionosphere by waves from below

A numerical model characterizing internal gravity wave propagation into the upper atmosphere

[1] Atmospheric gravity waves (GWs) perturb minor species involved in the chemical reactions of airglow emissions in the upper mesosphere and lower thermosphere. In order to determine gravity wave fluxes and the forcing effects of gravity waves on the mean state (which are proportional to the square of the wave amplitude), it is essential that the amplitude of airglow brightness fluctuation be related to the amplitude of major gas density fluctuation in a deterministic way. This has been achieved through detailed modeling combining gravity wave dynamics described using a full-wave model with the chemistry relevant to the airglow emission of interest. Alternatively, others have employed approximations allowing them to derive analytic expressions relating airglow brightness fluctuations to major gas density fluctuations through a so-called “cancellation factor” (CF). The effects of these approximations on the derived CF are investigated here using a full-wave model describing gravity wave propagation in a nonisothermal, windy, and viscous atmosphere. This numerical model combined with the chemical reaction scheme for the OH (8, 3) Meinel airglow emission is used to derive fluctuations in the OH* nightglow from which an equivalent CF is calculated. Comparisons are made between the analytically derived CF's and the numerically derived CF's based on using different approximations in the latter model. Differences exist at most wave periods, but they also depend on the horizontal wavelengths of the gravity waves considered. In addition to these different model comparisons, the sensitivity of the numerically derived CF to specific physical processes is examined exclusively using the full-wave model. These sensitivity tests show that the effect of eddy diffusion marginally influences the calculated CF's only for the very slowest gravity waves. Accounting for the effects of a nonisothermal mean state has a significant influence on the calculated CF's, and the CF's calculated assuming an isothermal mean state can be as much as a factor of 2 smaller than those calculated assuming a nonisothermal mean state. The effects of background mean winds also influence the derived CF's, which then become dependent on the azimuth of propagation. In this case the calculated CF's can vary by a factor of ∼2 from their windless values for gravity waves of short horizontal wavelength with phase speeds less than 100 m s−1. Finally, reflection from the lower and middle thermosphere in the full-wave model leads to undulations in the calculated CF's as a function of phase speed for gravity waves with horizontal wavelengths of 100 km and phase speeds greater than about 100 m s−1. These effects that are not reproduced in the analytic model lead to large differences between the CF's calculated with and without winds, but they only occur for fast gravity waves that are not usually observed in the airglow.

/pdf/a-full-wave-investigation-of-the-use-of-a-cancellation-2d06hgxafd.pdf

A Full-wave Investigation of the Use of a ‘‘Cancellation Factor’’ in Gravity Wave–OH Airglow Interaction Studies

Erratum to “Gravity wave heating and cooling in Jupiter's thermosphere”: [Icarus 148 (2000) 266–281]

[1] Upward propagating acoustic waves heat the atmosphere at essentially all heights due to effects of viscous dissipation, sensible heat flux divergence, and Eulerian drift work. Acoustic wave-induced pressure gradient work provides a cooling effect at all heights, but this is overwhelmed by the heating processes. Eulerian drift work and wave-induced pressure gradient work dominate the energy balance, but they nearly cancel at most altitudes, leaving their difference, together with viscous dissipation and sensible heat flux divergence to heat the atmosphere. Acoustic waves are very different from gravity waves which cool the upper atmosphere through the effect of sensible heat flux divergence. Acoustic wave dissipation could be an important source of upper atmospheric heating.

Physical Processes in Acoustic Wave Heating of the Thermosphere

[1] Temperature and wind data obtained from a Na wind/temperature lidar operated by the University of Illinois group during the Airborne Lidar and Observations of the Hawaiian Airglow (ALOHA-93) Campaign, previously analyzed by Huang et al. [1998] using an isothermal Brunt-Vaisala frequency, have been reexamined to include temperature gradients in the calculation of the Richardson number. In the previous analysis using the isothermal Brunt-Vaisala frequency the existence of convective instability could not be assessed. New analysis shows that the nonisothermal Richardson number preserves some features found previously, with some striking differences noticable at times between 0900 and 1030 UT. The nonisothermal Richardson number becomes negative as early as 0930 UT, indicating conditions conducive to the development of convective instability and turbulence. The possibility that turbulence could exist at times earlier than previously thought explains more satisfactorily the large temperature increase observed before 1000 UT.

/pdf/further-investigations-of-a-mesospheric-inversion-layer-3gw58lmag4.pdf

Michael P. Hickey

Papers

A numerical model characterizing internal gravity wave propagation into the upper atmosphere

A Full-wave Investigation of the Use of a ‘‘Cancellation Factor’’ in Gravity Wave–OH Airglow Interaction Studies

Erratum to “Gravity wave heating and cooling in Jupiter's thermosphere”: [Icarus 148 (2000) 266–281]

Physical Processes in Acoustic Wave Heating of the Thermosphere

Further investigations of a mesospheric inversion layer observed in the ALOHA-93 Campaign