scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Michele Cirasuolo

Bio: Michele Cirasuolo is an academic researcher from European Southern Observatory. The author has contributed to research in topics: Galaxy & Redshift. The author has an hindex of 68, co-authored 196 publications receiving 20170 citations. Previous affiliations of Michele Cirasuolo include Science and Technology Facilities Council & International School for Advanced Studies.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Norman A. Grogin1, Dale D. Kocevski2, Sandra M. Faber2, Henry C. Ferguson1, Anton M. Koekemoer1, Adam G. Riess3, Viviana Acquaviva4, David M. Alexander5, Omar Almaini6, Matthew L. N. Ashby7, Marco Barden8, Eric F. Bell9, Frédéric Bournaud10, Thomas M. Brown1, Karina Caputi11, Stefano Casertano1, Paolo Cassata12, Marco Castellano, Peter Challis7, Ranga-Ram Chary13, Edmond Cheung2, Michele Cirasuolo14, Christopher J. Conselice6, Asantha Cooray15, Darren J. Croton16, Emanuele Daddi10, Tomas Dahlen1, Romeel Davé17, Duilia F. de Mello18, Duilia F. de Mello19, Avishai Dekel20, Mark Dickinson, Timothy Dolch3, Jennifer L. Donley1, James Dunlop11, Aaron A. Dutton21, David Elbaz10, Giovanni G. Fazio7, Alexei V. Filippenko22, Steven L. Finkelstein23, Adriano Fontana, Jonathan P. Gardner18, Peter M. Garnavich24, Eric Gawiser4, Mauro Giavalisco12, Andrea Grazian, Yicheng Guo12, Nimish P. Hathi25, Boris Häussler6, Philip F. Hopkins22, Jiasheng Huang26, Kuang-Han Huang1, Kuang-Han Huang3, Saurabh Jha4, Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe, Robert P. Kirshner7, David C. Koo2, Kamson Lai2, Kyoung-Soo Lee27, Weidong Li22, Jennifer M. Lotz1, Ray A. Lucas1, Piero Madau2, Patrick J. McCarthy25, Elizabeth J. McGrath2, Daniel H. McIntosh28, Ross J. McLure11, Bahram Mobasher29, Leonidas A. Moustakas13, Mark Mozena2, Kirpal Nandra30, Jeffrey A. Newman31, Sami Niemi1, Kai G. Noeske1, Casey Papovich23, Laura Pentericci, Alexandra Pope12, Joel R. Primack2, Abhijith Rajan1, Swara Ravindranath32, Naveen A. Reddy29, Alvio Renzini, Hans-Walter Rix30, Aday R. Robaina33, Steven A. Rodney3, David J. Rosario30, Piero Rosati34, S. Salimbeni12, Claudia Scarlata35, Brian Siana29, Luc Simard36, Joseph Smidt15, Rachel S. Somerville4, Hyron Spinrad22, Amber Straughn18, Louis-Gregory Strolger37, Olivia Telford31, Harry I. Teplitz13, Jonathan R. Trump2, Arjen van der Wel30, Carolin Villforth1, Risa H. Wechsler38, Benjamin J. Weiner17, Tommy Wiklind39, Vivienne Wild11, Grant W. Wilson12, Stijn Wuyts30, Hao Jing Yan40, Min S. Yun12 
TL;DR: The Cosmic Assembly Near-IR Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey (CANDELS) as discussed by the authors was designed to document the first third of galactic evolution, from z approx. 8 - 1.5 to test their accuracy as standard candles for cosmology.
Abstract: The Cosmic Assembly Near-IR Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey (CANDELS) is designed to document the first third of galactic evolution, from z approx. 8 - 1.5. It will image > 250,000 distant galaxies using three separate cameras on the Hubble Space Tele8cope, from the mid-UV to near-IR, and will find and measure Type Ia supernovae beyond z > 1.5 to test their accuracy as standard candles for cosmology. Five premier multi-wavelength sky regions are selected, each with extensive ancillary data. The use of five widely separated fields mitigates cosmic variance and yields statistically robust and complete samples of galaxies down to a stellar mass of 10(exp 9) solar mass to z approx. 2, reaching the knee of the UV luminosity function of galaxies to z approx. 8. The survey covers approximately 800 square arc minutes and is divided into two parts. The CANDELS/Deep survey (5(sigma) point-source limit H =27.7mag) covers approx. 125 square arcminutes within GOODS-N and GOODS-S. The CANDELS/Wide survey includes GOODS and three additional fields (EGS, COSMOS, and UDS) and covers the full area to a 50(sigma) point-source limit of H ? or approx. = 27.0 mag. Together with the Hubble Ultradeep Fields, the strategy creates a three-tiered "wedding cake" approach that has proven efficient for extragalactic surveys. Data from the survey are non-proprietary and are useful for a wide variety of science investigations. In this paper, we describe the basic motivations for the survey, the CANDELS team science goals and the resulting observational requirements, the field selection and geometry, and the observing design.

2,088 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Anton M. Koekemoer1, Sandra M. Faber2, Henry C. Ferguson1, Norman A. Grogin1, Dale D. Kocevski2, David C. Koo2, Kamson Lai2, Jennifer M. Lotz1, Ray A. Lucas1, Elizabeth J. McGrath2, Sara Ogaz1, Abhijith Rajan1, Adam G. Riess3, S. Rodney3, L. G. Strolger4, Stefano Casertano1, Marco Castellano, Tomas Dahlen1, Mark Dickinson, Timothy Dolch3, Adriano Fontana, Mauro Giavalisco5, Andrea Grazian, Yicheng Guo5, Nimish P. Hathi6, Kuang-Han Huang3, Kuang-Han Huang1, Arjen van der Wel7, Hao Jing Yan8, Viviana Acquaviva9, David M. Alexander10, Omar Almaini11, Matthew L. N. Ashby12, Marco Barden13, Eric F. Bell14, Frédéric Bournaud15, Thomas M. Brown1, Karina Caputi16, Paolo Cassata5, Peter Challis17, Ranga-Ram Chary18, Edmond Cheung2, Michele Cirasuolo16, Christopher J. Conselice11, Asantha Cooray19, Darren J. Croton20, Emanuele Daddi15, Romeel Davé21, Duilia F. de Mello22, Loic de Ravel16, Avishai Dekel23, Jennifer L. Donley1, James Dunlop16, Aaron A. Dutton24, David Elbaz25, Giovanni Fazio12, Alexei V. Filippenko26, Steven L. Finkelstein27, Chris Frazer19, Jonathan P. Gardner22, Peter M. Garnavich28, Eric Gawiser9, Ruth Gruetzbauch11, Will G. Hartley11, B. Haussler11, Jessica Herrington14, Philip F. Hopkins26, J.-S. Huang29, Saurabh Jha9, Andrew Johnson2, Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe3, Ali Ahmad Khostovan19, Robert P. Kirshner12, Caterina Lani11, Kyoung-Soo Lee30, Weidong Li26, Piero Madau2, Patrick J. McCarthy6, Daniel H. McIntosh31, Ross J. McLure, Conor McPartland2, Bahram Mobasher32, Heidi Moreira9, Alice Mortlock11, Leonidas A. Moustakas18, Mark Mozena2, Kirpal Nandra33, Jeffrey A. Newman34, Jennifer L. Nielsen31, Sami Niemi1, Kai G. Noeske1, Casey Papovich27, Laura Pentericci, Alexandra Pope, Joel R. Primack2, Swara Ravindranath35, Naveen A. Reddy, Alvio Renzini, Hans Walter Rix7, Aday R. Robaina, David J. Rosario2, Piero Rosati7, S. Salimbeni5, Claudia Scarlata18, Brian Siana18, Luc Simard36, Joseph Smidt19, D. Snyder2, Rachel S. Somerville1, Hyron Spinrad26, Amber N. Straughn22, Olivia Telford34, Harry I. Teplitz18, Jonathan R. Trump2, Carlos J. Vargas9, Carolin Villforth1, C. Wagner31, P. Wandro2, Risa H. Wechsler37, Benjamin J. Weiner21, Tommy Wiklind1, Vivienne Wild, Grant W. Wilson5, Stijn Wuyts12, Min S. Yun5 
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe the Hubble Space Telescope imaging data products and data reduction procedures for the Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey (CANDELS).
Abstract: This paper describes the Hubble Space Telescope imaging data products and data reduction procedures for the Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey (CANDELS). This survey is designed to document the evolution of galaxies and black holes at z 1.5-8, and to study Type Ia supernovae at z > 1.5. Five premier multi-wavelength sky regions are selected, each with extensive multi-wavelength observations. The primary CANDELS data consist of imaging obtained in the Wide Field Camera 3 infrared channel (WFC3/IR) and the WFC3 ultraviolet/optical channel, along with the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS). The CANDELS/Deep survey covers ~125 arcmin2 within GOODS-N and GOODS-S, while the remainder consists of the CANDELS/Wide survey, achieving a total of ~800 arcmin2 across GOODS and three additional fields (Extended Groth Strip, COSMOS, and Ultra-Deep Survey). We summarize the observational aspects of the survey as motivated by the scientific goals and present a detailed description of the data reduction procedures and products from the survey. Our data reduction methods utilize the most up-to-date calibration files and image combination procedures. We have paid special attention to correcting a range of instrumental effects, including charge transfer efficiency degradation for ACS, removal of electronic bias-striping present in ACS data after Servicing Mission 4, and persistence effects and other artifacts in WFC3/IR. For each field, we release mosaics for individual epochs and eventual mosaics containing data from all epochs combined, to facilitate photometric variability studies and the deepest possible photometry. A more detailed overview of the science goals and observational design of the survey are presented in a companion paper.

2,011 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Anton M. Koekemoer, Sandra M. Faber, Henry C. Ferguson, Norman A. Grogin, Dale D. Kocevski, David C. Koo, Kamson Lai, Jennifer M. Lotz, Ray A. Lucas, Elizabeth J. McGrath, Sara Ogaz, Abhijith Rajan, Adam G. Riess, S. Rodney, Louis Gregory Strolger, Stefano Casertano, Marco Castellano, Tomas Dahlen, Mark Dickinson, Timothy Dolch, Adriano Fontana, Mauro Giavalisco, Andrea Grazian, Yicheng Guo, Nimish P. Hathi, Kuang-Han Huang, Arjen van der Wel, Haojing Yan, Viviana Acquaviva, David M. Alexander Omar Almaini, Matthew L. N. Ashby, Marco Barden, Eric F. Bell, Frédéric Bournaud, Thomas M. Brown, Karina Caputi, Paolo Cassata, Peter Challis, Ranga-Ram Chary, Edmond Cheung, Michele Cirasuolo, Christopher J. Conselice, Asantha Cooray, Darren J. Croton, Emanuele Daddi, Romeel Davé, Duilia F. de Mello, Loic de Ravel, Avishai Dekel, Jennifer L. Donley, James Dunlop, Aaron A. Dutton, David Elbaz, Giovanni G. Fazio, Alex V. Filippenko, Steven L. Finkelstein, Chris Frazer, Jonathan P. Gardner, Peter M. Garnavich, Eric Gawiser, Ruth Gruetzbauch, Will G. Hartley, Boris Häussler, Jessica Herrington, Philip F. Hopkins, Jiasheng Huang, Saurabh Jha, Andrew Johnson, Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe, Ali Ahmad Khostovan, Robert P. Kirshner, Caterina Lani, Kyoung-Soo Lee, Weidong Li, Piero Madau, Patrick J. McCarthy, Daniel H. McIntosh, Ross J. McLure, Conor McPartland, Bahram Mobasher, Heidi Moreira, Alice Mortlock, Leonidas A. Moustakas, Mark Mozena, Kirpal Nandra, Jeffrey A. Newman, Jennifer L. Nielsen, Sami Niemi, Kai G. Noeske, Casey Papovich, Laura Pentericci, Alexandra Pope, Joel R. Primack, Swara Ravindranath, Naveen A. Reddy, Alvio Renzini, Hans-Walter Rix, Aday R. Robaina, David J. Rosario, Piero Rosati, S. Salimbeni, Claudia Scarlata, Brian Siana, Luc Simard, Joseph Smidt, D. Snyder, Rachel S. Somerville, Hyron Spinrad, Amber Straughn, Olivia Telford, Harry I. Teplitz, Jonathan R. Trump, Carlos J. Vargas, Carolin Villforth, C. Wagner, P. Wandro, Risa H. Wechsler, Benjamin J. Weiner, Tommy Wiklind, Vivienne Wild, Grant W. Wilson, Stijn Wuyts, Min S. Yun 
TL;DR: The Cosmic Assembly Near-IR Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey (CANDELS) as mentioned in this paper was designed to document the evolution of galaxies and black holes at $z\sim 1.5-8$, and to study Type Ia SNe beyond $z>1.5.
Abstract: This paper describes the Hubble Space Telescope imaging data products and data reduction procedures for the Cosmic Assembly Near-IR Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey (CANDELS). This survey is designed to document the evolution of galaxies and black holes at $z\sim1.5-8$, and to study Type Ia SNe beyond $z>1.5$. Five premier multi-wavelength sky regions are selected, each with extensive multiwavelength observations. The primary CANDELS data consist of imaging obtained in the Wide Field Camera 3 / infrared channel (WFC3/IR) and UVIS channel, along with the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS). The CANDELS/Deep survey covers \sim125 square arcminutes within GOODS-N and GOODS-S, while the remainder consists of the CANDELS/Wide survey, achieving a total of \sim800 square arcminutes across GOODS and three additional fields (EGS, COSMOS, and UDS). We summarize the observational aspects of the survey as motivated by the scientific goals and present a detailed description of the data reduction procedures and products from the survey. Our data reduction methods utilize the most up to date calibration files and image combination procedures. We have paid special attention to correcting a range of instrumental effects, including CTE degradation for ACS, removal of electronic bias-striping present in ACS data after SM4, and persistence effects and other artifacts in WFC3/IR. For each field, we release mosaics for individual epochs and eventual mosaics containing data from all epochs combined, to facilitate photometric variability studies and the deepest possible photometry. A more detailed overview of the science goals and observational design of the survey are presented in a companion paper.

1,917 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Seb Oliver1, James J. Bock2, James J. Bock3, Bruno Altieri4, Alexandre Amblard5, V. Arumugam6, Herve Aussel7, Tom Babbedge8, Alexandre Beelen9, Matthieu Béthermin7, Matthieu Béthermin9, Andrew Blain2, Alessandro Boselli10, C. Bridge2, Drew Brisbin11, V. Buat10, Denis Burgarella10, N. Castro-Rodríguez12, N. Castro-Rodríguez13, Antonio Cava14, P. Chanial7, Michele Cirasuolo15, David L. Clements8, A. Conley16, L. Conversi4, Asantha Cooray17, Asantha Cooray2, C. D. Dowell3, C. D. Dowell2, Elizabeth Dubois1, Eli Dwek18, Simon Dye19, Stephen Anthony Eales20, David Elbaz7, Duncan Farrah1, A. Feltre21, P. Ferrero13, P. Ferrero12, N. Fiolet9, N. Fiolet22, M. Fox8, Alberto Franceschini21, Walter Kieran Gear20, E. Giovannoli10, Jason Glenn16, Yan Gong17, E. A. González Solares23, Matthew Joseph Griffin20, Mark Halpern24, Martin Harwit, Evanthia Hatziminaoglou, Sebastien Heinis10, Peter Hurley1, Ho Seong Hwang7, A. Hyde8, Edo Ibar15, O. Ilbert10, K. G. Isaak25, Rob Ivison6, Rob Ivison15, Guilaine Lagache9, E. Le Floc'h7, L. R. Levenson3, L. R. Levenson2, B. Lo Faro21, Nanyao Y. Lu2, S. C. Madden7, Bruno Maffei26, Georgios E. Magdis7, G. Mainetti21, Lucia Marchetti21, G. Marsden24, J. Marshall2, J. Marshall3, A. M. J. Mortier8, Hien Nguyen3, Hien Nguyen2, B. O'Halloran8, Alain Omont22, Mat Page27, P. Panuzzo7, Andreas Papageorgiou20, H. Patel8, Chris Pearson28, Chris Pearson29, Ismael Perez-Fournon12, Ismael Perez-Fournon13, Michael Pohlen20, Jonathan Rawlings27, Gwenifer Raymond20, Dimitra Rigopoulou29, Dimitra Rigopoulou30, L. Riguccini7, D. Rizzo8, Giulia Rodighiero21, Isaac Roseboom6, Isaac Roseboom1, Michael Rowan-Robinson8, M. Sanchez Portal4, Benjamin L. Schulz2, Douglas Scott24, Nick Seymour27, Nick Seymour31, D. L. Shupe2, A. J. Smith1, Jamie Stevens32, M. Symeonidis27, Markos Trichas33, K. E. Tugwell27, Mattia Vaccari21, Ivan Valtchanov4, Joaquin Vieira2, Marco P. Viero2, L. Vigroux22, Lifan Wang1, Robyn L. Ward1, Julie Wardlow17, G. Wright15, C. K. Xu2, Michael Zemcov3, Michael Zemcov2 
TL;DR: The Herschel Multi-tiered Extragalactic Survey (HerMES) is a legacy program designed to map a set of nested fields totalling ∼380deg^2 as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: The Herschel Multi-tiered Extragalactic Survey (HerMES) is a legacy programme designed to map a set of nested fields totalling ∼380 deg^2. Fields range in size from 0.01 to ∼20 deg^2, using the Herschel-Spectral and Photometric Imaging Receiver (SPIRE) (at 250, 350 and 500 μm) and the Herschel-Photodetector Array Camera and Spectrometer (PACS) (at 100 and 160 μm), with an additional wider component of 270 deg^2 with SPIRE alone. These bands cover the peak of the redshifted thermal spectral energy distribution from interstellar dust and thus capture the reprocessed optical and ultraviolet radiation from star formation that has been absorbed by dust, and are critical for forming a complete multiwavelength understanding of galaxy formation and evolution. The survey will detect of the order of 100 000 galaxies at 5σ in some of the best-studied fields in the sky. Additionally, HerMES is closely coordinated with the PACS Evolutionary Probe survey. Making maximum use of the full spectrum of ancillary data, from radio to X-ray wavelengths, it is designed to facilitate redshift determination, rapidly identify unusual objects and understand the relationships between thermal emission from dust and other processes. Scientific questions HerMES will be used to answer include the total infrared emission of galaxies, the evolution of the luminosity function, the clustering properties of dusty galaxies and the properties of populations of galaxies which lie below the confusion limit through lensing and statistical techniques. This paper defines the survey observations and data products, outlines the primary scientific goals of the HerMES team, and reviews some of the early results.

852 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors presented new improved constraints on the Hubble parameter H(z) in the redshift range 0.15 -1.1, obtained from the differential spectroscopic evolution of early-type galaxies as a function of redshift.
Abstract: We present new improved constraints on the Hubble parameter H(z) in the redshift range 0.15 \textless z \textless 1.1, obtained from the differential spectroscopic evolution of early-type galaxies as a function of redshift. We extract a large sample of early-type galaxies ( 11000) from several spectroscopic surveys, spanning almost 8 billion years of cosmic lookback time (0.15 \textless z \textless 1.42). We select the most massive, red elliptical galaxies, passively evolving and without signature of ongoing star formation. Those galaxies can be used as standard cosmic chronometers, as firstly proposed by Jimenez & Loeb (2002), whose (life! Nit age evolution as a function of cosmic time directly probes H (z). We analyze the 4000 angstrom break (D4000) as a function of redshift, use stellar population synthesis models to theoretically calibrate the dependence of the differential age evolution on the differential D4000, and estimate the Hubble parameter taking into account both statistical and systematical errors. We provide 8 new measurements of H(z) (see table 4), and determine its change in H(z) to a precision of 5-12% mapping homogeneously the redshift range up to z 1.1; for the first time, we place a constraint on 11(z) at z not equal 0 with a precision comparable with the one achieved for the Hubble constant (about 5-6% at z similar to 0.2), and covered a redshift range (0.5 \textless z \textless 0.8) which is crucial to distinguish many different quintessence cosmologies. These measurements have been tested to best match a ACDM model, clearly providing a statistically robust indication that the Universe is undergoing an accelerated expansion. This method shows the potentiality to open a new avenue in constrain a variety of alternative cosmologies, especially when future surveys (e.g. Euclid) will open the possibility to extend it up to z similar to 2.

724 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Peter A. R. Ade1, Nabila Aghanim2, Monique Arnaud3, M. Ashdown4  +334 moreInstitutions (82)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a cosmological analysis based on full-mission Planck observations of temperature and polarization anisotropies of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation.
Abstract: This paper presents cosmological results based on full-mission Planck observations of temperature and polarization anisotropies of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation. Our results are in very good agreement with the 2013 analysis of the Planck nominal-mission temperature data, but with increased precision. The temperature and polarization power spectra are consistent with the standard spatially-flat 6-parameter ΛCDM cosmology with a power-law spectrum of adiabatic scalar perturbations (denoted “base ΛCDM” in this paper). From the Planck temperature data combined with Planck lensing, for this cosmology we find a Hubble constant, H0 = (67.8 ± 0.9) km s-1Mpc-1, a matter density parameter Ωm = 0.308 ± 0.012, and a tilted scalar spectral index with ns = 0.968 ± 0.006, consistent with the 2013 analysis. Note that in this abstract we quote 68% confidence limits on measured parameters and 95% upper limits on other parameters. We present the first results of polarization measurements with the Low Frequency Instrument at large angular scales. Combined with the Planck temperature and lensing data, these measurements give a reionization optical depth of τ = 0.066 ± 0.016, corresponding to a reionization redshift of . These results are consistent with those from WMAP polarization measurements cleaned for dust emission using 353-GHz polarization maps from the High Frequency Instrument. We find no evidence for any departure from base ΛCDM in the neutrino sector of the theory; for example, combining Planck observations with other astrophysical data we find Neff = 3.15 ± 0.23 for the effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom, consistent with the value Neff = 3.046 of the Standard Model of particle physics. The sum of neutrino masses is constrained to ∑ mν < 0.23 eV. The spatial curvature of our Universe is found to be very close to zero, with | ΩK | < 0.005. Adding a tensor component as a single-parameter extension to base ΛCDM we find an upper limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio of r0.002< 0.11, consistent with the Planck 2013 results and consistent with the B-mode polarization constraints from a joint analysis of BICEP2, Keck Array, and Planck (BKP) data. Adding the BKP B-mode data to our analysis leads to a tighter constraint of r0.002 < 0.09 and disfavours inflationarymodels with a V(φ) ∝ φ2 potential. The addition of Planck polarization data leads to strong constraints on deviations from a purely adiabatic spectrum of fluctuations. We find no evidence for any contribution from isocurvature perturbations or from cosmic defects. Combining Planck data with other astrophysical data, including Type Ia supernovae, the equation of state of dark energy is constrained to w = −1.006 ± 0.045, consistent with the expected value for a cosmological constant. The standard big bang nucleosynthesis predictions for the helium and deuterium abundances for the best-fit Planck base ΛCDM cosmology are in excellent agreement with observations. We also constraints on annihilating dark matter and on possible deviations from the standard recombination history. In neither case do we find no evidence for new physics. The Planck results for base ΛCDM are in good agreement with baryon acoustic oscillation data and with the JLA sample of Type Ia supernovae. However, as in the 2013 analysis, the amplitude of the fluctuation spectrum is found to be higher than inferred from some analyses of rich cluster counts and weak gravitational lensing. We show that these tensions cannot easily be resolved with simple modifications of the base ΛCDM cosmology. Apart from these tensions, the base ΛCDM cosmology provides an excellent description of the Planck CMB observations and many other astrophysical data sets.

10,728 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present results based on full-mission Planck observations of temperature and polarization anisotropies of the CMB, which are consistent with the six-parameter inflationary LCDM cosmology.
Abstract: We present results based on full-mission Planck observations of temperature and polarization anisotropies of the CMB. These data are consistent with the six-parameter inflationary LCDM cosmology. From the Planck temperature and lensing data, for this cosmology we find a Hubble constant, H0= (67.8 +/- 0.9) km/s/Mpc, a matter density parameter Omega_m = 0.308 +/- 0.012 and a scalar spectral index with n_s = 0.968 +/- 0.006. (We quote 68% errors on measured parameters and 95% limits on other parameters.) Combined with Planck temperature and lensing data, Planck LFI polarization measurements lead to a reionization optical depth of tau = 0.066 +/- 0.016. Combining Planck with other astrophysical data we find N_ eff = 3.15 +/- 0.23 for the effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom and the sum of neutrino masses is constrained to < 0.23 eV. Spatial curvature is found to be |Omega_K| < 0.005. For LCDM we find a limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio of r <0.11 consistent with the B-mode constraints from an analysis of BICEP2, Keck Array, and Planck (BKP) data. Adding the BKP data leads to a tighter constraint of r < 0.09. We find no evidence for isocurvature perturbations or cosmic defects. The equation of state of dark energy is constrained to w = -1.006 +/- 0.045. Standard big bang nucleosynthesis predictions for the Planck LCDM cosmology are in excellent agreement with observations. We investigate annihilating dark matter and deviations from standard recombination, finding no evidence for new physics. The Planck results for base LCDM are in agreement with BAO data and with the JLA SNe sample. However the amplitude of the fluctuations is found to be higher than inferred from rich cluster counts and weak gravitational lensing. Apart from these tensions, the base LCDM cosmology provides an excellent description of the Planck CMB observations and many other astrophysical data sets.

9,745 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors review the range of complementary techniques and theoretical tools that allow astronomers to map the cosmic history of star formation, heavy element production, and reionization of the Universe from the cosmic "dark ages" to the present epoch.
Abstract: Over the past two decades, an avalanche of data from multiwavelength imaging and spectroscopic surveys has revolutionized our view of galaxy formation and evolution. Here we review the range of complementary techniques and theoretical tools that allow astronomers to map the cosmic history of star formation, heavy element production, and reionization of the Universe from the cosmic "dark ages" to the present epoch. A consistent picture is emerging, whereby the star-formation rate density peaked approximately 3.5 Gyr after the Big Bang, at z~1.9, and declined exponentially at later times, with an e-folding timescale of 3.9 Gyr. Half of the stellar mass observed today was formed before a redshift z = 1.3. About 25% formed before the peak of the cosmic star-formation rate density, and another 25% formed after z = 0.7. Less than ~1% of today's stars formed during the epoch of reionization. Under the assumption of a universal initial mass function, the global stellar mass density inferred at any epoch matches reasonably well the time integral of all the preceding star-formation activity. The comoving rates of star formation and central black hole accretion follow a similar rise and fall, offering evidence for co-evolution of black holes and their host galaxies. The rise of the mean metallicity of the Universe to about 0.001 solar by z = 6, one Gyr after the Big Bang, appears to have been accompanied by the production of fewer than ten hydrogen Lyman-continuum photons per baryon, a rather tight budget for cosmological reionization.

3,104 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The LSST design is driven by four main science themes: probing dark energy and dark matter, taking an inventory of the solar system, exploring the transient optical sky, and mapping the Milky Way.
Abstract: (Abridged) We describe here the most ambitious survey currently planned in the optical, the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST). A vast array of science will be enabled by a single wide-deep-fast sky survey, and LSST will have unique survey capability in the faint time domain. The LSST design is driven by four main science themes: probing dark energy and dark matter, taking an inventory of the Solar System, exploring the transient optical sky, and mapping the Milky Way. LSST will be a wide-field ground-based system sited at Cerro Pachon in northern Chile. The telescope will have an 8.4 m (6.5 m effective) primary mirror, a 9.6 deg$^2$ field of view, and a 3.2 Gigapixel camera. The standard observing sequence will consist of pairs of 15-second exposures in a given field, with two such visits in each pointing in a given night. With these repeats, the LSST system is capable of imaging about 10,000 square degrees of sky in a single filter in three nights. The typical 5$\sigma$ point-source depth in a single visit in $r$ will be $\sim 24.5$ (AB). The project is in the construction phase and will begin regular survey operations by 2022. The survey area will be contained within 30,000 deg$^2$ with $\delta<+34.5^\circ$, and will be imaged multiple times in six bands, $ugrizy$, covering the wavelength range 320--1050 nm. About 90\% of the observing time will be devoted to a deep-wide-fast survey mode which will uniformly observe a 18,000 deg$^2$ region about 800 times (summed over all six bands) during the anticipated 10 years of operations, and yield a coadded map to $r\sim27.5$. The remaining 10\% of the observing time will be allocated to projects such as a Very Deep and Fast time domain survey. The goal is to make LSST data products, including a relational database of about 32 trillion observations of 40 billion objects, available to the public and scientists around the world.

2,738 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The final version published in MNRAS August 2007 included significant revisions including significant revisions to the original version April 2006.
Abstract: Final published version including significant revisions. Twenty four pages, fourteen figures. Original version April 2006; final version published in MNRAS August 2007

2,562 citations