Michelle Shardell

Bio: Michelle Shardell is an academic researcher from University of Maryland, Baltimore. The author has contributed to research in topics: Hip fracture & Population. The author has an hindex of 48, co-authored 183 publications receiving 9379 citations. Previous affiliations of Michelle Shardell include National Institutes of Health.

The FNIH Sarcopenia Project: Rationale, Study Description, Conference Recommendations, and Final Estimates

Abstract: Background. Low muscle mass and weakness are common and potentially disabling in older adults, but in order to become recognized as a clinical condition, criteria for diagnosis should be based on clinically relevant thresholds and independently validated. The Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Biomarkers Consortium Sarcopenia Project used an evidence-based approach to develop these criteria. Initial findings were presented at a conference in May 2012, which generated recommendations that guided additional analyses to determine final recommended criteria. Details of the Project and its findings are presented in four accompanying manuscripts.

Cluster-randomized trial of a mobile phone personalized behavioral intervention for blood glucose control.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE To test whether adding mobile application coaching and patient/provider web portals to community primary care compared with standard diabetes management would reduce glycated hemoglobin levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A cluster-randomized clinical trial, the Mobile Diabetes Intervention Study, randomly assigned 26 primary care practices to one of three stepped treatment groups or a control group (usual care). A total of 163 patients were enrolled and included in analysis. The primary outcome was change in glycated hemoglobin levels over a 1-year treatment period. Secondary outcomes were changes in patient-reported diabetes symptoms, diabetes distress, depression, and other clinical (blood pressure) and laboratory (lipid) values. Maximal treatment was a mobile- and web-based self-management patient coaching system and provider decision support. Patients received automated, real-time educational and behavioral messaging in response to individually analyzed blood glucose values, diabetes medications, and lifestyle behaviors communicated by mobile phone. Providers received quarterly reports summarizing patient’s glycemic control, diabetes medication management, lifestyle behaviors, and evidence-based treatment options. RESULTS The mean declines in glycated hemoglobin were 1.9% in the maximal treatment group and 0.7% in the usual care group, a difference of 1.2% ( P = 0.001) over 12 months. Appreciable differences were not observed between groups for patient-reported diabetes distress, depression, diabetes symptoms, or blood pressure and lipid levels (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The combination of behavioral mobile coaching with blood glucose data, lifestyle behaviors, and patient self-management data individually analyzed and presented with evidence-based guidelines to providers substantially reduced glycated hemoglobin levels over 1 year.

Grip Strength Cutpoints for the Identification of Clinically Relevant Weakness

Abstract: Muscle weakness is related to poor physical performance and incident mobility limitations among older adults (1–6). Weakness is considered a key element of frailty (7) and, increasingly, of sarcopenia (8,9). Although the association between weakness and functional limitations is strong, there is no consensus regarding a cutpoint for identification of risk for functional problems. In order to identify population subgroups in whom weakness is a potential contributor to functional limitations, it is necessary to determine what constitutes a clinically relevant degree of weakness. This is the second in a series of reports from the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) Sarcopenia Project, which pooled data from multiple studies to develop and evaluate clinically relevant criteria for weakness and low muscle mass (10). The purpose of the analysis presented here was to identify cutpoints that distinguish weakness (measured by grip strength) associated with mobility impairment (measured by gait speed) using cross-sectional data (ie, to maximize concurrent validity). This analysis builds on previous research on the association between strength and walking speed using a data-driven approach across multiple populations and an analytic technique (Classification and Regression Tree [CART] analysis) designed to optimize concurrent validity in the context of complex interactions. Findings were used to address subsequent Project goals reported separately (11–13).

Criteria for Clinically Relevant Weakness and Low Lean Mass and Their Longitudinal Association With Incident Mobility Impairment and Mortality: The Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) Sarcopenia Project

Abstract: Results. Low grip strength (men: odds ratio (OR) = 2.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.34-3.99; women: OR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.23-3.21), low grip strength-to-BMI ratio (men: OR = 3.28, 95% CI 1.92-5.59; women: OR = 2.54, 95% CI 1.10-5.83) and low ALM-to-BMI ratio (men: OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.12-2.25; women: OR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.14-2.87), but not low ALM, were associated with increased likelihood for incident mobility impairment. Weakness increased likelihood of mobility impairment regardless of low lean mass. Mortality risk patterns were inconsistent. Conclusions. These findings support our cut-points for low grip strength and low ALM-to-BMI ratio as candidate criteria for clinically relevant weakness and low lean mass. Further validation in other populations and for alternate relevant outcomes is needed.

An Evidence-Based Comparison of Operational Criteria for the Presence of Sarcopenia

Abstract: Low muscle mass and weakness are potential contributors to disability in older persons. Although the term “sarcopenia” has become widespread, the criteria for an operational definition vary among studies and experts. Initial work on defining sarcopenia was based on measures of muscle mass alone, and the prevalence of sarcopenia when compared with a young reference population ranged between 13% and 24% among adults younger than 70 years to more than 50% among adults older than 80 years (1). However, a growing body of research suggests that there is a disconnect between muscle mass and strength. Thus, recent definitions of sarcopenia have incorporated elements of strength and physical performance in addition to muscle mass in the criteria for sarcopenia (2–5). However, these consensus statements were based on expert opinions and lacked access to large data sets to validate their recommendations. Thus, the goal of the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) Sarcopenia Project was to create a data-driven set of criteria for clinically relevant weakness and low lean mass using pooled data from multiple studies. This is the fifth report of the FNIH Sarcopenia Project. The first manuscript describes the rationale for the FNIH Sarcopenia Project and characteristics of the participating studies. The second and third manuscripts describe in detail the development of cutpoints for weakness and low lean mass; and the fourth manuscript demonstrates the predictive validity of these cutpoints. The purpose of the analyses presented here is to compare the criteria developed by the FNIH project to other published criteria, in order to assess prevalence, agreement, and discrepancies between candidate criteria. Our goal is to provide data-driven evidence to the field in order to advance professional consensus regarding clinically relevant cutpoints and terminology.

Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes

Abstract: XI. STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING DIABETES CARE D iabetes is a chronic illness that requires continuing medical care and patient self-management education to prevent acute complications and to reduce the risk of long-term complications. Diabetes care is complex and requires that many issues, beyond glycemic control, be addressed. A large body of evidence exists that supports a range of interventions to improve diabetes outcomes. These standards of care are intended to provide clinicians, patients, researchers, payors, and other interested individuals with the components of diabetes care, treatment goals, and tools to evaluate the quality of care. While individual preferences, comorbidities, and other patient factors may require modification of goals, targets that are desirable for most patients with diabetes are provided. These standards are not intended to preclude more extensive evaluation and management of the patient by other specialists as needed. For more detailed information, refer to Bode (Ed.): Medical Management of Type 1 Diabetes (1), Burant (Ed): Medical Management of Type 2 Diabetes (2), and Klingensmith (Ed): Intensive Diabetes Management (3). The recommendations included are diagnostic and therapeutic actions that are known or believed to favorably affect health outcomes of patients with diabetes. A grading system (Table 1), developed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and modeled after existing methods, was utilized to clarify and codify the evidence that forms the basis for the recommendations. The level of evidence that supports each recommendation is listed after each recommendation using the letters A, B, C, or E.

Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine

Abstract: The 11th edition of Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine welcomes Anthony Fauci to its editorial staff, in addition to more than 85 new contributors. While the organization of the book is similar to previous editions, major emphasis has been placed on disorders that affect multiple organ systems. Important advances in genetics, immunology, and oncology are emphasized. Many chapters of the book have been rewritten and describe major advances in internal medicine. Subjects that received only a paragraph or two of attention in previous editions are now covered in entire chapters. Among the chapters that have been extensively revised are the chapters on infections in the compromised host, on skin rashes in infections, on many of the viral infections, including cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus, on sexually transmitted diseases, on diabetes mellitus, on disorders of bone and mineral metabolism, and on lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly. The major revisions in these chapters and many

Sarcopenia: Revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis

Abstract: Background in 2010, the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) published a sarcopenia definition that aimed to foster advances in identifying and caring for people with sarcopenia. In early 2018, the Working Group met again (EWGSOP2) to update the original definition in order to reflect scientific and clinical evidence that has built over the last decade. This paper presents our updated findings. Objectives to increase consistency of research design, clinical diagnoses and ultimately, care for people with sarcopenia. Recommendations sarcopenia is a muscle disease (muscle failure) rooted in adverse muscle changes that accrue across a lifetime; sarcopenia is common among adults of older age but can also occur earlier in life. In this updated consensus paper on sarcopenia, EWGSOP2: (1) focuses on low muscle strength as a key characteristic of sarcopenia, uses detection of low muscle quantity and quality to confirm the sarcopenia diagnosis, and identifies poor physical performance as indicative of severe sarcopenia; (2) updates the clinical algorithm that can be used for sarcopenia case-finding, diagnosis and confirmation, and severity determination and (3) provides clear cut-off points for measurements of variables that identify and characterise sarcopenia. Conclusions EWGSOP2's updated recommendations aim to increase awareness of sarcopenia and its risk. With these new recommendations, EWGSOP2 calls for healthcare professionals who treat patients at risk for sarcopenia to take actions that will promote early detection and treatment. We also encourage more research in the field of sarcopenia in order to prevent or delay adverse health outcomes that incur a heavy burden for patients and healthcare systems.

Vitamin D deficiency.

Abstract: admission. This proportion could already be greater in some parts of the country and may increase if referrals of cases of self-poisoning increase faster than the facilities for their assessment and management. The provision of social work and psychiatric expertise in casualty departments may be one means of preventing unnecessary medical admissions without risk to the patients. Dr Blake's and Dr Bramble's figures do not demonstrate, however, that any advantage would attach to medical teams taking over assessment from psychiatrists except that, by implication, assessments would be completed sooner by staff working on the ward full time. What the figures actually suggest is that if assessment of overdoses were left to house doctors there would be an increase in admissions to psychiatric units (by 19°U), outpatients (by 5O°'), and referrals to social services (by 140o). So for house doctors to assess overdoses would provide no economy for the psychiatric or social services. The study does not tell us what the consequences would have been for the six patients who the psychiatrists would have admitted but to whom the house doctors would have offered outpatient appointments. E J SALTER

Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys

Abstract: 25. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. By D. B. Rubin. ISBN 0 471 08705 X. Wiley, Chichester, 1987. 258 pp. £30.25.