scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Milad Ashrafizadeh

Other affiliations: Islamic Azad University
Bio: Milad Ashrafizadeh is an academic researcher from Sabancı University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Cancer & Cancer cell. The author has an hindex of 14, co-authored 70 publications receiving 800 citations. Previous affiliations of Milad Ashrafizadeh include Islamic Azad University.

Papers published on a yearly basis

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes.
Abstract: In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.

1,129 citations


Cited by
More filters
01 Jan 2013
TL;DR: In this article, the landscape of somatic genomic alterations based on multidimensional and comprehensive characterization of more than 500 glioblastoma tumors (GBMs) was described, including several novel mutated genes as well as complex rearrangements of signature receptors, including EGFR and PDGFRA.
Abstract: We describe the landscape of somatic genomic alterations based on multidimensional and comprehensive characterization of more than 500 glioblastoma tumors (GBMs). We identify several novel mutated genes as well as complex rearrangements of signature receptors, including EGFR and PDGFRA. TERT promoter mutations are shown to correlate with elevated mRNA expression, supporting a role in telomerase reactivation. Correlative analyses confirm that the survival advantage of the proneural subtype is conferred by the G-CIMP phenotype, and MGMT DNA methylation may be a predictive biomarker for treatment response only in classical subtype GBM. Integrative analysis of genomic and proteomic profiles challenges the notion of therapeutic inhibition of a pathway as an alternative to inhibition of the target itself. These data will facilitate the discovery of therapeutic and diagnostic target candidates, the validation of research and clinical observations and the generation of unanticipated hypotheses that can advance our molecular understanding of this lethal cancer.

2,616 citations

01 Nov 2013
TL;DR: In this article, a review of the interactions between EMT-inducing transcription factors and epigenetic modulators during cancer progression and the therapeutic implications of exploiting this intricate regulatory process is presented.
Abstract: Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions (EMTs) are a key requirement for cancer cells to metastasize and colonize in a new environment. Epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity is mediated by master transcription factors and is also subject to complex epigenetic regulation. This Review outlines our current understanding of the interactions between EMT-inducing transcription factors and epigenetic modulators during cancer progression and the therapeutic implications of exploiting this intricate regulatory process. During the course of malignant cancer progression, neoplastic cells undergo dynamic and reversible transitions between multiple phenotypic states, the extremes of which are defined by the expression of epithelial and mesenchymal phenotypes. This plasticity is enabled by underlying shifts in epigenetic regulation. A small cohort of pleiotropically acting transcription factors is widely recognized to effect these shifts by controlling the expression of a constituency of key target genes. These master regulators depend on complex epigenetic regulatory mechanisms, notably the induction of changes in the modifications of chromatin-associated histones, in order to achieve the widespread changes in gene expression observed during epithelial-mesenchymal transitions (EMTs). These associations indicate that an understanding of the functional interactions between such EMT-inducing transcription factors and the modulators of chromatin configuration will provide crucial insights into the fundamental mechanisms underlying cancer progression and may, in the longer term, generate new diagnostic and therapeutic modalities for treating high-grade malignancies.

797 citations

01 May 1954

464 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
University of Michigan1, Cornell University2, University of Pennsylvania3, University of Massachusetts Medical School4, Baylor College of Medicine5, University of Naples Federico II6, Spanish National Research Council7, Complutense University of Madrid8, New York University9, University of Rome Tor Vergata10, Boston Children's Hospital11, NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital12, University of Pittsburgh13, French Institute of Health and Medical Research14, University of Paris15, National University of Cuyo16, Albert Einstein College of Medicine17, University of New Mexico18, Goethe University Frankfurt19, Weizmann Institute of Science20, University of Turku21, Sapienza University of Rome22, Virginia Commonwealth University23, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital24, Discovery Institute25, University of Copenhagen26, University of Tromsø27, Eötvös Loránd University28, Merck & Co.29, University of Freiburg30, Babraham Institute31, University of Adelaide32, University of South Australia33, University of Oviedo34, University of Chicago35, University of Graz36, National Institutes of Health37, City University of New York38, Queens College39, University of Tokyo40, University of Zurich41, Austrian Academy of Sciences42, University of British Columbia43, University of California, San Francisco44, Russian Academy of Sciences45, University Medical Center Groningen46, University of Cambridge47, University of Glasgow48, Rutgers University49, University of Padua50, University of Bern51, Kazan Federal University52, University of Oxford53, Oslo University Hospital54, University of Oslo55, Foundation for Research & Technology – Hellas56, University of Crete57, Francis Crick Institute58, Osaka University59, Harvard University60, Chinese Academy of Sciences61, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai62, Shanghai Jiao Tong University63, Karolinska Institutet64
TL;DR: In this paper, preclinical data linking autophagy dysfunction to the pathogenesis of major human disorders including cancer as well as cardiovascular, neurodegenerative, metabolic, pulmonary, renal, infectious, musculoskeletal, and ocular disorders.
Abstract: Autophagy is a core molecular pathway for the preservation of cellular and organismal homeostasis. Pharmacological and genetic interventions impairing autophagy responses promote or aggravate disease in a plethora of experimental models. Consistently, mutations in autophagy-related processes cause severe human pathologies. Here, we review and discuss preclinical data linking autophagy dysfunction to the pathogenesis of major human disorders including cancer as well as cardiovascular, neurodegenerative, metabolic, pulmonary, renal, infectious, musculoskeletal, and ocular disorders.

365 citations

Journal Article
11 Jun 2020-Elements
TL;DR: The design principles of AIE PSs and their biomedical applications are discussed in detail, starting with a summary of traditional PSs, followed by a comparison between traditional and AIEPSs to highlight the various design strategies and unique features of the latter.
Abstract: Photodynamic therapy is arising as a noninvasive treatment modality for cancer and other diseases. One of the key factors to determine the therapeutic function is the efficiency of photosensitizers (PSs). Opposed to traditional PSs, which show quenched fluorescence and reduced singlet oxygen production in the aggregate state, PSs with aggregation-induced emission (AIE) exhibit enhanced fluorescence and strong photosensitization ability in nanoparticles. Here, the design principles of AIE PSs and their biomedical applications are discussed in detail, starting with a summary of traditional PSs, followed by a comparison between traditional and AIE PSs to highlight the various design strategies and unique features of the latter. Subsequently, the applications of AIE PSs in photodynamic cancer cell ablation, bacteria killing, and image-guided therapy are discussed using charged AIE PSs, AIE PS molecular probes, and AIE PS nanoparticles as examples. These studies have demonstrated the great potential of AIE PSs as effective theranostic agents to treat tumor or bacterial infection. This review hopefully will spur more research interest in AIE PSs for future translational research.

345 citations