scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Mildred K. Cho

Bio: Mildred K. Cho is an academic researcher from Stanford University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Research ethics & Informed consent. The author has an hindex of 48, co-authored 175 publications receiving 18730 citations. Previous affiliations of Mildred K. Cho include Seattle Children's Research Institute & University of Western Ontario.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
John W. Belmont1, Paul Hardenbol, Thomas D. Willis, Fuli Yu1, Huanming Yang2, Lan Yang Ch'Ang, Wei Huang3, Bin Liu2, Yan Shen3, Paul K.H. Tam4, Lap-Chee Tsui4, Mary M.Y. Waye5, Jeffrey Tze Fei Wong6, Changqing Zeng2, Qingrun Zhang2, Mark S. Chee7, Luana Galver7, Semyon Kruglyak7, Sarah S. Murray7, Arnold Oliphant7, Alexandre Montpetit8, Fanny Chagnon8, Vincent Ferretti8, Martin Leboeuf8, Michael S. Phillips8, Andrei Verner8, Shenghui Duan9, Denise L. Lind10, Raymond D. Miller9, John P. Rice9, Nancy L. Saccone9, Patricia Taillon-Miller9, Ming Xiao10, Akihiro Sekine, Koki Sorimachi, Yoichi Tanaka, Tatsuhiko Tsunoda, Eiji Yoshino, David R. Bentley11, Sarah E. Hunt11, Don Powell11, Houcan Zhang12, Ichiro Matsuda13, Yoshimitsu Fukushima14, Darryl Macer15, Eiko Suda15, Charles N. Rotimi16, Clement Adebamowo17, Toyin Aniagwu17, Patricia A. Marshall18, Olayemi Matthew17, Chibuzor Nkwodimmah17, Charmaine D.M. Royal16, Mark Leppert19, Missy Dixon19, Fiona Cunningham20, Ardavan Kanani20, Gudmundur A. Thorisson20, Peter E. Chen21, David J. Cutler21, Carl S. Kashuk21, Peter Donnelly22, Jonathan Marchini22, Gilean McVean22, Simon Myers22, Lon R. Cardon22, Andrew P. Morris22, Bruce S. Weir23, James C. Mullikin24, Michael Feolo24, Mark J. Daly25, Renzong Qiu26, Alastair Kent, Georgia M. Dunston16, Kazuto Kato27, Norio Niikawa28, Jessica Watkin29, Richard A. Gibbs1, Erica Sodergren1, George M. Weinstock1, Richard K. Wilson9, Lucinda Fulton9, Jane Rogers11, Bruce W. Birren25, Hua Han2, Hongguang Wang, Martin Godbout30, John C. Wallenburg8, Paul L'Archevêque, Guy Bellemare, Kazuo Todani, Takashi Fujita, Satoshi Tanaka, Arthur L. Holden, Francis S. Collins24, Lisa D. Brooks24, Jean E. McEwen24, Mark S. Guyer24, Elke Jordan31, Jane Peterson24, Jack Spiegel24, Lawrence M. Sung32, Lynn F. Zacharia24, Karen Kennedy29, Michael Dunn29, Richard Seabrook29, Mark Shillito, Barbara Skene29, John Stewart29, David Valle21, Ellen Wright Clayton33, Lynn B. Jorde19, Aravinda Chakravarti21, Mildred K. Cho34, Troy Duster35, Troy Duster36, Morris W. Foster37, Maria Jasperse38, Bartha Maria Knoppers39, Pui-Yan Kwok10, Julio Licinio40, Jeffrey C. Long41, Pilar N. Ossorio42, Vivian Ota Wang33, Charles N. Rotimi16, Patricia Spallone29, Patricia Spallone43, Sharon F. Terry44, Eric S. Lander25, Eric H. Lai45, Deborah A. Nickerson46, Gonçalo R. Abecasis41, David Altshuler47, Michael Boehnke41, Panos Deloukas11, Julie A. Douglas41, Stacey Gabriel25, Richard R. Hudson48, Thomas J. Hudson8, Leonid Kruglyak49, Yusuke Nakamura50, Robert L. Nussbaum24, Stephen F. Schaffner25, Stephen T. Sherry24, Lincoln Stein20, Toshihiro Tanaka 
18 Dec 2003-Nature
TL;DR: The HapMap will allow the discovery of sequence variants that affect common disease, will facilitate development of diagnostic tools, and will enhance the ability to choose targets for therapeutic intervention.
Abstract: The goal of the International HapMap Project is to determine the common patterns of DNA sequence variation in the human genome and to make this information freely available in the public domain. An international consortium is developing a map of these patterns across the genome by determining the genotypes of one million or more sequence variants, their frequencies and the degree of association between them, in DNA samples from populations with ancestry from parts of Africa, Asia and Europe. The HapMap will allow the discovery of sequence variants that affect common disease, will facilitate development of diagnostic tools, and will enhance our ability to choose targets for therapeutic intervention.

5,926 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
28 Aug 1996-JAMA
TL;DR: For RCTs to ultimately benefit patients, the published report should be of the highest possible standard and should provide the reader with the ability to make informed judgments regarding the internal and external validity of the trial.
Abstract: THE RANDOMIZED controlled trial (RCT), more than any other methodology, can have a powerful and immediate impact on patient care. Ideally, the report of such an evaluation needs to convey to the reader relevant information concerning the design, conduct, analysis, and generalizability of the trial. This information should provide the reader with the ability to make informed judgments regarding the internal and external validity of the trial. Accurate and complete reporting also benefits editors and reviewers in their deliberations regarding submitted manuscripts. For RCTs to ultimately benefit patients, the published report should be of the highest possible standard. For editorial comment see p 649. Evidence produced repeatedly over the last 30 years indicates a wide chasm between what a trial should report and what is actually published in the literature. In a review of 71 RCTs with negative results published between 1960 and 1975, the authors reported that the vast

3,197 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: For RCTs to ultimately benefit patients, the published report should be of the highest possible standard and accurate and complete reporting is needed.

1,662 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Recommendations of a two-year project group funded by NIH to study how to manageIFs in genetic and genomic research, as well as imaging research are reported, which conclude that researchers have an obligation to address the possibility of discovering IFs in their protocol and communications with the IRB and research participants.
Abstract: Researchers, institutional review boards (IRBs), participants in human subjects research, and their families face an important but largely neglected problem — how should incidental findings (IFs) be managed in human subjects research. If researchers unexpectedly stumble upon information of potential health or reproductive significance, should they seek expert evaluation, contact the participant’s physician, tell the research participant, or respond with some combination? What should consent forms and the entire consent process say about how IFs will be handled in research? What should IRBs require?

636 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The GATK programming framework enables developers and analysts to quickly and easily write efficient and robust NGS tools, many of which have already been incorporated into large-scale sequencing projects like the 1000 Genomes Project and The Cancer Genome Atlas.
Abstract: Next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS) projects, such as the 1000 Genomes Project, are already revolutionizing our understanding of genetic variation among individuals. However, the massive data sets generated by NGS—the 1000 Genome pilot alone includes nearly five terabases—make writing feature-rich, efficient, and robust analysis tools difficult for even computationally sophisticated individuals. Indeed, many professionals are limited in the scope and the ease with which they can answer scientific questions by the complexity of accessing and manipulating the data produced by these machines. Here, we discuss our Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK), a structured programming framework designed to ease the development of efficient and robust analysis tools for next-generation DNA sequencers using the functional programming philosophy of MapReduce. The GATK provides a small but rich set of data access patterns that encompass the majority of analysis tool needs. Separating specific analysis calculations from common data management infrastructure enables us to optimize the GATK framework for correctness, stability, and CPU and memory efficiency and to enable distributed and shared memory parallelization. We highlight the capabilities of the GATK by describing the implementation and application of robust, scale-tolerant tools like coverage calculators and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) calling. We conclude that the GATK programming framework enables developers and analysts to quickly and easily write efficient and robust NGS tools, many of which have already been incorporated into large-scale sequencing projects like the 1000 Genomes Project and The Cancer Genome Atlas.

20,557 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Haploview is a software package that provides computation of linkage disequilibrium statistics and population haplotype patterns from primary genotype data in a visually appealing and interactive interface.
Abstract: Summary: Research over the last few years has revealed significant haplotype structure in the human genome. The characterization of these patterns, particularly in the context of medical genetic association studies, is becoming a routine research activity. Haploview is a software package that provides computation of linkage disequilibrium statistics and population haplotype patterns from primary genotype data in a visually appealing and interactive interface. Availability: http://www.broad.mit.edu/mpg/haploview/ Contact: jcbarret@broad.mit.edu

13,862 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Version 5 implements a number of new features and analytical methods allowing extensive DNA polymorphism analyses on large datasets, including visualizing sliding window results integrated with available genome annotations in the UCSC browser.
Abstract: Motivation: DnaSP is a software package for a comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Version 5 implements a number of new features and analytical methods allowing extensive DNA polymorphism analyses on large datasets. Among other features, the newly implemented methods allow for: (i) analyses on multiple data files; (ii) haplotype phasing; (iii) analyses on insertion/deletion polymorphism data; (iv) visualizing sliding window results integrated with available genome annotations in the UCSC browser. Availability: Freely available to academic users from: http://www.ub.edu/dnasp Contact: [email protected]

13,511 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Reading a book as this basics of qualitative research grounded theory procedures and techniques and other references can enrich your life quality.

13,415 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
24 Mar 2010-BMJ
TL;DR: The Consort 2010 Statement as discussed by the authors has been used worldwide to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials and has been updated by Schulz et al. in 2010, based on new methodological evidence and accumulating experience.
Abstract: The CONSORT statement is used worldwide to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials. Kenneth Schulz and colleagues describe the latest version, CONSORT 2010, which updates the reporting guideline based on new methodological evidence and accumulating experience. To encourage dissemination of the CONSORT 2010 Statement, this article is freely accessible on bmj.com and will also be published in the Lancet, Obstetrics and Gynecology, PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, Open Medicine, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, BMC Medicine, and Trials.

11,165 citations