Milliken Ad

Bio: Milliken Ad is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Health care. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 19 citations.

Physician engagement: a necessary but reciprocal process

Abstract: Physicians drive a high proportion of costs in health care. Without their engagement, managing costs is difficult. There is often tension between administrative groups who are hired to manage health care costs effectively and physicians who wish to provide effective treatment. Sometimes, patient

Physician-Organization Collaboration Reduces Physician Burnout and Promotes Engagement: The Mayo Clinic Experience.

Abstract: The process of creating healthy organization-physician relationships is critical to organizational success. Partnerships in process improvement can nurture these relationships and mitigate burnout by meeting physicians' psychological needs. To flourish, physicians need some degree of choice (control over their lives), camaraderie (social connectedness), and an opportunity for excellence (being part of something meaningful). Organizations can provide these opportunities by establishing constructive organization-physician relationships and developing physician leaders. We present a case study from the Mayo Clinic that supports the foundational principles of a physician-engagement model. We developed the Listen-Act-Develop model as an integrated strategy to reduce burnout and engage physicians in the mission of the organization. The intent of the model is to maximize physician wellness by fostering engagement and mitigating the drivers of burnout. This model provides a path to increase physician satisfaction and meaning in work and to improve organizational effectiveness.

Beyond clinical engagement: a pragmatic model for quality improvement interventions, aligning clinical and managerial priorities

Abstract: Despite taking advantage of established learning from other industries, quality improvement initiatives in healthcare may struggle to outperform secular trends. The reasons for this are rarely explored in detail, and are often attributed merely to difficulties in engaging clinicians in quality improvement work. In a narrative review of the literature, we argue that this focus on clinicians, at the relative expense of managerial staff, has proven counterproductive. Clinical engagement is not a universal challenge; moreover, there is evidence that managers—particularly middle managers—also have a role to play in quality improvement. Yet managerial participation in quality improvement interventions is often assumed, rather than proven. We identify specific factors that influence the coordination of front-line staff and managers in quality improvement, and integrate these factors into a novel model: the model of alignment. We use this model to explore the implementation of an interdisciplinary intervention in a recent trial, describing different participation incentives and barriers for different staff groups. The extent to which clinical and managerial interests align may be an important determinant of the ultimate success of quality improvement interventions.

Physician engagement: a concept analysis.

Abstract: The term "physician engagement" is used quite frequently, yet it remains poorly defined and measured. The aim of this study is to clarify the term "physician engagement." This study used an eight step-method for conducting concept analyses created by Walker and Avant. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched on February 14, 2019. No limitations were put on the searches with regard to year or language. Results identify that the term "physician engagement" is regular participation of physicians in (1) deciding how their work is done, (2) making suggestions for improvement, (3) goal setting, (4) planning, and (5) monitoring of their performance in activities targeted at the micro (patient), meso (organization), and/or macro (health system) levels. The antecedents of "physician engagement" include accountability, communication, incentives, interpersonal relations, and opportunity. The results include improved outcomes such as data quality, efficiency, innovation, job satisfaction, patient satisfaction, and performance. Defining physician engagement enables physicians and health care administrators to better appreciate and more accurately measure engagement and understand how to better engage physicians.

Hospital Physician Engagement: A Scoping Review.

Abstract: Background Literature on health system transformation highlights the importance of physician engagement, suggesting that it is a critical factor for lowering costs while improving efficiency, quality of care, patient safety, physician satisfaction and retention. "Engagement" in health care is often defined as a positive, fulfilling work-related state of mind, which is characterized by vigor, dedication and absorption. The aim of this scoping review is to identify factors associated with, and tools used to measure physician engagement. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and gray literature were searched. Supplementary articles were obtained by searching article references. All quantitative and qualitative study designs were eligible that described factors associated with, and tools used to measure, hospital physician engagement. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted. Groupings and clustering were conducted to determine dominant groups or cluster of characteristics. Conceptual mapping was then conducted to identify patterns. Results A total of 15 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. All were published between 2012 and 2017. Studies were predominantly conducted in Germany (n=8). Factors associated with physician engagement were synthesized into individual characteristics (n=7), work environment characteristics (n=7), and work outcomes (n=5). The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale was the most commonly used tool (n=14). Conclusions This scoping review provides a strong evidence-based platform to further advance knowledge in the area of physician engagement. The identification of environmental factors assists hospital administrative leaders in understanding how they might intervene to affect engagement, while the identification of individual characteristics enable identification of vulnerable physicians, permitting identification of the most pertinent targeted areas for focus.

Systematic literature review: An analysis of administrative strategies to engage providers in hospital quality initiatives

Abstract: Provider engagement in hospital quality initiatives is receiving increased attention in a pay-for-performance era. The traditional hospital–physician alignment structure has not promoted provider engagement in system-wide quality initiatives. This systematic literature review analyzes provider engagement strategies. Selected articles were required to introduce administrative strategies that engage providers in hospital quality initiatives. A PubMed search uncovered 196 articles using the following keywords: “provider* OR physician*, AND hospital*, AND quality, AND engage*. Providers were defined as physicians, fellows, residents, physician assistants, or advanced practice nurses. The following filters were applied during the search: English language, humans, and published in the last 5 years. A total of 45 articles met the inclusion criteria. The reported strategies comprised financial incentives, public or private reporting, removing barriers, provider leadership, and hospital-provider alignment. Each reported strategy demonstrated gains within a quality initiative. However, it remains unclear whether these surrogate measures reflected provider engagement or other phenomena.