scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Mortimer J. Buckley

Bio: Mortimer J. Buckley is an academic researcher from Harvard University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Myocardial infarction & Cardiogenic shock. The author has an hindex of 65, co-authored 223 publications receiving 12154 citations. Previous affiliations of Mortimer J. Buckley include University of Maryland Medical System & St Vincent Hospital.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator is a highly effective and relatively low risk treatment modality for patients with refractory life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.

380 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Thirty-one consecutive patients with medically treated dissecting aneurysm of the aorta were divided into two groups based on theAortographic findings, indicating an open communication with the aortsic lumen and long-term survival rates were 90% and 43%, respectively.
Abstract: Thirty-one consecutive patients with medically treated dissecting aneurysm of the aorta were divided into two groups based on the aortographic findings. Ten showed no opacification of the false channel; 21 did show opacification, indicating an open communication with the aortic lumen. The long-term survival rates of the two groups were 90% and 43%, respectively. Implications of these findings are discussed.

312 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results indicate that patients with unstable angina pectoris can be managed acutely with intensive medical therapy, including the administration of propranolol and long-acting nitrates in pharmacologic doses, with adequate control of pain in most patients and no increase in early mortality or myocardial infarction rates.
Abstract: A prospective randomized study comparing intensive medical therapy with urgent coronary bypass surgery for the acute management of patients with unstable angina pectoris was carried out by nine cooperating medical centers under the auspices of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Between 1972 and 1976, a total of 288 patients were entered into the study. All patients had transient S-T or T wave changes, or both, in the electrocardiogram during pain; 90 percent had pain at rest in the hospital, and 76 percent had multivessel coronary disease. The medically and surgically treated patients were comparable with respect to clinical, electrocardiographic and angiographic characteristics and left ventricular function. During the total study period, the hospital mortality rate was 5 percent in the surgical group and 3 percent in the medical group (difference not significant). The rate of in-hospital myocardial infarction was 17 and 8 percent in the respective groups (P In the 1st year after hospital discharge class III or IV angina (New York Heart Association criteria) was more common in medically than in surgically treated patients with one vessel disease (22 percent versus 3 percent, P The results indicate that patients with unstable angina pectoris can be managed acutely with intensive medical therapy, including the administration of propranolol and long-acting nitrates in pharmacologic doses, with adequate control of pain in most patients and no increase in early mortality or myocardial infarction rates. Later, elective surgery can be performed with a low risk and good clinical results if the patient's angina fails to respond to intensive medical therapy.

311 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Any patient who has a prosthetic valve and undergoes any procedure likely to produce bacteremia should receive antibiotic prophylaxis in an attempt to prevent late endocarditis.
Abstract: In 38 cases of prosthetic valve endocarditis, 19 were early cases (onset ≦ 60 days after insertion of prosthesis) and 19, late cases (onset ≧ 60 days). Nine late cases had onsets 12 to 53 months after surgery. The sources or predisposing factors in late cases included dental disease or manipulation; genitourinary tract procedures; and skin, urinary, or wound infections. In contrast, most early cases were secondary to complications of operation. Streptococci were the most common organisms causing late endocarditis, whereas staphylococci were most common among early cases. Four of the six patients who survived early onset were treated with antibiotics alone; the others, with antibiotics plus reoperation. In contrast, seven of the 11 late cases that survived were treated with antibiotics alone; the other four, with antibiotics plus reoperation. The lower mortality (42% vs 68%) in the late group probably reflects the less virulent infecting organisms and the better clinical condition of the hosts. Regardless of whether prosthetic valve endocarditis occurs early or late, intensive and prolonged administration of appropriate antibiotics together with aggressive surgical reintervention in selected situations appears necessary for cure. Any patient who has a prosthetic valve and undergoes any procedure likely to produce bacteremia should receive antibiotic prophylaxis in an attempt to prevent late endocarditis.

275 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is suggested that shock was produced mainly by right ventricular impairment in patients with postinfarction ventricular septal rupture, and that perioperative survival was much higher in patients who did not have shock preoperatively than in those who did.
Abstract: Forty-one patients with postinfarction ventricular septal rupture were cared for in our hospital during 1971-1975. Cardiogenic shock developed after septal rupture in 55% of these patients. Shock was unrelated to site of infarction, extent of coronary artery disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, or pulmonary-to-systemic flow ratio, but mean pulmonary artery pressure was lower in shock than in nonshock patients. These observations suggest that shock was produced mainly by right ventricular impairment. Perioperative survival was much higher in patients who did not have shock preoperatively (14 of 17 [82+]) than in those who did (three of 11 [27%]). Magnitude of shunt, left ventricular ejection fraction, extent of coronary artery disease, and performance of aortocoronary bypass grafting were not distinctly correlated with perioperative survival. After a minimum 4-year follow-up, 76% of the perioperative survivors are alive, and none suffer more than New York Heart Association functional class II disability. All 13 unoperated patients (11 in shock) died within 3 months.

261 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is important that the medical profession play a significant role in critically evaluating the use of diagnostic procedures and therapies as they are introduced in the detection, management, and management of diseases.
Abstract: PREAMBLE......e4 APPENDIX 1......e121 APPENDIX 2......e122 APPENDIX 3......e124 REFERENCES......e124 It is important that the medical profession play a significant role in critically evaluating the use of diagnostic procedures and therapies as they are introduced in the detection, management,

8,362 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This document summarizes current research, plans, and recommendations for future research, as well as providing a history of the field and some of the techniques used, currently in use, at the National Institutes of Health.
Abstract: Jeffrey L. Anderson, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair Jonathan L. Halperin, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair-Elect Nancy M. Albert, PhD, RN, FAHA Biykem Bozkurt, MD, PhD, FACC, FAHA Ralph G. Brindis, MD, MPH, MACC Mark A. Creager, MD, FACC, FAHA[#][1] Lesley H. Curtis, PhD, FAHA David DeMets, PhD[#][1] Robert A

6,967 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The 2017-18 FAHA/FACC/FAHA Education and Research Grants will be focused on advancing the profession’s understanding of central nervous system disorders and the management of post-traumatic stress disorder.

4,556 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors studied whether prophylactic therapy with an implanted cardioverter-defibrillator, as compared with conventional medical therapy, would improve survival in this high-risk group of patients.
Abstract: Background Unsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with previous myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction is associated with a two-year mortality rate of about 30 percent. We studied whether prophylactic therapy with an implanted cardioverter–defibrillator, as compared with conventional medical therapy, would improve survival in this high-risk group of patients. Methods Over the course of five years, 196 patients in New York Heart Association functional class I, II, or III with prior myocardial infarction; a left ventricular ejection fraction <0.35; a documented episode of asymptomatic unsustained ventricular tachycardia; and inducible, nonsuppressible ventricular tachyarrhythmia on electrophysiologic study were randomly assigned to receive an implanted defibrillator (n = 95) or conventional medical therapy (n = 101). We used a two-sided sequential design with death from any cause as the end point. Results The base-line characteristics of the two treatment groups were similar. During...

3,843 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents aim to present management recommendations based on all of the relevant evidence on a particular subject in order to help physicians select the best possible management strategies for the individual patient suffering from a specific condition, taking into account the impact on outcome and also the risk–benefit ratio of a particular diagnostic or therapeutic procedure.
Abstract: Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents aim to present management recommendations based on all of the relevant evidence on a particular subject in order to help physicians select the best possible management strategies for the individual patient suffering from a specific condition, taking into account the impact on outcome and also the risk–benefit ratio of a particular diagnostic or therapeutic procedure. Numerous studies have demonstrated that patient outcomes improve when guideline recommendations, based on the rigorous assessment of evidence-based research, are applied in clinical practice. A great number of Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents have been issued in recent years by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and also by other organizations or related societies. The profusion of documents can put at stake the authority and credibility of guidelines, particularly if discrepancies appear between different documents on the same issue, as this can lead to confusion in the minds of physicians. In order to avoid these pitfalls, the ESC and other organizations have issued recommendations for formulating and issuing Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents. The ESC recommendations for guidelines production can be found on the ESC website.1 It is beyond the scope of this preamble to recall all but the basic rules. In brief, the ESC appoints experts in the field to carry out a comprehensive review of the literature, with a view to making a critical evaluation of the use of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and assessing the risk–benefit ratio of the therapies recommended for management and/or prevention of a given condition. Estimates of expected health outcomes are included, where data exist. The strength of evidence for or against particular procedures or treatments is weighed according to predefined scales for grading recommendations and levels of evidence, as outlined in what follows. The Task Force members of the writing panels, …

3,707 citations