scispace - formally typeset
N

Neil Bourne

Researcher at University of Manchester

Publications -  311
Citations -  5193

Neil Bourne is an academic researcher from University of Manchester. The author has contributed to research in topics: Shock (mechanics) & Stress (mechanics). The author has an hindex of 37, co-authored 306 publications receiving 4762 citations. Previous affiliations of Neil Bourne include Cranfield University & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Hot-spot ignition mechanisms for explosives and propellants

TL;DR: In this paper, the response of explosives to stress and impact and in particular the mechanisms of hot-spot production are described and discussed. But, the authors focus on hot spot production.
Journal ArticleDOI

Shock-induced collapse of single cavities in liquids

TL;DR: In this article, a two-dimensional method was used to observe the interactions of plane shock waves with single cavities, which allowed study of processes occurring within the cavity during collapse.
Journal ArticleDOI

On the shock induced failure of brittle solids

TL;DR: The physical interpretation of the yield point of brittle materials, the Hugoniot elastic limit (HEL), the dependence of this threshold on propagation distance and the effect of polycrystalline microstructure remain to be comprehensively explained.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dynamic plasticity and failure of high-purity alumina under shock loading.

TL;DR: High-resolution electron microscopy of high-purity alumina, soft-recovered from shock-loading experiments shows the change of deformation behaviour from dislocation activity in the vicinity of grain boundaries to deformation twinning, which leads to the conversion of material failure from an intergranular mode to transgranular cleavage.
Journal ArticleDOI

On the analysis of transverse stress gauge data from shock loading experiments

TL;DR: In this article, the effect of gauge geometry was assessed and results showed that the measured stresses from either gauge were within 0.5% of each other when subjected to identical impact conditions.