scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Nicholas Khoo

Other affiliations: University of Liverpool
Bio: Nicholas Khoo is an academic researcher from University of Otago. The author has contributed to research in topics: China & International relations. The author has an hindex of 10, co-authored 24 publications receiving 247 citations. Previous affiliations of Nicholas Khoo include University of Liverpool.

Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
21 Mar 2013

4 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: A resurgent Jacksonianism and "America First" unilateralism could lead to a new US game plan in the Asia Pacific as mentioned in this paper, which would lead to new US strategy in the region.
Abstract: A resurgent Jacksonianism and 'America First' unilateralism could lead to a new US game plan in the Asia Pacific.

3 citations

Book ChapterDOI
21 Feb 2011

2 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors argued that Vietnamese co-operation with China's principal enemy, the Soviet Union, was the necessary and sufficient cause for the termination of China's alliance with Vietnam in the second-half of the 1970's.
Abstract: This article argues that Vietnamese co-operation with China's principal enemy, the Soviet Union, was the necessary and sufficient cause for the termination of China's alliance with Vietnam in the second-half of the 1970's.

2 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal Article

1,684 citations

Book
01 Jan 2009
TL;DR: A survey of the literature and institutions of International Security Studies (ISS) can be found in this paper, along with a detailed institutional account of ISS in terms of its journals, departments, think tanks and funding sources.
Abstract: International Security Studies (ISS) has changed and diversified in many ways since 1945. This book provides the first intellectual history of the development of the subject in that period. It explains how ISS evolved from an initial concern with the strategic consequences of superpower rivalry and nuclear weapons, to its current diversity in which environmental, economic, human and other securities sit alongside military security, and in which approaches ranging from traditional Realist analysis to Feminism and Post-colonialism are in play. It sets out the driving forces that shaped debates in ISS, shows what makes ISS a single conversation across its diversity, and gives an authoritative account of debates on all the main topics within ISS. This is an unparalleled survey of the literature and institutions of ISS that will be an invaluable guide for all students and scholars of ISS, whether traditionalist, ‘new agenda’ or critical. • The first book to tell the post-1945 story of International Security Studies and offer an integrated historical sociology of the whole field • Opens the door to a long-overdue conversation about what ISS is and where it should be going • Provides a detailed institutional account of ISS in terms of its journals, departments, think tanks and funding sources

579 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Ken Booth1

520 citations

Book
01 Jan 2000
TL;DR: The seeker after the truth is not one who studies the writings of the ancients and, following his natural disposition, puts his trust in them, but rather, one who suspects his faith in them and questions what he gathers from them, the one who submits to argument and demonstration, and not to the sayings of a human being whose nature is fraught with all kinds of imperfection and deformation as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: Therefore, the seeker after the truth is not one who studies the writings of the ancients and, following his natural disposition, puts his trust in them, but rather the one who suspects his faith in them and questions what he gathers from them, the one who submits to argument and demonstration, and not to the sayings of a human being whose nature is fraught with all kinds of imperfection and de‹ciency. Thus the duty of the man who investigates the writings of scientists, if learning the truth is his goal, is to make himself the enemy of all that he reads, and, applying his mind to the core and margins of its content, attack it from every side. He should also suspect himself as he performs his critical examination of it, so that he may avoid falling into either prejudice or leniency. (Ibn al-Haytham)1

512 citations