scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Nick Seymour

Bio: Nick Seymour is an academic researcher from Curtin University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Galaxy & Radio galaxy. The author has an hindex of 71, co-authored 309 publications receiving 16542 citations. Previous affiliations of Nick Seymour include University of Western Australia & Max Planck Society.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Seb Oliver1, James J. Bock2, James J. Bock3, Bruno Altieri4, Alexandre Amblard5, V. Arumugam6, Herve Aussel7, Tom Babbedge8, Alexandre Beelen9, Matthieu Béthermin7, Matthieu Béthermin9, Andrew Blain2, Alessandro Boselli10, C. Bridge2, Drew Brisbin11, V. Buat10, Denis Burgarella10, N. Castro-Rodríguez12, N. Castro-Rodríguez13, Antonio Cava14, P. Chanial7, Michele Cirasuolo15, David L. Clements8, A. Conley16, L. Conversi4, Asantha Cooray2, Asantha Cooray17, C. D. Dowell2, C. D. Dowell3, Elizabeth Dubois1, Eli Dwek18, Simon Dye19, Stephen Anthony Eales20, David Elbaz7, Duncan Farrah1, A. Feltre21, P. Ferrero12, P. Ferrero13, N. Fiolet9, N. Fiolet22, M. Fox8, Alberto Franceschini21, Walter Kieran Gear20, E. Giovannoli10, Jason Glenn16, Yan Gong17, E. A. González Solares23, Matthew Joseph Griffin20, Mark Halpern24, Martin Harwit, Evanthia Hatziminaoglou, Sebastien Heinis10, Peter Hurley1, Ho Seong Hwang7, A. Hyde8, Edo Ibar15, O. Ilbert10, K. G. Isaak25, Rob Ivison15, Rob Ivison6, Guilaine Lagache9, E. Le Floc'h7, L. R. Levenson3, L. R. Levenson2, B. Lo Faro21, Nanyao Y. Lu2, S. C. Madden7, Bruno Maffei26, Georgios E. Magdis7, G. Mainetti21, Lucia Marchetti21, G. Marsden24, J. Marshall2, J. Marshall3, A. M. J. Mortier8, Hien Nguyen2, Hien Nguyen3, B. O'Halloran8, Alain Omont22, Mat Page27, P. Panuzzo7, Andreas Papageorgiou20, H. Patel8, Chris Pearson28, Chris Pearson29, Ismael Perez-Fournon13, Ismael Perez-Fournon12, Michael Pohlen20, Jonathan Rawlings27, Gwenifer Raymond20, Dimitra Rigopoulou30, Dimitra Rigopoulou28, L. Riguccini7, D. Rizzo8, Giulia Rodighiero21, Isaac Roseboom1, Isaac Roseboom6, Michael Rowan-Robinson8, M. Sanchez Portal4, Benjamin L. Schulz2, Douglas Scott24, Nick Seymour31, Nick Seymour27, D. L. Shupe2, A. J. Smith1, Jamie Stevens32, M. Symeonidis27, Markos Trichas33, K. E. Tugwell27, Mattia Vaccari21, Ivan Valtchanov4, Joaquin Vieira2, Marco P. Viero2, L. Vigroux22, Lifan Wang1, Robyn L. Ward1, Julie Wardlow17, G. Wright15, C. K. Xu2, Michael Zemcov2, Michael Zemcov3 
TL;DR: The Herschel Multi-tiered Extragalactic Survey (HerMES) is a legacy program designed to map a set of nested fields totalling ∼380deg^2 as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: The Herschel Multi-tiered Extragalactic Survey (HerMES) is a legacy programme designed to map a set of nested fields totalling ∼380 deg^2. Fields range in size from 0.01 to ∼20 deg^2, using the Herschel-Spectral and Photometric Imaging Receiver (SPIRE) (at 250, 350 and 500 μm) and the Herschel-Photodetector Array Camera and Spectrometer (PACS) (at 100 and 160 μm), with an additional wider component of 270 deg^2 with SPIRE alone. These bands cover the peak of the redshifted thermal spectral energy distribution from interstellar dust and thus capture the reprocessed optical and ultraviolet radiation from star formation that has been absorbed by dust, and are critical for forming a complete multiwavelength understanding of galaxy formation and evolution. The survey will detect of the order of 100 000 galaxies at 5σ in some of the best-studied fields in the sky. Additionally, HerMES is closely coordinated with the PACS Evolutionary Probe survey. Making maximum use of the full spectrum of ancillary data, from radio to X-ray wavelengths, it is designed to facilitate redshift determination, rapidly identify unusual objects and understand the relationships between thermal emission from dust and other processes. Scientific questions HerMES will be used to answer include the total infrared emission of galaxies, the evolution of the luminosity function, the clustering properties of dusty galaxies and the properties of populations of galaxies which lie below the confusion limit through lensing and statistical techniques. This paper defines the survey observations and data products, outlines the primary scientific goals of the HerMES team, and reviews some of the early results.

852 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Seb Oliver1, James J. Bock2, James J. Bock3, Bruno Altieri4, Alexandre Amblard5, V. Arumugam6, Herve Aussel7, Tom Babbedge8, Alexandre Beelen, Matthieu Béthermin7, Andrew Blain3, Alessandro Boselli9, C. Bridge3, Drew Brisbin10, V. Buat9, Denis Burgarella9, N. Castro-Rodríguez11, N. Castro-Rodríguez12, Antonio Cava13, P. Chanial7, Michele Cirasuolo14, David L. Clements8, A. Conley15, L. Conversi4, Asantha Cooray3, Asantha Cooray16, C. D. Dowell3, C. D. Dowell2, Elizabeth Dubois1, Eli Dwek17, Simon Dye18, Stephen Anthony Eales19, David Elbaz7, Duncan Farrah1, A. Feltre20, P. Ferrero11, P. Ferrero12, N. Fiolet21, M. Fox8, Alberto Franceschini20, Walter Kieran Gear19, E. Giovannoli9, Jason Glenn15, Yan Gong16, E. A. González Solares22, Matthew Joseph Griffin19, Mark Halpern23, Martin Harwit, Evanthia Hatziminaoglou, Sebastien Heinis9, Peter Hurley1, Ho Seong Hwang7, A. Hyde8, Edo Ibar14, O. Ilbert9, K. G. Isaak24, Rob Ivison14, Rob Ivison6, Guilaine Lagache, E. Le Floc'h7, L. R. Levenson3, L. R. Levenson2, B. Lo Faro20, Nanyao Y. Lu3, S. C. Madden7, Bruno Maffei25, Georgios E. Magdis7, G. Mainetti20, Lucia Marchetti20, G. Marsden23, J. Marshall3, J. Marshall2, A. M. J. Mortier8, Hien Nguyen2, Hien Nguyen3, B. O'Halloran8, Alain Omont21, Mat Page26, P. Panuzzo7, Andreas Papageorgiou19, H. Patel8, Chris Pearson27, Chris Pearson28, Ismael Perez-Fournon11, Ismael Perez-Fournon12, Michael Pohlen19, Jonathan Rawlings26, Gwenifer Raymond19, Dimitra Rigopoulou29, Dimitra Rigopoulou28, L. Riguccini7, D. Rizzo8, Giulia Rodighiero20, Isaac Roseboom6, Isaac Roseboom1, Michael Rowan-Robinson8, M. Sanchez Portal4, Benjamin L. Schulz3, Douglas Scott23, Nick Seymour26, Nick Seymour30, D. L. Shupe3, A. J. Smith1, Jamie Stevens31, M. Symeonidis26, Markos Trichas32, K. E. Tugwell26, Mattia Vaccari20, Ivan Valtchanov4, Joaquin Vieira3, Marco P. Viero3, L. Vigroux21, Lifan Wang1, Robyn L. Ward1, Julie Wardlow16, G. Wright14, C. K. Xu3, Michael Zemcov2, Michael Zemcov3 
TL;DR: The Herschel Multi-tiered Extragalactic Survey (HerMES) is a legacy program designed to map a set of nested fields totalling ~380 deg^2 as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: The Herschel Multi-tiered Extragalactic Survey, HerMES, is a legacy program designed to map a set of nested fields totalling ~380 deg^2. Fields range in size from 0.01 to ~20 deg^2, using Herschel-SPIRE (at 250, 350 and 500 \mu m), and Herschel-PACS (at 100 and 160 \mu m), with an additional wider component of 270 deg^2 with SPIRE alone. These bands cover the peak of the redshifted thermal spectral energy distribution from interstellar dust and thus capture the re-processed optical and ultra-violet radiation from star formation that has been absorbed by dust, and are critical for forming a complete multi-wavelength understanding of galaxy formation and evolution. The survey will detect of order 100,000 galaxies at 5\sigma in some of the best studied fields in the sky. Additionally, HerMES is closely coordinated with the PACS Evolutionary Probe survey. Making maximum use of the full spectrum of ancillary data, from radio to X-ray wavelengths, it is designed to: facilitate redshift determination; rapidly identify unusual objects; and understand the relationships between thermal emission from dust and other processes. Scientific questions HerMES will be used to answer include: the total infrared emission of galaxies; the evolution of the luminosity function; the clustering properties of dusty galaxies; and the properties of populations of galaxies which lie below the confusion limit through lensing and statistical techniques. This paper defines the survey observations and data products, outlines the primary scientific goals of the HerMES team, and reviews some of the early results.

707 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Carlotta Gruppioni1, Francesca Pozzi2, Giulia Rodighiero3, Ivan Delvecchio2, S. Berta4, Lucia Pozzetti1, G. Zamorani1, P. Andreani, Alessandro Cimatti2, O. Ilbert5, E. Le Floc'h, Dieter Lutz4, Benjamin Magnelli4, Lucia Marchetti3, Lucia Marchetti6, Pierluigi Monaco7, Raanan Nordon4, Seb Oliver8, P. Popesso4, L. Riguccini, Isaac Roseboom8, Isaac Roseboom9, David J. Rosario4, Mark Sargent, Mattia Vaccari3, Mattia Vaccari10, Bruno Altieri, H. Aussel, Ángel Bongiovanni11, J. Cepa11, Emanuele Daddi, H. Dominguez-Sanchez1, H. Dominguez-Sanchez11, D. Elbaz, N. M. Foerster Schreiber4, R. Genzel4, Alvaro Iribarrem12, M. Magliocchetti1, Roberto Maiolino13, Albrecht Poglitsch4, A. M. Pérez García, M. Sánchez-Portal, Eckhard Sturm4, Linda J. Tacconi4, Ivan Valtchanov, Alexandre Amblard14, V. Arumugam9, M. Bethermin, James J. Bock15, James J. Bock16, A. Boselli5, V. Buat5, Denis Burgarella5, N. Castro-Rodríguez11, N. Castro-Rodríguez17, Antonio Cava18, P. Chanial, David L. Clements19, A. Conley20, Asantha Cooray15, Asantha Cooray21, C. D. Dowell16, C. D. Dowell15, Eli Dwek22, Stephen Anthony Eales23, Alberto Franceschini3, Jason Glenn20, Matthew Joseph Griffin23, Evanthia Hatziminaoglou, Edo Ibar24, K. G. Isaak25, Rob Ivison24, Rob Ivison9, Guilaine Lagache26, Louis Levenson16, Louis Levenson15, Nanyao Y. Lu15, S. C. Madden, Bruno Maffei27, G. Mainetti3, H. T. Nguyen15, H. T. Nguyen16, B. O'Halloran19, M. J. Page28, P. Panuzzo, Andreas Papageorgiou23, Chris Pearson29, Chris Pearson30, Ismael Perez-Fournon11, Ismael Perez-Fournon17, Michael Pohlen23, Dimitra Rigopoulou31, Dimitra Rigopoulou29, Michael Rowan-Robinson19, Benjamin L. Schulz15, Douglas Scott32, Nick Seymour28, Nick Seymour33, D. L. Shupe15, Anthony J. Smith8, Jamie Stevens34, M. Symeonidis28, Markos Trichas35, K. E. Tugwell28, L. Vigroux36, Lian-Tao Wang8, G. Wright24, C. K. Xu15, Michael Zemcov16, Michael Zemcov15, S. Bardelli1, M. Carollo37, Thierry Contini38, O. Le Fevre5, Simon J. Lilly37, Vincenzo Mainieri, Alvio Renzini1, Marco Scodeggio1, E. Zucca1 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors exploit the deep and extended far-IR data sets (at 70, 100 and 160 μm) of the GPS PACS Evolutionary Probe (PEP) Survey, in combination with the Herschel Multi-tiered Extragalactic Survey data at 250, 350 and 500 μm, to derive the evolution of the rest-frame 35-, 60-, 90- and total infrared luminosity functions (LFs) up to z ∼ 4.
Abstract: We exploit the deep and extended far-IR data sets (at 70, 100 and 160 μm) of the Herschel Guaranteed Time Observation (GTO) PACS Evolutionary Probe (PEP) Survey, in combination with the Herschel Multi-tiered Extragalactic Survey data at 250, 350 and 500 μm, to derive the evolution of the rest-frame 35-, 60-, 90- and total infrared (IR) luminosity functions (LFs) up to z ∼ 4. We detect very strong luminosity evolution for the total IR LF (LIR ∝ (1 + z)3.55 ± 0.10 up to z ∼ 2, and ∝ (1 + z)1.62 ± 0.51 at 2 < z ≲ 4) combined with a density evolution (∝(1 + z)−0.57 ± 0.22 up to z ∼ 1 and ∝ (1 + z)−3.92 ± 0.34 at 1 < z ≲ 4). In agreement with previous findings, the IR luminosity density (ρIR) increases steeply to z ∼ 1, then flattens between z ∼ 1 and z ∼ 3 to decrease at z ≳ 3. Galaxies with different spectral energy distributions, masses and specific star formation rates (SFRs) evolve in very different ways and this large and deep statistical sample is the first one allowing us to separately study the different evolutionary behaviours of the individual IR populations contributing to ρIR. Galaxies occupying the well-established SFR–stellar mass main sequence (MS) are found to dominate both the total IR LF and ρIR at all redshifts, with the contribution from off-MS sources (≥0.6 dex above MS) being nearly constant (∼20 per cent of the total ρIR) and showing no significant signs of increase with increasing z over the whole 0.8 < z < 2.2 range. Sources with mass in the range 10 ≤ log(M/M⊙) ≤ 11 are found to dominate the total IR LF, with more massive galaxies prevailing at the bright end of the high-z (≳2) LF. A two-fold evolutionary scheme for IR galaxies is envisaged: on the one hand, a starburst-dominated phase in which the Super Massive Black Holes (SMBH) grows and is obscured by dust (possibly triggered by a major merging event), is followed by an AGN-dominated phase, then evolving towards a local elliptical. On the other hand, moderately star-forming galaxies containing a low-luminosity AGN have various properties suggesting they are good candidates for systems in a transition phase preceding the formation of steady spiral galaxies.

461 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The EMU project as discussed by the authors is a wide-field radio continuum survey planned for the new Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (ASKAP) telescope, with a resolution of 10 arcsec.
Abstract: EMU is a wide-field radio continuum survey planned for the new Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (ASKAP) telescope. The primary goal of EMU is to make a deep (rms ~10 μJy/beam) radio continuum survey of the entire Southern sky at 1.3 GHz, extending as far North as +30° declination, with a resolution of 10 arcsec. EMU is expected to detect and catalogue about 70 million galaxies, including typical star-forming galaxies up to z ~ 1, powerful starbursts to even greater redshifts, and active galactic nuclei to the edge of the visible Universe. It will undoubtedly discover new classes of object. This paper defines the science goals and parameters of the survey, and describes the development of techniques necessary to maximise the science return from EMU.

353 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Peter A. R. Ade1, Nabila Aghanim2, Monique Arnaud3, M. Ashdown4  +334 moreInstitutions (82)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a cosmological analysis based on full-mission Planck observations of temperature and polarization anisotropies of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation.
Abstract: This paper presents cosmological results based on full-mission Planck observations of temperature and polarization anisotropies of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation. Our results are in very good agreement with the 2013 analysis of the Planck nominal-mission temperature data, but with increased precision. The temperature and polarization power spectra are consistent with the standard spatially-flat 6-parameter ΛCDM cosmology with a power-law spectrum of adiabatic scalar perturbations (denoted “base ΛCDM” in this paper). From the Planck temperature data combined with Planck lensing, for this cosmology we find a Hubble constant, H0 = (67.8 ± 0.9) km s-1Mpc-1, a matter density parameter Ωm = 0.308 ± 0.012, and a tilted scalar spectral index with ns = 0.968 ± 0.006, consistent with the 2013 analysis. Note that in this abstract we quote 68% confidence limits on measured parameters and 95% upper limits on other parameters. We present the first results of polarization measurements with the Low Frequency Instrument at large angular scales. Combined with the Planck temperature and lensing data, these measurements give a reionization optical depth of τ = 0.066 ± 0.016, corresponding to a reionization redshift of . These results are consistent with those from WMAP polarization measurements cleaned for dust emission using 353-GHz polarization maps from the High Frequency Instrument. We find no evidence for any departure from base ΛCDM in the neutrino sector of the theory; for example, combining Planck observations with other astrophysical data we find Neff = 3.15 ± 0.23 for the effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom, consistent with the value Neff = 3.046 of the Standard Model of particle physics. The sum of neutrino masses is constrained to ∑ mν < 0.23 eV. The spatial curvature of our Universe is found to be very close to zero, with | ΩK | < 0.005. Adding a tensor component as a single-parameter extension to base ΛCDM we find an upper limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio of r0.002< 0.11, consistent with the Planck 2013 results and consistent with the B-mode polarization constraints from a joint analysis of BICEP2, Keck Array, and Planck (BKP) data. Adding the BKP B-mode data to our analysis leads to a tighter constraint of r0.002 < 0.09 and disfavours inflationarymodels with a V(φ) ∝ φ2 potential. The addition of Planck polarization data leads to strong constraints on deviations from a purely adiabatic spectrum of fluctuations. We find no evidence for any contribution from isocurvature perturbations or from cosmic defects. Combining Planck data with other astrophysical data, including Type Ia supernovae, the equation of state of dark energy is constrained to w = −1.006 ± 0.045, consistent with the expected value for a cosmological constant. The standard big bang nucleosynthesis predictions for the helium and deuterium abundances for the best-fit Planck base ΛCDM cosmology are in excellent agreement with observations. We also constraints on annihilating dark matter and on possible deviations from the standard recombination history. In neither case do we find no evidence for new physics. The Planck results for base ΛCDM are in good agreement with baryon acoustic oscillation data and with the JLA sample of Type Ia supernovae. However, as in the 2013 analysis, the amplitude of the fluctuation spectrum is found to be higher than inferred from some analyses of rich cluster counts and weak gravitational lensing. We show that these tensions cannot easily be resolved with simple modifications of the base ΛCDM cosmology. Apart from these tensions, the base ΛCDM cosmology provides an excellent description of the Planck CMB observations and many other astrophysical data sets.

10,728 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present results based on full-mission Planck observations of temperature and polarization anisotropies of the CMB, which are consistent with the six-parameter inflationary LCDM cosmology.
Abstract: We present results based on full-mission Planck observations of temperature and polarization anisotropies of the CMB. These data are consistent with the six-parameter inflationary LCDM cosmology. From the Planck temperature and lensing data, for this cosmology we find a Hubble constant, H0= (67.8 +/- 0.9) km/s/Mpc, a matter density parameter Omega_m = 0.308 +/- 0.012 and a scalar spectral index with n_s = 0.968 +/- 0.006. (We quote 68% errors on measured parameters and 95% limits on other parameters.) Combined with Planck temperature and lensing data, Planck LFI polarization measurements lead to a reionization optical depth of tau = 0.066 +/- 0.016. Combining Planck with other astrophysical data we find N_ eff = 3.15 +/- 0.23 for the effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom and the sum of neutrino masses is constrained to < 0.23 eV. Spatial curvature is found to be |Omega_K| < 0.005. For LCDM we find a limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio of r <0.11 consistent with the B-mode constraints from an analysis of BICEP2, Keck Array, and Planck (BKP) data. Adding the BKP data leads to a tighter constraint of r < 0.09. We find no evidence for isocurvature perturbations or cosmic defects. The equation of state of dark energy is constrained to w = -1.006 +/- 0.045. Standard big bang nucleosynthesis predictions for the Planck LCDM cosmology are in excellent agreement with observations. We investigate annihilating dark matter and deviations from standard recombination, finding no evidence for new physics. The Planck results for base LCDM are in agreement with BAO data and with the JLA SNe sample. However the amplitude of the fluctuations is found to be higher than inferred from rich cluster counts and weak gravitational lensing. Apart from these tensions, the base LCDM cosmology provides an excellent description of the Planck CMB observations and many other astrophysical data sets.

9,745 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Nabila Aghanim1, Yashar Akrami2, Yashar Akrami3, Yashar Akrami4  +229 moreInstitutions (70)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present cosmological parameter results from the full-mission Planck measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies, combining information from the temperature and polarization maps and the lensing reconstruction.
Abstract: We present cosmological parameter results from the final full-mission Planck measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies, combining information from the temperature and polarization maps and the lensing reconstruction Compared to the 2015 results, improved measurements of large-scale polarization allow the reionization optical depth to be measured with higher precision, leading to significant gains in the precision of other correlated parameters Improved modelling of the small-scale polarization leads to more robust constraints on manyparameters,withresidualmodellinguncertaintiesestimatedtoaffectthemonlyatthe05σlevelWefindgoodconsistencywiththestandard spatially-flat6-parameter ΛCDMcosmologyhavingapower-lawspectrumofadiabaticscalarperturbations(denoted“base ΛCDM”inthispaper), from polarization, temperature, and lensing, separately and in combination A combined analysis gives dark matter density Ωch2 = 0120±0001, baryon density Ωbh2 = 00224±00001, scalar spectral index ns = 0965±0004, and optical depth τ = 0054±0007 (in this abstract we quote 68% confidence regions on measured parameters and 95% on upper limits) The angular acoustic scale is measured to 003% precision, with 100θ∗ = 10411±00003Theseresultsareonlyweaklydependentonthecosmologicalmodelandremainstable,withsomewhatincreasederrors, in many commonly considered extensions Assuming the base-ΛCDM cosmology, the inferred (model-dependent) late-Universe parameters are: HubbleconstantH0 = (674±05)kms−1Mpc−1;matterdensityparameterΩm = 0315±0007;andmatterfluctuationamplitudeσ8 = 0811±0006 We find no compelling evidence for extensions to the base-ΛCDM model Combining with baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements (and consideringsingle-parameterextensions)weconstraintheeffectiveextrarelativisticdegreesoffreedomtobe Neff = 299±017,inagreementwith the Standard Model prediction Neff = 3046, and find that the neutrino mass is tightly constrained toPmν < 012 eV The CMB spectra continue to prefer higher lensing amplitudesthan predicted in base ΛCDM at over 2σ, which pulls some parameters that affect thelensing amplitude away from the ΛCDM model; however, this is not supported by the lensing reconstruction or (in models that also change the background geometry) BAOdataThejointconstraintwithBAOmeasurementsonspatialcurvatureisconsistentwithaflatuniverse, ΩK = 0001±0002Alsocombining with Type Ia supernovae (SNe), the dark-energy equation of state parameter is measured to be w0 = −103±003, consistent with a cosmological constant We find no evidence for deviations from a purely power-law primordial spectrum, and combining with data from BAO, BICEP2, and Keck Array data, we place a limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio r0002 < 006 Standard big-bang nucleosynthesis predictions for the helium and deuterium abundances for the base-ΛCDM cosmology are in excellent agreement with observations The Planck base-ΛCDM results are in good agreement with BAO, SNe, and some galaxy lensing observations, but in slight tension with the Dark Energy Survey’s combined-probe results including galaxy clustering (which prefers lower fluctuation amplitudes or matter density parameters), and in significant, 36σ, tension with local measurements of the Hubble constant (which prefer a higher value) Simple model extensions that can partially resolve these tensions are not favoured by the Planck data

4,688 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors review the range of complementary techniques and theoretical tools that allow astronomers to map the cosmic history of star formation, heavy element production, and reionization of the Universe from the cosmic "dark ages" to the present epoch.
Abstract: Over the past two decades, an avalanche of data from multiwavelength imaging and spectroscopic surveys has revolutionized our view of galaxy formation and evolution. Here we review the range of complementary techniques and theoretical tools that allow astronomers to map the cosmic history of star formation, heavy element production, and reionization of the Universe from the cosmic "dark ages" to the present epoch. A consistent picture is emerging, whereby the star-formation rate density peaked approximately 3.5 Gyr after the Big Bang, at z~1.9, and declined exponentially at later times, with an e-folding timescale of 3.9 Gyr. Half of the stellar mass observed today was formed before a redshift z = 1.3. About 25% formed before the peak of the cosmic star-formation rate density, and another 25% formed after z = 0.7. Less than ~1% of today's stars formed during the epoch of reionization. Under the assumption of a universal initial mass function, the global stellar mass density inferred at any epoch matches reasonably well the time integral of all the preceding star-formation activity. The comoving rates of star formation and central black hole accretion follow a similar rise and fall, offering evidence for co-evolution of black holes and their host galaxies. The rise of the mean metallicity of the Universe to about 0.001 solar by z = 6, one Gyr after the Big Bang, appears to have been accompanied by the production of fewer than ten hydrogen Lyman-continuum photons per baryon, a rather tight budget for cosmological reionization.

3,104 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Nabila Aghanim1, Yashar Akrami2, Yashar Akrami3, Yashar Akrami4  +229 moreInstitutions (70)
TL;DR: In this paper, the cosmological parameter results from the final full-mission Planck measurements of the CMB anisotropies were presented, with good consistency with the standard spatially-flat 6-parameter CDM cosmology having a power-law spectrum of adiabatic scalar perturbations from polarization, temperature, and lensing separately and in combination.
Abstract: We present cosmological parameter results from the final full-mission Planck measurements of the CMB anisotropies. We find good consistency with the standard spatially-flat 6-parameter $\Lambda$CDM cosmology having a power-law spectrum of adiabatic scalar perturbations (denoted "base $\Lambda$CDM" in this paper), from polarization, temperature, and lensing, separately and in combination. A combined analysis gives dark matter density $\Omega_c h^2 = 0.120\pm 0.001$, baryon density $\Omega_b h^2 = 0.0224\pm 0.0001$, scalar spectral index $n_s = 0.965\pm 0.004$, and optical depth $\tau = 0.054\pm 0.007$ (in this abstract we quote $68\,\%$ confidence regions on measured parameters and $95\,\%$ on upper limits). The angular acoustic scale is measured to $0.03\,\%$ precision, with $100\theta_*=1.0411\pm 0.0003$. These results are only weakly dependent on the cosmological model and remain stable, with somewhat increased errors, in many commonly considered extensions. Assuming the base-$\Lambda$CDM cosmology, the inferred late-Universe parameters are: Hubble constant $H_0 = (67.4\pm 0.5)$km/s/Mpc; matter density parameter $\Omega_m = 0.315\pm 0.007$; and matter fluctuation amplitude $\sigma_8 = 0.811\pm 0.006$. We find no compelling evidence for extensions to the base-$\Lambda$CDM model. Combining with BAO we constrain the effective extra relativistic degrees of freedom to be $N_{\rm eff} = 2.99\pm 0.17$, and the neutrino mass is tightly constrained to $\sum m_ u< 0.12$eV. The CMB spectra continue to prefer higher lensing amplitudes than predicted in base -$\Lambda$CDM at over $2\,\sigma$, which pulls some parameters that affect the lensing amplitude away from the base-$\Lambda$CDM model; however, this is not supported by the lensing reconstruction or (in models that also change the background geometry) BAO data. (Abridged)

3,077 citations