scispace - formally typeset
N

Nicole Tieben

Researcher at University of Tübingen

Publications -  21
Citations -  474

Nicole Tieben is an academic researcher from University of Tübingen. The author has contributed to research in topics: Higher education & Vocational education. The author has an hindex of 11, co-authored 21 publications receiving 371 citations. Previous affiliations of Nicole Tieben include Leibniz University of Hanover & University of Mannheim.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Social selectivity of track mobility in secondary Schools. A comparison of intra-secondary transitions in Germany and the Netherlands

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compare social selectivity of track mobility in two countries, Germany and The Netherlands, and find that changing to a higher track is more likely for students who face the threat of status demotion and change to a lower track is independent of status maintenance motives.
Journal ArticleDOI

A healthy sorting machine? Social inequality in the transition to upper secondary education in Germany

TL;DR: The authors examined whether social inequality in lower secondary education outcome and transition to upper secondary education has changed during the process and found no robust evidence for change in social inequalities in the attainment of lower secondary school leaving certificates or entry into the various upper secondary options.
Journal ArticleDOI

Success and failure in secondary education: socio-economic background effects on secondary school outcome in the Netherlands, 1927-1998

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used repeated cross-sections from the Family Survey Dutch Population (1992, 1998, 2000 and 2003) to investigate the effect of social background on the transition from primary to secondary education.
Journal ArticleDOI

Transitions to Post-Secondary and Tertiary Education in the Netherlands: A Trend Analysis of Unconditional and Conditional Socio-Economic Background Effects.

TL;DR: This article found that children from lower socio-economic backgrounds tend to make decisions that do not fully capitalize on their previously obtained qualifications, while the students from advantaged backgrounds still profit from the parental resources in access to the most prestigious tertiary education institutions given secondary qualifications.