scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Niels Rahe-Meyer

Bio: Niels Rahe-Meyer is an academic researcher from Hannover Medical School. The author has contributed to research in topics: Thromboelastometry & Fibrin. The author has an hindex of 29, co-authored 63 publications receiving 4447 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: These guidelines are intended to provide an overview of current knowledge on the subject with an assessment of the quality of the evidence in order to allow anaesthetists throughout Europe to integrate this knowledge into daily patient care wherever possible.
Abstract: The aims of severe perioperative bleeding management are three-fold. First, preoperative identification by anamesis and laboratory testing of those patients for whom the perioperative bleeding risk may be increased. Second, implementation of strategies for correcting preoperative anaemia and stabilisation of the macro- and microcirculations in order to optimise the patient’s tolerance to bleeding. Third, targeted procoagulant interventions to reduce the amount of bleeding, morbidity, mortality and costs. The purpose of these guidelines is to provide an overview of current knowledge on the subject with an assessment of the quality of the evidence in order to allow anaesthetists throughout Europe to integrate this knowledge into daily patient care wherever possible. The Guidelines Committee of the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) formed a task force with members of scientific subcommittees and individual expert members of the ESA. Electronic databases were searched without language restrictions from the year 2000 until 2012. These searches produced 20 664 abstracts. Relevant systematic reviews with meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional surveys were selected. At the suggestion of the ESA Guideline Committee, the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) grading system was initially used to assess the level of evidence and to grade recommendations. During the process of guideline development, the official position of the ESA changed to favour the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. This report includes general recommendations as well as specific recommendations in various fields of surgical interventions. The final draft guideline was posted on the ESA website for four weeks and the link was sent to all ESA members. Comments were collated and the guidelines amended as appropriate. When the final draft was complete, the Guidelines Committee and ESA Board ratified the guidelines.

883 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This update includes revisions to existing recommendations with respect to the wording, or changes in the grade of recommendation, and also the addition of new recommendations.
Abstract: The management of perioperative bleeding involves multiple assessments and strategies to ensure appropriate patient care. Initially, it is important to identify those patients with an increased risk of perioperative bleeding. Next, strategies should be employed to correct preoperative anaemia and to

613 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Clot strength increases in a fibrinogen concentration-dependent manner independent of platelet count, when analyzed by ROTEM, suggesting that EXTEM® (extrinsic activation) and FIBTEM may be useful in guiding fibr inogen repletion therapy.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:The binding of fibrinogen and fibrin to platelets is important in normal hemostasis. The extent of platelet-fibrin interaction can be measured as the viscoelastic strength of clot by rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®). In this study, we investigated the effect of fibrinogen concentrat

284 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Hemostatic therapy with fibrinogen concentrate in patients undergoing aortic surgery significantly reduced the transfusion of allogeneic blood products.
Abstract: BACKGROUND Fibrinogen is suggested to play an important role in managing major bleeding. However, clinical evidence regarding the effect of fibrinogen concentrate (derived from human plasma) on transfusion is limited. The authors assessed whether fibrinogen concentrate can reduce blood transfusion when given as intraoperative, targeted, first-line hemostatic therapy in bleeding patients undergoing aortic replacement surgery. METHODS In this single-center, prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, patients aged 18 yr or older undergoing elective thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic replacement surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass were randomized to fibrinogen concentrate or placebo, administered intraoperatively. Study medication was given if patients had clinically relevant coagulopathic bleeding immediately after removal from cardiopulmonary bypass and completion of surgical hemostasis. Dosing was individualized using the fibrin-based thromboelastometry test. If bleeding continued, a standardized transfusion protocol was followed. RESULTS Twenty-nine patients in the fibrinogen concentrate group and 32 patients in the placebo group were eligible for the efficacy analysis. During the first 24 h after the administration of study medication, patients in the fibrinogen concentrate group received fewer allogeneic blood components than did patients in the placebo group (median, 2 vs. 13 U; P < 0.001; primary endpoint). Total avoidance of transfusion was achieved in 13 (45%) of 29 patients in the fibrinogen concentrate group, whereas 32 (100%) of 32 patients in the placebo group received transfusion (P < 0.001). There was no observed safety concern with using fibrinogen concentrate during aortic surgery. CONCLUSIONS Hemostatic therapy with fibrinogen concentrate in patients undergoing aortic surgery significantly reduced the transfusion of allogeneic blood products. Larger multicenter studies are necessary to confirm the role of fibrinogen concentrate in the management of perioperative bleeding in patients with life-threatening coagulopathy.

253 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluated the haemostatic efficacy of fibrinogen concentrate in correcting acquired perioperative deficiency in complex cardiac surgery using FIBTEM.
Abstract: Complex cardiac surgery is frequently accompanied by excessive perioperative bleeding because of coagulation system impairment, inadequate surgical haemostasis, or both.1 Bleeding increases the risk of re-exploration, allogeneic blood transfusion, or perioperative myocardial infarction, and consequently, associated morbidity and mortality.2 Aortic valve operation and ascending aorta replacement (AV–AA) typically involves hypothermia, prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and large graft anastomoses, and is associated with an increased risk of intra- and postoperative blood loss and high transfusion rates.3,4 Conventional haemostatic therapy consists of transfusion of allogeneic blood products that include fresh-frozen plasma (FFP), platelet concentrate, and cryoprecipitate. However, although the use of these products was developed empirically, their haemostatic efficacy has not been evaluated thoroughly in the surgical setting.5,6 Haemocomplettan® P (brand name in Europe)/Riastap (brand name in USA) (CSL Behring, Marburg, Germany) is a highly purified, lyophilized, virus-inactivated fibrinogen concentrate obtained from human plasma that can be rapidly reconstituted without the need for thawing and cross-matching, which are necessary for FFP and cryoprecipitate. The administration of fibrinogen concentrate was originally reserved for replacement therapy in congenital fibrinogen deficiency, and in the USA, Riastap is only approved for this indication. In the meantime, European reports on haemostatic therapy with Haemocomplettan® P in acquired perioperative deficiency of fibrinogen have been published.7–11 Acquired fibrinogen deficiency occurring during and after CPB is associated with increased bleeding after cardiac surgery.12,13 However, the haemostatic efficacy of fibrinogen concentrate in correcting such deficiency in complex cardiac surgery has not been investigated to date. To reduce blood component transfusion in cardiac surgery, point-of-care methods such as thrombelastography/thromboelastometry have been applied in algorithms supporting bleeding management in relation to blood clotting quality.14–16 Thromboelastometry (ROTEM®; Pentapharm GmbH, Munich, Germany) assesses the viscoelasticity of whole blood. One of the ROTEM® tests, the FIBTEM test, provides prompt information on the clot strength specifically attributed to fibrin/fibrinogen using cytochalasin-D-induced inactivation of platelets in vitro.17 This test may be used to guide the administration of fibrinogen concentrate for prompt haemostatic therapy.9–11 We hypothesized that postoperative haemostasis could be improved by increasing plasma fibrinogen concentrations, since bleeding complications were observed to be lower in patients with high perioperative fibrinogen concentrations.12,13 The primary aim of this pilot study was to evaluate whether FIBTEM-guided intraoperative fibrinogen repletion was able to reduce the use of allogeneic blood products and postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing AV–AA.

252 citations


Cited by
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 2010

5,842 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The guideline now recommends that patients be transferred directly to an appropriate trauma treatment centre and encourages use of a restricted volume replacement strategy during initial resuscitation, and may also serve as a basis for local implementation.
Abstract: Severe trauma continues to represent a global public health issue and mortality and morbidity in trauma patients remains substantial. A number of initiatives have aimed to provide guidance on the management of trauma patients. This document focuses on the management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma and encourages adaptation of the guiding principles to each local situation and implementation within each institution. The pan-European, multidisciplinary Task Force for Advanced Bleeding Care in Trauma was founded in 2004 and included representatives of six relevant European professional societies. The group used a structured, evidence-based consensus approach to address scientific queries that served as the basis for each recommendation and supporting rationale. Expert opinion and current clinical practice were also considered, particularly in areas in which randomised clinical trials have not or cannot be performed. Existing recommendations were reconsidered and revised based on new scientific evidence and observed shifts in clinical practice; new recommendations were formulated to reflect current clinical concerns and areas in which new research data have been generated. This guideline represents the fourth edition of a document first published in 2007 and updated in 2010 and 2013. The guideline now recommends that patients be transferred directly to an appropriate trauma treatment centre and encourages use of a restricted volume replacement strategy during initial resuscitation. Best-practice use of blood products during further resuscitation continues to evolve and should be guided by a goal-directed strategy. The identification and management of patients pre-treated with anticoagulant agents continues to pose a real challenge, despite accumulating experience and awareness. The present guideline should be viewed as an educational aid to improve and standardise the care of the bleeding trauma patients across Europe and beyond. This document may also serve as a basis for local implementation. Furthermore, local quality and safety management systems need to be established to specifically assess key measures of bleeding control and outcome. A multidisciplinary approach and adherence to evidence-based guidance are key to improving patient outcomes. The implementation of locally adapted treatment algorithms should strive to achieve measureable improvements in patient outcome.

1,247 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The present guidelines are the most recent data on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and an update on the 2 previous sets of guidelines published in 2003 and 2007.
Abstract: The present guidelines are the most recent data on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and an update on the 2 previous sets of guidelines published in 2003 and 2007. These guidelines were compiled by a multidisciplinary international panel of individuals with interest and expertise in PONV under the auspices of the Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia. The panel members critically and systematically evaluated the current medical literature on PONV to provide an evidence-based reference tool for the management of adults and children who are undergoing surgery and are at increased risk for PONV. These guidelines identify patients at risk for PONV in adults and children; recommend approaches for reducing baseline risks for PONV; identify the most effective antiemetic single therapy and combination therapy regimens for PONV prophylaxis, including nonpharmacologic approaches; recommend strategies for treatment of PONV when it occurs; provide an algorithm for the management of individuals at increased risk for PONV as well as steps to ensure PONV prevention and treatment are implemented in the clinical setting.

1,180 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Institutional Affiliations Co-chairs Feldman D: Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Georgia Institute of Technology and Morehouse School of Medicine, and Pamboukian SV: University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, Teuteberg JJ:University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Task force chairs.
Abstract: Institutional Affiliations Co-chairs Feldman D: Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Georgia Institute of Technology and Morehouse School of Medicine; Pamboukian SV: University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Teuteberg JJ: University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Task force chairs Birks E: University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky; Lietz K: Loyola University, Chicago, Maywood, Illinois; Moore SA: Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Morgan JA: Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan Contributing writers Arabia F: Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona; Bauman ME: University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada; Buchholz HW: University of Alberta, Stollery Children’s Hospital and Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Deng M: University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Dickstein ML: Columbia University, New York, New York; El-Banayosy A: Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania; Elliot T: Inova Fairfax, Falls Church, Virginia; Goldstein DJ: Montefiore Medical Center, New York, New York; Grady KL: Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Jones K: Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Hryniewicz K: Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota; John R: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Kaan A: St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Kusne S: Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona; Loebe M: Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas; Massicotte P: University of Alberta, Stollery Children’s Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Moazami N: Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Mohacsi P: University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland; Mooney M: Sentara Norfolk, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Nelson T: Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona; Pagani F: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Perry W: Integris Baptist Health Care, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; Potapov EV: Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Rame JE: University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Russell SD: Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland; Sorensen EN: University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; Sun B: Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Strueber M: Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany Independent reviewers Mangi AA: Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Petty MG: University of Minnesota Medical Center, Fairview, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Rogers J: Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

1,152 citations