National Institute of Standards and Technology における超伝導研究及び生活

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01009386/document

Energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks: A top-down survey

Internet of Things (IoT) has recently received a great attention due to its potential and capacity to be integrated into any complex system. As a result of rapid development of sensing technologies such as radio-frequency identification, sensors and the convergence of information technologies such as wireless communication and Internet, IoT is emerging as an important technology for monitoring systems. This paper reviews and introduces a framework for structural health monitoring (SHM) using IoT technologies on intelligent and reliable monitoring. Specifically, technologies involved in IoT and SHM system implementation as well as data routing strategy in IoT environment are presented. As the amount of data generated by sensing devices are voluminous and faster than ever, big data solutions are introduced to deal with the complex and large amount of data collected from sensors installed on structures.

Structural Health Monitoring Framework Based on Internet of Things: A Survey

RPL is the IPv6 routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks, standardized by IETF in 2012 as RFC6550. Specifically, RPL is designed to be a simple and inter-operable networking protocol for resource-constrained devices in industrial, home, and urban environments, intended to support the vision of the Internet of Things with thousands of devices interconnected through multihop mesh networks. More than four-years have passed since the standardization of RPL, and we believe that it is time to examine and understand its current state. In this paper, we review the history of research efforts in RPL; what aspects have been (and have not been) investigated and evaluated, how they have been studied, what was (and was not) implemented, and what remains for future investigation. We reviewed over 97 RPL-related academic research papers published by major academic publishers and present a topic-oriented survey for these research efforts. Our survey shows that only 40.2% of the papers evaluate RPL through experiments using implementations on real embedded devices, ContikiOS and TinyOS are the two most popular implementations (92.3%), and TelosB was the most frequently used hardware platform (69%) on testbeds that have average and median size of 49.4 and 30.5 nodes, respectively. Furthermore, unfortunately, despite it being approximately four years since its initial standardization, we are yet to see wide adoption of RPL as part of real-world systems and applications. We present our observations on the reasons behind this and suggest directions on which RPL should evolve.

Challenging the IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL): A Survey

The growing interest for the Internet of Things is contributing to the large-scale deployment of Low power and Lossy Networks (LLN). These networks support communications amongst objects from the real world, such as home automation devices and embedded sensors, and their interconnection to the Internet. An open standard routing protocol, called RPL, has been specified by the IETF in order to address the specific properties and constraints of these networks. However, this protocol is exposed to a large variety of attacks. Their consequences can be quite significant in terms of network performance and resources. In this paper, we propose to establish a taxonomy of the attacks against this protocol, considering three main categories including attacks targeting network resources, attacks modifying the network topology and attacks related to network traffic. We describe these attacks, analyze and compare their properties, discuss existing counter-measures and their usage from a risk management perspective.

/pdf/a-taxonomy-of-attacks-in-rpl-based-internet-of-things-2zw272bx2q.pdf

A Taxonomy of Attacks in RPL-based Internet of Things

http://www.cister.isep.ipp.pt/docs/rpl_in_a_nutshell__a_survey/748/view.pdf

Survey RPL in a nutshell: A survey

The Internet of Things (IoT) has emerged as a paradigm over the last few years as a result of the tight integration of the computing and the physical world. The requirement of remote sensing makes low-power wireless sensor networks one of the key enabling technologies of IoT. These networks encompass several challenges, especially in communication and networking, due to their inherent constraints of low-power features, deployment in harsh and lossy environments, and limited computing and storage resources. The IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) 1 was proposed by the IETF ROLL (Routing Over Low-power Lossy links) working group and is currently adopted as an IETF standard in the RFC 6550 since March 2012. Although RPL greatly satisfied the requirements of low-power and lossy sensor networks, several issues remain open for improvement and specification, in particular with respect to Quality of Service (QoS) guarantees and support for mobility.In this paper, we focus mainly on the RPL routing protocol. We propose some enhancements to the standard specification in order to provide QoS guarantees for static as well as mobile LLNs. For this purpose, we propose OF-FL (Objective Function based on Fuzzy Logic), a new objective function that overcomes the limitations of the standardized objective functions that were designed for RPL by considering important link and node metrics, namely end-to-end delay, number of hops, ETX (Expected transmission count) and LQL (Link Quality Level). In addition, we present the design of Co-RPL, an extension to RPL based on the corona mechanism that supports mobility in order to overcome the problem of slow reactivity to frequent topology changes and thus providing a better quality of service mainly in dynamic networks application. Performance evaluation results show that both OF-FL and Co-RPL allow a great improvement when compared to the standard specification, mainly in terms of packet loss ratio and average network latency.

Quality-of-service aware routing for static and mobile IPv6-based low-power and lossy sensor networks using RPL

Mobility support for wireless sensor networks has always been a challenging research topic. This paper addresses the issue of mobility support in the Routing Protocol for Low power and lossy networks (RPL), the recently adopted IETF routing protocol standard for low power wireless sensor networks. RPL was originally designed for static networks, with no support for mobility. In this work, we address this gap and propose Co-RPL as an extension to RPL based on the Corona mechanism to support mobility. To demonstrate the effectiveness of Co-RPL, we conducted an extensive simulation study using the Contiki/Cooja simulator and compared the performance against standard RPL. We study the impact of node speed, packet transmission rate and number of Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAG) roots on network performance. The simulation results show that Co-RPL decreases packet loss ratio by 45%, average energy consumption by 50% and end-to-end delay by 2.5 seconds, in comparison with the standard RPL.

/pdf/co-rpl-rpl-routing-for-mobile-low-power-wireless-sensor-7qzdrywt1y.pdf

Co-RPL: RPL Routing for Mobile Low Power Wireless Sensor Networks using Corona Mechanism

Low power and lossy networks (LLNs) require efficient routing protocols that should meet the requirements of the critical applications, such as real-time, reliability and high availability. RPL has been recently proposed by the ROLL working group as a tree routing protocol specifically designed for LLNs. It relies on objective functions to construct routes that optimize or constrain a routing metric on the paths. However, the working group did not specify the set of metrics and/or constraints to be used to specify the preferred path, and left it open to implementations. In this paper, we design OF-FL, a novel objective function that combines a set of metrics in order to provide a configurable routing decision based on the fuzzy parameters. OF-FL has the advantage to consider the application requirements in order to select the best paths to the destination. Our evaluation with a large-scale testbed in ContikiOS reveals that OF-FL can achieve remarkable performance of the RPL-based LLNs in comparison with the existing objective functions, and appropriately satisfy the quality of service contract of the different applications.

/pdf/of-fl-qos-aware-fuzzy-logic-objective-function-for-the-rpl-4cdfttdhsx.pdf

OF-FL: QoS-aware fuzzy logic objective function for the RPL routing protocol

In this paper, we simulate and analyze the performance of the network formation process with the RPL (IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks), which is a routing protocol specifically designed for Low power and Lossy Networks (LLN) compliant with 6LoWPAN (IPv6 Low power Wireless Personal Area Networks). One motivation behind this work is that RPL is the first prospective candidate routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks, which are a main component in the next generation Internet-of-Things. RPL is still under development, although having gained maturity, and is open to improvements. Indeed, there is a need to understand well its behavior, and investigate its relevance. Our analysis is based on the ContikiRPL accurate and realistic simulation model developed under Contiki operating system. The performance of RPL is evaluated and analyzed for different network settings to understand the impact of the protocol attributes on the network formation performance, namely in terms energy, storage overhead, communication overhead, network convergence time and the maximum hop count. We argue through simulation that RPL provides several features that make it suitable to large scale networks.

Olfa Gaddour

Papers

Survey RPL in a nutshell: A survey

Quality-of-service aware routing for static and mobile IPv6-based low-power and lossy sensor networks using RPL

Co-RPL: RPL Routing for Mobile Low Power Wireless Sensor Networks using Corona Mechanism

OF-FL: QoS-aware fuzzy logic objective function for the RPL routing protocol

Simulation and performance evaluation of DAG construction with RPL