scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Ondrej Hes

Bio: Ondrej Hes is an academic researcher from Charles University in Prague. The author has contributed to research in topics: Renal cell carcinoma & Carcinoma. The author has an hindex of 41, co-authored 273 publications receiving 7939 citations. Previous affiliations of Ondrej Hes include Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University & University of Rennes.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
John R. Srigley1, Brett Delahunt2, John N. Eble3, Lars Egevad4, Jonathan I. Epstein5, David J. Grignon3, Ondrej Hes6, Holger Moch7, Rodolfo Montironi, Satish K. Tickoo5, Ming Zhou8, Pedram Argani9, Anila Abraham, Adebowale J. Adeniran, Khalid Ahmed, Hikmat Al Ahmadie, Ferran Algaba, Robert W. Allan, Mahul B. Amin, Ulrika Axcrona, Marc Barry, Dilek Ertoy Baydar, Louis R. Bégin, Daniel M. Berney, Peter Bethwaite, Athanase Billis, Ruth Birbe, Stephen M. Bonsib, David G. Bostwick, Fadi Brimo, Helen P. Cathro, Ying-Bei Chen, Liang Cheng, John C. Cheville, Yong Mee Cho, Ai Ying Chuang, Cynthia Cohen, Henry Crist, Warick Delprado, Fang Ming Deng, Andrew Evans, Oluwole Fadare, Daniel A. Fajardo, Sara M. Falzarano, Samson W. Fine, Stewart Fleming, Eddie Fridman, Bungo Furusato, Masoud Ganji, Masoumeh Ghayouri, Giovanna A. Giannico, Neriman Gokden, David J. Griffiths, Nilesh S. Gupta, Omar Hameed, Michelle S. Hirsch, Jiaoti Huang, Wei Huang, Christina Hulsbergen Van De Kaa, Peter A. Humphrey, Sundus Hussein, Kenneth A. Iczkowski, Rafael E. Jimenez, Edward C. Jones, Laura Irene Jufe, James G. Kench, Masatoshi Kida, Glen Kristiansen, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Zhaoli Lane, Mathieu Latour, Claudio Lewin, Kathrine Lie, Josep Lloreta, Barbara Loftus, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Fiona Maclean, Cristina Magi-Galluzzi, Guido Martignoni, Teresa McHale, Jesse K. McKenney, Maria Merino, Rose Miller, Hiroshi Miyamoto, Hedwig Murphy, John N. Nacey, Tipu Nazeer, Gabriella Nesi, George J. Netto, Peter W. Nichols, Marie O'Donnell, Semra Olgac, Roberto Orozco, Adeboye O. Osunkoya, Aysim Ozagari, Chin Chen Pan, Anil V. Parwani, Joanna Perry-Keene, Constantina Petraki, Maria M. Picken, Maria Pyda-Karwicka, Victor E. Reuter, Katayoon Rezaei, Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq, Brian D. Robinson, Stephen Rohan, Ruben Ronchetti, Laurie Russell, Hemamali Samaratunga, Marina Scarpelli, Ahmed Shabaik, Rajal B. Shah, Jonathan H Shanks, Steven S. Shen, Maria Shevchuk, Mathilde Sibony, Bhuvana Srinivasan, Martin Susani, Sueli Suzigan, Joan Sweet, Hiroyuki Takahashi, Pheroze Tamboli, Puay Hoon Tan, Isabel Trias, Kiril Trpkov, Larry True, Toyonori Tsuzuki, Funda Vakar-Lopez, Theo H. van der Kwast, Cheng Wang, Anne Y. Warren, Jorge L. Yao, Asli Yilmaz, Jin Zhao, Debra L. Zynger 
TL;DR: The classification working group of the International Society of Urological Pathology consensus conference on renal neoplasia was in charge of making recommendations regarding additions and changes to the current World Health Organization Classification of Renal Tumors, with consensus that 5 entities should be recognized as new distinct epithelial tumors within the classification system.
Abstract: The classification working group of the International Society of Urological Pathology consensus conference on renal neoplasia was in charge of making recommendations regarding additions and changes to the current World Health Organization Classification of Renal Tumors (2004). Members of the group performed an exhaustive literature review, assessed the results of the preconference survey and participated in the consensus conference discussion and polling activities. On the basis of the above inputs, there was consensus that 5 entities should be recognized as new distinct epithelial tumors within the classification system: tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), acquired cystic disease-associated RCC, clear cell (tubulo) papillary RCC, the MiT family translocation RCCs (in particular t(6;11) RCC), and hereditary leiomyomatosis RCC syndrome-associated RCC. In addition, there are 3 rare carcinomas that were considered as emerging or provisional new entities: thyroid-like follicular RCC; succinate dehydrogenase B deficiency-associated RCC; and ALK translocation RCC. Further reports of these entities are required to better understand the nature and behavior of these highly unusual tumors. There were a number of new concepts and suggested modifications to the existing World Health Organization 2004 categories. Within the clear cell RCC group, it was agreed upon that multicystic clear cell RCC is best considered as a neoplasm of low malignant potential. There was agreement that subtyping of papillary RCC is of value and that the oncocytic variant of papillary RCC should not be considered as a distinct entity. The hybrid oncocytic chromophobe tumor, which is an indolent tumor that occurs in 3 settings, namely Birt-Hogg-Dube Syndrome, renal oncocytosis, and as a sporadic neoplasm, was placed, for the time being, within the chromophobe RCC category. Recent advances related to collecting duct carcinoma, renal medullary carcinoma, and mucinous spindle cell and tubular RCC were elucidated. Outside of the epithelial category, advances in our understanding of angiomyolipoma, including the epithelioid and epithelial cystic variants, were considered. In addition, the apparent relationship between cystic nephroma and mixed epithelial and stromal tumor was discussed, with the consensus that these tumors form a spectrum of neoplasia. Finally, it was thought that the synovial sarcoma should be removed from the mixed epithelial and mesenchymal category and placed within the sarcoma group. The new classification is to be referred to as the International Society of Urological Pathology Vancouver Classification of Renal Neoplasia.

911 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Brett Delahunt1, John C. Cheville2, Guido Martignoni3, Peter A. Humphrey4, Cristina Magi-Galluzzi5, Jesse K. McKenney5, Lars Egevad6, Ferran Algaba, Holger Moch7, David J. Grignon8, Rodolfo Montironi9, John R. Srigley10, John R. Srigley11, Anila Abraham, Adebowale J. Adeniran, Khalid Ahmed, Hikmat Al Ahmadie, Robert W. Allan, Mahul B. Amin, Pedram Argani, Ulrika Axcrona, Marc Barry, Dilek Ertoy Baydar, Louis R. Bégin, Daniel M. Berney, Peter Bethwaite, Athanase Billis, Ruth Birbe, Stephen M. Bonsib, David G. Bostwick, Fadi Brimo, Helen P. Cathro, Ying-Bei Chen, Liang Cheng, Yong Mee Cho, Ai Ying Chuang, Cynthia Cohen, Henry Crist, Warick Delprado, Fang Ming Deng, Jonathan I. Epstein, Andrew Evans, Oluwole Fadare, Daniel A. Fajardo, Sara M. Falzarano, Samson W. Fine, Stewart Fleming, Eddie Fridman, Bungo Furusato, Masoud Ganji, Masoumeh Ghayouri, Giovanna A. Giannico, Neriman Gokden, David J. Griffiths, Nilesh S. Gupta, Omar Hameed, Ondrej Hes, Michelle S. Hirsch, Jiaoti Huang, Wei Huang, Christina Hulsbergen Van De Kaa, Sundus Hussein, Kenneth A. Iczkowski, Rafael E. Jimenez, Edward C. Jones, Laura Irene Jufe, James G. Kench, Masatoshi Kida, Glen Kristiansen, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Zhaoli Lane, Mathieu Latour, Claudio Lewin, Kathrine Lie, Josep Lloreta, Barbara Loftus, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Fiona Maclean, Teresa McHale, Maria Merino, Rose Miller, Hiroshi Miyamoto, Hedwig Murphy, John N. Nacey, Tipu Nazeer, Gabriella Nesi, George J. Netto, Peter W. Nichols, Marie O'Donnell, Semra Olgac, Roberto Orozco, Adeboye O. Osunkoya, Aysim Ozagari, Chin Chen Pan, Anil V. Parwani, Joanna Perry-Keene, Constantina Petraki, Maria M. Picken, Maria Pyda-Karwicka, Victor E. Reuter, Katayoon Rezaei, Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq, Brian D. Robinson, Stephen Rohan, Ruben Ronchetti, Laurie Russell, Marina Scarpelli, Ahmed Shabaik, Rajal B. Shah, Jonathan H Shanks, Steven S. Shen, Maria Shevchuk, Mathilde Sibony, Bhuvana Srinivasan, Martin Susani, Sueli Suzigan, Joan Sweet, Hiroyuki Takahashi, Puay Hoon Tan, Satish K. Tickoo, Isabel Trias, Larry True, Toyonori Tsuzuki, Funda Vakar-Lopez, Theo H. van der Kwast, Cheng Wang, Anne Y. Warren, Jorge L. Yao, Asli Yilmaz, Jin Zhao, Ming Zhou, Debra L. Zynger 
TL;DR: The International Society of Urological Pathology 2012 Consensus Conference made recommendations regarding classification, prognostic factors, staging, and immunohistochemical and molecular assessment of adult renal tumors.
Abstract: The International Society of Urological Pathology 2012 Consensus Conference made recommendations regarding classification, prognostic factors, staging, and immunohistochemical and molecular assessment of adult renal tumors. Issues relating to prognostic factors were coordinated by a workgroup who identified tumor morphotype, sarcomatoid/rhabdoid differentiation, tumor necrosis, grading, and microvascular invasion as potential prognostic parameters. There was consensus that the main morphotypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were of prognostic significance, that subtyping of papillary RCC (types 1 and 2) provided additional prognostic information, and that clear cell tubulopapillary RCC was associated with a more favorable outcome. For tumors showing sarcomatoid or rhabdoid differentiation, there was consensus that a minimum proportion of tumor was not required for diagnostic purposes. It was also agreed upon that the underlying subtype of carcinoma should be reported. For sarcomatoid carcinoma, it was further agreed upon that if the underlying carcinoma subtype was absent the tumor should be classified as a grade 4 unclassified carcinoma with a sarcomatoid component. Tumor necrosis was considered to have prognostic significance, with assessment based on macroscopic and microscopic examination of the tumor. It was recommended that for clear cell RCC the amount of necrosis should be quantified. There was consensus that nucleolar prominence defined grades 1 to 3 of clear cell and papillary RCCs, whereas extreme nuclear pleomorphism or sarcomatoid and/or rhabdoid differentiation defined grade 4 tumors. It was agreed upon that chromophobe RCC should not be graded. There was consensus that microvascular invasion should not be included as a staging criterion for RCC.

610 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Although this tumor may undergo dedifferentiation and metastasize, sometimes after a prolonged delay, metastatic disease is rare in the absence of high-grade nuclear atypia or coagulative necrosis and showing a strong relationship with SDH germline mutation.
Abstract: Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient renal carcinoma has been accepted as a provisional entity in the 2013 International Society of Urological Pathology Vancouver Classification. To further define its morphologic and clinical features, we studied a multi-institutional cohort of 36 SDH-deficient renal carcinomas from 27 patients, including 21 previously unreported cases. We estimate that 0.05% to 0.2% of all renal carcinomas are SDH deficient. Mean patient age at presentation was 37 years (range, 14 to 76 y), with a slight male predominance (M:F=1.7:1). Bilateral tumors were observed in 26% of patients. Thirty-four (94%) tumors demonstrated the previously reported morphology at least focally, which included: solid or focally cystic growth, uniform cytology with eosinophilic flocculent cytoplasm, intracytoplasmic vacuolations and inclusions, and round to oval low-grade nuclei. All 17 patients who underwent genetic testing for mutation in the SDH subunits demonstrated germline mutations (16 in SDHB and 1 in SDHC). Nine of 27 (33%) patients developed metastatic disease, 2 of them after prolonged follow-up (5.5 and 30 y). Seven of 10 patients (70%) with high-grade nuclei metastasized as did all 4 patients with coagulative necrosis. Two of 17 (12%) patients with low-grade nuclei metastasized, and both had unbiopsied contralateral tumors, which may have been the origin of the metastatic disease. In conclusion, SDH-deficient renal carcinoma is a rare and unique type of renal carcinoma, exhibiting stereotypical morphologic features in the great majority of cases and showing a strong relationship with SDH germline mutation. Although this tumor may undergo dedifferentiation and metastasize, sometimes after a prolonged delay, metastatic disease is rare in the absence of high-grade nuclear atypia or coagulative necrosis.

257 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyzed the clinicopathologic parameters in a large series of 41 cases of pure epithelioid angiomyolipoma of the kidney, which they designate as pure (monotypic) epitheliosioid PEComas.
Abstract: Epithelioid angiomyolipomas (perivascular epithelioid cell tumors) of the kidney are defined as potentially malignant mesenchymal lesions that are closely related to classic angiomyolipoma. Although approximately 120 cases are published, mostly as case reports with variably used diagnostic criteria, the pathologic prognostic predictors of outcome are unknown. We analyzed the clinicopathologic parameters in a large series of 41 cases of pure epithelioid angiomyolipomas of the kidney, which we designate as pure (monotypic) epithelioid PEComas to contrast them from classic angiomyolipomas that are regarded by some as PEComas. We use the terminology "pure" to separate these cases from those that may have variable epithelioid components. The mean age of the patients was 40.7 years (range, 14 to 68 y). The male-to-female ratio was 1:1. Seventy-nine percent of patients were symptomatic at presentation with metastatic disease at onset in 12 cases. Follow-up and/or disease progression information were available for 33 of 41 cases (mean, 44.5 mo and median, 24.5 mo; range, 4 to 240); 9 patients had a history of associated tuberous sclerosis. Recurrence and metastasis were seen in 17% and 49% of patients; 33% of patients died of disease. Lymph node involvement was seen in 24% of patients; the liver (63%), lung (25%), and mesentery (18.8%) were the most common metastatic sites. Clinicopathologic parameters associated with disease progression (recurrence, metastasis, or death due to disease) in univariate analysis included associated tuberous sclerosis complex or concurrent angiomyolipoma (any metastasis, P=0.046), necrosis (metastasis at diagnosis, P=0.012), tumor size >7 cm (progression, P=0.021), extrarenal extension and/or renal vein involvement (progression, P=0.023), and carcinoma-like growth pattern (progression, P=0.040) (the 5 adverse prognostic parameters for pure epithelioid PEComas). Tumors with <2 adverse prognostic parameters (13 cases) were considered to be low risk for progression tumor, with 15% having disease progression. Tumors with 2 to 3 adverse prognostic parameters (14 cases) were considered to be "intermediate risk," with 64% having disease progression. Tumors with more than 4 or more adverse prognostic parameters (6 cases) were considered to be high risk, with all patients having disease progression. Of tumors with 3 or more adverse prognostic parameters, 80% had disease progression. An exact logistic regression analytic model showed that only carcinoma-like growth pattern and extrarenal extension and/or renal vein involvement were significant predictors of outcome (P=0.009 and 0.033, respectively). Our data of a large series with uniform definitional criteria confirm the malignant potential for pure epithelioid PEComas and provide adverse prognostic parameters for risk stratification in these patients.

206 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In conclusion, preemptive valganciclovir therapy and valacyclovir prophylaxis are equally effective in the prevention of CMV disease after renal transplantation.

196 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The 2014 RCC guideline has been updated by a multidisciplinary panel using the highest methodological standards, and provides the best and most reliable contemporary evidence base for RCC management.

3,100 citations

01 Jan 2011
TL;DR: The sheer volume and scope of data posed by this flood of data pose a significant challenge to the development of efficient and intuitive visualization tools able to scale to very large data sets and to flexibly integrate multiple data types, including clinical data.
Abstract: Rapid improvements in sequencing and array-based platforms are resulting in a flood of diverse genome-wide data, including data from exome and whole-genome sequencing, epigenetic surveys, expression profiling of coding and noncoding RNAs, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and copy number profiling, and functional assays. Analysis of these large, diverse data sets holds the promise of a more comprehensive understanding of the genome and its relation to human disease. Experienced and knowledgeable human review is an essential component of this process, complementing computational approaches. This calls for efficient and intuitive visualization tools able to scale to very large data sets and to flexibly integrate multiple data types, including clinical data. However, the sheer volume and scope of data pose a significant challenge to the development of such tools.

2,187 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This review summarizes the most significant differences between the newly published classification of urogenital tumours and the prior version for renal, penile, and testicular tumours.

2,024 citations

01 Jan 2014
TL;DR: Lymphedema is a common complication after treatment for breast cancer and factors associated with increased risk of lymphedEMA include extent of axillary surgery, axillary radiation, infection, and patient obesity.

1,988 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This manuscript focuses on the NCCN Guidelines Panel recommendations for the workup, primary treatment, risk reduction strategies, and surveillance specific to DCIS.
Abstract: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast represents a heterogeneous group of neoplastic lesions in the breast ducts. The goal for management of DCIS is to prevent the development of invasive breast cancer. This manuscript focuses on the NCCN Guidelines Panel recommendations for the workup, primary treatment, risk reduction strategies, and surveillance specific to DCIS.

1,545 citations