scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

P. Grossberg

Bio: P. Grossberg is an academic researcher from Stanford University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Adaptive control & Interaction point. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 10 publications receiving 77 citations.

Papers
More filters
T. Himel1, S. Allison1, P. Grossberg1, L. Hendrickson1, R. Sass1, H. Shoaee1 
01 May 1993
TL;DR: In this article, the SLAC Linear Collider has a total of twenty-four beam-steering feedback loops used to keep the electron and positron beams on their desired trajectories, seven of which measure and control the same beam as it proceeds down the linac through the arcs to the final focus.
Abstract: The SLAC Linear Collider now has a total of twenty-four beam-steering feedback loops used to keep the electron and positron beams on their desired trajectories. Seven of these loops measure and control the same beam as it proceeds down the linac through the arcs to the final focus. Ideally each loop should correct only for disturbances that occur between it and the immediate upstream loop. In fact, in the original system each loop corrected for all upstream disturbances. This resulted in undesirable overcorrection and ringing. We added MIMO (Multiple Input Multiple Output) adaptive noise cancellers to separate the signal we wish to correct from disturbances further up stream. This adaptive control improved performance in the 1992 run. >

20 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
T. Himel1, S. Allison1, P. Grossberg1, L. Hendrickson1, R. Sass1, H. Shoaee1 
17 May 1993
TL;DR: In this paper, the SLAC Linear Collider has a total of twenty-four beam-steering feedback loops used to keep the electron and positron beams on their desired trajectories, seven of which measure and control the same beam as it proceeds down the linac through the arcs to the final focus.
Abstract: The SLAC Linear Collider now has a total of twenty-four beam-steering feedback loops used to keep the electron and positron beams on their desired trajectories. Seven of these loops measure and control the same beam as it proceeds down the linac through the arcs to the final focus. Ideally each loop should correct only for disturbances that occur between it and the immediate upstream loop. In fact, in the original system each loop corrected for all upstream disturbances. This resulted in undesirable overcorrection and ringing. We added MIMO (Multiple Input Multiple Output) adaptive noise cancellers to separate the signal we wish to correct from disturbances further up stream. This adaptive control improved performance in the 1992 run. >

19 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
01 Jan 1999
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors proposed feedback systems for stable operation of a linear collider, providing a cost-effective method for relaxing tight tolerances for the next linear Collider (NLC).
Abstract: Feedback systems are essential for stable operation of a linear collider, providing a cost-effective method for relaxing tight tolerances. In the Stanford Linear Collider (SLC), feedback controls beam parameters such as trajectory, energy, and intensity throughout the accelerator. A novel dithering optimization system which adjusts final focus parameters to maximize luminosity contributed to achieving record performance in the 1997-98 run. Performance limitations of the steering feedback have been investigated, and improvements have been made. For the Next Linear Collider (NLC), extensive feedback systems are planned as an integral part of the design. Feedback requirements for JLC (the Japanese Linear Collider) are essentially identical to NLC; some of the TESLA requirements are similar but there are significant differences. For NLC, algorithms which incorporate improvements upon the SLC implementation are being prototyped. Specialized systems for the damping rings, RF and interaction point will operate at high bandwidth and fast response. To correct for the motion of individual bunches within a train, both feedforward and feedback systems are planned. SLC experience has shown that feedback systems are an invaluable operational tool for decoupling systems, allowing precision tuning, and providing pulse-to-pulse diagnostics. Feedback systems for the NLC will incorporate the key SLC features and the benefits of advancing technologies.

12 citations

01 Jan 1998
TL;DR: In this paper, a new luminosity optimization feedback system has been developed using novel dithering techniques to maximize the luminosity with respect to the 10 parameters, which are adjusted one at a time.
Abstract: The luminosity optimization at the SLC has been limited by the precision with which one can measure the micron size beams at the Interaction Point. Ten independent tuning parameters must be adjusted. An automated application has been used to scan each parameter over a significant range and set the minimum beam size as measured with a beambeam deflection scan. Measurement errors limited the accuracy of this procedure and degraded the resulting luminosity. A new luminosity optimization feedback system has been developed using novel dithering techniques to maximize the luminosity with respect to the 10 parameters, which are adjusted one at a time. Control devices are perturbed around nominal setpoints, while the averaged readout of a digitized luminosity monitor measurement is accumulated for each setting. Results are averaged over many pulses to achieve high precision and then fitted to determine the optimal setting. The dithering itself causes a small loss in luminosity, but the improved optimization is expected to significantly enhance the performance of the SLC. Commissioning results are reported.

11 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
01 May 1995
TL;DR: A fast feedback system provides beam stabilization for the SLC and controls a wide variety of machine parameters throughout the S LC and associated experiments, including regulation of beam position, angle, energy, intensity and timing parameters.
Abstract: A fast feedback system provides beam stabilization for the SLC. As the SLC is in some sense a prototype for future linear colliders, this system may be a prototype for future feedbacks. The SLC provides a good base of experience for feedback requirements and capabilities as well as a testing ground for performance characteristics. The feedback system controls a wide variety of machine parameters throughout the SLC and associated experiments, including regulation of beam position, angle, energy, intensity and timing parameters. The design and applications of the system are described, in addition to results of recent performance studies.

7 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Bernard Aubert1, R. Barate1, D. Boutigny1, Fabrice Couderc1  +1087 moreInstitutions (84)
TL;DR: The BaBar detector operated successfully at the PEP-II asymmetric e + e-collider at the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory from 1999 to 2008 as mentioned in this paper, and the performance of the collider and the detector systems, as well as the trigger, online and offline computing, and aspects of event reconstruction since the beginning of data taking.
Abstract: The BaBar detector operated successfully at the PEP-II asymmetric e +e- collider at the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory from 1999 to 2008. This report covers upgrades, operation, and performance of the collider and the detector systems, as well as the trigger, online and offline computing, and aspects of event reconstruction since the beginning of data taking.

146 citations

T. Himel1, S. Allison1, P. Grossberg1, L. Hendrickson1, R. Sass1, H. Shoaee1 
01 May 1993
TL;DR: In this article, the SLAC Linear Collider has a total of twenty-four beam-steering feedback loops used to keep the electron and positron beams on their desired trajectories, seven of which measure and control the same beam as it proceeds down the linac through the arcs to the final focus.
Abstract: The SLAC Linear Collider now has a total of twenty-four beam-steering feedback loops used to keep the electron and positron beams on their desired trajectories. Seven of these loops measure and control the same beam as it proceeds down the linac through the arcs to the final focus. Ideally each loop should correct only for disturbances that occur between it and the immediate upstream loop. In fact, in the original system each loop corrected for all upstream disturbances. This resulted in undesirable overcorrection and ringing. We added MIMO (Multiple Input Multiple Output) adaptive noise cancellers to separate the signal we wish to correct from disturbances further up stream. This adaptive control improved performance in the 1992 run. >

20 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
P. Emma1
01 May 1995
TL;DR: The Stanford Linear Collider (SLC) as mentioned in this paper is the only high-energy e/sup +/e/sup -/ linear collider in the world that produces high intensity, submicron sized, polarized beams at a single interaction point.
Abstract: The Stanford Linear Collider (SLC) is the first and only high-energy e/sup +/e/sup -/ linear collider in the world. Its most remarkable features are high intensity, submicron sized, polarized (e/sup -/) beams at a single interaction point. The main challenges posed by these unique characteristics include machine-wide emittance preservation, consistent high intensity operation, polarized electron production and transport, and the achievement of a high degree of beam stability on all time scales. In addition to serving as an important machine for the study of Z/sup 0/ boson production and decay using polarized beams, the SLC is also an indispensable source of hands-on experience for future linear colliders. Each new year of operation has been highlighted with a marked improvement in performance. The most significant improvements for the 1994-95 run include new low impedance vacuum chambers for the damping rings, an upgrade to the optics and diagnostics of the final focus systems, and a higher degree of polarization from the electron source. As a result, the average luminosity has nearly doubled over the previous year with peaks approaching 10/sup 30/ cm/sup -2/ s/sup -1/ and an 80% electron polarization at the interaction point. These developments as well as the remaining identifiable performance limitations will be discussed.

18 citations

Posted Content
N. Phinney1
TL;DR: The Stanford Linear Collider (SLC) was the first prototype of a new type of accelerator, the electron-positron linear collider as mentioned in this paper, and many years of dedicated effort were required to understand the physics of this new technology and to develop the techniques for maximizing performance.
Abstract: The Stanford Linear Collider (SLC) was the first prototype of a new type of accelerator, the electron-positron linear collider. Many years of dedicated effort were required to understand the physics of this new technology and to develop the techniques for maximizing performance. Key issues were emittance dilution, stability, final beam optimization and background control. Precision, non-invasive diagnostics were required to measure and monitor the beams throughout the machine. Beam-based feedback systems were needed to stabilize energy, trajectory, intensity and the final beam size at the interaction point. A variety of new tuning techniques were developed to correct for residual optical or alignment errors. The final focus system underwent a series of refinements in order to deliver sub-micron size beams. It also took many iterations to understand the sources of backgrounds and develop the methods to control them. The benefit from this accumulated experience was seen in the performance of the SLC during its final run in 1997-98. The luminosity increased by a factor of three to 3*10**30 and the 350,000 Z data sample delivered was nearly double that from all previous runs combined.

16 citations

Proceedings Article
27 Jul 1997
TL;DR: A new architecture for accelerator tuning that combines heuristic and knowledge based methods with traditional approaches to control is discussed, which is distributed and hierarchical to utilize parallel problem-solving in the face of time-sensitive control requirements.
Abstract: This paper discusses a new architecture for accelerator tuning that combines heuristic and knowledge based methods with traditional approaches to control. Control of particle accelerators requires a hybrid architecture, which includes methodologies for planning, intelligent search, and pattern recognition. Control is distributed and hierarchical to utilize parallel problem-solving in the face of time-sensitive control requirements and to decompose complex control problems into more manageable subtasks. For perspective, we discuss past attempts at accelerator control and why these attempts left many issues unresolved. We describe the details of our control architecture along with its motivation. We then report the results of deploying and testing it at two accelerator facilities. This paper ends with a discussion of the commercial importance of this work.

15 citations