Author
P. J. Webber
Other affiliations: University of Colorado Boulder, University of Alaska Fairbanks
Bio: P. J. Webber is an academic researcher from Michigan State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Tundra & Arctic. The author has an hindex of 22, co-authored 27 publications receiving 7112 citations. Previous affiliations of P. J. Webber include University of Colorado Boulder & University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Topics: Tundra, Arctic, Global warming, Vegetation, Plant community
Papers
More filters
••
University of Alaska Fairbanks1, Marine Biological Laboratory2, University of Colorado Boulder3, Middlebury College4, United States Geological Survey5, Michigan State University6, San Diego State University7, Colorado State University8, Monash University9, University of Delaware10, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory11, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration12, California State University San Marcos13, United States Forest Service14, University of Alaska Anchorage15
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a broad array of evidence that illustrates con- vincingly; the Arctic is undergoing a system-wide response to an altered climatic state.
Abstract: The Arctic climate is changing. Permafrost is warming, hydrological processes are chang- ing and biological and social systems are also evolving in response to these changing conditions. Knowing how the structure and function of arctic terrestrial ecosystems are responding to recent and persistent climate change is paramount to understanding the future state of the Earth system and how humans will need to adapt. Our holistic review presents a broad array of evidence that illustrates con- vincingly; the Arctic is undergoing a system-wide response to an altered climatic state. New extreme and seasonal surface climatic conditions are being experienced, a range of biophysical states and pro- cesses influenced by the threshold and phase change of freezing point are being altered, hydrological and biogeochemical cycles are shifting, and more regularly human sub-systems are being affected. Importantly, the patterns, magnitude and mechanisms of change have sometimes been unpredictable or difficult to isolate due to compounding factors. In almost every discipline represented, we show
1,315 citations
01 Dec 2004
1,242 citations
••
United States Department of Agriculture1, La Trobe University2, Grand Valley State University3, University of British Columbia4, Florida International University5, University of Gothenburg6, University of Alaska Fairbanks7, Abisko Scientific Research Station8, University of Virginia9, University Centre in Svalbard10, Colorado State University11, Michigan State University12, Marine Biological Laboratory13, University of California, Irvine14, United States Geological Survey15, Finnish Forest Research Institute16, Norwegian University of Life Sciences17, University of Colorado Boulder18, University of Stirling19
TL;DR: Warming increased height and cover of deciduous shrubs and graminoids, decreased cover of mosses and lichens, and decreased species diversity and evenness, which predict that warming will cause a decline in biodiversity across a wide variety of tundra, at least in the short term.
Abstract: Recent observations of changes in some tundra ecosystems appear to be responses to a warming climate. Several experimental studies have shown that tundra plants and ecosystems can respond strongly to environmental change, including warming; however, most studies were limited to a single location and were of short duration and based on a variety of experimental designs. In addition, comparisons among studies are difficult because a variety of techniques have been used to achieve experimental warming and different measurements have been used to assess responses. We used metaanalysis on plant community measurements from standardized warming experiments at 11 locations across the tundra biome involved in the International Tundra Experiment. The passive warming treatment increased plant-level air temperature by 1-3°C, which is in the range of predicted and observed warming for tundra regions. Responses were rapid and detected in whole plant communities after only two growing seasons. Overall, warming increased height and cover of deciduous shrubs and graminoids, decreased cover of mosses and lichens, and decreased species diversity and evenness. These results predict that warming will cause a decline in biodiversity across a wide variety of tundra, at least in the short term. They also provide rigorous experimental evidence that recently observed increases in shrub cover in many tundra regions are in response to climate warming. These changes have important implications for processes and interactions within tundra ecosystems and between tundra and the atmosphere.
1,232 citations
••
Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research1, Stony Brook University2, University of Gothenburg3, Marine Biological Laboratory4, University of Alberta5, University of Basel6, University of Zurich7, University of British Columbia8, Ohio State University9, Michigan State University10, University of Oulu11, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières12, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory13, Komarov Botanical Institute14, King's College London15, Florida International University16, University of Bergen17, University of Wyoming18, University of London19
TL;DR: Results indicate that key phenological events such as leaf bud burst and flowering occurred earlier in warmed plots throughout the study period; however, there was little impact on growth cessation at the end of the season.
Abstract: The International Tundra Experiment (ITEX) is a collaborative, multisite experiment using a common temperature manipulation to examine variability in species response across climatic and geographic gradients of tundra ecosystems. ITEX was designed specifically to examine variability in arctic and alpine species response to increased temperature. We compiled from one to four years of experimental data from 13 different ITEX sites and used meta-analysis to analyze responses of plant phenology, growth, and reproduction to experimental warming. Results indicate that key phenological events such as leaf bud burst and flowering occurred earlier in warmed plots throughout the study period; however, there was little impact on growth cessation at the end of the season. Quantitative measures of vegetative growth were greatest in warmed plots in the early years of the experiment, whereas reproductive effort and success increased in later years. A shift away from vegetative growth and toward reproductive effort and success in the fourth treatment year suggests a shift from the initial response to a secondary response. The change in vegetative response may be due to depletion of stored plant reserves, whereas the lag in reproductive response may be due to the formation of flower buds one to several seasons prior to flowering. Both vegetative and reproductive responses varied among life-forms; herbaceous forms had stronger and more consistent vegetative growth responses than did woody forms. The greater responsiveness of the herbaceous forms may be attributed to their more flexible morphology and to their relatively greater proportion of stored plant reserves. Finally, warmer, low arctic sites produced the strongest growth responses, but colder sites produced a greater reproductive response. Greater resource investment in vegetative growth may be a conservative strategy in the Low Arctic, where there is more competition for light, nutrients, or water, and there may be little opportunity for successful germination or seedling development. In contrast, in the High Arctic, heavy investment in producing seed under a higher temperature scenario may provide an opportunity for species to colonize patches of unvegetated ground. The observed differential response to warming suggests that the primary forces driving the response vary across climatic zones, functional groups, and through time.
854 citations
••
University of British Columbia1, Grand Valley State University2, University of Gothenburg3, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières4, VU University Amsterdam5, Arizona State University6, Umeå University7, Moscow State University8, Environment Canada9, United States Department of Agriculture10, University of California, Berkeley11, University of Alberta12, University of Texas at El Paso13, University of Saskatchewan14, University of Iceland15, United States Fish and Wildlife Service16, Norwegian University of Life Sciences17, Colorado State University18, Hokkaido University19, University of Copenhagen20, Florida International University21, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research22, Aarhus University23, Marine Biological Laboratory24, University of California, Davis25, University of Oulu26, La Trobe University27, Michigan State University28, University of Alaska Anchorage29
TL;DR: In this paper, remote sensing data indicate that contemporary climate warming has already resulted in increased productivity and increased productivity in the tundra biome (Tundra Tundra Bi biome).
Abstract: Temperature is increasing at unprecedented rates across most of the tundra biome(1). Remote-sensing data indicate that contemporary climate warming has already resulted in increased productivity ov ...
782 citations
Cited by
More filters
••
Australian National University1, Stockholm Resilience Centre2, University of Copenhagen3, McGill University4, Stellenbosch University5, University of Wisconsin-Madison6, Wageningen University and Research Centre7, Stockholm University8, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences9, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research10, International Livestock Research Institute11, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation12, University College London13, Stockholm Environment Institute14, The Energy and Resources Institute15, University of California, San Diego16, Royal Institute of Technology17
TL;DR: An updated and extended analysis of the planetary boundary (PB) framework and identifies levels of anthropogenic perturbations below which the risk of destabilization of the Earth system (ES) is likely to remain low—a “safe operating space” for global societal development.
Abstract: The planetary boundaries framework defines a safe operating space for humanity based on the intrinsic biophysical processes that regulate the stability of the Earth system. Here, we revise and update the planetary boundary framework, with a focus on the underpinning biophysical science, based on targeted input from expert research communities and on more general scientific advances over the past 5 years. Several of the boundaries now have a two-tier approach, reflecting the importance of cross-scale interactions and the regional-level heterogeneity of the processes that underpin the boundaries. Two core boundaries—climate change and biosphere integrity—have been identified, each of which has the potential on its own to drive the Earth system into a new state should they be substantially and persistently transgressed.
7,169 citations
•
01 Jun 2008
TL;DR: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Technical Paper Climate Change and Water draws together and evaluates the information in IPCC Assessment and Special Reports concerning the impacts of climate change on hydrological processes and regimes, and on freshwater resources.
Abstract: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Technical Paper Climate Change and Water draws together and evaluates the information in IPCC Assessment and Special Reports concerning the impacts of climate change on hydrological processes and regimes, and on freshwater resources – their availability, quality, use and management. It takes into account current and projected regional key vulnerabilities, prospects for adaptation, and the relationships between climate change mitigation and water. Its objectives are:
3,108 citations
••
TL;DR: Recent advances in several fields that have enabled scaling between species responses to recent climatic changes and shifts in ecosystem productivity are discussed, with implications for global carbon cycling.
Abstract: Plants are finely tuned to the seasonality of their environment, and shifts in the timing of plant activity (i.e. phenology) provide some of the most compelling evidence that species and ecosystems are being influenced by global environmental change. Researchers across disciplines have observed shifting phenology at multiple scales, including earlier spring flowering in individual plants and an earlier spring green-up' of the land surface revealed in satellite images. Experimental and modeling approaches have sought to identify the mechanisms causing these shifts, as well as to make predictions regarding the consequences. Here, we discuss recent advances in several fields that have enabled scaling between species responses to recent climatic changes and shifts in ecosystem productivity, with implications for global carbon cycling.
1,863 citations
••
TL;DR: The past decade has seen substantial advances in understanding Arctic amplification, that trends and variability in surface air temperature tend to be larger in the Arctic region than for the Northern Hemisphere or globe as a whole as discussed by the authors.
1,726 citations
01 Apr 2012
1,699 citations