scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

P. Niezurawski

Bio: P. Niezurawski is an academic researcher from University of Warsaw. The author has contributed to research in topics: Higgs boson & Standard Model. The author has an hindex of 19, co-authored 48 publications receiving 1976 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Georg Weiglein1, Sami Lehti2, Geneviève Bélanger, Tao Han3, David L. Rainwater4, Massimiliano Chiorboli5, Michael Ratz, M. Schumacher6, P. Niezurawski7, Stefano Moretti8, Filip Moortgat9, S. J. Asztalos10, Rohini M. Godbole11, Abdelhak Djouadi12, G. Polesello9, Werner Porod13, Werner Porod14, A.A. Giolo-Nicollerat15, Alessia Tricomi5, J.L. Hewett16, M. Szleper17, L. Zivkovic18, Stephen Godfrey19, Maria Krawczyk7, Klaus Desch20, Alexander Sherstnev21, Dimitri Bourilkov22, A. G. Akeroyd, Dirk Zerwas, M. Muhlleitner23, T. Binoth24, Maria Spiropulu9, Alexander Nikitenko25, A. Krokhotine, V. Bunichev21, Tadas Krupovnickas26, Peter Wienemann, T. Hurth9, T. Hurth16, A. De Roeck9, S. De Curtis27, Ritva Kinnunen2, D. Grellscheid28, U. Baur29, J. Kalinowski7, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick1, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick9, H. U. Martyn30, Alexander Pukhov21, C. Hugonie13, U. Ellwanger, Daniel Tovey31, Aleksander Filip Zarnecki7, Thomas G. Rizzo16, S. Slabospitsky, Jonathan L. Feng32, Remi Lafaye33, Sally Dawson34, Diaz23, Philip Bechtle20, I.F. Ginzburg, Hooman Davoudiasl, Andreas Redelbach24, J. Jiang35, W. J. Stirling1, Reinhold Rückl24, Per Osland36, S. Weinzierl37, Fernando Quevedo38, Laura Reina26, Timothy Barklow16, H. J. Schreiber, Andre Sopczak39, Wilfried Buchmuller, Howard E. Haber40, H. Pas24, E. Lytken41, Xerxes Tata, Howard Baer26, Tsutomu T. Yanagida42, Sabine Kraml43, Sabine Kraml9, Mayda Velasco17, Francois Richard, E. K. U. Gross6, A.F. Osorio44, J. Guasch23, Fawzi Boudjema, Stewart Boogert45, Sven Heinemeyer9, Sabine Riemann, D. Asner18, Daniele Dominici27, Victoria Jane Martin46, J.F. Gunion47, Marco Battaglia48, Michael Spira23, Doreen Wackeroth29, David J. Miller46, David J. Miller49, Joan Sola50, J. Gronberg10, Zack Sullivan, A. Juste, Lynne H. Orr4, Wolfgang Hollik51, Heather E. Logan3, Benjamin C. Allanach38, Junji Hisano42, Carlos E. M. Wagner35, Carlos E. M. Wagner52, Frank F. Deppisch24, Tilman Plehn9, F. Gianotti9, Gianluca Cerminara53, G.A. Blair54, Wolfgang Kilian, Michael Dittmar15, E. E. Boos21, Kiyotomo Kawagoe55, Alexander Belyaev26, Koichi Hamaguchi, Børge Kile Gjelsten56, Tim M. P. Tait, Klaus Mönig, Edmond L. Berger35, P.M. Zerwas, Mihoko M. Nojiri57 
Durham University1, University of Helsinki2, University of Wisconsin-Madison3, University of Rochester4, University of Catania5, Weizmann Institute of Science6, University of Warsaw7, University of Southampton8, CERN9, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory10, Indian Institute of Science11, University of Montpellier12, Spanish National Research Council13, University of Zurich14, ETH Zurich15, Stanford University16, Northwestern University17, University of Pittsburgh18, Carleton University19, University of Hamburg20, Moscow State University21, University of Florida22, Paul Scherrer Institute23, University of Würzburg24, Imperial College London25, Florida State University26, University of Florence27, University of Bonn28, University at Buffalo29, RWTH Aachen University30, University of Sheffield31, University of California, Irvine32, Laboratoire d'Annecy-le-Vieux de physique des particules33, Brookhaven National Laboratory34, Argonne National Laboratory35, University of Bergen36, University of Mainz37, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services38, Lancaster University39, University of California, Santa Cruz40, University of Copenhagen41, University of Tokyo42, Austrian Academy of Sciences43, University of Manchester44, University College London45, University of Edinburgh46, University of California, Davis47, University of California, Berkeley48, University of Glasgow49, University of Barcelona50, Max Planck Society51, University of Chicago52, University of Turin53, Royal Holloway, University of London54, Kobe University55, University of Oslo56, Kyoto University57
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the possible interplay between the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and the International e(+)e(-) Linear Collider (ILC) in testing the Standard Model and in discovering and determining the origin of new physics.

422 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Georg Weiglein, Timothy Barklow, E. E. Boos, A. De Roeck, Klaus Kurt Desch, F. Gianotti, Rohini M. Godbole, J.F. Gunion, Howard E. Haber, S. Heinemeyer, J.L. Hewett, Kiyotomo Kawagoe, Klaus Mönig, Mihoko M. Nojiri, G. Polesello, Francois Richard, Sabine Riemann, W. J. Stirling, A. G. Akeroyd, Benjamin C. Allanach, D. M. Asner, S. J. Asztalos, Howard Baer, M. Battaglia, U. Baur, Philip Bechtle, Geneviève Bélanger, Alexander Belyaev, Edmond L. Berger, T. Binoth, G.A. Blair, Stewart Boogert, Fawzi Boudjema, Dimitri Bourilkov, Wilfried Buchmuller, V. Bunichev, Gianluca Cerminara, Massimiliano Chiorboli, Hooman Davoudiasl, Sally Dawson, S. De Curtis, Frank F. Deppisch, Marco Aurelio Diaz, Michael Dittmar, Abdelhak Djouadi, Daniele Dominici, U. Ellwanger, Jonathan L. Feng, I.F. Ginzburg, A. S. Giolo-Nicollerat, Børge Kile Gjelsten, Stephen Godfrey, David Grellscheid, J. Gronberg, Eugene P. Gross, J. Guasch, Koichi Hamaguchi, Tao Han, Junji Hisano, Wolfgang Hollik, Cyril Hugonie, Tobias Hurth, J. Jiang, A. Juste, J. Kalinowski, Wolfgang Kilian, Ritva Kinnunen, Sabine Kraml, Maria Krawczyk, A. Krokhotine, T. Krupovnickas, Remi Lafaye, Sami Lehti, Heather E. Logan, Else Lytken, Victoria Jane Martin, H.U. Martyn, David J. Miller, Stefano Moretti, F. Moortgat, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick, M. Muhlleitner, P. Niezurawski, Alexander Nikitenko, Lynne H. Orr, Per Osland, A.F. Osorio, H. Pas, Tilman Plehn, Werner Porod, Alexander Pukhov, Fernando Quevedo, D. Rainwater, Michael Ratz, Andreas Redelbach, Laura Reina, Tom Rizzo, Reinhold Rückl, H. J. Schreiber, Markus Schumacher, Alexander Sherstnev, S. Slabospitsky, Joan Sola, Andre Sopczak, Michael Spira, Maria Spiropulu, Zack Sullivan, Michal Szleper, Tim M. P. Tait, Xerxes Tata, Daniel Tovey, Alessia Tricomi, Mayda Velasco, Doreen Wackeroth, Carlos E. M. Wagner, S. Weinzierl, Peter Wienemann, Tsutomu T. Yanagida, Aleksander Filip Zarnecki, Dirk Zerwas, P.M. Zerwas, L. Zivkovic 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors address the possible interplay between the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and the International e+e- Linear Collider (ILC) in testing the Standard Model and in discovering and determining the origin of new physics.
Abstract: Physics at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and the International e+e- Linear Collider (ILC) will be complementary in many respects, as has been demonstrated at previous generations of hadron and lepton colliders. This report addresses the possible interplay between the LHC and ILC in testing the Standard Model and in discovering and determining the origin of new physics. Mutual benefits for the physics programme at both machines can occur both at the level of a combined interpretation of Hadron Collider and Linear Collider data and at the level of combined analyses of the data, where results obtained at one machine can directly influence the way analyses are carried out at the other machine. Topics under study comprise the physics of weak and strong electroweak symmetry breaking, supersymmetric models, new gauge theories, models with extra dimensions, and electroweak and QCD precision physics. The status of the work that has been carried out within the LHC / LC Study Group so far is summarised in this report. Possible topics for future studies are outlined.

334 citations

ReportDOI
01 Feb 2010
TL;DR: The International Large Detector (ILD) is a concept for a detector at the International Linear Collider, ILC as discussed by the authors, which will collide electrons and positrons at energies of initially 500 GeV, upgradeable to 1 TeV.
Abstract: The International Large Detector (ILD) is a concept for a detector at the International Linear Collider, ILC. The ILC will collide electrons and positrons at energies of initially 500 GeV, upgradeable to 1 TeV. The ILC has an ambitious physics program, which will extend and complement that of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). A hallmark of physics at the ILC is precision. The clean initial state and the comparatively benign environment of a lepton collider are ideally suited to high precision measurements. To take full advantage of the physics potential of ILC places great demands on the detector performance. The design of ILD is driven by these requirements. Excellent calorimetry and tracking are combined to obtain the best possible overall event reconstruction, including the capability to reconstruct individual particles within jets for particle ow calorimetry. This requires excellent spatial resolution for all detector systems. A highly granular calorimeter system is combined with a central tracker which stresses redundancy and efficiency. In addition, efficient reconstruction of secondary vertices and excellent momentum resolution for charged particles are essential for an ILC detector. The interaction region of the ILC is designed to host two detectors, which can be moved into the beam position with a push-pull scheme. The mechanical design of ILD and the overall integration of subdetectors takes these operational conditions into account.

202 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss the most relevant theories which go beyond the Standard Model and its minimal, CP-conserving supersymmetric extension: two-Higgs-doublet models with CP violation, super-ymmetric models with an extra singlet, models with extra gauge groups or Higgs triplets, Little Higgs models, models in extra dimensions, and models with technicolour or other new strong dynamics.
Abstract: There are many possibilities for new physics beyond the Standard Model that feature non-standard Higgs sectors. These may introduce new sources of CP violation, and there may be mixing between multiple Higgs bosons or other new scalar bosons. Alternatively, the Higgs may be a composite state, or there may even be no Higgs at all. These non-standard Higgs scenarios have important implications for collider physics as well as for cosmology, and understanding their phenomenology is essential for a full comprehension of electroweak symmetry breaking. This report discusses the most relevant theories which go beyond the Standard Model and its minimal, CP-conserving supersymmetric extension: two-Higgs-doublet models and minimal supersymmetric models with CP violation, supersymmetric models with an extra singlet, models with extra gauge groups or Higgs triplets, Little Higgs models, models in extra dimensions, and models with technicolour or other new strong dynamics. For each of these scenarios, this report presents an introduction to the phenomenology, followed by contributions on more detailed theoretical aspects and studies of possible experimental signatures at the LHC and other colliders.

144 citations

DOI
01 Jul 2006
TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss the most relevant theories which go beyond the Standard Model and its minimal, CP-conserving supersymmetric extension: two-Higgs-doublet models with CP violation, super-ymmetric models with an extra singlet, models with extra gauge groups or Higgs triplets, Little Higgs models, models in extra dimensions, and models with technicolour or other new strong dynamics.
Abstract: There are many possibilities for new physics beyond the Standard Model that feature non-standard Higgs sectors. These may introduce new sources of CP violation, and there may be mixing between multiple Higgs bosons or other new scalar bosons. Alternatively, the Higgs may be a composite state, or there may even be no Higgs at all. These non-standard Higgs scenarios have important implications for collider physics as well as for cosmology, and understanding their phenomenology is essential for a full comprehension of electroweak symmetry breaking. This report discusses the most relevant theories which go beyond the Standard Model and its minimal, CP-conserving supersymmetric extension: two-Higgs-doublet models and minimal supersymmetric models with CP violation, supersymmetric models with an extra singlet, models with extra gauge groups or Higgs triplets, Little Higgs models, models in extra dimensions, and models with technicolour or other new strong dynamics. For each of these scenarios, this report presents an introduction to the phenomenology, followed by contributions on more detailed theoretical aspects and studies of possible experimental signatures at the LHC and other colliders.

108 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
K. Adcox1, S. S. Adler2, Serguei Afanasiev3, Christine Angela Aidala4  +550 moreInstitutions (48)
TL;DR: In this paper, the results of the PHENIX detector at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) were examined with an emphasis on implications for the formation of a new state of dense matter.

2,572 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors report world averages of measurements of b-hadron, c-, c-, and tau-lepton properties obtained by the Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFAG) using results available through the end of 2011.
Abstract: This article reports world averages of measurements of b-hadron, c-hadron, and tau-lepton properties obtained by the Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFAG) using results available through the end of 2011. In some cases results available in the early part of 2012 are included. For the averaging, common input parameters used in the various analyses are adjusted (rescaled) to common values, and known correlations are taken into account. The averages include branching fractions, lifetimes, neutral meson mixing parameters, CP violation parameters, parameters of semileptonic decays and CKM matrix elements.

2,151 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the main results obtained by the BRAHMS Collaboration on the properties of hot and dense hadronic and partonic matter produced in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions at RHIC are reviewed.

1,860 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: In this paper, the subject of quantum electrodynamics is presented in a new form, which may be dealt with in two ways: using redundant variables and using a direct physical interpretation.
Abstract: THE subject of quantum electrodynamics is extremely difficult, even for the case of a single electron. The usual method of solving the corresponding wave equation leads to divergent integrals. To avoid these, Prof. P. A. M. Dirac* uses the method of redundant variables. This does not abolish the difficulty, but presents it in a new form, which may be dealt with in two ways. The first of these needs only comparatively simple mathematics and is directly connected with an elegant general scheme, but unfortunately its wave functions apply only to a hypothetical world and so its physical interpretation is indirect. The second way has the advantage of a direct physical interpretation, but the mathematics is so complicated that it has not yet been solved even for what appears to be the simplest possible case. Both methods seem worth further study, failing the discovery of a third which would combine the advantages of both.

1,398 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the final electroweak measurements performed with data taken at the Z resonance by the experiments operating at the electron-positron colliders SLC and LEP are reported.

1,381 citations