scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Pablo Koch-Medina

Other affiliations: Swiss Re, Swiss Finance Institute
Bio: Pablo Koch-Medina is an academic researcher from University of Zurich. The author has contributed to research in topics: Capital adequacy ratio & Acceptance set. The author has an hindex of 12, co-authored 60 publications receiving 481 citations. Previous affiliations of Pablo Koch-Medina include Swiss Re & Swiss Finance Institute.

Papers published on a yearly basis

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors introduce risk measurement as the minimum cost of making a position acceptable by adding an optimal combination of multiple eligible assets under certain assumptions, and show that these risk measures have properties similar to those of coherent risk measures.
Abstract: This paper is concerned with clarifying the link between risk measurement and capital efficiency. For this purpose we introduce risk measurement as the minimum cost of making a position acceptable by adding an optimal combination of multiple eligible assets. Under certain assumptions, it is shown that these risk measures have properties similar to those of coherent risk measures. The motivation for this paper was the study of a multi-currency setting where it is natural to use simultaneously a domestic and a foreign asset as investment vehicles to inject the capital necessary to make an unacceptable position acceptable. We also study what happens when one changes the unit of account from domestic to foreign currency and are led to the notion of compatibility of risk measures. In addition, we aim to clarify terminology in the field.

80 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the non-degeneracy, finiteness and continuity properties of set-valued risk measures with respect to multiple eligible assets and provided a characterization of when such extensions exist.
Abstract: The risk of financial positions is measured by the minimum amount of capital to raise and invest in eligible portfolios of traded assets in order to meet a prescribed acceptability constraint. We investigate nondegeneracy, finiteness and continuity properties of these risk measures with respect to multiple eligible assets. Our finiteness and continuity results highlight the interplay between the acceptance set and the class of eligible portfolios. We present a simple, alternative approach to the dual representation of convex risk measures by directly applying to the acceptance set the external characterization of closed, convex sets. We prove that risk measures are nondegenerate if and only if the pricing functional admits a positive extension which is a supporting functional for the underlying acceptance set, and provide a characterization of when such extensions exist. Finally, we discuss applications to set-valued risk measures, superhedging with shortfall risk, and optimal risk sharing.

50 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: This work proves that risk measures are nondegenerate if and only if the pricing functional admits a positive extension which is a supporting functional for the underlying acceptance set, and provides a characterization of when such extensions exist.
Abstract: The risk of financial positions is measured by the minimum amount of capital to raise and invest in eligible portfolios of traded assets in order to meet a prescribed acceptability constraint. We investigate nondegeneracy, finiteness and continuity properties of these risk measures with respect to multiple eligible assets. Our finiteness and continuity results highlight the interplay between the acceptance set and the class of eligible portfolios. We present a simple, alternative approach to the dual representation of convex risk measures by directly applying to the acceptance set the external characterization of closed, convex sets. We prove that risk measures are nondegenerate if and only if the pricing functional admits a positive extension which is a supporting functional for the underlying acceptance set, and provide a characterization of when such extensions exist. Finally, we discuss applications to set-valued risk measures, superhedging with shortfall risk, and optimal risk sharing.

39 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide a variety of finiteness and continuity results for the corresponding risk measures and apply them to risk measures based on value at risk and tail value-at-risk on L p spaces, as well as to shortfall risk measures on Orlicz spaces.
Abstract: We discuss risk measures representing the minimum amount of capital a financial institution needs to raise and invest in a pre-specified eligible asset to ensure it is adequately capitalized. Most of the literature has focused on cash-additive risk measures, for which the eligible asset is a risk-free bond, on the grounds that the general case can be reduced to the cash-additive case by a change of numeraire. However, discounting does not work in all financially relevant situations, especially when the eligible asset is a defaultable bond. In this paper, we fill this gap by allowing general eligible assets. We provide a variety of finiteness and continuity results for the corresponding risk measures and apply them to risk measures based on value-at-risk and tail value-at-risk on L p spaces, as well as to shortfall risk measures on Orlicz spaces. We pay special attention to the property of cash subadditivity, which has been recently proposed as an alternative to cash additivity to deal with defaultable bonds. For important examples, we provide characterizations of cash subadditivity and show that when the eligible asset is a defaultable bond, cash subadditivity is the exception rather than the rule. Finally, we consider the situation where the eligible asset is not liquidly traded and the pricing rule is no longer linear. We establish when the resulting risk measures are quasiconvex and show that cash subadditivity is only compatible with continuous pricing rules.

35 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors show that, from a theoretical perspective, Expected Shortfall based regulation can provide a misleading assessment of tail behaviour, does not necessarily protect liability holders' interests much better than Value-at-Risk based regulation, and may also allow for regulatory arbitrage when used as a global solvency measure.
Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to dispel some common misunderstandings about capital adequacy rules based on Expected Shortfall. We establish that, from a theoretical perspective, Expected Shortfall based regulation can provide a misleading assessment of tail behaviour, does not necessarily protect liability holders' interests much better than Value-at-Risk based regulation, and may also allow for regulatory arbitrage when used as a global solvency measure. We also show that, for a value-maximizing financial institution, the benefits derived from protecting its franchise may not be sufficient to disincentivize excessive risk taking. We further interpret our results in the context of portfolio risk measurement. Our results do not invalidate the possible merits of Expected Shortfall as a risk measure but instead highlight the need for its cautious use in the context of capital adequacy regimes and of portfolio risk control.

31 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a risk management approach for value at risk and beyond in the context of risk management, which is based on the concept of Value at Risk and Beyond.
Abstract: (2003). Risk Management: Value at Risk and Beyond. Journal of the American Statistical Association: Vol. 98, No. 462, pp. 494-494.

612 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a time-0 coherent risk measure is defined for value processes and two other constructions of measurement processes are given in terms of sets of test probabilities, when the sets fulfill a stability condition also met in multi-period treatment of ambiguity as in decision-making.
Abstract: Starting with a time-0 coherent risk measure defined for “value processes”, we also define risk measurement processes. Two other constructions of measurement processes are given in terms of sets of test probabilities. These latter constructions are identical and are related to the former construction when the sets fulfill a stability condition also met in multiperiod treatment of ambiguity as in decision-making. We finally deduce risk measurements for the final value of locked-in positions and repeat a warning concerning Tail-Value-at-Risk.

450 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that Hampel's classical notion of qualitative robustness is not suitable for risk measurement, and propose and analyze a refined notion of robustness that applies to tail-dependent law-invariant convex risk measures on Orlicz spaces.
Abstract: When estimating the risk of a P&L from historical data or Monte Carlo simulation, the robustness of the estimate is important. We argue here that Hampel’s classical notion of qualitative robustness is not suitable for risk measurement, and we propose and analyze a refined notion of robustness that applies to tail-dependent law-invariant convex risk measures on Orlicz spaces. This concept captures the tradeoff between robustness and sensitivity and can be quantified by an index of qualitative robustness. By means of this index, we can compare various risk measures, such as distortion risk measures, in regard to their degree of robustness. Our analysis also yields results of independent interest such as continuity properties and consistency of estimators for risk measures, or a Skorohod representation theorem for ψ-weak convergence.

173 citations

01 Jan 2016
TL;DR: The non additive measure and integral is universally compatible with any devices to read and is available in the book collection an online access to it is set as public so you can get it instantly.
Abstract: Thank you very much for downloading non additive measure and integral. Maybe you have knowledge that, people have search numerous times for their chosen books like this non additive measure and integral, but end up in infectious downloads. Rather than enjoying a good book with a cup of coffee in the afternoon, instead they are facing with some infectious bugs inside their computer. non additive measure and integral is available in our book collection an online access to it is set as public so you can get it instantly. Our digital library spans in multiple countries, allowing you to get the most less latency time to download any of our books like this one. Kindly say, the non additive measure and integral is universally compatible with any devices to read.

136 citations