There is, I think, something ethereal about i —the square root of minus one. I remember first hearing about it at school. It seemed an odd beast at that time—an intruder hovering on the edge of reality.

Usually familiarity dulls this sense of the bizarre, but in the case of i it was the reverse: over the years the sense of its surreal nature intensified. It seemed that it was impossible to write mathematics that described the real world in …

I and i

In semidefinite programming, one minimizes a linear function subject to the constraint that an affine combination of symmetric matrices is positive semidefinite. Such a constraint is nonlinear and nonsmooth, but convex, so semidefinite programs are convex optimization problems. Semidefinite programming unifies several standard problems (e.g., linear and quadratic programming) and finds many applications in engineering and combinatorial optimization. Although semidefinite programs are much more general than linear programs, they are not much harder to solve. Most interior-point methods for linear programming have been generalized to semidefinite programs. As in linear programming, these methods have polynomial worst-case complexity and perform very well in practice. This paper gives a survey of the theory and applications of semidefinite programs and an introduction to primaldual interior-point methods for their solution.

Semidefinite programming

1. Introduction. 2. Linear Algebra. 3. Linear Systems. 4. H2 and Ha Spaces. 5. Internal Stability. 6. Performance Specifications and Limitations. 7. Balanced Model Reduction. 8. Uncertainty and Robustness. 9. Linear Fractional Transformation. 10. m and m- Synthesis. 11. Controller Parameterization. 12. Algebraic Riccati Equations. 13. H2 Optimal Control. 14. Ha Control. 15. Controller Reduction. 16. Ha Loop Shaping. 17. Gap Metric and ...u- Gap Metric. 18. Miscellaneous Topics. Bibliography. Index.

/pdf/essentials-of-robust-control-3kaks6yk3h.pdf

Essentials of Robust Control

From the Publisher:
A comprehensive treatment of model-based fuzzy control systems
This volume offers full coverage of the systematic framework for the stability and design of nonlinear fuzzy control systems. Building on the Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy model, authors Tanaka and Wang address a number of important issues in fuzzy control systems, including stability analysis, systematic design procedures, incorporation of performance specifications, numerical implementations, and practical applications.
Issues that have not been fully treated in existing texts, such as stability analysis, systematic design, and performance analysis, are crucial to the validity and applicability of fuzzy control methodology. Fuzzy Control Systems Design and Analysis addresses these issues in the framework of parallel distributed compensation, a controller structure devised in accordance with the fuzzy model.
This balanced treatment features an overview of fuzzy control, modeling, and stability analysis, as well as a section on the use of linear matrix inequalities (LMI) as an approach to fuzzy design and control. It also covers advanced topics in model-based fuzzy control systems, including modeling and control of chaotic systems. Later sections offer practical examples in the form of detailed theoretical and experimental studies of fuzzy control in robotic systems and a discussion of future directions in the field.
Fuzzy Control Systems Design and Analysis offers an advanced treatment of fuzzy control that makes a useful reference for researchers and a reliable text for advanced graduate students in the field.

Fuzzy Control Systems Design and Analysis: A Linear Matrix Inequality Approach

This paper presents an overview of a linear matrix inequality (LMI) approach to the multiobjective synthesis of linear output-feedback controllers. The design objectives can be a mix of H/sub /spl infin// performance, H/sub 2/ performance, passivity, asymptotic disturbance rejection, time-domain constraints, and constraints on the closed-loop pole location. In addition, these objectives can be specified on different channels of the closed-loop system. When all objectives are formulated in terms of a common Lyapunov function, controller design amounts to solving a system of linear matrix inequalities. The validity of this approach is illustrated by a realistic design example.

/pdf/multiobjective-output-feedback-control-via-lmi-optimization-8cihrh828q.pdf

Multiobjective output-feedback control via LMI optimization

This paper addresses the design of state- or output-feedback H/sub /spl infin// controllers that satisfy additional constraints on the closed-loop pole location. Sufficient conditions for feasibility are derived for a general class of convex regions of the complex plane. These conditions are expressed in terms of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs), and the authors' formulation is therefore numerically tractable via LMI optimization. In the state-feedback case, mixed H/sub 2//H/sub /spl infin// synthesis with regional pole placement is also discussed. Finally, the validity and applicability of this approach are illustrated by a benchmark example.

H/sub /spl infin// design with pole placement constraints: an LMI approach

This paper describes a new MATLAB-based toolbox for control design via linear matrix inequality (LMI) techniques. After a brief review of LMIs and of some of their applications to control, the toolbox contents and capabilities are presented. >

The LMI control toolbox

This paper presents new tests to analyze the robust stability and/or performance of linear systems with uncertain real parameters. These tests are extensions of the notions of quadratic stability and performance where the fixed quadratic Lyapunov function is replaced by a Lyapunov function with affine dependence on the uncertain parameters. Admittedly with some conservatism, the construction of such parameter-dependent Lyapunov functions can be reduced to a linear matrix inequality (LMI) problem and hence is numerically tractable. These LMI-based tests are applicable to constant or time-varying uncertain parameters and are less conservative than quadratic stability in the case of slow parametric variations. They also avoid the frequency sweep needed in real-/spl mu/ analysis, and numerical experiments indicate that they often compare favorably with /spl mu/ analysis for time-invariant parameter uncertainty.

Affine parameter-dependent Lyapunov functions and real parametric uncertainty

Discusses analysis and synthesis techniques for robust pole placement in linear matrix inequality (LMI) regions, a class of convex regions of the complex plane that embraces most practically useful stability regions. The focus is on linear systems with static uncertainty on the state matrix. For this class of uncertain systems, the notion of quadratic stability and the related robustness analysis tests are generalized to arbitrary LMI regions. The resulting tests for robust pole clustering are all numerically tractable because they involve solving linear matrix inequalities (LMIs) and cover both unstructured and parameter uncertainty. These analysis results are then applied to the synthesis of dynamic output-feedback controllers that robustly assign the closed-loop poles in a prescribed LMI region. With some conservatism, this problem is again tractable via LMI optimization. In addition, robust pole placement can be combined with other control objectives, such as H/sub 2/ or H/sub /spl infin// performance, to capture realistic sets of design specifications. Physically motivated examples demonstrate the effectiveness of this robust pole clustering technique.

Pascal Gahinet

Papers

Multiobjective output-feedback control via LMI optimization

H/sub /spl infin// design with pole placement constraints: an LMI approach

The LMI control toolbox

Affine parameter-dependent Lyapunov functions and real parametric uncertainty

Robust pole placement in LMI regions