scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Patrick C. Alguire

Bio: Patrick C. Alguire is an academic researcher from American College of Physicians. The author has contributed to research in topics: Health care & Faculty development. The author has an hindex of 20, co-authored 48 publications receiving 1754 citations. Previous affiliations of Patrick C. Alguire include University of Florida & Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The focus of the study was the users of the test rather than the usefulness of electrocardiography for diagnosing specific diseases, and the studies were not graded by quality.
Abstract: This systematic review provides detailed supporting evidence for the American College of Physicians' recommendations on competency in electrocardiogram interpretation. The authors found no evidence...

243 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The American College of Physicians convened a workgroup of physicians to identify, using a consensus-based process, common clinical situations in which screening and diagnostic tests are used in ways that do not reflect high-value care.
Abstract: To begin to identify ways that practicing clinicians can contribute to the delivery of high-value, cost-conscious health care, the American College of Physicians convened a workgroup of physicians ...

239 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Journal club formats are educationally diverse, can incorporate adult learning principles, and are an adaptable format for teaching the “new basic sciences.”
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To review the goals, organization, and teaching methods of journal clubs, summarize elements of successful clubs, and evaluate their effect on reading habits, and effectiveness in meeting teaching goals. Examples of clubs that utilize principles of adult learning are reviewed.

194 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A task force consisting of physicians representing a broad range of views within general medicine, expertise and experience in clinical education, and who represented internal medicine organizations outside of SGIM focused on reform in 5 specific areas: ambulatory education, inpatient education, residency curriculum, health disparities, and life-long learning skills.
Abstract: The structure, process, and outcomes of internal medicine residency training have concerned the profession for over 20 years.1–9 Over the last decade the initiative to move to outcomes-based education redefined the competencies physicians should obtain during training.10,11 The core principle of outcomes-based education is the objective demonstration that a graduating trainee, whether from medical school or a residency, possesses the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to progress to the next stage of his or her professional career.12,13 The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) have defined core competencies for physicians shown in Table 1.10,14 While both the ACGME and IOM provide a framework for the desired outcomes, medical educators bear the burden of designing the structures and processes to achieve them.15 Table 1 Comparison of the IOM and ACGME Competencies Educators face several key challenges in redesigning residency programs. First, residency programs must prepare trainees for a variety of general internal medicine and subspecialty careers. Second, the settings and resources for residency training are highly heterogeneous. Third, an aging and increasingly diverse population, combined with rapidly expanding medical information and procedural technology, challenges all internists to acquire and maintain the knowledge, skills, attitudes, and performance necessary to provide high-quality care within their chosen discipline.16,17 Finally, growing public dissatisfaction, substantial health care disparities, increased acuity but shorter lengths of stay for hospitalized patients, new work hour requirements, increasing medical student debt, and changing student demographics and lifestyle concerns further complicate residency reform.18–25 To provide recommendations for residency reform. The Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) convened a task force consisting of physicians representing a broad range of views within general medicine, expertise and experience in clinical education, and who represented internal medicine organizations outside of SGIM (Appendix 1). The task force focused on reform in 5 specific areas: ambulatory education, inpatient education, residency curriculum, health disparities, and life-long learning skills. To prepare this report, 4 subcommittees performed literature reviews that guided a prospective, systematic process to develop the final recommendations. The guiding principles, task force timeline, and the specific findings of the 4 subcommittees can be viewed at http://www.sgim.org. We acknowledge this report cannot cover all important aspects of residency training. The task force enthusiastically welcomes comments from other educators and internal medicine specialty organizations. Only through active collaboration and serious dialogue can we improve residency training.

109 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A survey of members of the American College of Physicians (ACP) in 1986 found that general internists did a large number and variety of procedures, but the practice of general internal medicine has changed and technological change has made some procedures unnecessary and changed the way in which others are done.
Abstract: A survey of general internist members of the American College of Physicians in 1986 found that internists did a large number and variety of procedures in their practices. The authors repeated this ...

97 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A report on the state of medical schools in medical research and health care under the leadership of John A. D. Cooper and the impact of the coalition for health funding under his leadership and other topics.
Abstract: BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH POLICY COMMITTEE REPORT WAS PUBLISHED AS A SUPPLEMENT TO THE AUGUSTJOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION. A REPRINT IS ENCLOSED. REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL COPIES SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO THISOFFICE. -COPIES ARE BEING SENT TO MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND THE KEY MEMBERS OF THE ADMINISTRATION. CALLING UPON-YOUR SENATORSAND CONGRESSMEN TO TELL THE STORY OF THE ROLE. OF MEDICAL SCHOOLS IN BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH AND HEALTH CARE IS IMPORTANT.I STRONGLY URGE THAT YOU MAKE AN 411 APPOINTMENT TO SEE YOUR CONGRESSIONAL REPRESENTATIVES WHILE YOU ARE IN WASHINGTON FOR THE COUNCIL MEETINGON OCTOBER 29. UPON REQUEST WE CAN SUPPLY THE NAMES OF APPOINTMENT SECRETARIES AND PHONE NUMBERS OF YOUR SENATORS AND CONGRESSMEN. APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE ACTED WITH EXTRAORDINARY ALACRITY THIS YEAR. THE-NIH APPROPRIATION WAS INCREASED BY 242 MILLION DOLLARSOVER 1971, REPRESENTING A 142 MILLION DOLLAR INCREASE OVER. THE ADMINISTRATION BUDGET, THE BLUE SHEET ASCRIBES APPROPRIATIONS OUTCOME TO THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE COALITION FOR HEALTH FUNDING UNDER THE LEADERSHIP OF JOHN A. D. COOPER.

1,230 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A 2001 systematic review of the effects of these training interventions for healthcare providers that aim to promote patient-centred care in clinical consultations was updated by as discussed by the authors, who found 29 new randomized trials (up to June 2010), bringing the total of studies included in the review to 43.
Abstract: Problems may arise when healthcare providers focus on managing diseases rather than on people and their health problems. Patient-centred approaches to care delivery in the patient encounter are increasingly advocated by consumers and clinicians and incorporated into training for healthcare providers. The authors updated a 2001 systematic review of the effects of these training interventions for healthcare providers that aim to promote patient-centred care in clinical consultations. They found 29 new randomized trials (up to June 2010), bringing the total of studies included in the review to 43. In most of the studies, training interventions were directed at primary care physicians (general practitioners, internists, paediatricians or family doctors) or nurses practising in community or hospital outpatient settings. Some studies trained specialists. Patients were predominantly adults with general medical problems, though two studies included children with asthma. These studies showed that training providers to improve their ability to share control with patients about topics and decisions addressed in consultations are largely successful in teaching providers new skills. Short-term training (less than 10 hours) is as successful in this regard as longer training. Results are mixed about whether patients are more satisfied when providers practice these skills. The impact on general health is also mixed, although the limited data that could be pooled showed small positive effects on health status. Patients' specific health behaviours show improvement in the small number of studies where interventions use provider training combined with condition-specific educational materials and/or training for patients, such as teaching question-asking during the consultation or medication-taking after the consultation. However, the number of studies is too small to determine which elements of these multi-faceted studies are essential in helping patients change their healthcare behaviours.

1,081 citations

01 May 2002
TL;DR: A new finding for this update is that short-term training (less than 10 hours) is as successful as longer training, and mixed results on satisfaction, behaviour and health status are shown.

884 citations