P
Patrick M.M. Bossuyt
Researcher at University of Amsterdam
Publications - 916
Citations - 120653
Patrick M.M. Bossuyt is an academic researcher from University of Amsterdam. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Systematic review. The author has an hindex of 136, co-authored 832 publications receiving 85153 citations. Previous affiliations of Patrick M.M. Bossuyt include University Medical Center Utrecht & University of York.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Matthew J. Page,Joanne E. McKenzie,Patrick M.M. Bossuyt,Isabelle Boutron,Tammy Hoffmann,Cynthia D. Mulrow,Larissa Shamseer,Jennifer Tetzlaff,Elie A. Akl,Sue E. Brennan,Roger Chou,Julie Glanville,Jeremy M. Grimshaw,Asbjørn Hróbjartsson,Manoj M. Lalu,Tianjing Li,Elizabeth Loder,Evan Mayo-Wilson,Steve McDonald,Luke A McGuinness,Lesley A. Stewart,James Thomas,Andrea C. Tricco,Vivian Welch,Penny Whiting,David Moher +25 more
TL;DR: The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement as discussed by the authors was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found.
Journal ArticleDOI
QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
Penny Whiting,Anne W S Rutjes,Marie Westwood,Susan Mallett,Jonathan J Deeks,Johannes B. Reitsma,Mariska M.G. Leeflang,Jonathan A C Sterne,Patrick M.M. Bossuyt +8 more
TL;DR: The QUADAS-2 tool will allow for more transparent rating of bias and applicability of primary diagnostic accuracy studies.
Journal ArticleDOI
The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews
TL;DR: In this article, an evidence-based quality assessment tool called QUADAS was proposed to assess the quality of primary studies of diagnostic accuracy, based on the results of three previously conducted reviews of the diagnostic literature.
Journal ArticleDOI
Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.
Johannes B. Reitsma,Afina S. Glas,Anne W S Rutjes,Rob J. P. M. Scholten,Patrick M.M. Bossuyt,Aeilko H. Zwinderman +5 more
TL;DR: The bivariate model can be seen as an improvement and extension of the traditional sROC approach by reanalyzing the data of a published meta-analysis of diagnostic studies reporting pairs of sensitivity and specificity.
Journal ArticleDOI
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative
Patrick M.M. Bossuyt,Johannes B. Reitsma,David E. Bruns,Constantine Gatsonis,Paul Glasziou,Les Irwig,Jeroen G. Lijmer,David Moher,Drummond Rennie,Henrica C.W. de Vet +9 more
TL;DR: If medical journals adopt the STARD checklist and flow diagram, the quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy should improve to the advantage of clinicians, researchers, reviewers, journals, and the public.