Paul Casperson

Bio: Paul Casperson is an academic researcher from University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. The author has contributed to research in topics: Coronary artery disease & Percutaneous coronary intervention. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 7 publications receiving 4039 citations. Previous affiliations of Paul Casperson include Veterans Health Administration & University of Texas at San Antonio.

Optimal Medical Therapy with or without PCI for Stable Coronary Disease

Abstract: We conducted a randomized trial involving 2287 patients who had objective evidence of myocardial ischemia and significant coronary artery disease at 50 U.S. and Canadian centers. Between 1999 and 2004, we assigned 1149 patients to undergo PCI with optimal medical therapy (PCI group) and 1138 to receive optimal medical therapy alone (medical-therapy group). The primary outcome was death from any cause and nonfatal myocardial infarction during a follow-up period of 2.5 to 7.0 years (median, 4.6). Results There were 211 primary events in the PCI group and 202 events in the medicaltherapy group. The 4.6-year cumulative primary-event rates were 19.0% in the PCI group and 18.5% in the medical-therapy group (hazard ratio for the PCI group, 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.27; P = 0.62). There were no significant differences between the PCI group and the medical-therapy group in the composite of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke (20.0% vs. 19.5%; hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.27; P = 0.62); hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome (12.4% vs. 11.8%; hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.37; P = 0.56); or myocardial infarction (13.2% vs. 12.3%; hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.43; P = 0.33). Conclusions As an initial management strategy in patients with stable coronary artery disease, PCI did not reduce the risk of death, myocardial infarction, or other major cardiovascular events when added to optimal medical therapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00007657.)

The Evolving Pattern of Symptomatic Coronary Artery Disease in the United States and Canada: Baseline Characteristics of the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive DruG Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial

Abstract: Major improvements in medical therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary artery disease (CAD) have emerged during the previous 2 decades, but no randomized trial in patients with stable CAD has been powered to compare these 2 strategies for the hard clinical end points of death or myocardial infarction (MI), and previous studies have not evaluated the effect of coronary stents and intensive medical therapy on cardiac events during long-term follow-up. Between 1999 and 2004, 2,287 patients with documented myocardial ischemia and angiographically confirmed CAD were randomized to the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive DruG Evaluation (COURAGE) trial, with a principal hypothesis that a strategy of percutaneous coronary intervention plus intensive, guideline-driven medical therapy would be superior to a strategy of intensive medical therapy alone. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause mortality or acute MI (time to first event) during a 2.5- to 7-year (median 5) follow-up. Baseline characteristics were a mean age of 62 ± 5 years, 85% men, and 86% Caucasian. Mean duration of angina before randomization was 26 months (average 10 episodes/week), and 29% of patients were smokers, 67% had hypertension, 38% had previous MI, 71% had dyslipidemia, 34% had diabetes, 27% had previous revascularization, and 69% had multivessel CAD. Approximately 55% of patients met established criteria for the metabolic syndrome. In conclusion, baseline characteristics of the COURAGE trial study population indicate a highly symptomatic group of patients with CAD who have a significant duration and frequency of antecedent angina pectoris and a high prevalence of cardiac risk factors.

CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

Abstract: Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not optimal. Without transparent reporting, readers cannot judge the reliability and validity of trial findings nor extract information for systematic reviews. Recent methodological analyses indicate that inadequate reporting and design are associated with biased estimates of treatment effects. Such systematic error is seriously damaging to RCTs, which are considered the gold standard for evaluating interventions because of their ability to minimise or avoid bias. A group of scientists and editors developed the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement to improve the quality of reporting of RCTs. It was first published in 1996 and updated in 2001. The statement consists of a checklist and flow diagram that authors can use for reporting an RCT. Many leading medical journals and major international editorial groups have endorsed the CONSORT statement. The statement facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of RCTs. During the 2001 CONSORT revision, it became clear that explanation and elaboration of the principles underlying the CONSORT statement would help investigators and others to write or appraise trial reports. A CONSORT explanation and elaboration article was published in 2001 alongside the 2001 version of the CONSORT statement. After an expert meeting in January 2007, the CONSORT statement has been further revised and is published as the CONSORT 2010 Statement. This update improves the wording and clarity of the previous checklist and incorporates recommendations related to topics that have only recently received recognition, such as selective outcome reporting bias. This explanatory and elaboration document-intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the CONSORT statement-has also been extensively revised. It presents the meaning and rationale for each new and updated checklist item providing examples of good reporting and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies. Several examples of flow diagrams are included. The CONSORT 2010 Statement, this revised explanatory and elaboration document, and the associated website (www.consort-statement.org) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of randomised trials.

Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2012

Abstract: D iabetes mellitus is a chronic illness that requires continuing medical care and ongoing patient self-management education and support to prevent acute complications and to reduce the risk of long-term complications. Diabetes care is complex and requires that many issues, beyond glycemic control, be addressed. A large body of evidence exists that supports a range of interventions to improve diabetes outcomes. These standards of care are intended to provide clinicians, patients, researchers, payers, and other interested individuals with the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals, and tools to evaluate the quality of care. While individual preferences, comorbidities, and other patient factors may require modification of goals, targets that are desirable for most patients with diabetes are provided. Specifically titled sections of the standards address children with diabetes, pregnant women, and people with prediabetes. These standards are not intended to preclude clinical judgment or more extensive evaluation and management of the patient by other specialists as needed. For more detailed information about management of diabetes, refer to references 1–3. The recommendations included are screening, diagnostic, and therapeutic actions that are known or believed to favorably affect health outcomes of patients with diabetes. A large number of these interventions have been shown to be cost-effective (4). A grading system (Table 1), developed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) andmodeled after existingmethods, was utilized to clarify and codify the evidence that forms the basis for the recommendations. The level of evidence that supports each recommendation is listed after each recommendation using the letters A, B, C, or E. These standards of care are revised annually by the ADA’s multidisciplinary Professional Practice Committee, incorporating new evidence. For the current revision, committee members systematically searched Medline for human studies related to each subsection and published since 1 January 2010. Recommendations (bulleted at the beginning of each subsection and also listed in the “Executive Summary: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetesd2012”) were revised based on new evidence or, in some cases, to clarify the prior recommendation or match the strength of the wording to the strength of the evidence. A table linking the changes in recommendations to new evidence can be reviewed at http:// professional.diabetes.org/CPR_Search. aspx. Subsequently, as is the case for all Position Statements, the standards of care were reviewed and approved by the ExecutiveCommittee of ADA’s Board ofDirectors, which includes health care professionals, scientists, and lay people. Feedback from the larger clinical community was valuable for the 2012 revision of the standards. Readers who wish to comment on the “Standards of Medical Care in Diabetesd2012” are invited to do so at http://professional.diabetes.org/ CPR_Search.aspx. Members of the Professional Practice Committee disclose all potential financial conflicts of interest with industry. These disclosures were discussed at the onset of the standards revisionmeeting. Members of the committee, their employer, and their disclosed conflicts of interest are listed in the “Professional PracticeCommitteeMembers” table (see pg. S109). The AmericanDiabetes Association funds development of the standards and all its position statements out of its general revenues and does not utilize industry support for these purposes.

Optimal Medical Therapy with or without PCI for Stable Coronary Disease

Abstract: We conducted a randomized trial involving 2287 patients who had objective evidence of myocardial ischemia and significant coronary artery disease at 50 U.S. and Canadian centers. Between 1999 and 2004, we assigned 1149 patients to undergo PCI with optimal medical therapy (PCI group) and 1138 to receive optimal medical therapy alone (medical-therapy group). The primary outcome was death from any cause and nonfatal myocardial infarction during a follow-up period of 2.5 to 7.0 years (median, 4.6). Results There were 211 primary events in the PCI group and 202 events in the medicaltherapy group. The 4.6-year cumulative primary-event rates were 19.0% in the PCI group and 18.5% in the medical-therapy group (hazard ratio for the PCI group, 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.27; P = 0.62). There were no significant differences between the PCI group and the medical-therapy group in the composite of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke (20.0% vs. 19.5%; hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.27; P = 0.62); hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome (12.4% vs. 11.8%; hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.37; P = 0.56); or myocardial infarction (13.2% vs. 12.3%; hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.43; P = 0.33). Conclusions As an initial management strategy in patients with stable coronary artery disease, PCI did not reduce the risk of death, myocardial infarction, or other major cardiovascular events when added to optimal medical therapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00007657.)

2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology.

Abstract: 99mTc : technetium-99m 201TI : thallium 201 ABCB1 : ATP-binding cassette sub-family B member 1 ABI : ankle-brachial index ACC : American College of Cardiology ACCF : American College of Cardiology Foundation ACCOMPLISH : Avoiding Cardiovascular Events Through Combination Therapy in Patients Living With Systolic Hypertension ACE : angiotensin converting enzyme ACIP : Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischaemia Pilot ACS : acute coronary syndrome ADA : American Diabetes Association ADP : adenosine diphosphate AHA : American Heart Association ARB : angiotensin II receptor antagonist ART : Arterial Revascularization Trial ASCOT : Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial ASSERT : Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation and Stroke Evaluation in pacemaker patients and the atrial fibrillation Reduction atrial pacing Trial AV : atrioventricular BARI 2D : Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes BEAUTIFUL : Morbidity-Mortality Evaluation of the If Inhibitor Ivabradine in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Dysfunction BIMA : bilateral internal mammary artery BMI : body mass index BMS : bare metal stent BNP : B-type natriuretic peptide BP : blood pressure b.p.m. : beats per minute CABG : coronary artery bypass graft CAD : coronary artery disease CAPRIE : Clopidogrel vs. Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischaemic Events CASS : Coronary Artery Surgery Study CCB : calcium channel blocker CCS : Canadian Cardiovascular Society CFR : coronary flow reserve CHARISMA : Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischaemic Stabilization, Management and Avoidance CI : confidence interval CKD : chronic kidney disease CKD-EPI : Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration CMR : cardiac magnetic resonance CORONARY : The CABG Off or On Pump Revascularization Study COURAGE : Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation COX-1 : cyclooxygenase-1 COX-2 : cyclooxygenase-2 CPG : Committee for Practice Guidelines CT : computed tomography CTA : computed tomography angiography CV : cardiovascular CVD : cardiovascular disease CXR : chest X-ray CYP2C19*2 : cytochrome P450 2C19 CYP3A : cytochrome P3A CYP3A4 : cytochrome P450 3A4 CYP450 : cytochrome P450 DANAMI : Danish trial in Acute Myocardial Infarction DAPT : dual antiplatelet therapy DBP : diastolic blood pressure DECOPI : Desobstruction Coronaire en Post-Infarctus DES : drug-eluting stents DHP : dihydropyridine DSE : dobutamine stress echocardiography EACTS : European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery EECP : enhanced external counterpulsation EMA : European Medicines Agency EASD : European Association for the Study of Diabetes ECG : electrocardiogram Echo : echocardiogram ED : erectile dysfunction EF : ejection fraction ESC : European Society of Cardiology EXCEL : Evaluation of XIENCE PRIME or XIENCE V vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization FAME : Fractional Flow Reserve vs. Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation FDA : Food & Drug Administration (USA) FFR : fractional flow reserve FREEDOM : Design of the Future Revascularization Evaluation in patients with Diabetes mellitus: Optimal management of Multivessel disease GFR : glomerular filtration rate HbA1c : glycated haemoglobin HDL : high density lipoprotein HDL-C : high density lipoprotein cholesterol HR : hazard ratio HRT : hormone replacement therapy hs-CRP : high-sensitivity C-reactive protein HU : Hounsfield units ICA : invasive coronary angiography IMA : internal mammary artery IONA : Impact Of Nicorandil in Angina ISCHEMIA : International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches IVUS : intravascular ultrasound JSAP : Japanese Stable Angina Pectoris KATP : ATP-sensitive potassium channels LAD : left anterior descending LBBB : left bundle branch block LIMA : Left internal mammary artery LDL : low density lipoprotein LDL-C : low density lipoprotein cholesterol LM : left main LMS : left main stem LV : left ventricular LVEF : left ventricular ejection fraction LVH : left ventricular hypertrophy MACE : major adverse cardiac events MASS : Medical, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study MDRD : Modification of Diet in Renal Disease MERLIN : Metabolic Efficiency with Ranolazine for Less Ischaemia in Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes MERLIN-TIMI 36 : Metabolic Efficiency with Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction MET : metabolic equivalents MI : myocardial infarction MICRO-HOPE : Microalbuminuria, cardiovascular and renal sub-study of the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study MPI : myocardial perfusion imaging MRI : magnetic resonance imaging NO : nitric oxide NSAIDs : non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs NSTE-ACS : non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome NYHA : New York Heart Association OAT : Occluded Artery Trial OCT : optical coherence tomography OMT : optimal medical therapy PAR-1 : protease activated receptor type 1 PCI : percutaneous coronary intervention PDE5 : phosphodiesterase type 5 PES : paclitaxel-eluting stents PET : positron emission tomography PRECOMBAT : Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery vs. Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease PTP : pre-test probability PUFA : polyunsaturated fatty acid PVD : peripheral vascular disease QoL : quality of life RBBB : right bundle branch block REACH : Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health RITA-2 : Second Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina ROOBY : Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass SAPT : single antiplatelet therapy SBP : systolic blood pressure SCAD : stable coronary artery disease SCORE : Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation SCS : spinal cord stimulation SES : sirolimus-eluting stents SIMA : single internal mammary artery SPECT : single photon emission computed tomography STICH : Surgical Treatment for Ischaemic Heart Failure SWISSI II : Swiss Interventional Study on Silent Ischaemia Type II SYNTAX : SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery TC : total cholesterol TENS : transcutaneous electrical neural stimulation TERISA : Type 2 Diabetes Evaluation of Ranolazine in Subjects With Chronic Stable Angina TIME : Trial of Invasive vs. Medical therapy TIMI : Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction TMR : transmyocardial laser revascularization TOAT : The Open Artery Trial WOEST : What is the Optimal antiplatElet and anticoagulant therapy in patients with oral anticoagulation and coronary StenTing Guidelines summarize and evaluate all evidence available, at the time of the writing process, on a particular issue with the aim of assisting physicians in selecting the best management strategies for an individual patient with a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome, as well …