P
Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham
Researcher at Yale University
Publications - 54
Citations - 2608
Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham is an academic researcher from Yale University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Bankruptcy & Debt. The author has an hindex of 18, co-authored 50 publications receiving 1698 citations. Previous affiliations of Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham include Federal Reserve Bank of New York & Harvard University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Bartik Instruments: What, When, Why, and How
TL;DR: The typical use of a Bartik instrument assumes a pooled exposure research design, where the shares measure differential exposure to common shocks, and identification is based on exogeneity of the shares as discussed by the authors.
Journal Article
Social networks and the identification of peer effects
TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on a Manski-type linear-in-means model that has proved to be popular in empirical work and critically examine some aspects of the statistical model that may be restrictive in empirical analyses.
Journal ArticleDOI
MBS Ratings and the Mortgage Credit Boom
TL;DR: In this paper, credit ratings on subprime and Alt-A mortgage-backed-securities (MBS) deals issued between 2001 and 2007, the period leading up to the subprime crisis were studied.
Journal ArticleDOI
Predictably Unequal? The Effects of Machine Learning on Credit Markets
Andreas Fuster,Andreas Fuster,Andreas Fuster,Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham,Tarun Ramadorai,Tarun Ramadorai,Ansgar Walther,Ansgar Walther +7 more
TL;DR: In this paper, a simple equilibrium model of credit provision in which to evaluate the impacts of statistical technology on the fairness of outcomes across categories such as race and gender was proposed. But the model was not applied to US mortgages.
Journal ArticleDOI
Social Networks and the Identification of Peer Effects
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors focus on a Manski-type linear-in-means model that has proved to be popular in empirical work and critically examine some aspects of the statistical model that may be restrictive in empirical analyses.