Author
Paul L. den Exter
Other affiliations: Leiden University
Bio: Paul L. den Exter is an academic researcher from Leiden University Medical Center. The author has contributed to research in topics: Pulmonary embolism & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 14, co-authored 39 publications receiving 1465 citations. Previous affiliations of Paul L. den Exter include Leiden University.
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: The combination of pretest clinical probability assessment with age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff was associated with a larger number of patients in whom PE could be considered ruled out with a low likelihood of subsequent clinical venous thromboembolism.
Abstract: RESULTS Of the 3346 patients with suspected PE included, the prevalence of PE was 19%. Among the 2898 patients with a nonhigh or an unlikely clinical probability, 817 patients (28.2%) had a D-dimer level lower than 500 μg/L (95% CI, 26.6%-29.9%) and 337 patients (11.6%) had a D-dimer between 500 μg/L and their age-adjusted cutoff (95% CI, 10.5%-12.9%). The 3-month failure rate in patients with a D-dimer level higher than 500 μg/L but below the age-adjusted cutoff was 1 of 331 patients (0.3% [95% CI, 0.1%-1.7%]). Among the 766 patients 75 years or older, of whom 673 had a nonhigh clinical probability, using the age-adjusted cutoff instead of the 500 μg/L cutoff increased the proportion of patients in whom PE could be excluded on the basis of D-dimer from 43 of 673 patients (6.4% [95% CI, 4.8%-8.5%) to 200 of 673 patients (29.7% [95% CI, 26.4%-33.3%), without any additional false-negative findings. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Compared with a fixed D-dimer cutoff of 500 μg/L, the combination of pretest clinical probability assessment with age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff was associated with a larger number of patients in whom PE could be considered ruled out with a low likelihood of subsequent clinical venous thromboembolism. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01134068
666 citations
••
TL;DR: It is suggested that oncology patients diagnosed with and treated for incidental PE, have similar high rates of recurrent venous thromboembolism, bleeding complications, and mortality, as compared with oncologists patients who develop symptomatic PE.
Abstract: Purpose The routine use of modern computed tomography scanners has led to an increased detection of incidental pulmonary embolism (PE), in particular in patients with cancer. The clinical relevance of these incidental findings is unknown. Patients and Methods In this retrospective cohort study, oncology patients in whom PE was objectively proven between 2004 and 2010 and anticoagulant treatment was started, were included. Fifty-one patients with incidental PE and 144 with symptomatic PE were observed for 1 year to compare the risks of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), bleeding complications, and mortality. Kaplan-Meier and Cox survival analyses were performed. Results Incidental and symptomatic patients did not differ with respect to mean age, sex, cancer type and stage, and risk factors for VTE. As a result from evolving treatment guidelines, approximately half of the patients in both groups received long-term treatment with vitamin K antagonists in stead of currently recommended low-molecular-weig...
239 citations
••
TL;DR: It is indicated that patients with SSPE mimic those with more proximally located PE in regards to their risk profile and clinical outcome.
140 citations
••
TL;DR: A systematic review and IPD meta-analysis combining patient-level data from 6 large, prospective outcome studies in which diagnostic management of clinically suspected PE had been guided by the Wells rule and d-dimer testing is done.
Abstract: Background: The performance of different diagnostic strategies for pulmonary embolism (PE) in patient subgroups is unclear. Purpose: To evaluate and compare the efficiency and safety of the Wells rule with fixed or age-adjusted D-dimer testing overall and in inpatients and persons with cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, previous venous thromboembolism, delayed presentation, and age 75 years or older. Data Sources: MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1 January 1988 to 13 February 2016. Study Selection: 6 prospective studies in which the diagnostic management of PE was guided by the dichotomized Wells rule and quantitative D-dimer testing. Data Extraction: Individual data of 7268 patients; risk of bias assessed by 2 investigators with the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2) tool. Data Synthesis: The proportion of patients in whom imaging could be withheld based on a "PE-unlikely" Wells score and a negative D-dimer test result (efficiency) was estimated using fixed (50 years) D-dimer thresholds; their 3-month incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (failure rate) was also estimated. Overall, efficiency increased from 28% to 33% when the age-adjusted (instead of the fixed) D-dimer threshold was applied. This increase was more prominent in elderly patients (12%) but less so in inpatients (2.6%). The failure rate of age-adjusted D-dimer testing was less than 3% in all examined subgroups. Limitation: Post hoc analysis, between-study differences in patient characteristics, use of various D-dimer assays, and limited statistical power to assess failure rate. Conclusion: Age-adjusted D-dimer testing is associated with a 5% absolute increase in the proportion of patients with suspected PE in whom imaging can be safely withheld compared with fixed D-dimer testing. This strategy seems safe across different high-risk subgroups, but its efficiency varies.
99 citations
•
TL;DR: In this article, a review of the use of the Wells rule with D-dimer testing to make decisions about imaging in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism is presented. But this review is limited to the case of lung cancer.
Abstract: This review contributes new information on use of the Wells rule with D-dimer testing to make decisions about imaging in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
95 citations
Cited by
More filters
••
TL;DR: Strong recommendations apply to most patients, whereas weak recommendations are sensitive to differences among patients, including their preferences.
5,924 citations
••
TL;DR: Author(s): Go, Alan S; Mozaffarian, Dariush; Roger, Veronique L; Benjamin, Emelia J; Berry, Jarett D; Borden, William B; Bravata, Dawn M; Dai, Shifan; Ford, Earl S; Fox, Caroline S; Franco, Sheila; Fullerton, Heather J; Gillespie, Cathleen; Hailpern, Susan M; Heit, John A; Howard, Virginia J; Huff
Abstract: Author(s): Go, Alan S; Mozaffarian, Dariush; Roger, Veronique L; Benjamin, Emelia J; Berry, Jarett D; Borden, William B; Bravata, Dawn M; Dai, Shifan; Ford, Earl S; Fox, Caroline S; Franco, Sheila; Fullerton, Heather J; Gillespie, Cathleen; Hailpern, Susan M; Heit, John A; Howard, Virginia J; Huffman, Mark D; Kissela, Brett M; Kittner, Steven J; Lackland, Daniel T; Lichtman, Judith H; Lisabeth, Lynda D; Magid, David; Marcus, Gregory M; Marelli, Ariane; Matchar, David B; McGuire, Darren K; Mohler, Emile R; Moy, Claudia S; Mussolino, Michael E; Nichol, Graham; Paynter, Nina P; Schreiner, Pamela J; Sorlie, Paul D; Stein, Joel; Turan, Tanya N; Virani, Salim S; Wong, Nathan D; Woo, Daniel; Turner, Melanie B; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee
5,449 citations
••
McMaster University1, American University of Beirut2, University of Alcalá3, University of Geneva4, Leiden University Medical Center5, Virginia Commonwealth University6, University of California, San Diego7, Ohio State University8, University of Utah9, UCLA Medical Center10, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute11, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences12
TL;DR: Recommendations on 12 topics that were in the 9th edition of these guidelines are updated, and 3 new topics are addressed.
3,934 citations
••
TL;DR: Guidelines summarize and evaluate all available evidence at the time of the writing process, on a particular issue with the aim of assisting health professionals in selecting the best management strategies for an individual patient, with a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome.
Abstract: ACS
: acute coronary syndrome
AMPLIFY
: Apixaban for the Initial Management of Pulmonary Embolism and Deep-Vein Thrombosis as First-line Therapy
aPTT
: activated partial thromboplastin time
b.i.d.
: bis in diem (twice daily)
b.p.m.
: beats per minute
BNP
: brain natriuretic peptide
BP
: blood pressure
CI
: confidence interval
CO
: cardiac output
COPD
: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
CPG
: Committee for Practice Guidelines
CRNM
: clinically relevant non-major
CT
: computed tomographic/tomogram
CTEPH
: chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
CUS
: compression venous ultrasonography
DSA
: digital subtraction angiography
DVT
: deep vein thrombosis
ELISA
: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
ESC
: European Society of Cardiology
H-FABP
: heart-type fatty acid-binding protein
HIT
: heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
HR
: hazard ratio
ICOPER
: International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry
ICRP
: International Commission on Radiological Protection
INR
: international normalized ratio
iPAH
: idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension
IVC
: inferior vena cava
LMWH
: low molecular weight heparin
LV
: left ventricle/left ventricular
MDCT
: multi-detector computed tomographic (angiography)
MRA
: magnetic resonance angiography
NGAL
: neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin
NOAC(s)
: Non-vitamin K-dependent new oral anticoagulant(s)
NT-proBNP
: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide
o.d.
: omni die (every day)
OR
: odds ratio
PAH
: pulmonary arterial hypertension
PE
: pulmonary embolism
PEA
: pulmonary endarterectomy
PEITHO
: Pulmonary EmbolIsm THrOmbolysis trial
PESI
: pulmonary embolism severity index
PH
: pulmonary hypertension
PIOPED
: Prospective Investigation On Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis
PVR
: pulmonary vascular resistance
RIETE
: Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad Thromboembolica venosa
RR
: relative risk
rtPA
: recombinant tissue plasminogen activator
RV
: right ventricle/ventricular
SPECT
: single photon emission computed tomography
sPESI
: simplified pulmonary embolism severity index
TAPSE
: tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion
Tc
: technetium
TOE
: transoesophageal echocardiography
TTR
: time in therapeutic range
TV
: tricuspid valve
UFH
: unfractionated heparin
V/Q scan
: ventilation–perfusion scintigraphy
VKA
: vitamin K antagonist(s)
VTE
: venous thromboembolism
Guidelines summarize and evaluate all available evidence at the time of the writing process, on a particular issue with the aim of assisting health professionals in selecting the best management strategies for an individual patient, with a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome, as well as the risk-benefit-ratio of particular diagnostic or therapeutic means. Guidelines and recommendations should help the health professionals to make decisions in their daily practice. However, the final decisions concerning an individual patient must be made by the responsible health professional(s) in consultation with the patient and caregiver as appropriate.
A great number of Guidelines have …
2,113 citations
••
University of Mainz1, Paris Descartes University2, University of Perugia3, Carlos III Health Institute4, Utrecht University5, Helsinki University Central Hospital6, Leiden University7, French Institute of Health and Medical Research8, Imperial College London9, University of Alcalá10, University Hospital of Lausanne11, Medical University of Vienna12, University of Göttingen13, Maastricht University14, University of Franche-Comté15, University College Dublin16, Medical University of Warsaw17, University of Geneva18
TL;DR: Guidelines summarize and evaluate available evidence with the aim of assisting health professionals in proposing the best management strategies for an individual patient with a given condition.
Abstract: Guidelines summarize and evaluate available evidence with the aim of assisting health professionals in proposing the best management strategies for an individual patient with a given condition. Guidelines and their recommendations should facilitate decision making of health professionals in their daily practice. However, the final decisions concerning an individual patient must be made by the responsible health professional(s) in consultation with the patient and caregiver as appropriate.
2,079 citations