scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Paulette Pierce

Bio: Paulette Pierce is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Race (biology). The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 175 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

175 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Indigenous Australians, like First Nations peoples around the globe, are arguably the most studied people of the world as mentioned in this paper, and it is the research by such people and their institutions that have been responsible for the extraction, storage, and control over Indigenous knowledges.
Abstract: Indigenous Australians, like First Nations Peoples around the globe, are arguably the most studied people of the world. The research enterprise as a vehicle for investigation has poked, prodded, measured, tested, and compared data toward understanding Indigenous cultures and human nature. Explorers, medical practitioners, intellectuals, travelers, and voyeurs who observed from a distance have all played a role in the scientific scrutiny of Indigenous peoples. Indeed, it is the research by such people and their institutions that have been responsible for the extraction, storage, and control over Indigenous knowledges. Moreover, "it is the acquisition of Indigenous knowledges and the ensuing ownership of that knowledge which are > the foundations upon which many academic qualifications and careers ' have been achieved" (Brady, 105; see also Williams and Stewart). 0 It is little wonder that the world's Indigenous communities are apprehensive and cautious toward research "ontologies (assumptions v about the nature of reality), epistemologies (the ways of knowing that 109 reality) and axiologies (the disputational contours of right and wrong a or morality and values)" (Scheurich and Young, 6). This is not to say that Indigenous people reject outright research and its various methodological practices. Indeed some research and methodologies have benefited the emancipation of Indigenous communities. However, Indigenous people now want research and its designs to contribute to the

829 citations

Book
18 May 2001
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a theoretical framework for indigenous mobilization in Latin America and present a case study of the Peruvian anomaly and subnational variation of the Kataristas and their legacy.
Abstract: Part I. Theoretical Framing: 1. Questions, approaches, and cases 2. Citizenship regimes, the state, and ethnic cleavages 3. The argument: indigenous mobilization in Latin America Part II. The Cases: 4. Ecuador: Latin America's strongest indigenous movement 5. The Ecuadorian Andes and ECUARUNARI 6. The Ecuadorian Amazon and CONFENAIE 7. Forming the National Confederation, CONAIE 8. Bolivia: strong regional movements 9. The Bolivian Andes: the Kataristas and their legacy 10. The Bolivian Amazon 11. Peru: weak national movements and subnational variation 12. Peru. Ecuador, and Bolivia: most similar cases 13. No national indigenous movement: explaining the Peruvian anomaly 14. Explaining subnational variation 15. Conclusion: 16. Democracy and the postliberal challenge in Latin America.

768 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors traces the contours of a comparative, global, cross-disciplinary, and multiparadigmatic field that construes ethnicity, race, and nationhood as a single integrated family of forms of cultural understanding, social organization, and political contestation.
Abstract: This article traces the contours of a comparative, global, cross-disciplinary, and multiparadigmatic field that construes ethnicity, race, and nationhood as a single integrated family of forms of cultural understanding, social organization, and political contestation. It then reviews a set of diverse yet related efforts to study the way ethnicity, race, and nation work in social, cultural, and political life without treating ethnic groups, races, or nations as substantial entities, or even taking such groups as units of analysis at all.

445 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The sociological perspective on race has always been a significant sociological theme, from the founding of the field and the formulation of classical theoretical statements to the present as discussed by the authors, reflecting shifts in large-scale political processes.
Abstract: Race has always been a significant sociological theme, from the founding of the field and the formulation of classical theoretical statements to the present. Since the nineteenth century, sociological perspectives on race have developed and changed, always reflecting shifts in large-scale political processes. In the classical period, colonialism and biologistic racism held sway. As the twentieth century dawned, sociology came to be dominated by US-based figures. DuBois and the Chicago School presented the first notable challenges to the field's racist assumptions. In the aftermath of World War II, with the destruction of European colonialism, the rise of the civil rights movement, and the surge in migration on a world scale, the sociology of race became a central topic. The field moved toward a more critical, more egalitarian awareness of race, focused particularly on the overcoming of prejudice and discrimination. Although the recognition of these problems increased and political reforms made some headwa...

390 citations

Book
22 Sep 2009
TL;DR: In this article, Neta Crawford proposes a theory of argument in world politics which focuses on the role of ethical arguments in fostering changes in long-standing practices and offers a prescriptive analysis of how ethical arguments could be deployed to deal with the problem of humanitarian intervention.
Abstract: Arguments have consequences in world politics that are as real as the military forces of states or the balance of power among them. Neta Crawford proposes a theory of argument in world politics which focuses on the role of ethical arguments in fostering changes in long-standing practices. She examines five hundred years of history, analyzing the role of ethical arguments in colonialism, the abolition of slavery and forced labour, and decolonization. Pointing out that decolonization is the biggest change in world politics in the last five hundred years, the author examines ethical arguments from the sixteenth century justifying Spanish conquest of the Americas, and from the twentieth century over the fate of Southern Africa. The book also offers a prescriptive analysis of how ethical arguments could be deployed to deal with the problem of humanitarian intervention. Co-winner of the APSA Jervis-Schroeder Prize for the best book on international history and politics.

336 citations