P
Per Skaane
Researcher at Oslo University Hospital
Publications - 96
Citations - 5782
Per Skaane is an academic researcher from Oslo University Hospital. The author has contributed to research in topics: Mammography & Breast cancer. The author has an hindex of 38, co-authored 94 publications receiving 5227 citations. Previous affiliations of Per Skaane include University of Oslo.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Comparison of Digital Mammography Alone and Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in a Population-based Screening Program
Per Skaane,Andriy I. Bandos,Randi Gullien,Ellen B. Eben,Ulrika Ekseth,Unni Haakenaasen,Mina Izadi,Ingvild N. Jebsen,Gunnar Jahr,Mona Krager,Loren Niklason,Solveig Hofvind,David Gur +12 more
TL;DR: The use of mammography plus tomosynthesis in a screening environment resulted in a significantly higher cancer detection rate and enabled the detection of more invasive cancers.
Journal ArticleDOI
Breast MRI: EUSOBI recommendations for women's information.
Ritse M. Mann,Corinne Balleyguier,Pascal A. T. Baltzer,Ulrich Bick,Catherine Colin,Eleanor Cornford,Andrew Evans,Eva M. Fallenberg,Gabor Forrai,Michael Fuchsjäger,Fiona J. Gilbert,Thomas H. Helbich,Sylvia H. Heywang-Köbrunner,Julia Camps-Herrero,Christiane K. Kuhl,Laura Martincich,Federica Pediconi,Pietro Panizza,Luis Pina,Ruud M. Pijnappel,Katja Pinker-Domenig,Per Skaane,Francesco Sardanelli +22 more
TL;DR: Information on breast MRI concerns advantages/disadvantages and preparation to the examination, and Claustrophobia, implantable devices, allergic predisposition, and renal function should be checked.
Journal ArticleDOI
Two-View Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening with Synthetically Reconstructed Projection Images: Comparison with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Full-Field Digital Mammographic Images
Per Skaane,Andriy I. Bandos,Ellen B. Eben,Ingvild N. Jebsen,Mona Krager,Unni Haakenaasen,Ulrika Ekseth,Mina Izadi,Solveig Hofvind,Randi Gullien +9 more
TL;DR: The combination of current reconstructed 2D images and DBT performed comparably to FFDM plus DBT and is adequate for routine clinical use when interpreting screening mammograms.
Journal ArticleDOI
Screen-Film Mammography versus Full-Field Digital Mammography with Soft-Copy Reading: Randomized Trial in a Population-based Screening Program—The Oslo II Study
Per Skaane,Arnulf Skjennald +1 more
TL;DR: FFDM allowed a higher cancer detection rate than did SFM in the group aged 50-69, although the difference did not reach statistical significance, and SFM and FFDM with soft-copy reading are comparable techniques for population-based screening mammography programs.
Journal ArticleDOI
Randomized Trial of Screen-Film versus Full-Field Digital Mammography with Soft-Copy Reading in Population-based Screening Program: Follow-up and Final Results of Oslo II Study
TL;DR: FFDM resulted in a significantly higher cancer detection rate than did SFM and the PPVs were comparable for the two imaging modalities.