scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Petar V. Kokotovic

Bio: Petar V. Kokotovic is an academic researcher from University of California, Santa Barbara. The author has contributed to research in topics: Nonlinear system & Adaptive control. The author has an hindex of 83, co-authored 354 publications receiving 40395 citations. Previous affiliations of Petar V. Kokotovic include Washington State University & University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A new approach to the optimum design of cold rolling mills is presented, which takes advantage of slow variation of the winding reel radius and transforms an initially non linear system into a parametric family of linear systems.

1 citations

Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 1993
TL;DR: This approach abandon the traditional linear certainty-equivalence concept and treat the control of linear plants with unknown parameters as a nonlinear problem, and develops a recursive design procedure which guarantees strict passivity of the adaptation loop.
Abstract: This talk is a tutorial presentation of a new approach to adaptive control of linear systems. In this approach we abandon the traditional linear certainty-equivalence concept and treat the control of linear plants with unknown parameters as a nonlinear problem. We develop a recursive design procedure which guarantees strict passivity of the adaptation loop. The states of the resulting adaptive system converge to a manifold whose dimension is smaller than with any previous scheme. A simulation comparison with a standard indirect linear scheme shows that the new nonlinear controller achieves superior transient performance without an increase in control effort.

1 citations

Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 1997
TL;DR: The first three sections of this chapter are based on these references from which we extract, and at times reformulate, the most important concepts and system properties to be used in the rest of the book as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: Only a few system theory concepts can match passivity in its physical and intuitive appeal. This explains the longevity of the passivity concept from the time of its first appearance some 60 years ago, to its current use as a tool for nonlinear feedback design. The pioneering results of Lurie and Popov, summarized in the monographs by Aizerman and Gantmacher [3], and Popov [88], were extended by Yakubovich [121], Kalman [51], Zames [123], Willems [120], and Hill and Moylan [37], among others. The first three sections of this chapter are based on these references from which we extract, and at times reformulate, the most important concepts and system properties to be used in the rest of the book.

1 citations

Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 1992
TL;DR: In this paper, a testbed arc welding installation is used to demonstrate the practicality of the sensitivity methods in control education, beginning with the first course, and the inclusion of sensitivity methods is advocated.
Abstract: Parametric dependence of system responses is an important issue in control system analysis and design. Time domain sensitivity functions provide an efficient, simple and insightful method for evaluating parameters effects. Sensitivity function methods are reviewed, and a testbed arc welding installation is used to demonstrate the practicality of the techniques. Inclusion of sensitivity methods in control education, beginning with the first course, is advocated.

1 citations


Cited by
More filters
Book
01 Jan 1994
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a brief history of LMIs in control theory and discuss some of the standard problems involved in LMIs, such as linear matrix inequalities, linear differential inequalities, and matrix problems with analytic solutions.
Abstract: Preface 1. Introduction Overview A Brief History of LMIs in Control Theory Notes on the Style of the Book Origin of the Book 2. Some Standard Problems Involving LMIs. Linear Matrix Inequalities Some Standard Problems Ellipsoid Algorithm Interior-Point Methods Strict and Nonstrict LMIs Miscellaneous Results on Matrix Inequalities Some LMI Problems with Analytic Solutions 3. Some Matrix Problems. Minimizing Condition Number by Scaling Minimizing Condition Number of a Positive-Definite Matrix Minimizing Norm by Scaling Rescaling a Matrix Positive-Definite Matrix Completion Problems Quadratic Approximation of a Polytopic Norm Ellipsoidal Approximation 4. Linear Differential Inclusions. Differential Inclusions Some Specific LDIs Nonlinear System Analysis via LDIs 5. Analysis of LDIs: State Properties. Quadratic Stability Invariant Ellipsoids 6. Analysis of LDIs: Input/Output Properties. Input-to-State Properties State-to-Output Properties Input-to-Output Properties 7. State-Feedback Synthesis for LDIs. Static State-Feedback Controllers State Properties Input-to-State Properties State-to-Output Properties Input-to-Output Properties Observer-Based Controllers for Nonlinear Systems 8. Lure and Multiplier Methods. Analysis of Lure Systems Integral Quadratic Constraints Multipliers for Systems with Unknown Parameters 9. Systems with Multiplicative Noise. Analysis of Systems with Multiplicative Noise State-Feedback Synthesis 10. Miscellaneous Problems. Optimization over an Affine Family of Linear Systems Analysis of Systems with LTI Perturbations Positive Orthant Stabilizability Linear Systems with Delays Interpolation Problems The Inverse Problem of Optimal Control System Realization Problems Multi-Criterion LQG Nonconvex Multi-Criterion Quadratic Problems Notation List of Acronyms Bibliography Index.

11,085 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
02 Sep 2004
TL;DR: Free MATLAB toolbox YALMIP is introduced, developed initially to model SDPs and solve these by interfacing eternal solvers by making development of optimization problems in general, and control oriented SDP problems in particular, extremely simple.
Abstract: The MATLAB toolbox YALMIP is introduced. It is described how YALMIP can be used to model and solve optimization problems typically occurring in systems and control theory. In this paper, free MATLAB toolbox YALMIP, developed initially to model SDPs and solve these by interfacing eternal solvers. The toolbox makes development of optimization problems in general, and control oriented SDP problems in particular, extremely simple. In fact, learning 3 YALMIP commands is enough for most users to model and solve the optimization problems

7,676 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
15 Oct 1995
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a model for dynamic control systems based on Adaptive Control System Design Steps (ACDS) with Adaptive Observers and Parameter Identifiers.
Abstract: 1. Introduction. Control System Design Steps. Adaptive Control. A Brief History. 2. Models for Dynamic Systems. Introduction. State-Space Models. Input/Output Models. Plant Parametric Models. Problems. 3. Stability. Introduction. Preliminaries. Input/Output Stability. Lyapunov Stability. Positive Real Functions and Stability. Stability of LTI Feedback System. Problems. 4. On-Line Parameter Estimation. Introduction. Simple Examples. Adaptive Laws with Normalization. Adaptive Laws with Projection. Bilinear Parametric Model. Hybrid Adaptive Laws. Summary of Adaptive Laws. Parameter Convergence Proofs. Problems. 5. Parameter Identifiers and Adaptive Observers. Introduction. Parameter Identifiers. Adaptive Observers. Adaptive Observer with Auxiliary Input. Adaptive Observers for Nonminimal Plant Models. Parameter Convergence Proofs. Problems. 6. Model Reference Adaptive Control. Introduction. Simple Direct MRAC Schemes. MRC for SISO Plants. Direct MRAC with Unnormalized Adaptive Laws. Direct MRAC with Normalized Adaptive Laws. Indirect MRAC. Relaxation of Assumptions in MRAC. Stability Proofs in MRAC Schemes. Problems. 7. Adaptive Pole Placement Control. Introduction. Simple APPC Schemes. PPC: Known Plant Parameters. Indirect APPC Schemes. Hybrid APPC Schemes. Stabilizability Issues and Modified APPC. Stability Proofs. Problems. 8. Robust Adaptive Laws. Introduction. Plant Uncertainties and Robust Control. Instability Phenomena in Adaptive Systems. Modifications for Robustness: Simple Examples. Robust Adaptive Laws. Summary of Robust Adaptive Laws. Problems. 9. Robust Adaptive Control Schemes. Introduction. Robust Identifiers and Adaptive Observers. Robust MRAC. Performance Improvement of MRAC. Robust APPC Schemes. Adaptive Control of LTV Plants. Adaptive Control for Multivariable Plants. Stability Proofs of Robust MRAC Schemes. Stability Proofs of Robust APPC Schemes. Problems. Appendices. Swapping Lemmas. Optimization Techniques. Bibliography. Index. License Agreement and Limited Warranty.

4,378 citations

Book
26 Jun 2003
TL;DR: Preface, Notations 1.Introduction to Time-Delay Systems I.Robust Stability Analysis II.Input-output stability A.LMI and Quadratic Integral Inequalities Bibliography Index
Abstract: Preface, Notations 1.Introduction to Time-Delay Systems I.Frequency-Domain Approach 2.Systems with Commensurate Delays 3.Systems withIncommensurate Delays 4.Robust Stability Analysis II.Time Domain Approach 5.Systems with Single Delay 6.Robust Stability Analysis 7.Systems with Multiple and Distributed Delays III.Input-Output Approach 8.Input-output stability A.Matrix Facts B.LMI and Quadratic Integral Inequalities Bibliography Index

4,200 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Arie Levant1
TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed arbitrary-order robust exact differentiators with finite-time convergence, which can be used to keep accurate a given constraint and feature theoretically-infinite-frequency switching.
Abstract: Being a motion on a discontinuity set of a dynamic system, sliding mode is used to keep accurately a given constraint and features theoretically-infinite-frequency switching. Standard sliding modes provide for finite-time convergence, precise keeping of the constraint and robustness with respect to internal and external disturbances. Yet the relative degree of the constraint has to be 1 and a dangerous chattering effect is possible. Higher-order sliding modes preserve or generalize the main properties of the standard sliding mode and remove the above restrictions. r-Sliding mode realization provides for up to the rth order of sliding precision with respect to the sampling interval compared with the first order of the standard sliding mode. Such controllers require higher-order real-time derivatives of the outputs to be available. The lacking information is achieved by means of proposed arbitrary-order robust exact differentiators with finite-time convergence. These differentiators feature optimal asymptot...

2,954 citations