scispace - formally typeset
P

Peter A. Gloor

Researcher at Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Publications -  230
Citations -  5644

Peter A. Gloor is an academic researcher from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Social network analysis & Social network. The author has an hindex of 37, co-authored 211 publications receiving 4918 citations. Previous affiliations of Peter A. Gloor include University of Cologne & Union Bank of Switzerland.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Predicting Stock Market Indicators Through Twitter “I hope it is not as bad as I fear”

TL;DR: This paper found that emotional tweet percentage significantly negatively correlated with Dow Jones, NASDAQ and S&P 500, but displayed a significant positive correlation to VIX, and that just checking on twitter for emotional outbursts of any kind gives a predictor of how the stock market will be doing the next day.
Book

Swarm Creativity: Competitive Advantage through Collaborative Innovation Networks

TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss the benefits of COINs and the DNA of COINS, as well as real-life examples of lessons learned from COIN and its applications in communications technology.
Journal ArticleDOI

In the shades of the uncanny valley: An experimental study of human–chatbot interaction

TL;DR: Understanding the user’s side may be crucial for designing better chatbots in the future and, thus, can contribute to advancing the field of human–computer interaction.
Journal ArticleDOI

The power of prediction with social media

TL;DR: It is argued that statistical models seem to be the most fruitful approach to apply to make predictions from social media data in the field of social media-based prediction and forecasting.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Visualization of Communication Patterns in Collaborative Innovation Networks - Analysis of Some W3C Working Groups

TL;DR: First results of a project that examines innovation networks by analyzing the e-mail archives of some W3C (WWW consortium) working groups are reported, which revealed significant variations between the communication patterns and network structures of the different groups.